Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Mechanics of Axis Formation in Hydra

Arthur Hernandez1,*, Cuncheng Zhu2,*, and Luca Giomi1,†

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: giomi@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl

PRX Life 4, 043012 – Published 10 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/t1s1-gky6

Abstract

The emergence of a body axis is a fundamental step in the development of multicellular organisms. In simple systems such as Hydra, growing evidence suggests that mechanical forces generated by collective cellular activity play a central role in this process. Here, we explore a physical mechanism for axis formation based on the coupling between active stresses and tissue elasticity. We develop an active spherical shell model in which the activity of muscle fibers is described by active nematodynamics, while the elastic response of the tissue is captured by linear elasticity. We analyze the elastic deformations induced by activity-generated stresses and show that, owing to the spherical topology of the tissue, forces globally condense toward configurations in which both elastic strain and nematic defects localize at opposite poles. These mechanically selected states define either an apolar or a polar head-foot body axis. To characterize the condensed regime, we introduce a compact parametrization of the active force and flux distributions, enabling analytical predictions and direct comparison with experiments. Using this framework, we calculate experimentally relevant observables, including areal strain, lateral pressure, and normal displacements during muscular contraction, as well as the detailed structure of topological defect complexes in the head and foot regions. Together, our results identify a mechanical route by which active tissues can spontaneously break symmetry at the organismal scale, suggesting a general physical principle underlying body-axis specification during morphogenesis.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. Y. Maroudas-Sacks, L. Garion, L. Shani-Zerbib, A. Livshits, E. Braun, and K. Keren, Topological defects in the nematic order of actin fibres as organization centres of Hydra morphogenesis, Nat. Phys. 17, 251 (2021).
  2. J. F. Fuhrmann, A. Krishna, J. Paijmans, C. Duclut, G. Cwikla, S. Eaton, M. Popović, F. Jülicher, C. D. Modes, and N. A. Dye, Active shape programming drives Drosophila wing disc eversion, Sci. Adv. 10, eadp0860 (2024).
  3. Y. Maroudas-Sacks, S. Suganthan, L. Garion, Y. Ascoli-Abbina, A. Westfried, N. Dori, I. Pasvinter, M. Popović, and K. Keren, Mechanical strain focusing at topological defect sites in regenerating Hydra, Development 152, DEV204514 (2025).
  4. T. T. Liu and J. T. Chang, Number of tentacles in Hydra vulgaris as a genetic character, Nature (London) 157, 728 (1946).
  5. L. V. Beloussov, N. I. Kazakova, N. N. Luchinskaia, and V. V. Novoselov, Studies in developmental cytomechanics, Int. J. Dev. Biol. 41, 793 (1997).
  6. M. Sato-Maeda and H. Tashiro, Development of oriented motion in regenerating Hydra cell aggregates, Zool. Sci. 16, 327 (1999).
  7. D. J. Benos, R. G. Kirk, W. P. Barba, and M. M. Goldner, Hyposmotic fluid formation in Hydra, Tissue Cell 9, 11 (1977).
  8. M. Kücken, J. Soriano, P. A. Pullarkat, A. Ott, and E. M. Nicola, An osmoregulatory basis for shape oscillations in regenerating Hydra, Biophys. J. 95, 978 (2008).
  9. M. Broun, L. Gee, B. Reinhardt, and H. R. Bode, Formation of the head organizer in Hydra involves the canonical Wnt pathway, Development 132, 2907 (2005).
  10. H. R. Bode, Axial patterning in Hydra, Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 1, a000463 (2009).
  11. Y. Maroudas-Sacks, L. Garion, S. Suganthan, M. Popović, and K. Keren, Confinement modulates axial patterning in regenerating Hydra, PRX Life 2, 043007 (2024).
  12. Y. Y. Ravichandran, M. C. Vogg, K. Kruse, D. J. G. Pearce, and A. Roux, Topology changes of Hydra define actin orientation defects as organizers of morphogenesis, Sci. Adv. 11, eadr9855 (2025).
  13. J. Ferenc, P. Papasaikas, J. Ferralli, Y. Nakamura, S. Smallwood, and C. D. Tsiairis, Mechanical oscillations orchestrate axial patterning through Wnt activation in Hydra, Sci. Adv. 7, eabj6897 (2021).
  14. A. Bailles, G. Serafini, H. Andreas, C. Zechner, C. D. Modes, and P. Tomancak, Anisotropic stretch biases the self-organization of actin fibers in multicellular Hydra aggregates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2423437122 (2025).
  15. Z. Wang, M. C. Marchetti, and F. Brauns, Patterning of morphogenetic anisotropy fields, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2220167120 (2023).
  16. O. Agam and E. Braun, Hydra morphogenesis as phase transition dynamics, Europhys. Lett. 143, 27001 (2023).
  17. P.-G. de Gennes and J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1993).
  18. S. L. Weevers, A. D. Falconer, M. Mercker, H. Sadeghi, D. Rozema, J. Ferenc, J.-L. Maître, A. Ott, D. B. Oelz, A. Marciniak-Czochra, and C. D. Tsiairis, Mechanochemical patterning localizes the organizer of a luminal epithelium, Sci. Adv. 11, eadu2286 (2025).
  19. M. A. Zhukovsky, S.-E. Sung, and A. Ott, Is Hydra axis definition a fluctuation-based process picking up external cues? J. Dev. Biol. 13, 24 (2025).
  20. F. Vafa and L. Mahadevan, Active nematic defects and epithelial morphogenesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 098102 (2022).
  21. S. C. Al-Izzi and R. G. Morris, Morphodynamics of active nematic fluid surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 957, A4 (2023).
  22. R. D. J. G. Ho, S. O. Bœ, D. K. Dysthe, and L. Angheluta, Role of tissue fluidization and topological defects in epithelial tubulogenesis, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023315 (2024).
  23. L. A. Hoffmann, L. N. Carenza, J. Eckert, and L. Giomi, Theory of defect-mediated morphogenesis, Sci. Adv. 8, eabk2712 (2022).
  24. L. A. Hoffmann, L. N. Carenza, and L. Giomi, Tuneable defect-curvature coupling and topological transitions in active shells, Soft Matter 19, 3423 (2023).
  25. D. J. G. Pearce, C. Thibault, Q. Chaboche, and C. Blanch-Mercader, Passive defect driven morphogenesis in nematic membranes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 018402 (2025).
  26. H. D. Park, A. B. Ortmeyer, and D. P. Blankenbaker, Cell division during regeneration in Hydra, Nature (London) 227, 617 (1970).
  27. T. C. Lubensky, R. Mukhopadhyay, L. Radzihovsky, and X. Xing, Symmetries and elasticity of nematic gels, Phys. Rev. E 66, 011702 (2002).
  28. M. Warner and E. M. Terentjev, Liquid Crystal Elastomers, International Series of Monographs on Physics Vol. 120 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007).
  29. D. J. G. Pearce, P. W. Ellis, A. Fernandez-Nieves, and L. Giomi, Geometrical control of active turbulence in curved topographies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 168002 (2019).
  30. F. I. Niordson, Shell Theory, Applied Mathematics and Mechanics Vol. 29 (Academic Press, London, UK, 1985).
  31. A. Maitra and S. Ramaswamy, Oriented active solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 238001 (2019).
  32. F. Brauns, M. O'Leary, A. Hernandez, M. J. Bowick, and M. C. Marchetti, Active solids: Topological defect self-propulsion without flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 058302 (2026).
  33. D. J. G. Pearce, S. Gat, G. Livne, A. Bernheim-Groswasser, and K. Kruse, Defect-driven shape transitions in elastic active nematic shells, arXiv:2010.13141.
  34. L. A. Hoffmann, K. Schakenraad, R. M. H. Merks, and L. Giomi, Chiral stresses in nematic cell monolayers, Soft Matter 16, 764 (2020).
  35. T. C. Lubensky and J. Prost, Orientational order and vesicle shape, J. Phys. II France 2, 371 (1992).
  36. V. Vitelli and D. R. Nelson, Nematic textures in spherical shells, Phys. Rev. E 74, 021711 (2006).
  37. C. Zhu, D. Saintillan, and A. Chern, Active nematic fluids on Riemannian two-manifolds, Proc. R. Soc. A 481, 20240418 (2025).
  38. J. Lidmar, L. Mirny, and D. R. Nelson, Virus shapes and buckling transitions in spherical shells, Phys. Rev. E 68, 051910 (2003).
  39. P. G. Ciarlet and P. Ciarlet, Jr., Another approach to linearized elasticity and a new proof of Korn's inequality, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 15, 259 (2005).
  40. J. E. Marsden and T. J. R. Hughes, Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity (Courier Corporation, Mineola, NY, 1994).
  41. R. Kupferman and R. Leder, On Saint-Venant compatibility and stress potentials in manifolds with boundary and constant sectional curvature, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 54, 4625 (2022).
  42. R. Kupferman and R. Leder, Elliptic pre-complexes, Hodge-like decompositions and overdetermined boundary-value problems, Forum Math. Sigma 13, e51 (2025).
  43. L. Giomi, Stretching theory of hookean metashells, Phys. Rev. X 16, 021035 (2026).
  44. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoFOPmDkAcE.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation