Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Sluggish quantum mechanics of noninteracting fermions with spatially varying effective mass

Giuseppe Del Vecchio Del Vecchio1,*, Manas Kulkarni2,†, Satya N. Majumdar3,‡, and Sanjib Sabhapandit4,§

  • *Contact author: giuseppedelvecchiodelvecchio@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: manas.kulkarni@icts.res.in
  • ‡Contact author: satyanarayan.majumdar@cnrs.fr
  • §Contact author: sanjib@rri.res.in

APS Open Sci. 1, 000173 – Published 15 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mbp5-cd7c

Abstract

We analyze a class of one-dimensional quantum systems characterized by a position-dependent kinetic term arising as the continuum limit of an inhomogeneous tight-binding model with spatially varying hopping amplitudes. In this limit, the Schrödinger equation takes the so-called BenDaniel-Duke form with an effective mass, scaling as meff(x)=meff|x|α, with α>0, leading to a framework we term “sluggish quantum mechanics,” where particle motion is progressively suppressed at larger distances. For the case with no external confinement, we obtain the eigenfunctions and the quantum propagator exactly. In the presence of a confining potential Vext(x)=12meff(x)ω2x2=12meffω2|x|α+2, we show that the model remains exactly solvable and obtain the spectral properties and the propagator analytically. We then investigate the problem of N noninteracting spinless fermions in the trap, determining the many-body ground-state wavefunction and the joint probability density function of the positions of the N fermions. We show that the many-body quantum probability density in the ground state forms a determinantal point process whose correlation kernel can be computed for any N, giving access to the average density as well as higher-order correlation functions for any finite N. Moreover, we analyze the scaling form of this kernel in the large-N limit in the bulk, near the edge, and close to the origin. Our results show that the scaled average density profile for large N has a finite support symmetric with respect to the origin, but has a nonmonotonic shape with a vanishing minimum at the origin for any α>0. One of the key findings of our work is that the scaled kernel near the origin x=0 for α>0 is neither the Bessel nor the Airy kernel (that are standard for trapped fermions), but is new, and is given by a sum of two Bessel kernels with different indices. Our results thus provide a framework relevant to engineered optical lattices with position-dependent tunneling.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (75)

  1. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).
  2. S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1215 (2008).
  3. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbène, Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nat. Phys. 8, 267 (2012).
  4. M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, and V. Ahufinger, Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating Quantum Many-Body Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
  5. I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014).
  6. C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017).
  7. I. Bloch, Quantum simulations come of age, Nat. Phys. 14, 1159 (2018).
  8. D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108 (1998).
  9. O. Morsch and M. Oberthaler, Dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 179 (2006).
  10. J. Billy, V. Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. Lugan, D. Clément, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Direct observation of Anderson localization of matter waves in a controlled disorder, Nature (London) 453, 891 (2008).
  11. G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose–Einstein condensate, Nature (London) 453, 895 (2008).
  12. Y. Lahini, R. Pugatch, F. Pozzi, M. Sorel, R. Morandotti, N. Davidson, and Y. Silberberg, Observation of a localization transition in quasiperiodic photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 013901 (2009).
  13. M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. Lüschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015).
  14. G. Gauthier, I. Lenton, N. McKay Parry, M. Baker, M. J. Davis, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and T. W. Neely, Direct imaging of a digital-micromirror device for configurable microscopic optical potentials, Optica 3, 1136 (2016).
  15. X. Qiu, J. Zou, X. Qi, and X. Li, Precise programmable quantum simulations with optical lattices, npj Quantum Inf. 6, 87 (2020).
  16. H.-T. Wei, E. Ibarra-García-Padilla, M. L. Wall, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Hubbard parameters for programmable tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. A 109, 013318 (2024).
  17. C. Tabares, C. Kokail, P. Zoller, D. González-Cuadra, and A. González-Tudela, Programming optical-lattice Fermi-Hubbard quantum simulators, PRX Quantum 6, 030356 (2025).
  18. D. J. BenDaniel and C. B. Duke, Space-charge effects on electron tunneling, Phys. Rev. 152, 683 (1966).
  19. T. Gora and F. Williams, Theory of electronic states and transport in graded mixed semiconductors, Phys. Rev. 177, 1179 (1969).
  20. G. Bastard, J. K. Furdyna, and J. Mycielski, Landau levels and cyclotron resonance in graded mixed semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 12, 4356 (1975).
  21. Q.-G. Zhu and H. Kroemer, Interface connection rules for effective-mass wave functions at an abrupt heterojunction between two different semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 27, 3519 (1983).
  22. O. von Roos, Position-dependent effective masses in semiconductor theory, Phys. Rev. B 27, 7547 (1983).
  23. P. Harrison and A. Valavanis, Quantum Wells, Wires and Dots: Theoretical and Computational Physics of Semiconductor Nanostructures (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2016).
  24. G. Bastard, Wave Mechanics Applied to Semiconductor Heterostructures (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1990).
  25. T. de Jongh, J. Verstraten, M. Dixmerias, C. Daix, B. Peaudecerf, and T. Yefsah, Quantum gas microscopy of fermions in the continuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 183403 (2025).
  26. M. Dixmerias, G. Del Vecchio Del Vecchio, C. Daix, J. Verstraten, T. de Jongh, B. Peaudecerf, P. Le Doussal, G. Schehr, and T. Yefsah, Universal random matrix behavior of a fermionic quantum gas, Nat. Commun. (2026), doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-77088-w.
  27. T. Maltezopoulos, A. Bolz, C. Meyer, C. Heyn, W. Hansen, M. Morgenstern, and R. Wiesendanger, Wave-function mapping of InAs quantum dots by scanning tunneling spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 196804 (2003).
  28. J. Verstraten, K. Dai, M. Dixmerias, B. Peaudecerf, T. de Jongh, and T. Yefsah, In situ imaging of a single-atom wave packet in continuous space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 083403 (2025).
  29. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, 3rd ed., Vol. 3 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1977; reprinted by Elsevier, 2013).
  30. S. Albeverio, F. Gesztesy, R. Hoegh-Krohn, and H. Holden, Solvable Models in Quantum Mechanics (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2012).
  31. E. Vicari, Entanglement and particle correlations of Fermi gases in harmonic traps, Phys. Rev. A 85, 062104 (2012).
  32. V. Eisler, Universality in the full counting statistics of trapped fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 080402 (2013).
  33. R. Marino, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr, and P. Vivo, Phase transitions and edge scaling of number variance in Gaussian random matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 254101 (2014).
  34. P. Calabrese, P. Le Doussal, and S. N. Majumdar, Random matrices and entanglement entropy of trapped Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A 91, 012303 (2015).
  35. D. S. Dean, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Finite-temperature free fermions and the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation at finite time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 110402 (2015).
  36. D. S. Dean, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Universal ground-state properties of free fermions in a d-dimensional trap, Europhys. Lett. 112, 60001 (2015).
  37. D. S. Dean, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Noninteracting fermions at finite temperature in a d-dimensional trap: Universal correlations, Phys. Rev. A 94, 063622 (2016).
  38. D. S. Dean, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Noninteracting fermions in a trap and random matrix theory, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 144006 (2019).
  39. M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices, 3rd ed. (Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2004).
  40. P. J. Forrester, Log-Gases and Random Matrices (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010).
  41. K. S. Fa and E. K. Lenzi, Power law diffusion coefficient and anomalous diffusion: Analysis of solutions and first passage time, Phys. Rev. E 67, 061105 (2003).
  42. A. G. Cherstvy, A. V. Chechkin, and R. Metzler, Anomalous diffusion and ergodicity breaking in heterogeneous diffusion processes, New J. Phys. 15, 083039 (2013).
  43. A. L. Stella, A. Chechkin, and G. Teza, Universal singularities of anomalous diffusion in the Richardson class, Phys. Rev. E 107, 054118 (2023).
  44. N. Leibovich and E. Barkai, Infinite ergodic theory for heterogeneous diffusion processes, Phys. Rev. E 99, 042138 (2019).
  45. S. Ray, Expediting Feller process with stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. E 106, 034133 (2022).
  46. A. Zodage, R. Allen, M. Evans, and S. Majumdar, A sluggish random walk with subdiffusive spread, J. Stat. Mech. (2023) 033211.
  47. A. L. Stella, A. Chechkin, and G. Teza, Anomalous dynamical scaling determines universal critical singularities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 207104 (2023).
  48. G. D. V. Del Vecchio and S. N. Majumdar, Generalized arcsine laws for a sluggish random walker with subdiffusive growth, J. Stat. Mech. (2025) 023207.
  49. G. D. V. Del Vecchio, M. Kulkarni, S. N. Majumdar, and S. Sabhapandit, Proxitaxis: An adaptive search strategy based on proximity and stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. E 113, L042101 (2026).
  50. D. Boyer and S. N. Majumdar, Ultra slow sub-logarithmic diffusion of a sluggish random walker subject to resetting with memory J. Stat. Mech. (2026) 063201.
  51. M. Lenzi, E. Lenzi, L. Guilherme, L. Evangelista, and H. Ribeiro, Transient anomalous diffusion in heterogeneous media with stochastic resetting, Physica A 588, 126560 (2022).
  52. L. Menon and C. Anteneodo, Random search with resetting in heterogeneous environments, Phys. Rev. E 110, 054111 (2024).
  53. N. G. Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, 3rd ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007).
  54. M. P. Marder, Condensed Matter Physics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2010).
  55. R. Feynman, R. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, The New Millennium Edition: Quantum Mechanics (Basic Books, New York, 2015), Vol. III.
  56. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 8th ed., edited by D. Zwillinger and V. Moll (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2014).
  57. L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Fermi gas in the harmonic trap, in Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016).
  58. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (Dover Publications, New York, 1965).
  59. A. Erdélyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and F. G. Tricomi, Higher Transcendental Functions (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953), Vol. II.
  60. R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, emended by D. F. Styer (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 2010).
  61. M. Kulkarni, S. N. Majumdar, and S. Sabhapandit, Dynamically emergent correlations in bosons via quantum resetting, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58, 105003 (2025).
  62. C. Nadal and S. N. Majumdar, Nonintersecting Brownian interfaces and Wishart random matrices, Phys. Rev. E 79, 061117 (2009).
  63. B. Lacroix-A-Chez-Toine, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Non-interacting fermions in hard-edge potentials, J. Stat. Mech. (2018) 123103.
  64. P. J. Forrester, The spectrum edge of random matrix ensembles, Nucl. Phys. B 402, 709 (1993).
  65. S. N. Majumdar and G. Schehr, Statistics of Extremes and Records in Random Sequences (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2024).
  66. G. Szegö, Orthogonal Polynomials (American Mathematical Soc., Providence, RI, 1939), Vol. 23.
  67. T. Guhr, A. Müller–Groeling, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Random-matrix theories in quantum physics: Common concepts, Phys. Rep. 299, 189 (1998).
  68. G. Akemann, J. Baik, and P. Di Francesco, The Oxford Handbook of Random Matrix Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015).
  69. A. Mitra, Quantum quench dynamics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 9, 245 (2018).
  70. M. Saha, M. Kulkarni, and A. Dhar, Generalized hydrodynamic description of the Page curve–like dynamics of a freely expanding fermionic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 230402 (2024).
  71. S. Kehrein, Page curve entanglement dynamics in an analytically solvable model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 224308 (2024).
  72. T. Gorin, T. Prosen, T. H. Seligman, and M. Žnidarič, Dynamics of Loschmidt echoes and fidelity decay, Phys. Rep. 435, 33 (2006).
  73. J. Grela, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Kinetic energy of a trapped Fermi gas at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 130601 (2017).
  74. M. Kulkarni, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Density profile of noninteracting fermions in a rotating two-dimensional trap at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. A 107, 023302 (2023).
  75. M. Kulkarni, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, The distribution of the moment of inertia for harmonically trapped noninteracting bosons at finite temperature: Large deviations, arXiv:2511.12247.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation