Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nonlocality in continuous-variable quantum networks

Sudip Chakrabarty*, Amit Kundu†, and A. S. Majumdar‡

  • *Contact author: sudip27042000@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: amit8967@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: archan@bose.res.in

APS Open Sci. 1, 000095 – Published 14 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dklm-6g7s

Abstract

Quantum networks enable forms of nonlocality beyond the standard Bell scenario, with a multitude of potential applications. Continuous-variable (CV) platforms are particularly attractive for large-scale networks, offering deterministic entanglement generation and favorable prospects for long-distance distribution. Here, we present a formalism to study CV network nonlocality using pseudospin measurements. Considering the linear chain and star configurations, we derive the maximal violations of the corresponding network locality inequalities for arbitrary two-mode states. Using two-mode squeezed vacuum states, we show that the strength of nonlocality in the star configuration remains independent of the network size. Moreover, the nonlocal correlations persist even at arbitrarily high temperatures provided the squeezing exceeds a critical threshold. Further, we demonstrate non-Gaussianity as an enhancer of network nonlocality through illustrations of various classes of non-Gaussian resources. Remarkably, a coherent superposition of single-photon subtractions across modes achieves maximal violation for arbitrarily small squeezing. Finally, we provide schematics of an experimentally feasible implementation of CV network nonlocality based on the isomorphism between pseudospin and spatial parity observables.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (93)

  1. J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195 (1964).
  2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
  3. N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Bell nonlocality, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014).
  4. M. McKague and M. Mosca, Generalized self-testing and the security of the 6-state protocol, in Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication, and Cryptography: 5th Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, Vol. 6519 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 113–130.
  5. M. McKague, T. H. Yang, and V. Scarani, Robust self testing of the singlet, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 455304 (2012).
  6. I. Supic and J. Bowles, Self-testing of quantum systems: A review, Quantum 4, 337 (2020).
  7. S. Goswami, B. Bhattacharya, D. Das, S. Sasmal, C. Jebaratnam, and A. S. Majumdar, One-sided device-independent self-testing of any pure two-qubit entangled state, Phys. Rev. A 98, 022311 (2018).
  8. Z. Bian, A. S. Majumdar, C. Jebarathinam, K. Wang, L. Xiao, X. Zhan, Y. Zhang, and P. Xue, Experimental demonstration of one-sided device-independent self-testing of any pure two-qubit entangled state, Phys. Rev. A 101, 020301 (2020).
  9. A. Acin, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, S. Massar, S. Pironio, and V. Scarani, Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).
  10. M. Farkas, Unbounded device-independent quantum key rates from arbitrarily small nonlocality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 210803 (2024).
  11. C. Portmann and R. Renner, Security in quantum cryptography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 025008 (2022).
  12. F. Grasselli, G. Murta, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Entropy bounds for multiparty device-independent cryptography, PRX Quantum 2, 010308 (2021).
  13. H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, S. Massar, and R. de Wolf, Nonlocality and communication complexity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 665 (2010).
  14. S. Pironio et al., Random numbers certified by Bell's theorem, Nature (London) 464, 1021 (2010).
  15. A. Acín, S. Massar, and S. Pironio, Randomness versus nonlocality and entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 100402 (2012).
  16. L. K. Shalm et al., Strong loophole-free test of local realism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).
  17. M. Giustina, A. Mech, S. Ramelow, B. Wittmann, J. Kofler, J. Beyer, A. E. Lita, B. Calkins, T. Gerrits, S. Woo Nam, R. Ursin, C. Wittmann, and A. Zeilinger, Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption, Nature (London) 497, 227 (2013).
  18. B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. E. Dréau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. S. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, C. Abellán, W. Amaya, V. Pruneri, M. W. Mitchell, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, D. Elkouss, S. Wehner, T. H. Taminiau, and R. Hanson, Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres, Nature (London) 526, 682 (2015).
  19. Y. P. Zhong, H. S. Chang, K. J. Satzinger, M. Pechal, A. Bienfait, M. H. Chou, A. N. Cleland, M. Freedman, D. P. Pappas, L. Frunzio, M. H. Devoret, and A. N. Cleland, Violating Bell's inequality with remotely connected superconducting qubits, Nat. Phys. 15, 741 (2019).
  20. D.-K. Shin, B. M. Henson, S. S. Hodgman, and A. G. Truscott, Bell correlations between spatially separated pairs of atoms, Nat. Commun. 10, 4447 (2019).
  21. P. R. Tapster, J. G. Rarity, and P. C. M. Owens, Violation of Bell's inequality over 4 km of optical fiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1923 (1994).
  22. W. Tittel, J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Violation of Bell inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563 (1998).
  23. S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005).
  24. G. Adesso, S. Ragy, and A. R. Lee, Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 21, 1440001 (2014).
  25. S. Adhikari, A. S. Majumdar, and N. Nayak, Broadcasting of continuous-variable entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 77, 042301 (2008).
  26. S. Adhikari, B. Chakraborty, A. S. Majumdar, and S. Vaidya, Quantum entanglement in a noncommutative system, Phys. Rev. A 79, 042109 (2009).
  27. P. Chowdhury, A. S. Majumdar, and G. S. Agarwal, Nonlocal continuous-variable correlations and violation of Bell's inequality for light beams with topological singularities, Phys. Rev. A 88, 013830 (2013).
  28. P. Chowdhury, T. Pramanik, A. S. Majumdar, and G. S. Agarwal, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering using quantum correlations in non-Gaussian entangled states, Phys. Rev. A 89, 012104 (2014).
  29. G. S. Agarwal, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012).
  30. C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight, Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023).
  31. D. Leibfried, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, C. H. Monroe, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Experimental determination of the motional quantum state of a trapped atom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4281 (1996).
  32. D. T. Smithey, M. Beck, M. G. Raymer, and A. Faridani, Measurement of the Wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: Application to squeezed states and the vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1244 (1993).
  33. E. Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).
  34. K. Banaszek and K. Wódkiewicz, Nonlocality of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen state in the Wigner representation, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4345 (1998).
  35. Z.-B. Chen, J.-W. Pan, G. Hou, and Y.-D. Zhang, Maximal violation of Bell's inequalities for continuous variable systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040406 (2002).
  36. T. Yarnall, A. F. Abouraddy, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Experimental violation of Bell's inequality in spatial-parity space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 170408 (2007).
  37. E. M. Rains, Rigorous treatment of distillable entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 60, 173 (1999).
  38. E. M. Rains, Bound on distillable entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 60, 179 (1999).
  39. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
  40. G. Giedke and J. I. Cirac, Characterization of Gaussian operations and distillation of Gaussian states, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032316 (2002).
  41. J. Eisert, S. Scheel, and M. B. Plenio, Distilling Gaussian states with Gaussian operations is impossible, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137903 (2002).
  42. S. L. Braunstein, Error correction for continuous quantum variables, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4084 (1998).
  43. M. Walschaers, Non-Gaussian quantum states and where to find them, PRX Quantum 2, 030204 (2021).
  44. C. Navarrete-Benlloch, R. García-Patrón, J. H. Shapiro, and N. J. Cerf, Enhancing quantum entanglement by photon addition and subtraction, Phys. Rev. A 86, 012328 (2012).
  45. S.-Y. Lee, S.-W. Ji, H.-J. Kim, and H. Nha, Enhancing quantum entanglement for continuous variables by a coherent superposition of photon subtraction and addition, Phys. Rev. A 84, 012302 (2011).
  46. S. Roy, T. Chanda, T. Das, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Response in the violation of the Bell inequality to imperfect photon addition and subtraction in noisy squeezed states of light, Phys. Rev. A 98, 052131 (2018).
  47. A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, Quantum-to-classical transition with single-photon-added coherent states of light, Science 306, 660 (2004).
  48. V. Parigi, A. Zavatta, M. S. Kim, and M. Bellini, Probing quantum commutation rules by addition and subtraction of single photons to/from a light field, Science 317, 1890 (2007).
  49. O. Morin, K. Huang, J. Liu, H. L. Jeannic, C. Fabre, and J. Laurat, Remote creation of hybrid entanglement between particle-like and wave-like optical qubits, Nat. Photonics 8, 570 (2014).
  50. J. P. Olson, K. P. Seshadreesan, K. R. Motes, P. P. Rohde, and J. P. Dowling, Sampling arbitrary photon-added or photon-subtracted squeezed states is in the same complexity class as boson sampling, Phys. Rev. A 91, 022317 (2015).
  51. P. Chowdhury, T. Pramanik, and A. S. Majumdar, Stronger steerability criterion for more uncertain continuous-variable systems, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042317 (2015).
  52. A. G. Maity, S. Datta, and A. S. Majumdar, Tighter Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering inequality based on the sum-uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. A 96, 052326 (2017).
  53. A. Tavakoli, A. Pozas-Kerstjens, M.-X. Luo, and M.-O. Renou, Bell nonlocality in networks, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 056001 (2022).
  54. C. Branciard, N. Gisin, and S. Pironio, Characterizing the nonlocal correlations created via entanglement swapping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 170401 (2010).
  55. C. Branciard, D. Rosset, N. Gisin, and S. Pironio, Bilocal versus nonbilocal correlations in entanglement-swapping experiments, Phys. Rev. A 85, 032119 (2012).
  56. N. Gisin, Q. Mei, A. Tavakoli, M. O. Renou, and N. Brunner, All entangled pure quantum states violate the bilocality inequality, Phys. Rev. A 96, 020304 (2017).
  57. S. Gupta, S. Datta, and A. S. Majumdar, Preservation of quantum nonbilocal correlations in noisy entanglement-swapping experiments using weak measurements, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042322 (2018).
  58. K. Mukherjee, B. Paul, and D. Sarkar, Correlations in n-local scenario, Quantum Info. Proc. 14, 2025 (2015).
  59. A. Kundu, M. K. Molla, I. Chattopadhyay, and D. Sarkar, Maximal qubit violation of n-local inequalities in a quantum network, Phys. Rev. A 102, 052222 (2020).
  60. A. Tavakoli, P. Skrzypczyk, D. Cavalcanti, and A. Acín, Nonlocal correlations in the star-network configuration, Phys. Rev. A 90, 062109 (2014).
  61. M. Żukowski, A. Zeilinger, M. A. Horne, and A. K. Ekert, “Event-ready-detectors” Bell experiment via entanglement swapping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287 (1993).
  62. K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 045006 (2023).
  63. S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018).
  64. H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature (London) 453, 1023 (2008).
  65. S. Sarkar, Network quantum steering enables randomness certification without seed randomness, Quantum 8, 1419 (2024).
  66. K. Mukherjee, Full network nonlocality based security in quantum key distribution, arXiv:2603.20035.
  67. S. Munshi and A. K. Pan, Device-independent full network nonlocality for arbitrary-party and unbounded-input scenario, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 210203 (2025).
  68. J. C. Guerra Copete, Network nonlocality with continuous variables, Ph.D. thesis, ICFO—Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, Barcelona, Spain, 2021.
  69. J.-L. Jiang, X.-Z. Liu, X. Yang, X. Ding, D. Zhang, and M.-X. Luo, One-way network nonlocality of continuous variable entangled networks, Adv. Quantum Technol. 8, e2500147 (2025).
  70. T. Yan, J. Hou, X. Qi, and K. He, Witnessing nonlocality in quantum networks of continuous-variable systems by generalized quasiprobability functions, Sci. China Inf. Sci. 69, 180503 (2026).
  71. A. F. Abouraddy, T. Yarnall, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Violation of Bell's inequality with continuous spatial variables, Phys. Rev. A 75, 052114 (2007).
  72. T. Yarnall, A. F. Abouraddy, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Synthesis and analysis of entangled photonic qubits in spatial-parity space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250502 (2007).
  73. K. H. Kagalwala, G. Di Giuseppe, A. F. Abouraddy, and B. E. A. Saleh, Single-photon three-qubit quantum logic using spatial light modulators, Nat. Commun. 8, 739 (2017).
  74. B. Zhang, Z.-R. Zhong, and S.-B. Zheng, Quantum nonlocality for two-mode correlated states based on generalized pseudospin operators, Phys. Lett. A 375, 1765 (2011).
  75. Z.-B. Chen and Y.-D. Zhang, Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger nonlocality for continuous-variable systems, Phys. Rev. A 65, 044102 (2002).
  76. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and M. Horodecki, Violating Bell inequality by mixed spin-12 states: Necessary and sufficient condition, Phys. Lett. A 200, 340 (1995).
  77. F. Andreoli, G. Carvacho, L. Santodonato, R. Chaves, and F. Sciarrino, Maximal qubit violation of n-locality inequalities in a star-shaped quantum network, New J. Phys. 19, 113020 (2017).
  78. M. M. Dorantes and J. L. Lucio M, Generalizations of the pseudospin operator to test the Bell inequality for the TMSV state, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 285309 (2009).
  79. S. D. Bartlett, B. C. Sanders, S. L. Braunstein, and K. Nemoto, Efficient classical simulation of continuous variable quantum information processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 097904 (2002).
  80. A. Mari and J. Eisert, Positive Wigner functions render classical simulation of quantum computation efficient, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 230503 (2012).
  81. S. Chakrabarty, B. Mallick, A. G. Maity, and A. S. Majumdar, Operational detection of Wigner negativity in arbitrary quantum states from few copies, arXiv:2606.26084.
  82. S. Lloyd and S. L. Braunstein, Quantum computation over continuous variables, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1784 (1999).
  83. M. S. Kim, Recent developments in photon-level operations on travelling light fields, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41, 133001 (2008).
  84. B. Mallick, S. Chakrabarty, S. Mukherjee, A. G. Maity, and A. S. Majumdar, Efficient detection of nonclassicality using moments of the Wigner function, Phys. Rev. A 111, 032406 (2025).
  85. B. C. Sanders, Entangled coherent states, Phys. Rev. A 45, 6811 (1992).
  86. P. Nandi, N. Debnath, S. Kala, and A. S. Majumdar, Magnetically induced Schrödinger cat states: The shadow of a quantum space, Phys. Rev. A 110, 032204 (2024).
  87. D. Hoshi, T. Nagase, S. Kwon, D. Iyama, T. Kamiya, S. Fujii, H. Mukai, S. Ahmed, A. F. Kockum, S. Watabe, F. Yoshihara, and J.-S. Tsai, Entangling Schrödinger's cat states by bridging discrete- and continuous-variable encoding, Nat. Commun. 16, 1309 (2025).
  88. S. J. van Enk and O. Hirota, Entangled coherent states: Teleportation and decoherence, Phys. Rev. A 64, 022313 (2001).
  89. P. De Fabritiis, F. M. Guedes, G. Peruzzo, and S. P. Sorella, Entangled coherent states and violations of Bell-CHSH inequalities, Phys. Lett. A 486, 129111 (2023).
  90. H. Jeong, W. Son, M. S. Kim, D. Ahn, and Č. Brukner, Quantum nonlocality test for continuous-variable states with dichotomic observables, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012106 (2003).
  91. R. F. Werner, Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
  92. L. Mišta, R. Filip, and J. Fiurášek, Continuous-variable Werner state: Separability, nonlocality, squeezing, and teleportation, Phys. Rev. A 65, 062315 (2002).
  93. B. Kubala, A. Sauer, A. Tarantola, D. Fabian, A. Ginter, O. Kulikovska, F. D. Pumpo, J. Seiler, W. P. Schleich, and M. Zimmermann, Advanced quantum communication and quantum networks—From basic research to future applications, arXiv:2602.05781.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation