- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

PRX Life

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Temporal Reformatting of Odor Signals by Flow Environments

Elle Stark1, Aaron True1, John P. Crimaldi1,*, and Jonathan D. Victor2

  • *Contact author: crimaldi@colorado.edu
PDF

PRX Life 4, 023013 – Published 13 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mrkx-yldh

Abstract

In broad terms, the goal of a sensory system is to allow an organism to gain information about the external world, taking into account the physical processes that intervene between the sources of the signals and the organism's receptors. In olfaction, these transformations may be particularly complex, as they include the fluid mechanics of odorant transport, which is often turbulent. Here we focus on this transformation, viewing it as an inescapable signal processing stage that occurs before sensory transduction. The typically passive nature of an odorant (i.e., that it is carried by the flow, but does not affect the flow) allows for a concise characterization of how flow transforms the temporal characteristics of odorant concentration at the source into its temporal characteristics downstream. Specifically, the power spectrum (but not the odor concentration time series itself) is transformed in a linear fashion: Spectral components at the source are filtered and mapped to other frequencies at a downstream sensor. We characterize the dominant processes in the mapping as (1) frequency filtering acting as a low-pass filter on the source signal, (2) frequency spreading that redistributes power about the source frequency, and (3) frequency production of an underlying spectrum regardless of input frequency. Each of these processes arises naturally from the multiscale nature of turbulent flow environments. This machinery provides a framework for comparison with active sensation, viewed as another form of signal processing that occurs prior to sensory transduction.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (106)

  1. G. Reddy, V. N. Murthy, and M. Vergassola, Olfactory sensing and navigation in turbulent environments, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 191 (2022).
  2. B. Auffarth, Understanding smell—The olfactory stimulus problem, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 1667 (2013).
  3. C.-Y. Su, K. Menuz, and J. R. Carlson, Olfactory perception: Receptors, cells, and circuits, Cell 139, 45 (2009).
  4. G. Laurent, M. Stopfer, R. W. Friedrich, M. I. Rabinovich, A. Volkovskii, and H. D. Abarbanel, Odor encoding as an active, dynamical process: Experiments, computation, and theory, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 263 (2001).
  5. V. Jacob, C. Monsempès, J.-P. Rospars, J.-B. Masson, and P. Lucas, Olfactory coding in the turbulent realm, PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005870 (2017).
  6. P. Szyszka, R. C. Gerkin, C. G. Galizia, and B. H. Smith, High-speed odor transduction and pulse tracking by insect olfactory receptor neurons, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16925 (2014).
  7. A. Egea-Weiss, A. Renner, C. J. Kleineidam, and P. Szyszka, High precision of spike timing across olfactory receptor neurons allows rapid odor coding in Drosophila, iScience 4, 76 (2018).
  8. A. Mafra-neto and R. T. Cardé, Effect of the fine‐scale structure of pheromone plumes: Pulse frequency modulates activation and upwind flight of almond moth males, Physiol. Entomol. 20, 229 (1995).
  9. A. Gumaste, K. L. Baker, M. Izydorczak, A. C. True, G. Vasan, J. P. Crimaldi, and J. Verhagen, Behavioral discrimination and olfactory bulb encoding of odor plume intermittency, eLife 13, e85303 (2024).
  10. L. Conchou, P. Lucas, C. Meslin, M. Proffit, M. Staudt, and M. Renou, Insect odorscapes: From plant volatiles to natural olfactory scenes, Front. Physiol. 10, 972 (2019).
  11. M. Pannunzi and T. Nowotny, Odor stimuli: Not just chemical identity, Front. Physiol. 10, 1428 (2019).
  12. K. I. Nagel, E. J. Hong, and R. I. Wilson, Synaptic and circuit mechanisms promoting broadband transmission of olfactory stimulus dynamics, Nat. Neurosci. 18, 56 (2015).
  13. C. Martelli, J. R. Carlson, and T. Emonet, Intensity invariant dynamics and odor-specific latencies in olfactory receptor neuron response, J. Neurosci. 33, 6285 (2013).
  14. T. Ackels, A. Erskine, D. Dasgupta, A. C. Marin, T. P. A. Warner, S. Tootoonian, I. Fukunaga, J. J. Harris, and A. T. Schaefer, Fast odour dynamics are encoded in the olfactory system and guide behaviour, Nature (London) 593, 558 (2021).
  15. H. Guo, K. Kunwar, and D. Smith, Odorant receptor sensitivity modulation in Drosophila, J. Neurosci. 37, 9465 (2017).
  16. H. Guo and D. P. Smith, Time-dependent odorant sensitivity modulation in insects, Insects 13, 354 (2022).
  17. C.-Y. Su, C. Martelli, T. Emonet, and J. R. Carlson, Temporal coding of odor mixtures in an olfactory receptor neuron, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5075 (2011).
  18. D. Raccuglia, L. Y. McCurdy, M. Demir, S. Gorur-Shandilya, M. Kunst, T. Emonet, and M. N. Nitabach, Presynaptic GABA receptors mediate temporal contrast enhancement in Drosophila olfactory sensory neurons and modulate odor-driven behavioral kinetics, eneuro 3, ENEURO.0080-16.2016 (2016).
  19. V. Jayaram, N. Kadakia, and T. Emonet, Sensing complementary temporal features of odor signals enhances navigation of diverse turbulent plumes, eLife 11, e72415 (2022).
  20. N. Kadakia, M. Demir, B. T. Michaelis, B. D. DeAngelis, M. A. Reidenbach, D. A. Clark, and T. Emonet, Odour motion sensing enhances navigation of complex plumes, Nature (London) 611, 754 (2022).
  21. J. Murlis, Odor plumes and the signal they provide, in Insect Pheromone Research, edited by R. T. Cardé and A. K. Minks (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1997), pp. 221–231.
  22. M. Wachowiak, A. Dewan, T. Bozza, T. F. O'Connell, and E. J. Hong, Recalibrating olfactory neuroscience to the range of naturally occurring odor concentrations, J. Neurosci. 45, e1872242024 (2025).
  23. E. Villermaux, Mixing versus stirring, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 245 (2019).
  24. J. Murlis, M. A. Willis, and R. T. Cardé, Spatial and temporal structures of pheromone plumes in fields and forests, Physiol. Entomol. 25, 211 (2000).
  25. A. Obukhov, On the energy distribution in the spectrum of a turbulent flow, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 32, 22 (1941).
  26. A. Kolmogorov, The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds' numbers, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 301 (1941).
  27. Z. Warhaft, Passive scalars in turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 203 (2000).
  28. A. Celani, E. Villermaux, and M. Vergassola, Odor landscapes in turbulent environments, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041015 (2014).
  29. S. Tootoonian, A. C. True, E. Stark, J. P. Crimaldi, and A. T. Schaefer, Quantifying spectral information about source separation in multisource odour plumes, PLoS One 20, e0297754 (2025).
  30. C. Finelli, Velocity and concentration distributions in turbulent odor plumes in the presence of vegetation mimics: A flume study, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 207, 297 (2000).
  31. P. A. Moore and J. Atema, Spatial information in the three-dimensional fine structure of an aquatic odor plume, Biol. Bull. 181, 408 (1991).
  32. R. Shapley and P. Lennie, Spatial frequency analysis in the visual system, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 547 (1985).
  33. S. L. Bressler and W. J. Freeman, Frequency analysis of olfactory system EEG in cat, rabbit, and rat, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 50, 19 (1980).
  34. S. Shamma, On the role of space and time in auditory processing, Trends Cognit. Sci. 5, 340 (2001).
  35. A. Gescheider, S. Bolanowski, and K. Hardick, The frequency selectivity of information-processing channels in the tactile sensory system, Somatosens. Motor Res. 18, 191 (2001).
  36. K. I. Nagel and R. I. Wilson, Biophysical mechanisms underlying olfactory receptor neuron dynamics, Nat. Neurosci. 14, 208 (2011).
  37. A. J. Kim, A. A. Lazar, and Y. B. Slutskiy, System identification of Drosophila olfactory sensory neurons, J. Comput. Neurosci. 30, 143 (2011).
  38. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/mrkx-yldh for animations of three-dimensional plot rotations.
  39. S. P. Foster and K. G. Anderson, Sex pheromone biosynthesis, storage and release in a female moth: Making a little go a long way, Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20202775 (2020).
  40. M. Rucci and J. D. Victor, The unsteady eye: An information-processing stage, not a bug, Trends Neurosci. 38, 195 (2015).
  41. X. Kuang, M. Poletti, J. Victor, and M. Rucci, Temporal encoding of spatial information during active visual fixation, Curr. Biol. 22, 510 (2012).
  42. M. Aytekin, J. D. Victor, and M. Rucci, The visual input to the retina during natural head-free fixation, J. Neurosci. 34, 12701 (2014).
  43. C. Nironi, P. Salizzoni, M. Marro, P. Mejean, N. Grosjean, and L. Soulhac, Dispersion of a passive scalar fluctuating plume in a turbulent boundary layer. Part I: Velocity and concentration measurements, Bound. Layer Meteorol. 156, 415 (2015).
  44. G. K. Batchelor, I. D. Howells, and A. A. Townsend, Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid Part 2. The case of large conductivity, J. Fluid Mech. 5, 134 (1959).
  45. L. Richardson, Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 110, 709 (1926).
  46. M. Bourgoin, N. T. Ouellette, H. Xu, J. Berg, and E. Bodenschatz, The role of pair dispersion in turbulent flow, Science 311, 835 (2006).
  47. F. Nicolleau and G. Yu, Two-particle diffusion and locality assumption, Phys. Fluids 16, 2309 (2004).
  48. D. R. Osborne, J. C. Vassilicos, K. Sung, and J. D. Haigh, Fundamentals of pair diffusion in kinematic simulations of turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036309 (2006).
  49. N. A. Malik, Turbulent particle pair diffusion: A theory based on local and non-local diffusional processes, PLoS One 13, e0202940 (2018).
  50. P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen, P. S. Ayyaswamy, and H. H. Hu, Fluid Mechanics, 4th ed. (Elsevier, London, 2007).
  51. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
  52. B. K. Martin, X. L. Wu, W. I. Goldburg, and M. A. Rutgers, Spectra of decaying turbulence in a soap film, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3964 (1998).
  53. S. Gorur-Shandilya, M. Demir, J. Long, D. A. Clark, and T. Emonet, Olfactory receptor neurons use gain control and complementary kinetics to encode intermittent odorant stimuli, eLife 6, e27670 (2017).
  54. M. Levakova, L. Kostal, C. Monsempès, V. Jacob, and P. Lucas, Moth olfactory receptor neurons adjust their encoding efficiency to temporal statistics of pheromone fluctuations, PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006586 (2018).
  55. A. Nag and F. Van Breugel, Odour source distance is predictable from a time history of odour statistics for large scale outdoor plumes, J. R. Soc. Interface 21, 20240169 (2024).
  56. M. Schmuker, V. Bahr, and R. Huerta, Exploiting plume structure to decode gas source distance using metal-oxide gas sensors, Sens. Actuators, B 235, 636 (2016).
  57. L. Biferale, G. Boffetta, A. Celani, B. J. Devenish, A. Lanotte, and F. Toschi, Lagrangian statistics of particle pairs in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 17, 115101 (2005).
  58. R. Shnapp, S. Brizzolara, M. M. Neamtu-Halic, A. Gambino, and M. Holzner, Universal alignment in turbulent pair dispersion, Nat. Commun. 14, 4195 (2023).
  59. P. Szyszka, T. Emonet, and T. L. Edwards, Extracting spatial information from temporal odor patterns: Insights from insects, Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 59, 101082 (2023).
  60. B. T. Michaelis, K. W. Leathers, Y. V. Bobkov, B. W. Ache, J. C. Principe, R. Baharloo, I. M. Park, and M. A. Reidenbach, Odor tracking in aquatic organisms: The importance of temporal and spatial intermittency of the turbulent plume, Sci. Rep. 10, 7961 (2020).
  61. J. I. Raji, J. K. Konopka, and C. J. Potter, A spatial map of antennal-expressed ionotropic receptors in the malaria mosquito, Cell Rep. 42, 112101 (2023).
  62. L. B. Vosshall, H. Amrein, P. S. Morozov, A. Rzhetsky, and R. Axel, A spatial map of olfactory receptor expression in the Drosophila antenna, Cell 96, 725 (1999).
  63. C. Chen, C. Kachramanoglou, D. Li, P. Andrews, and D. Choi, Anatomy and cellular constituents of the human olfactory mucosa: A review, J. Neurol. Surg. B 75, 293 (2014).
  64. B. Zapiec and P. Mombaerts, The zonal organization of odorant receptor gene choice in the main olfactory epithelium of the mouse, Cell Rep. 30, 4220 (2020).
  65. J. Murlis, J. S. Elkinton, and R. T. Cardé, Odor plumes and how insects use them, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 505 (1992).
  66. T. A. Keller and M. J. Weissburg, Effects of odor flux and pulse rate on chemosensory tracking in turbulent odor plumes by the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, Biol. Bull. 207, 44 (2004).
  67. H. Kim, G. Lee, J. Song, and S.-G. Kim, Real-time visualization of scent accumulation reveals the frequency of floral scent emissions, Front. Plant Sci. 13, 835305 (2022).
  68. L. Kang, J. Kaur, K. Winkeler, D. Kubiak, and J. E. Hill, How the volatile organic compounds emitted by corpse plant change through flowering, Sci. Rep. 13, 372 (2023).
  69. H. Tichy, A. Hinterwirth, and E. Gingl, Olfactory receptors on the cockroach antenna signal odour ON and odour OFF by excitation, Eur. J. Neurosci. 22, 3147 (2005).
  70. M. Vergassola, E. Villermaux, and B. I. Shraiman, ‘Infotaxis’ as a strategy for searching without gradients, Nature (London) 445, 406 (2007).
  71. S. D. Boie, E. G. Connor, M. McHugh, K. I. Nagel, G. B. Ermentrout, J. P. Crimaldi, and J. D. Victor, Information-theoretic analysis of realistic odor plumes: What cues are useful for determining location? PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006275 (2018).
  72. A. Sunil, O. Pedroncini, A. T. Schaefer, and T. Ackels, How do mammals convert dynamic odor information into neural maps for landscape navigation? PLoS Biol. 22, e3002908 (2024).
  73. J. Crimaldi, H. Lei, A. Schaefer, M. Schmuker, B. H. Smith, A. C. True, J. V. Verhagen, and J. D. Victor, Active sensing in a dynamic olfactory world, J. Comput. Neurosci. 50, 1 (2022).
  74. M. Wachowiak, All in a sniff: Olfaction as a model for active sensing, Neuron 71, 962 (2011).
  75. F. Gascue, E. Marachlian, M. Azcueta, F. F. Locatelli, and M. Klappenbach, Antennal movements can be used as behavioral readout of odor valence in honey bees, IBRO Neurosci. Rep. 12, 323 (2022).
  76. J. S. Tripathy, O. J. Peters, E. M. Staudacher, F. R. Kalwar, M. N. Hatfield, and K. C. Daly, Odors pulsed at wing beat frequencies are tracked by primary olfactory networks and enhance odor detection, Front. Cell. Neurosci. 4, 1 (2010).
  77. R. R. Anholt, Molecular physiology of olfaction, Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 257, C1043 (1989).
  78. E. A. Corey and B. W. Ache, Comparative olfactory transduction, in Chemosensory Transduction, edited by F. Zufall and S. D. Munger (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2016), pp. 207–223.
  79. G. T. Csanady, Concentration fluctuations in turbulent diffusion, J. Atmos. Sci. 24, 21 (1967).
  80. A. A. Townsend, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1980).
  81. P. A. Durbin, A stochastic model of two-particle dispersion and concentration fluctuations in homogeneous turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 100, 279 (1980).
  82. B. Sawford, Turbulent relative dispersion, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 33, 289 (2001).
  83. M. Cassiani, M. B. Bertagni, M. Marro, and P. Salizzoni, Concentration fluctuations from localized atmospheric releases, Bound. Layer Meteorol. 177, 461 (2020).
  84. D. J. Thomson, A stochastic model for the motion of particle pairs in isotropic high-Reynolds-number turbulence, and its application to the problem of concentration variance, J. Fluid Mech. 210, 113 (1990).
  85. P. K. Yeung, Direct numerical simulation of two-particle relative diffusion in isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 6, 3416 (1994).
  86. A. Arnèodo, R. Benzi, J. Berg, L. Biferale, E. Bodenschatz, A. Busse, E. Calzavarini, B. Castaing, M. Cencini, L. Chevillard, R. T. Fisher, R. Grauer, H. Homann, D. Lamb, A. S. Lanotte, E. Lévèque, B. Lüthi, J. Mann, N. Mordant, W.-C. Müller, et al., Universal intermittent properties of particle trajectories in highly turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 254504 (2008).
  87. D. J. Thomson, Eulerian analysis of concentration fluctuations in dispersing plumes and puffs, Phys. Fluids 9, 2349 (1997).
  88. M. Cassiani, P. Franzese, and U. Giostra, A PDF micromixing model of dispersion for atmospheric flow. Part I: Development of the model, application to homogeneous turbulence and to neutral boundary layer, Atmos. Environ. 39, 1457 (2005).
  89. R. Benzi and A. Vulpiani, Multifractal approach to fully developed turbulence, Rendiconti Lincei. Sci. Fis. Nat. 33, 471 (2022).
  90. J. E. Fackrell and A. G. Robins, The effects of source size on concentration fluctuations in plumes, Bound. Layer Meteorol. 22, 335 (1982).
  91. R. I. Sykes, W. S. Lewellen, and S. F. Parker, A turbulent-transport model for concentration fluctuations and fluxes, J. Fluid Mech. 139, 193 (1984).
  92. N. Rigolli, G. Reddy, A. Seminara, and M. Vergassola, Alternation emerges as a multi-modal strategy for turbulent odor navigation, eLife 11, e76989 (2022).
  93. S. Gorur-Shandilya, C. Martelli, M. Demir, and T. Emonet, Controlling and measuring dynamic odorant stimuli in the laboratory, J. Exp. Biol. 222, jeb207787 (2019).
  94. E. Stark, J. Crimaldi, A. True, and J. D. Victor, Temporal reformatting of odor signals by flow environments: CFD dataset (2025), https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/datasets/ft848s53n.
  95. Z. Zhou, L. Fang, N. T. Ouellette, and H. Xu, Vorticity gradient stretching in the direct enstrophy transfer process of two-dimensional turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 054602 (2020).
  96. J. P. Crimaldi and J. R. Koseff, High-resolution measurements of the spatial and temporal scalar structure of a turbulent plume, Exp. Fluids 31, 90 (2001).
  97. H. Lim and C. Vanderwel, Turbulent dispersion of a passive scalar in a smooth-wall turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 969, A26 (2023).
  98. J. J. Hopfield, Olfactory computation and object perception, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 6462 (1991).
  99. A. Sehdev and P. Szyszka, Segregation of unknown odors from mixtures based on stimulus onset asynchrony in honey bees, Front. Behav. Neurosci. 13, 155 (2019).
  100. A. Sehdev, Y. G. Mohammed, T. Triphan, and P. Szyszka, Olfactory object recognition based on fine-scale stimulus timing in Drosophila, iScience 13, 113 (2019).
  101. O. Schenk, K. Gärtner, W. Fichtner, and A. Stricker, PARDISO: A high-performance serial and parallel sparse linear solver in semiconductor device simulation, Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 18, 69 (2001).
  102. M. Klein, Integral turbulent length and time scales of higher order moments, Flow Turbul. Combust. 112, 397 (2024).
  103. J. P. Salazar and L. R. Collins, Two-particle dispersion in isotropic turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 405 (2009).
  104. E. Yee, P. R. Kosteniuk, G. M. Chandler, C. A. Biltoft, and J. F. Bowers, Statistical characteristics of concentration fluctuations in dispersing plumes in the atmospheric surface layer, Bound. Layer Meteorol. 65, 69 (1993).
  105. P. L. Miller and P. E. Dimotakis, Measurements of scalar power spectra in high Schmidt number turbulent jets, J. Fluid Mech. 308, 129 (1996).
  106. M. Mohaghar, L. P. Dasi, and D. R. Webster, Scalar power spectra and turbulent scalar length scales of high-Schmidt-number passive scalar fields in turbulent boundary layers, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 084606 (2020).

Outline

Information

PRX Life 4, 023013– Published 13 May, 2026
  • Received 5 December 2025
  • Accepted 15 April 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation