Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Self-organized tower of Babel: Diversification through competition

Riz Fernando Noronha* and Kunihiko Kaneko

  • *Contact author: noronha@nbi.ku.dk

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013303 – Published 19 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zf6b-mlrn

Abstract

We introduce a minimal evolutionary model to show how local cooperation and global competition can create a transition to the diversity of communities such as linguistic groups. By using a lattice model with high-dimensional state agents and evolution under a fitness that depends on an agent’s local neighborhood and global dissimilarity, clusters of diverse communities with different fitness are organized by equalizing the finesses on the boundaries, where their numbers and sizes are robust to parameters. We observe successive transitions over quasistationary states, as triggered by the emergence of new communities on the boundaries. Our abstract framework provides a simple mechanism for the diversification of culture.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (62)

  1. M. Tomasello, Origins of Human Communication (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA , USA, 2010).
  2. S. Pinker and P. Bloom, Natural language and natural selection, Behav. Brain Sci. 13, 707 (2011).
  3. R. Axelrod, The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization, J. Conflict Resolut. 41, 203 (1997).
  4. C. Castellano, M. Marsili, and A. Vespignani, Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for social influence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3536 (2000).
  5. B. Dybiec, N. Mitarai, and K. Sneppen, Axelrod model: Accepting or discussing, Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 357 (2012).
  6. A. Radillo-Díaz, L. A. Pérez, and M. del Castillo-Mussot, Axelrod models of social influence with cultural repulsion, Phys. Rev. E 80, 066107 (2009).
  7. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, and M. S. Miguel, Global culture: A noise-induced transition in finite systems, Phys. Rev. E 67, 045101(R) (2003).
  8. S. S. Mufwene, The emergence of complexity in language: An evolutionary perspective, in Complexity Perspectives on Language, Communication and Society, edietd by À. Massip-Bonet and A. Bastardas-Boada (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013), pp. 197–218.
  9. E. Haugen, The Ecology of Language (Stanford University Press, Redwood, CA, USA, 1972).
  10. P. Trudgill, Dialects in Contact (Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford, UK, 1986).
  11. S. S. Mufwene, The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact (ERIC, Cambridge, UK, 2001).
  12. P. Baker, Polari-the Lost Language of Gay Men (Routledge, London, UK, 2003).
  13. D. M. Abrams and S. H. Strogatz, Modelling the dynamics of language death, Nature (London) 424, 900 (2003).
  14. X. Castelló, V. M. Eguíluz, and M. San Miguel, Ordering dynamics with two non-excluding options: Bilingualism in language competition, New J. Phys. 8, 308 (2006).
  15. X. Castelló, A. Baronchelli, and V. Loreto, Consensus and ordering in language dynamics, Eur. Phys. J. B 71, 557 (2009).
  16. T. Gong, J. W. Minett, and W. S.-Y. Wang, Exploring social structure effect on language evolution based on a computational model, Connect. Sci. 20, 135 (2008).
  17. S. Takahashi, D. L. Sallach, and J. Rouchier, Advancing Social Simulation: The First World Congress (Springer, Tokyo, Japan, 2007), Vol. 129.
  18. X. Castelló, L. Loureiro-Porto, and M. San Miguel, Agent-based models of language competition, Int. J. Sociol. Lang. 2013, 21 (2013).
  19. B. Dybiec, N. Mitarai, and K. Sneppen, Information spreading and development of cultural centers, Phys. Rev. E 85, 056116 (2012).
  20. V. M. De Oliveira, M. A. Gomes, and I. R. Tsang, Theoretical model for the evolution of the linguistic diversity, Physica A 361, 361 (2006).
  21. P. Turchin, Historical Dynamics: Why States Rise and Fall (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2018).
  22. We also studied the behavior of a mean-field model: See Sec. 1 and Figs. 1–3 in Supplemental Material [33].
  23. D. Stauffer, F. Lima, A. Sousa, C. Schulze, and S. M. de Oliveira, Bit-strings and other modifications of viviane model for language competition, Physica A 376, 609 (2007).
  24. Simulations where agents aligned with their nearest neighbors, and differentiation was local, but long ranged were also studied. Qualitatively, this system resembled that of the current system, except that communities of the same language could coexist in areas of space larger than the discommunication range. Within the discommunication length scale, the behavior was very similar, and thus we adopt a global discommunication to remove a parameter.
  25. We run the simulations for a minimum of 40 000 generations before recording the snapshots. The same (statistically) evolved states are also obtained by starting from random initial conditions.
  26. Due to the presence of mutations causing single random agents to have a different language, we ignore clusters of size 1.
  27. We obtain similar results with a sequential algorithm: There is a shift in the transition boundary, and the sequential algorithm remains diverse for longer [the transition boundary moves from α/γ≈1.6 to α/γ≈1.8 for L = 256); however, the main features of the model (the robustness of the clusters to the parameter α/γ (although the number itself is slightly modified, from ≈25 to ≈21)], the nature of the transition, and it’s dependence on L and μ, etc.), remain unchanged.
  28. J. Reichardt and S. Bornholdt, Detecting fuzzy community structures in complex networks with a potts model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 218701 (2004).
  29. J. Reichardt and S. Bornholdt, Statistical mechanics of community detection, Phys. Rev. E 74, 016110 (2006).
  30. A. Turing, The chemical basis of morphogenesis, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 237, 37 (1952).
  31. S. Bornholdt, Expectation bubbles in a spin model of markets: Intermittency from frustration across scales, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 12, 667 (2001).
  32. To be precise, the diversity transition is hard to quantify exactly. The position of the transition depends on μ as well as on L. The system also shows hysteresis (Fig. 6 in the Supplemental Material [33]) reminiscent of classical nucleation theory [34, 35], which implies that the transition also depends on initial conditions. However, the transition is observed to be shallower (easier to homogenize) in the mean-field model and steeper (easier to diversify) in 1D (Fig. 2 in the Supplemental Material [33]).
  33. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/zf6b-mlrn for further numerical and analytical results, which includes Refs. [36, 37].
  34. V. I. Kalikmanov, Classical nucleation theory, Nucleation Theory (Springer, 2012), pp. 17–41.
  35. X. Xu, C. L. Ting, I. Kusaka, and Z.-G. Wang, Nucleation in polymers and soft matter, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 449 (2014).
  36. I. Letunic and P. Bork, Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6 recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool, Nucl. Acids Res. 52, W78 (2024).
  37. H. Skirgå, H. J. Haynie, D. E. Blasi, H. Hammarström, J. Collins, J. J. Latarche, J. Lesage, T. Weber, A. Witzlack-Makarevich, S. Passmore, et al., Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss, Sci. Adv. 9, eadg6175 (2023).
  38. Such transitionary dynamics over quasi-stationary states have been investigated by punctuated equilibria [43, 44], ecosystem dynamics [45] and high-dimensional dynamical systems [46], though the mechanisms here are distinct from these.
  39. S. Nelson-Sathi, J.-M. List, H. Geisler, H. Fangerau, R. D. Gray, W. Martin, and T. Dagan, Networks uncover hidden lexical borrowing in Indo-European language evolution, Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 1794 (2011).
  40. J.-M. List, S. Nelson-Sathi, H. Geisler, and W. Martin, Networks of lexical borrowing and lateral gene transfer in language and genome evolution, BioEssays 36, 141 (2013).
  41. M. Eigen and P. Schuster, The abstract hypercycle, Hypercycle: Princ. Nat. Self-Organ. 25 (1979).
  42. M. Eigen, J. McCaskill, and P. Schuster, Molecular quasi-species, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 6881 (1988).
  43. P. Bak and K. Sneppen, Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4083 (1993).
  44. S. J. Gould and N. Eldredge, Punctuated equilibrium comes of age, Nature (London) 366, 223 (1993).
  45. E. Mallmin, A. Traulsen, and S. De Monte, Chaotic turnover of rare and abundant species in a strongly interacting model community, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2312822121 (2024).
  46. K. Kaneko, I. Tsuda, et al., Chaotic itinerancy, Chaos Interdisp. J. Nonlinear Sci. 13, 926 (2003).
  47. However, in the specific case of a finite system with no parity between α, γ, L, and B (for instance, α = 1, γ = 1, L = 31, and B = 16), we can get into a situation where it is impossible for the fitness of all boundaries to be simultaneously equalized, which creates an unstable system. This unstable system can have traveling waves, which has stronger species invading weaker ones (as discussed in depth in ecosystem theory [48]), but simultaneously allows a weaker species to consistently invade a stronger one due to the boundary imbalance and global carrying capacity, making the whole system analogous to a Penrose staircase.
  48. R. A. Fisher, The wave of advance of advantageous genes, Ann. eugenics 7, 355 (1937).
  49. S. G. Thomason and T. Kaufman, Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics (University of California Press, Oakland, CA, USA, 2023).
  50. K. L. Pike, Language as particle, wave, and field, in Kenneth Pike: Selected Writings, edited by R. M. Brend (Mouton, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1972), pp. 129–143.
  51. C. M. Waters and B. L. Bassler, Quorum sensing: Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 319 (2005).
  52. M. Whiteley, S. P. Diggle, and E. P. Greenberg, Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing research, Nature (London) 551, 313 (2017).
  53. H. G. Hampton, B. N. Watson, and P. C. Fineran, The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes, Nature (London) 577, 327 (2020).
  54. A. Shrestha, M. Grimm, I. Ojiro, J. Krumwiede, and A. Schikora, Impact of quorum sensing molecules on plant growth and immune system, Front. Microbiol. 11, 1545 (2020).
  55. R. F. Noronha, K. Sneppen, and K. Kaneko, Modeling soil as a living system: Feedback between microbial activity and spatial structure, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023207 (2025).
  56. T. Kuteva, Languages and societies: The “punctuated equilibrium” model of language development, Lang. Commun. 19, 213 (1999).
  57. M. J. O'Brien, S. Valverde, S. Duran-Nebreda, B. Vidiella, and R. A. Bentley, Punctuated equilibrium at 50: Anything there for evolutionary anthropology? Yes; definitely, Evol. Anthropol. News Issues Rev. 33, e22009 (2024).
  58. C. Müller-Crepon, G. Schvitz, and L.-E. Cederman, Shaping states into nations: The effects of ethnic geography on state borders, Am. J. Polit. Sci. 69, 132 (2025).
  59. E. Zeitoun and C.-H. Yu, The Formosan language archive: Linguistic analysis and language processing, in International Journal of Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language Processing (International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing (IJCLCLP), Taipei, Taiwan, 2005), pp. 167–200.
  60. P. J.-k. Li, The internal relationships of Formosan languages, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (10-ICAL) (Linguistic Society of the Philippines and SIL Internationa, Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines, 2006), pp. 17–20.
  61. P. J.-k. Li, The great diversity of Formosan languages, Language and Linguistics 9, 523 (2008).
  62. Riz, rizfn/Babel-transition: Self-Organized Babel: Initial release of data (v0.1), Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17342373.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation