- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Open Access

Experimental demonstration of electric power generation from Earth's rotation through its own magnetic field

Christopher F. Chyba*

Kevin P. Hand

Thomas H. Chyba

  • Department of Astrophysical Sciences and School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

  • Spectral Sensor Solutions, LLC, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87111, USA

  • *Contact author: cchyba@princeton.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 013285 – Published 19 March, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.013285

Abstract

Earth rotates through the axisymmetric part of its own magnetic field, but a simple proof shows that it is impossible to use this to generate electricity in a conductor rotating with Earth. However, we previously identified implicit assumptions underlying this proof and showed theoretically that these could be violated and the proof circumvented. This requires using a soft magnetic material with a topology satisfying a particular mathematical condition and a composition and scale favoring magnetic diffusion, i.e., having a low magnetic Reynolds number Rm [Chyba and Hand, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 014017 (2016)]. Here we realize these requirements with a cylindrical shell of manganese-zinc ferrite. Controlling for thermoelectric and other potentially confounding effects (including 60 Hz and RF background), we show that this small demonstration system generates a continuous DC voltage and current of the (low) predicted magnitude. We test and verify other predictions of the theory: voltage and current peak when the cylindrical shell's long axis is orthogonal to both Earth's rotational velocity v and magnetic field; voltage and current go to zero when the entire apparatus (cylindrical shell together with current leads and multimeters) is rotated 90∘ to orient the shell parallel to v; voltage and current again reach a maximum but of opposite sign when the apparatus is rotated a further 90∘; an otherwise-identical solid MnZn ferrite cylinder generates zero voltage at all orientations; and a high-Rm cylindrical shell produces zero voltage. We also reproduce the effect at a second experimental location. The purpose of these experiments was to test the existence of the predicted effect. Ways in which this effect might be scaled to generate higher voltage and current may now be investigated.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Corrections

28 May, 2025

Correction: Equations (24), (25), and (A13) contained minor errors and have been fixed.

Focus

Attempt to Harness Energy from Earth’s Rotation

Published 19 March, 2025

Experiments support a controversial proposal to generate electricity from our planet’s rotation by using a device that interacts with Earth’s magnetic field.

See more in Physics

Comments & Replies

Comment on “Experimental demonstration of electric power generation from Earth's rotation through its own magnetic field”

Rinke J. Wijngaarden
Phys. Rev. Research 8, 028001 (2026)

Reply to “Comment on “Experimental demonstration of electric power generation from Earth’s rotation through its own magnetic field””

Christopher F. Chyba, Kevin P. Hand, and Thomas H. Chyba
Phys. Rev. Research 8, 028002 (2026)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. M. Farady, in Faraday's Diary of Experimental Investigations 1820–1862, edited by T. Martin (HR Direct, Riverton, UT, 2008), Vol. I.
  2. C. F. Chyba and K. P. Hand, Electric power generation from Earth's rotation through its own magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 014017 (2016).
  3. J. Van Bladel, Relativity and Engineering (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984).
  4. C. C. Finlay, S. Maus, and C. D. Beggan, T. N. Bondar, A. Chambodut, T. A. Chernova, A. Chulliat, V. P. Golovkov, B. Hamilton, M. Hamoudi et al., International geomagnetic reference field: The eleventh generation, Geophys. J. Int. 183, 1216 (2010).
  5. W. D. Parkinson, Introduction to Geomagnetism (Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 1983).
  6. R. T. Merrill, M. W. McElhinny, and P. L. McFadden, The Magnetic Field of the Earth (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1998).
  7. C. F. Chyba and K. P. Hand, Reply to “Comment on ‘Electric power generation from Earth's rotation through its own magnetic field’,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 028002 (2020).
  8. A. I. Miller, Unipolar induction: A case study of the interaction between science and technology, Ann. Sci. 38, 155 (1981).
  9. A. L. Kholmetskii, One century later: Remarks on the Barnett experiment, Am. J. Phys. 71, 558 (2003).
  10. M. Faraday, Experimental researches in electricity: Twenty-eighth series, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 142, 25 (1852).
  11. L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004).
  12. B. Auchmann, S. Kurz, and S. Russenschuck, A note on Faraday paradoxes, IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 1025 (2014).
  13. P. J. Scanlon, R. N. Henriksen, and J. R. Allen, Approaches to electromagnetic induction, Am. J. Phys. 37, 698 (1969).
  14. S. T. Preston, On some electromagnetic experiments of Faraday and Plücker, Philos. Mag. 19, 131 (1885).
  15. “La question ne peut être résolue parce qu'elle n'a pas de sens,” H. Poincaré, Sur l'induction unipolaire, L'Eclairage Electrique 23, 42 (1900).
  16. S. J. Barnett, On electromagnetic induction and relative motion, Phys. Rev. (Series I) 35, 323 (1912).
  17. E. H. Kennard, On unipolar induction: another experiment and its significance for the existence of the aether, Philos. Mag. 33, 179 (1917).
  18. G. B. Pegram, Unipolar induction and electron theory, Phys. Rev. 10, 591 (1917).
  19. A. I. Miller, Albert Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (Springer, Berlin, 1998).
  20. F. J. Müller, Unipolar induction revisited: new experiments and the “edge effect” theory, IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 1 (2014).
  21. K. Chen, X.-J. Li, and Y.-X. Hui, An experimental study on unipolar induction, Acta Phys. Pol. A 131, 271 (2017).
  22. J. Djurić, Spinning magnetic fields, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 679 (1975).
  23. A. Viviani and R. Viviani, Comment on “Spinning magnetic fields,” J. Appl. Phys. 48, 3981 (1977).
  24. J. Djurić, Reply to “Comment on ‘Spinning magnetic fields',” J. Appl. Phys. 50, 537 (1979).
  25. V. Leus and S. Taylor, On the motion of the field of a permanent magnet, Eur. J. Phys. 32, 1179 (2011).
  26. I. Galili and D. Kaplan, Changing approach to teaching electromagnetism in a conceptually oriented introductory physics course, Am. J. Phys. 65, 657 (1997).
  27. P. Lorrain, F. Lorrain, and S. Houle, Magneto-Fluid Dynamics (Springer, Berlin, 2006).
  28. D. V. Redžić, Conductors moving in magnetic fields: Approach to equilibrium, Eur. J. Phys. 25, 623 (2004).
  29. R. H. Tyler, T. P. Boyer, T. Minami, M. M. Zweng, and J. R. Reagan, Electrical conductivity of the global ocean, Earth Planets Space 69, 156 (2017).
  30. T. Rikitake, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Shielding (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1987).
  31. J. Prat-Camps, C. Navau, D.-X. Chen, and A. Sanchez, Exact analytical demagnetizing factors for long hollow cylinders in transverse field, IEEE Magn. Lett. 3, 0500104 (2012).
  32. A. J. Mager, Das Eindringen von Magnetfeldern in offene Abschirmzylinder, Angew. Phys. 23, 381 (1967).
  33. National oceanic and atmospheric administration, Magnetic declination, https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/declination.shtml.
  34. E. C. Snelling, Soft Ferrites: Properties and Applications, 2nd ed. (Butterworth, Oxford, UK, 1988).
  35. National magnetics group, M100 material, https://www.magneticsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M100.pdf.
  36. K. Latha and D. Ravinder, Electrical conductivity of Mn–Zn ferrites, Phys. Status Solidi A 139, K109 (1993).
  37. P. B. Roberts, The absolute scale of thermoelectricity II, Philos. Mag. B 43, 1125 (1981).
  38. R. H. Romer, What do “voltmeters” measure?: Faraday's law in a multiply connected region, Am. J. Phys. 50, 1089 (1982).
  39. B. Veltkamp and R. J. Wijngaarden, Attempting to extract power from Earth's rotation: An experimental test, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 054023 (2018).
  40. B. Veltkamp, Power from Earth's rotation and rotating magnets, Master's thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 2018.
  41. J. Jeener, Comment on “Electric power generation from Earth's rotation through its own magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 028001 (2020).
  42. C. F. Chyba, K. P. Hand, and P. J. Thomas, Energy conservation and Poynting's theorem in the homopolar generator, Am. J. Phys. 83, 72 (2015).
  43. D. J. Griffiths, Note on “Field versus action-at-a-distance in a static situation,” Am J. Phys. 57, 558 (1989).
  44. N. L. Sharma, Field versus action-at-a-distance in a static situation, Am. J. Phys. 56, 420 (1988).
  45. E. M. Pugh and G. E. Pugh, Physical significance of the Poynting vector in static fields, Am. J. Phys. 35, 153 (1967).
  46. K. Lambeck, Changes in length-of-day and atmospheric circulation, Nature (London) 286, 104 (1980).
  47. W. Wang, J. Vidale, G. Pang, K. Koper, and R. Wang, Inner core backtracking by seismic waveform change reversals, Nature (London) 631, 340 (2024).
  48. K. Lambeck, Effects of tidal dissipation in the oceans on the Moon's orbit and the Earth's rotation, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 2917 (1975).
  49. C. F. Chyba, K. P. Hand, and T. H. Chyba, Experimental data for “Experimental demonstration of electric power generation from Earth's rotation through its own magnetic field” [xlsx], Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14676436.
  50. F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010).
  51. Magnetic shields electrical engineering, Mu metal specifications, http://mumetal.co.uk/?p=100.
  52. Magnetic shield corporation, Mumetal material properties, http://www.mu-metal.com/technical-data.html.
  53. H. J. Juretschke, Electromagnetic theory of dc effects in ferromagnetic resonance, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 1401 (1960).
  54. W. Egan and H. J. Juretschke, DC detection of ferromagnetic resonance in thin nickel films, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1477 (1963).
  55. Y. S. Gui, L. H. Bai, and C. M. Hu, The physics of spin rectification and its application, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 56, 124 (2013).
  56. M. Harder, Y. Gui, and C.-M. Hu, Electrical detection of magnetization dynamics via spin rectification effects, Phys. Rep. 661, 1 (2016).
  57. A. Shadowitz, The Electromagnetic Field (Dover, Mineola, NY, 1975).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 013285– Published 19 March, 2025
  • Received 9 April 2023
  • Accepted 21 January 2025
  • Corrected 28 May 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation