- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Liouvillian and Hamiltonian exceptional points of atomic vapors: The spectral signatures of quantum jumps

Marek Kopciuch* and Adam Miranowicz†

  • Institute of Spintronics and Quantum Information, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

  • *Contact author: marek.kopciuch@amu.edu.pl
  • †Contact author: adam.miranowicz@amu.edu.pl
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033187 – Published 22 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zxw5-nlsn

Abstract

We investigate spectral singularities in an alkali-metal atomic vapor modeled using four and effectively three hyperfine states. By comparing the eigenvalue spectra of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (NHH) and a Liouvillian superoperator, we analyze the emergence and characteristics of both semiclassical and quantum exceptional points. Our results reveal that, for atomic systems, the NHH approach alone may be insufficient to fully capture the system’s spectral properties. While NHHs can yield accurate predictions in certain regimes, a comprehensive description typically requires the Liouvillian formalism, which governs the Lindblad master equation and explicitly incorporates quantum-jump processes responsible for repopulation dynamics. We demonstrate that the inclusion of quantum jumps fundamentally alters the spectral structure of the system. In particular, we present examples in which the existence, location in parameter space, or even the order of spectral degeneracies differs significantly between the two approaches, thereby highlighting the impact of quantum jumps and the limitations of the NHH method. Finally, using the hybrid-Liouvillian formalism, we show how quantum jumps reshape spectral features initially predicted by the NHH, ultimately determining the full Liouvillian spectrum.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (104)

  1. T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, New York, 1966).
  2. W. D. Heiss, Repulsion of resonance states and exceptional points, Phys. Rev. E 61, 929 (2000).
  3. C. Dembowski, H.-D. Graf, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, Experimental observation of the topological structure of exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 787 (2001).
  4. M. V. Berry, Physics of non-Hermitian degeneracies, Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1039 (2004).
  5. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  6. C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947 (2007).
  7. W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 444016 (2012).
  8. Ş. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity-time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat. Mater. 18, 783 (2019).
  9. M. Miri and A. Alù, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).
  10. M. Parto, Y. G. N. Liu, B. Bahari, M. Khajavikhan, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian and topological photonics: Optics at an exceptional point, Nanophotonics 10, 403 (2021).
  11. A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of PT-symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009).
  12. C. Rüter, K. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, Observation of parity-time symmetry in optics, Nat. Phys. 6, 192 (2010).
  13. A. Regensburger, C. Bersch, M.-A. Miri, G. Onishchukov, D. N. Christodoulides, and U. Peschel, Parity-time synthetic photonic lattices, Nature (London) 488, 167 (2012).
  14. B. Zhen et al., Spawning rings of exceptional points out of Dirac cones, Nature (London) 525, 354 (2015).
  15. K. Ding, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Coalescence of exceptional points and phase diagrams for one-dimensional PT-symmetric photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 92, 235310 (2015).
  16. A. Cerjan, A. Raman, and S. Fan, Exceptional contours and band structure design in parity-time symmetric photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 203902 (2016).
  17. L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Non-Hermitian photonics based on parity-time symmetry, Nat. Photon. 11, 752 (2017).
  18. R. El-Ganainy, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and Ş. K. Özdemir, The dawn of non-Hermitian optics, Commun. Phys. 2, 37 (2019).
  19. J. Schindler, A. Li, M. C. Zheng, F. M. Ellis, and T. Kottos, Experimental study of active LRC circuits with PT symmetries, Phys. Rev. A 84, 040101(R) (2011).
  20. H. Benisty et al., Implementation of PT symmetric devices using plasmonics: Principle and applications, Opt. Express 19, 18004 (2011).
  21. H. Alaeian and J. A. Dionne, Parity-time-symmetric plasmonic metamaterials, Phys. Rev. A 89, 033829 (2014).
  22. P.-C. Kuo, N. Lambert, A. Miranowicz, G.-Y. Chen, Y.-N. Chen, and F. Nori, Collectively induced exceptional points of quantum emitters coupled to nanoparticle surface plasmons, Phys. Rev. A 101, 013814 (2020).
  23. X. Zhu, H. Ramezani, C. Shi, J. Zhu, and X. Zhang, PT-symmetric acoustics, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031042 (2014).
  24. H. Jing, Ş. K. Özdemir, X.-Y. Lu, J. Zhang, L. Yang, and F. Nori, PT-symmetric phonon laser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053604 (2014).
  25. R. Fleury, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alu, An invisible acoustic sensor based on parity-time symmetry, Nat. Commun. 6, 5905 (2015).
  26. K. Ding, G. Ma, M. Xiao, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Emergence, coalescence, and topological properties of multiple exceptional points and their experimental realization, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021007 (2016).
  27. H. Lü, Ş. K. Özdemir, L. M. Kuang, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Exceptional points in random-defect phonon lasers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 044020 (2017).
  28. J. Zhang et al., A phonon laser operating at an exceptional point, Nat. Photon. 12, 479 (2018).
  29. H. Jing et al., Optomechanically-induced transparency in parity-timesymmetric microresonators, Sci. Rep. 5, 9663 (2015).
  30. D. W. Schönleber, A. Eisfeld, and R. El-Ganainy, Optomechanical interactions in non-Hermitian photonic molecules, New J. Phys. 18, 045014 (2016).
  31. H. Xu, D. Mason, L. Jiang, and J. G. E. Harris, Topological energy transfer in an optomechanical system with exceptional points, Nature (London) 537, 80 (2016).
  32. H. Jing, Ş. K. Özdemir, H. Lü, and F. Nori, High-order exceptional points in optomechanics, Sci. Rep. 7, 3386 (2017).
  33. Z. Zhang et al., Observation of parity-time symmetry in optically induced atomic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 123601 (2016).
  34. M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the exceptional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nat. Phys. 15, 1232 (2019).
  35. W. Chen, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum jumps in the non-Hermitian dynamics of a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140504 (2021).
  36. W. Chen, M. Abbasi, B. Ha, S. Erdamar, Y. N. Joglekar, K. W. Murch, Decoherence induced exceptional points in a dissipative superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 110402 (2022).
  37. A. Roy, S. Jahani, Q. Guo, A. Dutt, S. Fan, M.-A. Miri, and A. Marandi, Nondissipative non-Hermitian dynamics and exceptional points in coupled optical parametric oscillators, Optica 8, 415 (2021).
  38. A. Roy, S. Jahani, C. Langrock, M. Fejer, and A. Marandi, Spectral phase transitions in optical parametric oscillators, Nat. Commun. 12, 835 (2021).
  39. S. Jahani, A. Roy, and A. Marandi, Wavelength-scale optical parametric oscillators, Optica 8, 262 (2021).
  40. M. Sheikhey, A. Fard, and H. Baghban, Non-Hermitian gauged topological laser with multi protected modes, Phys. Scr. 96, 125829 (2021).
  41. M. Kang, F. Liu, and J. Li, Effective spontaneous PT-symmetry breaking in hybridized metamaterials, Phys. Rev. A 87, 053824 (2013).
  42. R. Fleury, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alo, Negative refraction and planar focusing based on parity-time symmetric metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 023903 (2014).
  43. Y. Sun, W. Tan, H.-Q. Li, J. Li, and H. Chen, Experimental demonstration of a coherent perfect absorber with PT phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143903 (2014).
  44. M. Kang, J. Chen, and Y. D. Chong, Chiral exceptional points in metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. A 94, 033834 (2016).
  45. S. Xiao, J. Gear, S. Rotter, and J. Li, Effective PT-symmetric metasurfaces for subwavelength amplified sensing, New J. Phys. 18, 085004 (2016).
  46. T. Gao et al., Observation of non-Hermitian degeneracies in a chaotic exciton-polariton billiard, Nature (London) 526, 554 (2015).
  47. P. Peng et al., Anti-parity-time symmetry with flying atoms, Nat. Phys. 12, 1139 (2016).
  48. L. Ding, K. Shi, Q. Zhang, D. Shen, X. Zhang, and W. Zhang, Experimental determination of PT-symmetric exceptional points in a single trapped ion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 083604 (2021).
  49. C. Liang, Y. Tang, A.-N. Xu, and Y.-C. Liu, Observation of exceptional points in thermal atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 263601 (2023).
  50. J. L. Miller, Exceptional points make for exceptional sensors, Phys. Today 70(10), 23 (2017).
  51. J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photon. Res. 8, 1457 (2020).
  52. J. Wiersig, Prospects and fundamental limits in exceptional point-based sensing, Nat. Commun. 11, 2454 (2020).
  53. N. Hatano, Exceptional points of the Lindblad operator of a two-level system, Mol. Phys. 117, 2121 (2019).
  54. F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. Chhajlany, and F. Nori, Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps, Phys. Rev. A 100, 062131 (2019).
  55. M. Auzinsh, D. Budker, and S. M. Rochester, Optically Polarized Atoms: Understanding Light-Atom Interactions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).
  56. F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany, I. I. Arkhipov, and F. Nori, Hybrid-Liouvillian formalism connecting exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Liouvillians via postselection of quantum trajectories, Phys. Rev. A 101, 062112 (2020).
  57. C.-Y. Ju, A. Miranowicz, G.-Y. Chen, F. Nori, Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and no-go theorems in quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 100, 062118 (2019).
  58. C.-Y. Ju, A. Miranowicz, F. Minganti, C.-T. Chan, G.-Y. Chen, and F. Nori, Flattening the curve with Einstein’s quantum elevator: Hermitization of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians via the vielbein formalism, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023070 (2022).
  59. C.-Y. Ju, A. Miranowicz, Y.-N. Chen, G.-Y. Chen, and F. Nori, Emergent parallel transports and curvatures in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Quantum 8, 1277 (2024).
  60. C.-Y. Ju, A. Miranowicz, J. Barnett, G.-Y. Chen, and F. Nori, Heisenberg and Heisenberg-like representations via hilbert space bundle geometry in the non-Hermitian regime, Phys. Rev. A 111, 052213 (2025).
  61. S. Erdamar, M. Abbasi, B. Ha, W. Chen, J. Muldoon, Y. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Constraining work fluctuations of non-Hermitian dynamics across the exceptional point of a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022013 (2024).
  62. S. Abo, P. Tulewicz, K. Bartkiewicz, S. K. Özdemir, and A. Miranowicz, Experimental Liouvillian exceptional points in a quantum system without Hamiltonian singularities, New J. Phys. 26, 123032 (2024).
  63. J.-W. Zhang et al., Dynamical control of quantum heat engines using exceptional points, Nat. Commun. 13, 6225 (2022).
  64. J.-T. Bu et al., Enhancement of quantum heat engine by encircling a liouvillian exceptional point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 110402 (2023).
  65. J.-T. Bu et al., Chiral quantum heating and cooling with an optically controlled ion, Light Sci. Appl. 13, 143 (2024).
  66. S. Khandelwal, N. Brunner, and G. Haack, Signatures of liouvillian exceptional points in a quantum thermal machine, PRX Quantum 2, 040346 (2021).
  67. J.-D. Lin, P.-C. Kuo, N. Lambert, A. Miranowicz, F. Nori, and Y.-N. Chen, Non-Markovian quantum exceptional points, Nat. Commun. 16, 1289 (2025).
  68. M. V. Berry and M. Wilkinson, Diabolical points in the spectra of triangles, Proc. R. Soc. London A 392, 15 (1984).
  69. I. I. Arkhipov, A. Miranowicz, F. Minganti, S. K. Özdemir, and F. Nori, Dynamically encircling an exceptional curve by crossing diabolic points: A programmable multimode switch, Nat. Commun. 14, 2076 (2023).
  70. J. Naikoo, R. W. Chhajlany, and A. Miranowicz, Enhanced quantum sensing with hybrid exceptional-diabolic singularities, New J. Phys. 27, 064505 (2025).
  71. J. Perina Jr., A. Miranowicz, G. Chimczak, and A. Kowalewska-Kudlaszyk, Quantum Liouvillian exceptional and diabolical points for bosonic fields with quadratic Hamiltonians: The Heisenberg-Langevin equation approach, Quantum 6, 883 (2022).
  72. J. Peřina, A. Miranowicz, J. K. Kalaga, and W. Leoński, Unavoidability of nonclassicality loss in PT-symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. A 108, 033512 (2023).
  73. K. Thapliyal, J. Peřina Jr., G. Chimczak, A. Kowalewska-Kudłaszyk, and A. Miranowicz, Multiple quantum exceptional, diabolical, and hybrid points in multimode bosonic systems: I. Inherited and genuine singularities, arXiv:2405.01666.
  74. J. Peřina Jr., K. Thapliyal, G. Chimczak, A. Kowalewska-Kudłaszyk, and A. Miranowicz, Multiple quantum exceptional, diabolical, and hybrid points in multimode bosonic systems: II. Nonconventional PT-symmetric dynamics and unidirectional coupling, arXiv:2405.01667.
  75. M. Anderson, J. Ensher, M. Matthews, C. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor, Science 269, 198 (1995).
  76. K. Davis, M. Mewes, M. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995).
  77. M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature (London) 415, 39 (2002).
  78. P. S. Jessen and I. H. Deutsch, Optical lattices, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, edited by B. Bederson and H. Walther (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1996), Vol. 37, pp. 95–138.
  79. W. Happer and A. Tam, Effect of rapid spin exchange on the magnetic-resonance spectrum of alkali vapors, Phys. Rev. A 16, 1877 (1977).
  80. K. Mouloudakis, J. Kong, A. Sierant, E. Arkin, M. Hernndez Ruiz, R. Jiménez-Martinez, and M. Mitchell, Anomalous noise spectra in a spin-exchange-relaxation-free alkali-metal vapor, Phys. Rev. A 109, L040802 (2024).
  81. J. Kong, R. Jiménez-Martinez, C. Troullinou, V. Lucivero, G. Tóth, and M. Mitchell, Measurement-induced, spatially-extended entanglement in a hot, strongly-interacting atomic system, Nat. Commun. 11, 2415 (2020).
  82. M. V. Balabas, T. Karaulanov, M. P. Ledbetter, and D. Budker, Polarized alkali-metal vapor with minute-long transverse spin-relaxation time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 070801 (2010).
  83. O. Schmidt, R. Wynands, Z. Hussein, and D. Meschede, Steep dispersion and group velocity below c/3000 in coherent population trapping, Phys. Rev. A 53, R27 (1996).
  84. K. Hammerer, K. Mölmer, E. Polzik, and J. Cirac, Light-matter quantum interface, Phys. Rev. A 70, 044304 (2004).
  85. O. Katz, R. Shaham, E. Polzik, and O. Firstenberg, Long-lived entanglement generation of nuclear spins using coherent light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 043602 (2020).
  86. K. Jensen, W. Wasilewski, H. Krauter, T. Fernholz, B. Nielsen, M. Owari, M. Plenio, A. Serafini, M. Wolf, and E. Polzik, Quantum memory for entangled continuous-variable states, Nat. Phys. 7, 13 (2011).
  87. E. Mikhailov and I. Novikova, Low-frequency vacuum squeezing via polarization self-rotation in Rb vapor, Opt. Lett. 33, 1213 (2008).
  88. H. Dang, A. Maloof, and M. Romalis, Ultrahigh sensitivity magnetic field and magnetization measurements with an atomic magnetometer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 151110 (2010).
  89. W. Chalupczak, R. Godun, S. Pustelny, and W. Gawlik, Room temperature femtotesla radio-frequency atomic magnetometer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 242401 (2012).
  90. D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical magnetometry, Nat. Phys. 3, 227 (2007).
  91. T. Kornack, R. Ghosh, and M. Romalis, Nuclear spin gyroscope based on an atomic comagnetometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230801 (2005).
  92. S. Afach et al., Search for topological defect dark matter with a global network of optical magnetometers, Nat. Phys. 17, 1396 (2021).
  93. M. Padniuk, M. Kopciuch, R. Cipolletti, A. Wickenbrock, D. Budker, and S. Pustelny, Response of atomic spin-based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic perturbations, Sci. Rep. 12, 324 (2022).
  94. F. Reiter and A. S. Sorensen, Effective operator formalism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 85, 032111 (2012).
  95. B. Baumgartner and H. Narnhofer, Analysis of quantum semigroups with GKS-Lindblad generators: II. General, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 395303 (2008).
  96. V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014).
  97. P. Kumar, K. Snizhko, and Y. Gefen, Near-unit efficiency of chiral state conversion via hybrid-Liouvillian dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 104, L050405 (2021).
  98. M. Kopciuch and S. Pustelny, Optical reconstruction of the collective density matrix of a qutrit, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022406 (2022).
  99. M. Kopciuch, M. Smolis, A. Miranowicz, and S. Pustelny, Optimized experimental optical tomography of quantum states of room-temperature alkali-metal vapor, Phys. Rev. A 109, 032402 (2024).
  100. R. T. Thew, K. Nemoto, A. G. White, and W. J. Munro, Qudit quantum state tomography, Phys. Rev. A 66, 012303 (2002).
  101. G. O. Samach et al., Lindblad tomography of a superconducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 064056 (2022).
  102. Y. Sun, M. Kopciuch, A. D. Fard, and S. Pustelny, Quantum process tomography of atomic vapors (unpublished).
  103. A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1961), Vol. 2.
  104. J. Schlienz and G. Mahler, Description of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 52, 4396 (1995).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033187– Published 22 August, 2025
  • Received 3 June 2025
  • Accepted 24 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation