Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Coherence of Microwave and Optical Qubit Levels in Neutral Thulium

D. Mishin1, D. Tregubov1, N. Kolachevsky1,2, and A. Golovizin1,2,*

  • *Contact author: artem.golovizin@gmail.com

PRX Quantum 6, 040329 – Published 10 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/f8xg-w57m

Abstract

Hyperfine-encoded qubits in alkali atoms have established themselves as robust platforms for quantum computing, while alkaline-earth-like elements expand the state manipulation toolbox through their rich spectrum of optical transitions and metastable states. In this work, we demonstrate that thulium is a viable candidate for quantum computing, combining advantages of hyperfine qubit encoding with a rich energy-level structure of alkaline-earth-like atoms. We describe protocols for the initial state preparation and state-selective readout, and show single-qubit operations on the microwave transition at 1497 MHz. We demonstrate ground-state hyperfine qubit coherence times up to T2∗=22−2+2 s and T2=55−14+59 s, representing record-scale performance for neutral-atom systems. Furthermore, we show operations involving metastable optical states, including shelving for the state-selective readout as well as coherent population transfer of the ground-state qubit with coherence time primarily limited by the metastable level natural lifetime of 112 ms. These results mark the first step toward using thulium for quantum computing applications and highlight its promising characteristics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Popular Summary

Article Text

References (61)

  1. J. F. Kam, H. Kang, C. D. Hill, G. J. Mooney, and L. C. Hollenberg, Characterization of entanglement on superconducting quantum computers of up to 414 qubits, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033155 (2024).
  2. B. T. Edman, A hardware-focused tour of IBM’s 127-qubit eagle processor, Vanderbilt Undergraduate Res. J. 14, 21 (2024).
  3. A. Anferov, S. P. Harvey, F. Wan, J. Simon, and D. I. Schuster, Superconducting qubits above 20 GHz operating over 200 mK, PRX Quantum 5, 030347 (2024).
  4. J. Howard, A. Lidiak, C. Jameson, B. Basyildiz, K. Clark, T. Zhao, M. Bal, J. Long, D. P. Pappas, M. Singh, et al., Implementing two-qubit gates at the quantum speed limit, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043194 (2023).
  5. P. Wang, C.-Y. Luan, M. Qiao, M. Um, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Yuan, M. Gu, J. Zhang, and K. Kim, Single ion qubit with estimated coherence time exceeding one hour, Nat. Commun. 12, 233 (2021).
  6. C. M. Löschnauer, J. Mosca Toba, A. C. Hughes, S. A. King, M. A. Weber, R. Srinivas, R. Matt, R. Nourshargh, D. T. C. Allcock, C. J. Ballance, et al., Scalable, high-fidelity all-electronic control of trapped-ion qubits, PRX Quantum 6, 040313 (2025).
  7. R. Srinivas, S. Burd, H. Knaack, R. Sutherland, A. Kwiatkowski, S. Glancy, E. Knill, D. Wineland, D. Leibfried, A. C. Wilson, et al., High-fidelity laser-free universal control of trapped ion qubits, Nature 597, 209 (2021).
  8. H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, X. Lv, K. H. Leung, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits, Nature (2025).
  9. N.-C. Chiu, E. C. Trapp, J. Guo, M. H. Abobeih, L. M. Stewart, S. Hollerith, P. L. Stroganov, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, et al., Continuous operation of a coherent 3000-qubit system, Nature (2025).
  10. M. Schlosser, S. Tichelmann, D. Schäffner, D. O. de Mello, M. Hambach, J. Schütz, and G. Birkl, Scalable multilayer architecture of assembled single-atom qubit arrays in a three-dimensional Talbot tweezer lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 180601 (2023).
  11. D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kalinowski, D. Hangleiter, et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, 58 (2024).
  12. S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, et al., High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268 (2023).
  13. S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit, Nature 622, 279 (2023).
  14. C. Sheng, J. Hou, X. He, K. Wang, R. Guo, J. Zhuang, B. Mamat, P. Xu, M. Liu, J. Wang, et al., Defect-free arbitrary-geometry assembly of mixed-species atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 083202 (2022).
  15. K. Singh, S. Anand, A. Pocklington, J. T. Kemp, and H. Bernien, Dual-element, two-dimensional atom array with continuous-mode operation, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011040 (2022).
  16. S. Anand, C. E. Bradley, R. White, V. Ramesh, K. Singh, and H. Bernien, A dual-species Rydberg array, Nat. Phys. 20, 1744 (2024).
  17. C. Fang, J. Miles, J. Goldwin, M. Lichtman, M. Gillette, M. Bergdolt, S. Deshpande, S. A. Norrell, P. Huft, M. A. Kats, et al., Interleaved dual-species arrays of single atoms using a passive optical element and one trapping laser, Sci. Adv. 11, eadw4166 (2025).
  18. M. Norcia, W. Cairncross, K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, A. Brown, M. Brown, K. Cassella, C.-A. Chen, R. Coxe, D. Crow, et al., Midcircuit qubit measurement and rearrangement in a 171Yb atomic array, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041034 (2023).
  19. S. Saskin, J. Wilson, B. Grinkemeyer, and J. Thompson, Narrow-line cooling and imaging of ytterbium atoms in an optical tweezer array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 143002 (2019).
  20. A. Urech, I. H. Knottnerus, R. J. Spreeuw, and F. Schreck, Narrow-line imaging of single strontium atoms in shallow optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023245 (2022).
  21. K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, B. J. Bloom, K. Cassella, R. Coxe, N. Crisosto, J. P. King, S. S. Kondov, K. Kotru, S. C. Larsen, et al., Assembly and coherent control of a register of nuclear spin qubits, Nat. Commun. 13, 2779 (2022).
  22. Z. Jia, W. Huie, L. Li, W. K. C. Sun, X. Hu, Aakash, , H. Kogan, A. Karve, J. Y. Lee, and J. P. Covey, An architecture for two-qubit encoding in neutral ytterbium-171 atoms, npj Quantum Inf. 10, 106 (2024).
  23. W. Huie, C. Conefrey-Shinozaki, Z. Jia, P. Draper, and J. P. Covey, Three-qubit encoding in ytterbium-171 atoms for simulating 1+1D QCD, ArXiv:2507.18426.
  24. A. S. Nikolaeva, I. V. Zalivako, A. S. Borisenko, N. V. Semenin, K. P. Galstyan, A. E. Korolkov, E. O. Kiktenko, K. Y. Khabarova, I. A. Semerikov, A. K. Fedorov, et al., Scalable improvement of the generalized Toffoli gate realization using trapped-ion-based qutrits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 060601 (2025).
  25. A. L. Shaw, P. Scholl, R. Finkelstein, R. B.-S. Tsai, J. Choi, and M. Endres, Erasure cooling, control, and hyperentanglement of motion in optical tweezers, Science 388, 845 (2025).
  26. J. Wilson, S. Saskin, Y. Meng, S. Ma, R. Dilip, A. Burgers, and J. Thompson, Trapping alkaline earth Rydberg atoms optical tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 033201 (2022).
  27. D. Mishin, D. Tregubov, N. Kolachevsky, and A. Golovizin, Combined microwave and optical spectroscopy for hyperfine structure analysis in thulium atoms, Phys. Rev. A 110, 032817 (2024).
  28. V. A. Khlebnikov, D. A. Pershin, V. V. Tsyganok, E. T. Davletov, I. S. Cojocaru, E. S. Fedorova, A. A. Buchachenko, and A. V. Akimov, Random to chaotic statistic transformation in low-field Fano-Feshbach resonances of cold thulium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 213402 (2019).
  29. V. Khlebnikov, V. Tsyganok, D. Pershin, E. Davletov, E. Kuznetsova, and A. Akimov, Characterizing the temperature dependence of Fano-Feshbach resonances of ultracold polarized thulium, Phys. Rev. A 103, 023306 (2021).
  30. E. T. Davletov, V. V. Tsyganok, V. A. Khlebnikov, D. A. Pershin, D. V. Shaykin, and A. V. Akimov, Machine learning for achieving Bose-Einstein condensation of thulium atoms, Phys. Rev. A 102, 011302(R) (2020).
  31. A. Golovizin, E. Fedorova, D. Tregubov, D. Sukachev, K. Khabarova, V. Sorokin, and N. Kolachevsky, Inner-shell clock transition in atomic thulium with a small blackbody radiation shift, Nat. Commun. 10, 1724 (2019).
  32. A. A. Golovizin, D. O. Tregubov, E. S. Fedorova, D. A. Mishin, D. I. Provorchenko, K. Y. Khabarova, V. N. Sorokin, and N. N. Kolachevsky, Simultaneous bicolor interrogation in thulium optical clock providing very low systematic frequency shifts, Nat. Commun. 12, 5171 (2021).
  33. A. Golovizin, D. Tregubov, D. Mishin, D. Provorchenko, and N. Kolachevsky, Compact magneto-optical trap of thulium atoms for a transportable optical clock, Opt. Express 29, 36734 (2021).
  34. D. Sukachev, A. Sokolov, K. Chebakov, A. Akimov, N. Kolachevsky, and V. Sorokin, Sub-Doppler laser cooling of thulium atoms in a magneto-optical trap, JETP Lett. 92, 703 (2010).
  35. G. Vishnyakova, E. Kalganova, D. Sukachev, S. Fedorov, A. Sokolov, A. Akimov, N. Kolachevsky, and V. Sorokin, Two-stage laser cooling and optical trapping of thulium atoms, Laser Phys. 24, 074018 (2014).
  36. D. Provorchenko, D. Tregubov, D. Mishin, M. Yaushev, D. Kryuchkov, V. Sorokin, K. Khabarova, A. Golovizin, and N. Kolachevsky, Deep laser cooling of thulium atoms to sub-μK temperatures in magneto-optical trap, Atoms 11, 30 (2023).
  37. D. I. Provorchenko, D. O. Tregubov, A. A. Golovizin, and N. N. Kolachevsky, Laser cooling of thulium atoms to ground vibrational state in an optical lattice, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 194, 1185 (2024).
  38. D. A. Mishin, D. I. Provorchenko, D. O. Tregubov, A. A. Golovizin, K. Y. Khabarova, V. N. Sorokin, and N. N. Kolachevsky, Effect of optical lattice field on characteristics of a clock transition in thulium atoms, Quantum Electron. 52, 505 (2022).
  39. D. Sukachev, S. Fedorov, I. Tolstikhina, D. Tregubov, E. Kalganova, G. Vishnyakova, A. Golovizin, N. Kolachevsky, K. Khabarova, and V. Sorokin, Inner-shell magnetic dipole transition in Tm atoms: A candidate for optical lattice clocks, Phys. Rev. A 94, 022512 (2016).
  40. C. Ryan-Anderson, J. G. Bohnet, K. Lee, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, J. Gaebler, D. Francois, A. Chernoguzov, D. Lucchetti, N. C. Brown, et al., Realization of real-time fault-tolerant quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041058 (2021).
  41. A. Jayakumar, S. Chessa, C. Coffrin, A. Y. Lokhov, M. Vuffray, and S. Misra, Universal framework for simultaneous tomography of quantum states and spam noise, Quantum 8, 1426 (2024).
  42. E. Fedorova, D. O. Tregubov, A. A. Golovizin, G. A. Vishnyakova, D. A. Mishin, D. I. Provorchenko, K. Y. Khabarova, V. N. Sorokin, and N. N. Kolachevsky, Optical pumping of ultracold thulium atoms to a lower level of the clock transition and study of their depolarisation, Quantum Electron. 49, 418 (2019).
  43. E. Fedorova, A. Golovizin, D. Tregubov, D. Mishin, D. Provorchenko, V. Sorokin, K. Khabarova, and N. Kolachevsky, Simultaneous preparation of two initial clock states in a thulium optical clock, Phys. Rev. A 102, 063114 (2020).
  44. G. A. Sinuco-Leon, B. M. Garraway, H. Mas, S. Pandey, G. Vasilakis, V. Bolpasi, W. von Klitzing, B. Foxon, S. Jammi, K. Poulios, and T. Fernholz, Microwave spectroscopy of radio-frequency-dressed 87Rb, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053416 (2019).
  45. R. Wynands and S. Weyers, Atomic fountain clocks, Metrologia 42, S64 (2005).
  46. Y. Wu, S. Kolkowitz, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, Erasure conversion for fault-tolerant quantum computing in alkaline earth Rydberg atom arrays, Nat. Commun. 13, 4657 (2022).
  47. J. Weiner, V. S. Bagnato, S. Zilio, and P. S. Julienne, Experiments and theory in cold and ultracold collisions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1 (1999).
  48. A. M. Souza, G. A. Álvarez, and D. Suter, Robust dynamical decoupling, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 370, 4748 (2012).
  49. M. J. Biercuk, H. Uys, A. P. VanDevender, N. Shiga, W. M. Itano, and J. J. Bollinger, Optimized dynamical decoupling in a model quantum memory, Nature 458, 996 (2009).
  50. K. Khodjasteh and D. A. Lidar, Fault-tolerant quantum dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 180501 (2005).
  51. H. Y. Carr and E. M. Purcell, Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments, Phys. Rev. 94, 630 (1954).
  52. A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, W. R. Milner, D. Kedar, M. A. Norcia, E. Oelker, N. Schine, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Half-minute-scale atomic coherence and high relative stability in a tweezer clock, Nature 588, 408 (2020).
  53. M. A. Norcia, A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, E. Oelker, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Seconds-scale coherence on an optical clock transition in a tweezer array, Science 366, 93 (2019).
  54. Z. Tian, H. Chang, X. Lv, M. Yang, Z. Wang, P. Yang, P. Zhang, G. Li, and T. Zhang, Extending the coherence time limit of a single-alkali-atom qubit by suppressing phonon-jumping-induced decoherence, Optica 11, 1391 (2024).
  55. D. A. Pershin, V. V. Yaroshenko, V. V. Tsyganok, V. A. Khlebnikov, E. T. Davletov, D. V. Shaykin, E. R. Gadylshin, I. S. Cojocaru, E. L. Svechnikov, P. V. Kapitanova, and A. V. Akimov, Microwave coherent spectroscopy of ultracold thulium atoms, Phys. Rev. A 102, 043114 (2020).
  56. A. Golovizin, V. Soshenko, D. Tregubov, M. Yaushev, E. Agapov, D. Mishin, D. Provorchenko, and N. Kolachevsky, A control unit for the thulium optical clock, Instrum. Exp. Tech. 65, 896 (2022).
  57. M. Yaushev, D. Mishin, D. Tregubov, N. Kolachevsky, and A. Golovizin, Loading of the narrow line Tm MOT from a pulsed cold atomic beam, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 96, 033202 (2025).
  58. J. Camparo and R. Frueholz, Parameters of adiabatic rapid passage in the 0-0 hyperfine transition of 87Rb, Phys. Rev. A 30, 803 (1984).
  59. J. Martin, B. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Coherent population transfer in multilevel systems with magnetic sublevels. III. Experimental results, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1556 (1996).
  60. G. Kleine Büning, J. Will, W. Ertmer, E. Rasel, J. Arlt, C. Klempt, F. Ramírez-Martínez, F. Piéchon, and P. Rosenbusch, Extended coherence time on the clock transition of optically trapped rubidium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 240801 (2011).
  61. K. Kim, A. Aeppli, W. Warfield, A. Chu, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Atomic coherence of 2 min and instability of 1.5×10−18 at 1 s in a Wannier-Stark lattice clock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 103601 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation