Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Asymptotically deterministic robust preparation of maximally entangled bosonic states

Matteo Piccolini1,*, Vittorio Giovannetti2, and Rosario Lo Franco1,†

  • 1Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
  • 2NEST, Scuola Normale Superiore and Istituto Nanoscienze-CNR, I-56126 Pisa, Italy

  • *matteo.piccolini@unipa.it
  • †rosario.lofranco@unipa.it

Phys. Rev. Research 6, 013073 – Published 19 January, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013073

Abstract

We introduce a theoretical scheme to prepare a pure Bell singlet state of two bosonic qubits, in a way that is robust under the action of arbitrary local noise. Focusing on a photonic platform, the proposed procedure employs passive optical devices and a polarization insensitive, nonabsorbing, parity check detector in an iterative process which achieves determinism asymptotically with the number of repetitions. Distributing the photons over two distinct spatial modes, we further show that the elements of the related basis composed of maximally entangled states can be divided in two groups according to an equivalence based on passive optical transformations. We demonstrate that the parity check detector can be used to connect the two sets of states. We thus conclude that the proposed protocol can be employed to prepare any pure state of two bosons which are maximally entangled in either the internal degree of freedom (Bell states) or the spatial mode (NOON states).

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (59)

  1. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  2. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nat. Photon. 5, 222 (2011).
  3. M. G. A. Paris, Quantum estimation for quantum technology, Int. J. Quantum Inform. 07, 125 (2009).
  4. T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O'Brien, Quantum computers, Nature (London) 464, 45 (2010).
  5. S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani et al., Advances in quantum cryptography, Adv. Opt. Photon. 12, 1012 (2020).
  6. H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
  7. L. Aolita, F. De Melo, and L. Davidovich, Open-system dynamics of entanglement: a key issues review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 042001 (2015).
  8. J. Preskill, Reliable quantum computers, Proc. R. Soc. London A 454, 385 (1998).
  9. E. Knill, Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices, Nature (London) 434, 39 (2005).
  10. P. W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995).
  11. A. M. Steane, Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793 (1996).
  12. L. Mazzola, S. Maniscalco, J. Piilo, K.-A. Suominen, and B. M. Garraway, Sudden death and sudden birth of entanglement in common structured reservoirs, Phys. Rev. A 79, 042302 (2009).
  13. B. Bellomo, R. Lo Franco, S. Maniscalco, and G. Compagno, Entanglement trapping in structured environments, Phys. Rev. A 78, 060302(R) (2008).
  14. R. Lo Franco, B. Bellomo, S. Maniscalco, and G. Compagno, Dynamics of quantum correlations in two-qubit systems within non-markovian environments, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 27, 1345053 (2013).
  15. J.-S. Xu, C.-F. Li, M. Gong, X.-B. Zou, C.-H. Shi, G. Chen, and G.-C. Guo, Experimental Demonstration of Photonic Entanglement Collapse and Revival, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 100502 (2010).
  16. B. Bylicka, D. Chruściński, and S. Maniscalco, Non-markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum channels: a quantum information theory perspective, Sci. Rep. 4, 1 (2014).
  17. Z.-X. Man, Y.-J. Xia, and R. Lo Franco, Cavity-based architecture to preserve quantum coherence and entanglement, Sci. Rep. 5, 13843 (2015).
  18. J. Tan, T. H. Kyaw, and Y. Yeo, Non-markovian environments and entanglement preservation, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062119 (2010).
  19. Q.-J. Tong, J.-H. An, H.-G. Luo, and C. H. Oh, Mechanism of entanglement preservation, Phys. Rev. A 81, 052330 (2010).
  20. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016).
  21. Z.-X. Man, Y.-J. Xia, and R. Lo Franco, Harnessing non-markovian quantum memory by environmental coupling, Phys. Rev. A 92, 012315 (2015).
  22. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722 (1996).
  23. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Inseparable two spin-1 2 density matrices can be distilled to a singlet form, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 574 (1997).
  24. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Mixed-State Entanglement and Distillation: Is there a “Bound” Entanglement in Nature? Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239 (1998).
  25. P. Horodecki and R. Horodecki, Distillation and bound entanglement, Quantum Inf. Comput. 1, 45 (2001).
  26. P. G. Kwiat, S. Barraza-Lopez, A. Stefanov, and N. Gisin, Experimental entanglement distillation and hidden non-locality, Nature (London) 409, 1014 (2001).
  27. R. Dong, M. Lassen, J. Heersink, C. Marquardt, R. Filip, G. Leuchs, and U. L. Andersen, Experimental entanglement distillation of mesoscopic quantum states, Nat. Phys. 4, 919 (2008).
  28. P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Noiseless Quantum Codes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3306 (1997).
  29. D. A. Lidar, I. L. Chuang, and K. B. Whaley, Decoherence-Free Subspaces for Quantum Computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998).
  30. L. Viola and S. Lloyd, Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 58, 2733 (1998).
  31. L. Viola and E. Knill, Random Decoupling Schemes for Quantum Dynamical Control and Error Suppression, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 060502 (2005).
  32. A. D'Arrigo, R. Lo Franco, G. Benenti, E. Paladino, and G. Falci, Recovering entanglement by local operations, Ann. Phys. 350, 211 (2014).
  33. R Lo Franco, A. D'Arrigo, G. Falci, G. Compagno, and E. Paladino, Preserving entanglement and nonlocality in solid-state qubits by dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. B 90, 054304 (2014).
  34. A. Orieux, A. D'Arrigo, G. Ferranti, R. Lo Franco, G. Benenti, E. Paladino, G. Falci, F. Sciarrino, and P. Mataloni, Experimental on-demand recovery of entanglement by local operations within non-markovian dynamics, Sci. Rep. 5, 1 (2015).
  35. P. Facchi, D. A. Lidar, and S. Pascazio, Unification of dynamical decoupling and the quantum zeno effect, Phys. Rev. A 69, 032314 (2004).
  36. R. Lo Franco, B. Bellomo, E. Andersson, and G. Compagno, Revival of quantum correlations without system-environment back-action, Phys. Rev. A 85, 032318 (2012).
  37. J.-S. Xu, K. Sun, C.-F. Li, X.-Y. Xu, G.-C. Guo, E. Andersson, R. Lo Franco, and G. Compagno, Experimental recovery of quantum correlations in absence of system-environment back-action, Nat. Commun. 4, 2851 (2013).
  38. S. Damodarakurup, M. Lucamarini, G. Di Giuseppe, D. Vitali, and P. Tombesi, Experimental Inhibition of Decoherence on Flying Qubits via “Bang-Bang” Control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 040502 (2009).
  39. Á. Cuevas, A. Mari, A. De Pasquale, A. Orieux, M. Massaro, F. Sciarrino, P. Mataloni, and V. Giovannetti, Cut-and-paste restoration of entanglement transmission, Phys. Rev. A 96, 012314 (2017).
  40. A. Mortezapour, M. A. Borji, and R. Lo Franco, Protecting entanglement by adjusting the velocities of moving qubits inside non-markovian environments, Laser Phys. Lett. 14, 055201 (2017).
  41. A. Mortezapour and R. Lo Franco, Protecting quantum resources via frequency modulation of qubits in leaky cavities, Sci. Rep. 8, 14304 (2018).
  42. F. Nosrati, A. Castellini, G. Compagno, and R. Lo Franco, Robust entanglement preparation against noise by controlling spatial indistinguishability, npj Quantum. Inf. 6, 39 (2020).
  43. M. Piccolini, F. Nosrati, G. Compagno, P. Livreri, R. Morandotti, and R. Lo Franco, Entanglement robustness via spatial deformation of identical particle wave functions, Entropy 23, 708 (2021).
  44. M. Piccolini, F. Nosrati, R. Morandotti, and R. Lo Franco, Indistinguishability-enhanced entanglement recovery by spatially localized operations and classical communication, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 28, 2150020 (2021).
  45. R. Lo Franco and G. Compagno, Indistinguishability of Elementary Systems as a Resource for Quantum Information Processing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 240403 (2018).
  46. M. Piccolini, F. Nosrati, G. Adesso, R. Morandotti, and R. Lo Franco, Generating indistinguishability within identical particle systems: Spatial deformations as quantum resource activators, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 381, 20220104 (2023).
  47. K. Sun, Y. Wang, Z.-H. Liu, X.-Y. Xu, J.-S. Xu, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, A. Castellini, F. Nosrati, G. Compagno, and R. Lo Franco, Experimental quantum entanglement and teleportation by tuning remote spatial indistinguishability of independent photons, Opt. Lett. 45, 6410 (2020).
  48. M. R. Barros, S. Chin, T. Pramanik, H.-T. Lim, Y.-W. Cho, J. Huh, and Y.-S. Kim, Entangling bosons through particle indistinguishability and spatial overlap, Opt. Express 28, 38083 (2020).
  49. K. Sun, Z.-H. Liu, Y. Wang, Z.-Y. Hao, X.-Y. Xu, J.-S. Xu, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, A. Castellini, L. Lami, et al., Activation of indistinguishability-based quantum coherence for enhanced metrological applications with particle statistics imprint, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2119765119 (2022).
  50. Y. Wang, Z.-Y. Hao, Z.-H. Liu, K. Sun, J.-S. Xu, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, A. Castellini, B. Bellomo, G. Compagno, and R. Lo Franco, Remote entanglement distribution in a quantum network via multinode indistinguishability of photons, Phys. Rev. A 106, 032609 (2022).
  51. Y. Wang, M. Piccolini, Z.-Y. Hao, Z.-H. Liu, K. Sun, J.-S. Xu, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, R. Morandotti, G. Compagno, and R. Lo Franco, Proof-of-Principle Direct Measurement of Particle Statistical Phase, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 064024 (2022).
  52. F. Nosrati, B. Bellomo, G. De Chiara, G. Compagno, R. Morandotti, and R. Lo Franco, Indistinguishability-assisted two-qubit entanglement distillation, Preprint at arXiv:2305.11964 [quant-ph] (2023).
  53. R. Lo Franco and G. Compagno, Quantum entanglement of identical particles by standard information-theoretic notions, Sci. Rep. 6, 20603 (2016).
  54. G. Compagno, A. Castellini, and R. Lo Franco, Dealing with indistinguishable particles and their entanglement, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 376, 20170317 (2018).
  55. M. C Tichy, F. Mintert, and A. Buchleitner, Essential entanglement for atomic and molecular physics, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 192001 (2011).
  56. G. Ghirardi and L. Marinatto, General criterion for the entanglement of two indistinguishable particles, Phys. Rev. A 70, 012109 (2004).
  57. W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
  58. C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996).
  59. M. Piccolini, V. Giovannetti, and R. Lo Franco, Robust engineering of maximally entangled states by identical particle interferometry, Adv. Quant. Tech. 6, 2300146 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation