Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Cavity optomechanical quantum memory for twisted photons using a ring Bose-Einstein condensate

Nilamoni Daloi1,*,†, Rahul Gupta2,*,‡, Aritra Ghosh1,3, Pardeep Kumar4,§, Himadri S. Dhar2,5, and M. Bhattacharya1

  • * These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: nilamoni123@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: rahul.quantumfield@iitb.ac.in
  • §Contact author: pardeep.kumar@mpl.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013013 – Published 9 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zd1d-39d7

Abstract

We theoretically propose a photonic orbital angular momentum quantum memory, currently of great interest from the perspective of quantum networks, based on a ring-trapped Bose-Einstein condensate interacting with Laguerre-Gaussian beams. The optical states are stored in the large Hilbert space of topologically protected persistent currents of the condensate. In contrast to earlier work, our proposal uses a cavity, which enhances the light-matter interaction by several orders of magnitude, resulting in high fidelity, convenient detection, and no need to repeat read-write cycles degraded by atom loss. Our scheme avoids using multiple internal atomic states as in generic electromagnetically induced transparency-based protocols and thus bypasses problems like off-resonant photoassociation by the control fields and dephasing effects that limit memory storage time. For optimized parameters, our work yields a storage time 3 orders of magnitude better than presently available and opens the way for exploiting existing advantages of cavity-based noise suppression, wavelength transduction, large bandwidth, and nondestructive readout of the memory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (54)

  1. K. Heshami, D. G. England, P. C. Humphreys, P. J. Bustard, V. M. Acosta, J. Nunn, and B. J. Sussman, Quantum memories: Emerging applications and recent advances, J. Mod. Opt. 63, 2005 (2016).
  2. A. I. Lvovsky, B. C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, Optical quantum memory, Nat. Photonics 3, 706 (2009).
  3. L. Veissier, Quantum memory protocols in large cold atomic ensembles, Theses, Université Pierre et Marie Curie—Paris VI, 2013.
  4. C. He, Y. Shen, and A. Forbes, Towards higher-dimensional structured light, Light Sci. Appl. 11, 205 (2022).
  5. B.-S. Shi, D.-S. Ding, and W. Zhang, Quantum storage of orbital angular momentum entanglement in cold atomic ensembles, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 032004 (2018).
  6. D.-S. Ding, W. Zhang, S. Shi, Z.-Y. Zhou, Y. Li, B.-S. Shi, and G.-C. Guo, High-dimensional entanglement between distant atomic-ensemble memories, Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16157 (2016).
  7. D.-S. Ding, W. Zhang, Z.-Y. Zhou, S. Shi, G.-Y. Xiang, X.-S. Wang, Y.-K. Jiang, B.-S. Shi, and G.-C. Guo, Quantum storage of orbital angular momentum entanglement in an atomic ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 050502 (2015).
  8. A. Nicolas, L. Veissier, L. Giner, E. Giacobino, D. Maxein, and J. Laurat, A quantum memory for orbital angular momentum photonic qubits, Nat. Photonics 8, 234 (2014).
  9. D. Moretti, D. Felinto, and J. W. R. Tabosa, Collapses and revivals of stored orbital angular momentum of light in a cold-atom ensemble, Phys. Rev. A 79, 023825 (2009).
  10. L. Veissier, A. Nicolas, L. Giner, D. Maxein, A. S. Sheremet, E. Giacobino, and J. Laurat, Reversible optical memory for twisted photons, Opt. Lett. 38, 712 (2013).
  11. C. Wang, Y. Yu, Y. Chen, M. Cao, J. Wang, X. Yang, S. Qiu, D. Wei, H. Gao, and F. Li, Efficient quantum memory of orbital angular momentum qubits in cold atoms, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 045008 (2021).
  12. Z.-Q. Zhou, Y.-L. Hua, X. Liu, G. Chen, J.-S. Xu, Y.-J. Han, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Quantum storage of three-dimensional orbital-angular-momentum entanglement in a crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 070502 (2015).
  13. Y.-H. Ye, L. Zeng, M.-X. Dong, W.-H. Zhang, E.-Z. Li, D.-C. Li, G.-C. Guo, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, Long-lived memory for orbital angular momentum quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 193601 (2022).
  14. A. J. Leggett, Bose-Einstein condensation in the alkali gases: Some fundamental concepts, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 307 (2001).
  15. O. Morizot, Y. Colombe, V. Lorent, H. Perrin, and B. M. Garraway, Ring trap for ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A 74, 023617 (2006).
  16. B. E. Sherlock, M. Gildemeister, E. Owen, E. Nugent, and C. J. Foot, Time-averaged adiabatic ring potential for ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A 83, 043408 (2011).
  17. C. Ryu, M. F. Andersen, P. Cladé, V. Natarajan, K. Helmerson, and W. D. Phillips, Observation of persistent flow of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a toroidal trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 260401 (2007).
  18. K. C. Wright, R. B. Blakestad, C. J. Lobb, W. D. Phillips, and G. K. Campbell, Driving phase slips in a superfluid atom circuit with a rotating weak link, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 025302 (2013).
  19. Y. Guo, R. Dubessy, M. de Goër de Herve, A. Kumar, T. Badr, A. Perrin, L. Longchambon, and H. Perrin, Supersonic rotation of a superfluid: A long-lived dynamical ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 025301 (2020).
  20. J. Polo, W. J. Chetcuti, T. Haug, A. Minguzzi, K. Wright, and L. Amico, Persistent currents in ultracold gases, Phys. Rep. 1137, 1 (2025).
  21. A. Ramanathan, K. C. Wright, S. R. Muniz, M. Zelan, W. T. Hill, C. J. Lobb, K. Helmerson, W. D. Phillips, and G. K. Campbell, Superflow in a toroidal Bose-Einstein condensate: An atom circuit with a tunable weak link, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130401 (2011).
  22. S. Beattie, S. Moulder, R. J. Fletcher, and Z. Hadzibabic, Persistent currents in spinor condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 025301 (2013).
  23. K. T. Kapale and J. P. Dowling, Vortex phase qubit: Generating arbitrary, counterrotating, coherent superpositions in Bose-Einstein condensates via optical angular momentum beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 173601 (2005).
  24. M. Lettner, M. Mücke, S. Riedl, C. Vo, C. Hahn, S. Baur, J. Bochmann, S. Ritter, S. Dürr, and G. Rempe, Remote entanglement between a single atom and a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 210503 (2011).
  25. K. Hammerer, A. S. Sørensen, and E. S. Polzik, Quantum interface between light and atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1041 (2010).
  26. J. Leach, M. J. Padgett, S. M. Barnett, S. Franke-Arnold, and J. Courtial, Measuring the orbital angular momentum of a single photon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 257901 (2002).
  27. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, General teleportation channel, singlet fraction, and quasidistillation, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1888 (1999).
  28. A. M. Yao and M. J. Padgett, Orbital angular momentum: Origins, behavior and applications, Adv. Opt. Photonics 3, 161 (2011).
  29. P. Kumar, T. Biswas, K. Feliz, R. Kanamoto, M.-S. Chang, A. K. Jha, and M. Bhattacharya, Cavity optomechanical sensing and manipulation of an atomic persistent current, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 113601 (2021).
  30. S. Simjanovski, G. Gauthier, M. J. Davis, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and T. W. Neely, Optimizing persistent currents in a ring-shaped Bose-Einstein condensate using machine learning, Phys. Rev. A 108, 063306 (2023).
  31. A. D. Ludlow, X. Huang, M. Notcutt, T. Zanon-Willette, S. M. Foreman, M. M. Boyd, S. Blatt, and J. Ye, Compact, thermal-noise-limited optical cavity for diode laser stabilization at 1×10−15, Opt. Lett. 32, 641 (2007).
  32. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/zd1d-39d7 for the detailed derivation of the Hamiltonian, a protocol for generating single photons in ±ℓℏ OAM coherent superpositions, fidelity analysis with logarithmic negativity entanglement quantification, the variation of storage time with mechanical damping, and a discussion of cavity resonances, which includes Refs. [28, 30, 31, 34, 37, 40].
  33. S. Pandey, H. Mas, G. Drougakis, P. Thekkeppatt, V. Bolpasi, G. Vasilakis, K. Poulios, and W. von Klitzing, Hypersonic Bose–Einstein condensates in accelerator rings, Nature (London) 570, 205 (2019).
  34. M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  35. V. Fiore, Y. Yang, M. C. Kuzyk, R. Barbour, L. Tian, and H. Wang, Storing optical information as a mechanical excitation in a silica optomechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133601 (2011).
  36. S. Weis, R. Rivière, S. Deléglise, E. Gavartin, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optomechanically induced transparency, Science 330, 1520 (2010).
  37. S. Kalita, P. Kumar, R. Kanamoto, M. Bhattacharya, and A. K. Sarma, Pump-probe cavity optomechanics with a rotating atomic superfluid in a ring, Phys. Rev. A 107, 013525 (2023).
  38. C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum markov processes, in Quantum Noise (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2004).
  39. E. J. Galvez, L. E. Coyle, E. Johnson, and B. J. Reschovsky, Interferometric measurement of the helical mode of a single photon, New J. Phys. 13, 053017 (2011).
  40. C. Gerry and P. Knight, Beam splitters and interferometers, in Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004), pp. 135–149.
  41. E. Lombardi, F. Sciarrino, S. Popescu, and F. De Martini, Teleportation of a vacuum–one-photon qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 070402 (2002).
  42. H.-W. Lee and J. Kim, Quantum teleportation and bell’s inequality using single-particle entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012305 (2000).
  43. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001).
  44. S. Huang, Quantum state transfer in cavity electro-optic modulators, Phys. Rev. A 92, 043845 (2015).
  45. S. Massar and S. Popescu, Optimal extraction of information from finite quantum ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259 (1995).
  46. K. Hammerer, M. M. Wolf, E. S. Polzik, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum benchmark for storage and transmission of coherent states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 150503 (2005).
  47. M. Gündoğan, P. M. Ledingham, A. Almasi, M. Cristiani, and H. de Riedmatten, Quantum storage of a photonic polarization qubit in a solid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 190504 (2012).
  48. R. Fickler, R. Lapkiewicz, W. N. Plick, M. Krenn, C. Schaeff, S. Ramelow, and A. Zeilinger, Quantum entanglement of high angular momenta, Science 338, 640 (2012).
  49. S. Kiesewetter, R. Teh, P. Drummond, and M. Reid, Pulsed entanglement of two optomechanical oscillators and furry’s hypothesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 023601 (2017).
  50. R. Ghobadi, A. R. Bahrampour, and C. Simon, Quantum optomechanics in the bistable regime, Phys. Rev. A 84, 033846 (2011).
  51. L. Tian and H. Wang, Optical wavelength conversion of quantum states with optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 82, 053806 (2010).
  52. H. Kaviani, R. Ghobadi, B. Behera, M. Wu, A. Hryciw, S. Vo, D. Fattal, and P. Barclay, Optomechanical detection of light with orbital angular momentum, Opt. Express 28, 15482 (2020).
  53. J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open-source python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1760 (2012).
  54. N. Daloi, R. Gupta, A. Ghosh, P. Kumar, H. S. Dhar, and M. Bhattacharya, Ring_BEC_Quantum_Memory, 2025, https://github.com/qid-iitb/Ring_BEC_Quantum_Memory.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation