Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Field-Theoretic Approach to Compartmental Neuronal Networks: Impact of Dendritic Calcium Spike-Dependent Bursting

Audrey O'Brien Teasley

Gabriel Koch Ocker*

  • Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA

  • Department of Mathematics and Statistics and Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA

  • *Contact author: gkocker@bu.edu

PRX Life 4, 013016 – Published 5 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/66wj-xhlg

Abstract

Neurons are spatially extended cells. Different parts of a neuron have specific voltage dynamics. Important types of neurons even generate different spikes in different parts of the cell. Neurons' inputs are also often spatially compartmentalized, with different sources targeting different locations on the cell. Classic mean-field theories for neural population activity, however, rely on point-neuron models with at most one type of spike, the sodium-potassium action potential. Here, we develop a statistical field-theoretic approach to understanding collective activity in networks of compartmental neurons, including those generating multiple types of spikes. We use this to examine simple models of cortical networks with pyramidal cells that generate dendritic calcium spikes. In the weakly coupled regime, we uncover an exact mean-field limit for these networks that maps them to a marked point process. We use this mean-field limit to compare the impact of compartmentalized recurrent excitatory and inhibitory connectivity on the equilibrium phase diagram. This exposes regions of metastability between various activity states, including activity with silent vs active dendrites, with and without inhibitory activity, and oscillations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (90)

  1. S. Coombes, Large-scale neural dynamics: Simple and complex, NeuroImage 52, 731 (2010).
  2. J. C. Eccles, The action potential of the superior cervical ganglion, J. Physiol. 85, 179 (1935).
  3. A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol. 117, 500 (1952).
  4. M. E. Larkum, J. Wu, S. A. Duverdin, and A. Gidon, The guide to dendritic spikes of the Mammalian cortex in vitro and in vivo, Neuroscience 489, 15 (2022).
  5. M. E. Larkum, J. J. Zhu, and B. Sakmann, A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers, Nature (London) 398, 338 (1999).
  6. R. Naud and H. Sprekeler, Sparse bursts optimize information transmission in a multiplexed neural code, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6329 (2018).
  7. Z. Friedenberger, E. Harkin, K. Tóth, and R. Naud, Silences, spikes and bursts: Three-part knot of the neural code, J. Physiol. 601, 5165 (2023).
  8. J. C. Brumberg, L. G. Nowak, and D. A. McCormick, Ionic mechanisms underlying repetitive high-frequency burst firing in supragranular cortical neurons, J. Neurosci. 20, 4829 (2000).
  9. P. A. Schwartzkroin and M. Slawsky, Probable calcium spikes in hippocampal neurons, Brain Res. 135, 157 (1977).
  10. R. K. Wong, D. A. Prince, and A. I. Basbaum, Intradendritic recordings from hippocampal neurons, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 986 (1979).
  11. J. C. Magee and M. Carruth, Dendritic voltage-gated ion channels regulate the action potential firing mode of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons, J. Neurophysiol. 82, 1895 (1999).
  12. M. E. Larkum, J. Waters, B. Sakmann, and F. Helmchen, Dendritic spikes in apical dendrites of neocortical layer 2/3 Pyramidal neurons, J. Neurosci. 27, 8999 (2007).
  13. H. Jahnsen and R. Llinás, Ionic basis for the electro-responsiveness and oscillatory properties of guinea-pig thalamic neurones in vitro, J. Physiol. 349, 227 (1984).
  14. A. Destexhe, M. Neubig, D. Ulrich, and J. Huguenard, Dendritic low-threshold Calcium currents in thalamic relay cells, J. Neurosci. 18, 3574 (1998).
  15. J. C. Eccles, R. Llinás, and K. Sasaki, The excitatory synaptic action of climbing fibres on the purkinje cells of the cerebellum, J. Physiol. 182, 268 (1966).
  16. J. T. Davie, B. A. Clark, and M. Häusser, The origin of the complex spike in cerebellar purkinje cells, J. Neurosci. 28, 7599 (2008).
  17. D. J. Felleman and D. C. Van Essen, Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex, Cereb. Cortex 1, 1 (1991).
  18. J. A. Harris, S. Mihalas, K. E. Hirokawa, J. D. Whitesell, H. Choi, A. Bernard, P. Bohn, S. Caldejon, L. Casal, A. Cho, A. Feiner, D. Feng, N. Gaudreault, C. R. Gerfen, N. Graddis, P. A. Groblewski, A. M. Henry, A. Ho, R. Howard, J. E. Knox, et al., Hierarchical organization of cortical and thalamic connectivity, Nature (London) 575, 195 (2019).
  19. B. Rudy, G. Fishell, S. Lee, and J. Hjerling-Leffler, Three groups of interneurons account for nearly 100% of neocortical gabaergic neurons, Dev. Neurobiol. 71, 45 (2011).
  20. R. D. Traub, D. Contreras, M. O. Cunningham, H. Murray, F. E. N. LeBeau, A. Roopun, A. Bibbig, W. B. Wilent, M. J. Higley, and M. A. Whittington, Single-Column thalamocortical network model exhibiting gamma oscillations, sleep spindles, and epileptogenic bursts, J. Neurophysiol. 93, 2194 (2005).
  21. H. Markram, The blue brain project, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 153 (2006).
  22. H. Markram, E. Muller, S. Ramaswamy, M. W. Reimann, M. Abdellah, C. A. Sanchez, A. Ailamaki, L. Alonso-Nanclares, N. Antille, S. Arsever, G. A. A. Kahou, T. K. Berger, A. Bilgili, N. Buncic, A. Chalimourda, G. Chindemi, J.-D. Courcol, F. Delalondre, V. Delattre, S. Druckmann, et al., Reconstruction and simulation of neocortical microcircuitry, Cell 163, 456 (2015).
  23. Y. N. Billeh, B. Cai, S. L. Gratiy, K. Dai, R. Iyer, N. W. Gouwens, R. Abbasi-Asl, X. Jia, J. H. Siegle, S. R. Olsen, C. Koch, S. Mihalas, and A. Arkhipov, Systematic integration of structural and functional data into multi-scale models of mouse primary visual cortex, Neuron 106, 388 (2020).
  24. S. Grossberg, On learning and energy-entropy dependence in recurrent and nonrecurrent signed networks, J. Stat. Phys. 1, 319 (1969).
  25. S.-I. Amari, Characteristics of randomly connected threshold-element networks and network systems, Proc. IEEE 59, 35 (1971).
  26. S.-I. Amari, Characteristics of random nets of analog neuron-like elements, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-2, 643 (1972).
  27. H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan, Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons, Biophys. J. 12, 1 (1972).
  28. H. Sompolinsky, A. Crisanti, and H. J. Sommers, Chaos in random neural networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 259 (1988).
  29. T. Ohira and J. D. Cowan, Master-equation approach to stochastic neurodynamics, Phys. Rev. E 48, 2259 (1993).
  30. I. Ginzburg and H. Sompolinsky, Theory of correlations in stochastic neural networks, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3171 (1994).
  31. C. van Vreeswijk and H. Sompolinsky, Chaotic balanced state in a model of cortical circuits, Neural Comput. 10, 1321 (1998).
  32. N. Brunel, Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons, J. Comput. Neurosci. 8, 183 (2000).
  33. W. Gerstner, Time structure of the activity in neural network models, Phys. Rev. E 51, 738 (1995).
  34. A. Renart, J. de la Rocha, P. Bartho, L. Hollender, N. Parga, A. Reyes, and K. D. Harris, The asynchronous state in cortical circuits, Science 327, 587 (2010).
  35. E. Montbrió, D. Pazó, and A. Roxin, Macroscopic description for networks of spiking neurons, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021028 (2015).
  36. S. Paliwal, G. K. Ocker, and B. A. W. Brinkman, Metastability in networks of stochastic integrate-and-fire neurons, Phys. Rev. E 111, 064402 (2025).
  37. C. C. Chow and M. A. Buice, Path integral methods for stochastic differential equations, J. Math. Neurosci. 5, 8 (2015).
  38. G. K. Ocker, Republished: Dynamics of stochastic integrate-and-fire networks, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041047 (2023).
  39. M. A. Buice and J. D. Cowan, Field-theoretic approach to fluctuation effects in neural networks, Phys. Rev. E 75, 051919 (2007).
  40. M. A. Buice, J. D. Cowan, and C. C. Chow, Systematic fluctuation expansion for neural network activity equations, Neural Comput. 22, 377 (2010).
  41. G. K. Ocker, K. Josić, E. Shea-Brown, and M. A. Buice, Linking structure and activity in nonlinear spiking networks, PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005583 (2017).
  42. S. R. Williams and G. J. Stuart, Mechanisms and consequences of action potential burst firing in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons, J. Physiol. 521, 467 (1999).
  43. M. E. Larkum, J. J. Zhu, and B. Sakmann, Dendritic mechanisms underlying the coupling of the dendritic with the axonal action potential initiation zone of adult rat layer 5 pyramidal neurons, J. Physiol. 533, 447 (2001).
  44. P. Schwindt and W. Crill, Mechanisms underlying burst and regular spiking evoked by dendritic depolarization in layer 5 Cortical pyramidal neurons, J. Neurophysiol. 81, 1341 (1999).
  45. H. G. Kim and B. W. Connors, Apical dendrites of the neocortex: Correlation between sodium- and calcium-dependent spiking and pyramidal cell morphology, J. Neurosci. 13, 5301 (1993).
  46. L. Zhu, Large deviations for markovian nonlinear hawkes processes, Ann. Appl. Probab. 25, 548 (2015).
  47. S. Delattre, N. Fournier, and M. Hoffmann, Hawkes processes on large networks, Ann. Appl. Probab. 26, 216 (2016).
  48. S. Heesen and W. Stannat, Fluctuation limits for mean-field interacting nonlinear Hawkes processes, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 139, 280 (2021).
  49. P. Pfaffelhuber, S. Rotter, and J. Stiefel, Mean-field limits for non-linear hawkes processes with excitation and inhibition, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 153, 57 (2022).
  50. X.-J. Wang, Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits, Neuron 36, 955 (2002).
  51. A. Destexhe, Self-sustained asynchronous irregular states and up–down states in thalamic, cortical and thalamocortical networks of nonlinear integrate-and-fire neurons, J. Comput. Neurosci. 27, 493 (2009).
  52. A. Litwin-Kumar and B. Doiron, Slow dynamics and high variability in balanced cortical networks with clustered connections, Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1498 (2012).
  53. K. C. Bittner, C. Grienberger, S. P. Vaidya, A. D. Milstein, J. J. Macklin, J. Suh, S. Tonegawa, and J. C. Magee, Conjunctive input processing drives feature selectivity in hippocampal CA1 neurons, Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1133 (2015).
  54. J. Cichon and W.-B. Gan, Branch-specific dendritic ca2+ spikes cause persistent synaptic plasticity, Nature (London) 520, 180 (2015).
  55. K. C. Bittner, A. D. Milstein, C. Grienberger, S. Romani, and J. C. Magee, Behavioral time scale synaptic plasticity underlies CA1 place fields, Science 357, 1033 (2017).
  56. V. Francioni, Z. Padamsey, and N. L. Rochefort, High and asymmetric somato-dendritic coupling of V1 layer 5 neurons independent of visual stimulation and locomotion, eLife 8, e49145 (2019).
  57. V. Francioni and M. T. Harnett, Rethinking single neuron electrical compartmentalization: Dendritic contributions to network computation In Vivo, Neuroscience 489, 185 (2022).
  58. P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Statistical dynamics of classical systems, Phys. Rev. A 8, 423 (1973).
  59. C. D. Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la théorie des champs et dynamique des phénomènes critiques, J. Phys. Colloq. 37, C1 (1976).
  60. H.-K. Janssen, On a lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Phys. Kondens. Mater. 23, 377 (1976).
  61. R. V. Jensen, Functional integral approach to classical statistical dynamics, J. Stat. Phys. 25, 183 (1981).
  62. F. Vercruysse, R. Naud, and H. Sprekeler, Self-organization of a doubly asynchronous irregular network state for spikes and bursts, PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1009478 (2021).
  63. V. Schmutz, E. Löcherbach, and T. Schwalger, On a finite-size neuronal population equation, arXiv:2106.14721.
  64. G. V. Vinci, R. Benzi, and M. Mattia, Self-consistent stochastic dynamics for finite-size networks of spiking neurons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 097402 (2023).
  65. E. Fleurantin, K. Slyman, B. Barker, and C. K. R. T. Jones, A dynamical systems approach for most probable escape paths over periodic boundaries, Physica D 454, 133860 (2023).
  66. G. Rodriguez, M. Sarazin, A. Clemente, S. Holden, J. T. Paz, and B. Delord, Conditional bistability, a generic cellular mnemonic mechanism for robust and flexible working memory computations, J. Neurosci. 38, 5209 (2018).
  67. C. C. Ceballos, N. Chadly, E. Lowet, and R. F. O. Pena, Interleaved single and bursting spiking resonance in neurons, PLoS Comput. Biol. 21, e1013126 (2025).
  68. M. V. Tsodyks, W. E. Skaggs, T. J. Sejnowski, and B. L. McNaughton, Paradoxical effects of external modulation of inhibitory interneurons, J. Neurosci. 17, 4382 (1997).
  69. A. Sanzeni, B. Akitake, H. C. Goldbach, C. E. Leedy, N. Brunel, and M. H. Histed, Inhibition stabilization is a widespread property of cortical networks, eLife 9, e54875 (2020).
  70. A. Litwin-Kumar, R. Rosenbaum, and B. Doiron, Inhibitory stabilization and visual coding in cortical circuits with multiple interneuron subtypes, J. Neurophysiol. 115, 1399 (2016).
  71. H. Touchette, The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics, Phys. Rep. 478, 1 (2009).
  72. L. M. Palmer, J. M. Schulz, S. C. Murphy, D. Ledergerber, M. Murayama, and M. E. Larkum, The cellular basis of gabab-mediated interhemispheric inhibition, Science 335, 989 (2012).
  73. E. Hay, S. Hill, F. Schürmann, H. Markram, and I. Segev, Models of neocortical layer 5b pyramidal cells capturing a wide range of dendritic and perisomatic active properties, PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002107 (2011).
  74. N.-L. Xu, M. T. Harnett, S. R. Williams, D. Huber, D. H. O'Connor, K. Svoboda, and J. C. Magee, Nonlinear dendritic integration of sensory and motor input during an active sensing task, Nature (London) 492, 247 (2012).
  75. M. T. Harnett, N.-L. Xu, J. C. Magee, and S. R. Williams, Potassium Channels control the interaction between active dendritic integration compartments in layer 5 Cortical pyramidal neurons, Neuron 79, 516 (2013).
  76. L. M. Ricciardi and L. Sacerdote, The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process as a model for neuronal activity, Biol. Cybern. 35, 1 (1979).
  77. Z. Friedenberger and R. Naud, Dendritic excitability controls overdispersion, Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 19 (2024).
  78. H. Markram, J. Lübke, M. Frotscher, A. Roth, and B. Sakmann, Physiology and anatomy of synaptic connections between thick tufted pyramidal neurones in the developing rat neocortex, J. Physiol. 500, 409 (1997).
  79. H. Markram, A network of tufted layer 5 pyramidal neurons, Cereb. Cortex 7, 523 (1997).
  80. A. L. Bodor, C. M. Schneider-Mizell, C. Zhang, L. Elabbady, A. Mallen, A. Bergeson, D. Brittain, J. Buchanan, D. J. Bumbarger, R. Dalley, C. Gamlin, E. Joyce, D. Kapner, S. Kinn, G. Mahalingam, S. Seshamani, S. Suckow, M. Takeno, R. Torres, W. Yin, et al., The synaptic architecture of layer 5 thick tufted excitatory neurons in mouse visual cortex, Nat. Neurosci. 281704 (2025).
  81. J. Schiller, G. Major, H. J. Koester, and Y. Schiller, NMDA spikes in basal dendrites of cortical pyramidal neurons, Nature (London) 404, 285 (2000).
  82. T. Nevian, M. E. Larkum, A. Polsky, and J. Schiller, Properties of basal dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: A direct patch-clamp recording study, Nat. Neurosci. 10, 206 (2007).
  83. M. E. Larkum, T. Nevian, M. Sandler, A. Polsky, and J. Schiller, Synaptic integration in tuft dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: A new unifying principle, Science 325, 756 (2009).
  84. J. E. Rubin, R. C. Gerkin, G.-Q. Bi, and C. Chow, Calcium Time course as a signal for spike-timing-dependent plasticity, J. Neurophysiol. 93, 2600 (2005).
  85. H. Z. Shouval, S. S.-H. Wang, and G. M. Wittenberg, Spike timing dependent plasticity: A consequence of more fundamental learning rules, Front. Comput. Neurosci. 4, 19 (2010).
  86. M. Graupner and N. Brunel, Calcium-based plasticity model explains sensitivity of synaptic changes to spike pattern, rate, and dendritic location, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3991 (2012).
  87. https://github.com/gkocker/burst_mft.
  88. M. Helias and D. Dahmen, Statistical Field Theory for Neural Networks, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer International Publishing, Berlin, 2020).
  89. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2002).
  90. J. Berges, Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory, AIP Conf. Proc. 739, 3 (2004).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation