- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Odd relaxation in three-dimensional Fermi liquids

Seth Musser1,*, Sankar Das Sarma1, and Johannes Hofmann2,3

  • *Contact author: swmusser@gmail.com
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013176 – Published 17 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/z6jk-h6n1

Abstract

Recent theoretical works predict a hierarchy of long-lived, nonhydrodynamic modes in two-dimensional Fermi liquids arising from the feature—supposedly unique to two dimensions—that relaxation by head-on scattering is not efficient in the presence of Pauli blocking. This leads to a parity-based separation of scattering rates, with odd-parity modes relaxing much more slowly than even-parity ones. In this work, we establish that a similar effect exists in isotropic three-dimensional (3D) Fermi liquids, even though relaxation does not proceed solely by head-on scattering. We show that while the relaxation rates of even and odd modes in 3D share the same leading-order ∼T2 low-temperature scaling typical of Fermi liquids, their magnitudes differ, with odd-parity modes relaxing more slowly than even ones for a broad class of interactions. We find a relative difference between odd-parity and even-parity relaxation rates as large as 40% just by Pauli blocking alone, with a strong additional dependence on the scattering potential, such that the odd-even staggering is further enhanced by interactions that favor large-angle scattering. We identify signatures of these odd-parity relaxation rates in the static transverse conductivity as well as the transverse collective mode structure. Our results establish the unexpected existence of a tomographiclike regime in higher-dimensional Fermi liquids and suggest experimental probes via transport measurements.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. R. N. Gurzhi, Minimum of resistance in impurity-free conductors, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. 17, 521 (1962).
  2. R. N. Gurzhi, Hydrodynamic effects in solids at low temperature, Sov. Phys. Usp. 11, 255 (1968).
  3. S. Ahn and S. Das Sarma, Hydrodynamics, viscous electron fluid, and Wiedeman-Franz law in two-dimensional semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 106, L081303 (2022).
  4. D. Tong, Lectures on Theoretical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012), Vol. 4.
  5. A. Lucas and K. C. Fong, Hydrodynamics of electrons in graphene, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 053001 (2018).
  6. S. Musser, H. Goldman, and T. Senthil, Observable signatures of Hall viscosity in lowest Landau level superfluids, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024515 (2024).
  7. L. Fritz and T. Scaffidi, Hydrodynamic electronic transport, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 15, 17 (2024).
  8. D. Khveshchenko, Strange sounds, Phys. Lett. A 527, 130006 (2024).
  9. D. V. Khveshchenko, Collective modes in two-dimensional non-Fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B 111, L161108 (2025).
  10. A. Aharon-Steinberg, T. Völkl, A. Kaplan, A. K. Pariari, I. Roy, T. Holder, Y. Wolf, A. Y. Meltzer, Y. Myasoedov, M. E. Huber, B. Yan, G. Falkovich, L. S. Levitov, M. Hücker, and E. Zeldov, Direct observation of vortices in an electron fluid, Nature (London) 607, 74 (2022).
  11. Z. J. Krebs, W. A. Behn, S. Li, K. J. Smith, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Levchenko, and V. W. Brar, Imaging the breaking of electrostatic dams in graphene for ballistic and viscous fluids, Science 379, 671 (2023).
  12. P. Ledwith, H. Guo, and L. Levitov, Angular superdiffusion and directional memory in two-dimensional electron fluids, arXiv:1708.01915.
  13. P. Ledwith, H. Guo, A. Shytov, and L. Levitov, Tomographic dynamics and scale-dependent viscosity in 2D electron systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 116601 (2019).
  14. J. Hofmann and S. Das Sarma, Collective modes in interacting two-dimensional tomographic Fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205412 (2022).
  15. J. Hofmann and U. Gran, Anomalously long lifetimes in two-dimensional Fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B 108, L121401 (2023).
  16. B. Laikhtman, Electron-electron angular relaxation in a two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 45, 1259 (1992).
  17. G. F. Giuliani and J. J. Quinn, Lifetime of a quasiparticle in a two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 26, 4421 (1982).
  18. L. Zheng and S. Das Sarma, Coulomb scattering lifetime of a two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 53, 9964 (1996).
  19. Y. Liao, D. Buterakos, M. Schecter, and S. Das Sarma, Two-dimensional electron self-energy: Long-range Coulomb interaction, Phys. Rev. B 102, 085145 (2020).
  20. R. N. Gurzhi, A. N. Kalinenko, and A. I. Kopeliovich, Electron-electron collisions and a new hydrodynamic effect in two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3872 (1995).
  21. E. Nilsson, U. Gran, and J. Hofmann, Nonequilibrium relaxation and odd-even effect in finite-temperature electron gases, Phys. Rev. X 15, 041007 (2025).
  22. J. Hofmann and H. Rostami, Nonlinear thermoelectric probes of anomalous electron lifetimes in topological Fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042042 (2024).
  23. K. G. Nazaryan and L. Levitov, Nonlocal conductivity, continued fractions, and current vortices in electron fluids, Phys. Rev. B 110, 045147 (2024).
  24. S. Kryhin, Q. Hong, and L. Levitov, Linear-in-temperature conductance in two-dimensional electron fluids, Phys. Rev. B 111, L081403 (2025).
  25. H. Rostami, N. Ben-Shachar, S. Moroz, and J. Hofmann, Magnetic field suppression of tomographic electron transport, Phys. Rev. B 111, 155434 (2025).
  26. N. Ben-Shachar and J. Hofmann, Tomographic electron flow in confined geometries: Beyond the dual-relaxation time approximation, arXiv:2503.14461.
  27. N. Ben-Shachar and J. Hofmann, Magnetotransport of tomographic electrons in a channel, arXiv:2503.14431.
  28. J. Estrada-Álvarez, E. Díaz, and F. Domínguez-Adame, Superballistic paradox in electron fluids: Evidence of tomographic transport, arXiv:2502.10265.
  29. G. A. Starkov and B. Trauzettel, Anomalous Knudsen effect signaling long-lived modes in 2D electron gases, arXiv:2502.04880.
  30. J. Maki, U. Gran, and J. Hofmann, Odd-parity effect and scale-dependent viscosity in atomic quantum gases, Commun. Phys. 8, 319 (2025).
  31. I. Moiseenko, E. Mönch, K. Kapralov, D. Bandurin, S. Ganichev, and D. Svintsov, Testing the tomographic Fermi liquid hypothesis with high-order cyclotron resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 226902 (2025).
  32. Y. Zeng, H. Guo, O. M. Ghosh, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. S. Levitov, and C. R. Dean, Quantitative measurement of viscosity in two-dimensional electron fluids, arXiv:2407.05026.
  33. J. A. Sulpizio, L. Ella, A. Rozen, J. Birkbeck, D. J. Perello, D. Dutta, M. Ben-Shalom, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. Holder, R. Queiroz, A. Principi, A. Stern, T. Scaffidi, A. K. Geim, and S. Ilani, Visualizing Poiseuille flow of hydrodynamic electrons, Nature (London) 576, 75 (2019).
  34. U. Vool, A. Hamo, G. Varnavides, Y. Wang, T. X. Zhou, N. Kumar, Y. Dovzhenko, Z. Qiu, C. A. C. Garcia, A. T. Pierce, J. Gooth, P. Anikeeva, C. Felser, P. Narang, and A. Yacoby, Imaging phonon-mediated hydrodynamic flow in WTe2, Nat. Phys. 17, 1216 (2021).
  35. A. A. Abrikosov and I. M. Khalatnikov, The theory of a Fermi liquid (the properties of liquid He3 at low temperatures), Rep. Prog. Phys. 22, 329 (1959).
  36. G. A. Brooker and J. Sykes, Transport properties of a Fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 279 (1968).
  37. J. Sykes and G. Brooker, The transport coefficients of a Fermi liquid, Ann. Phys. 56, 1 (1970).
  38. D. Pines and P. Nozières, The Theory of Quantum Liquids: Normal Fermi Liquids (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2018).
  39. G. Baym and C. Pethick, Landau Fermi‐Liquid Theory: Concepts and Applications (Wiley, New York, NY, 1991).
  40. H. Smith and H. H. Jensen, Transport Phenomena (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989).
  41. D. Buterakos, D. Vu, J. Yu, and S. Das Sarma, Presence versus absence of two-dimensional Fermi surface anomalies, Phys. Rev. B 103, 205154 (2021).
  42. S. Das Sarma and Y. Liao, Know the enemy: 2D Fermi liquids, Ann. Phys. 435, 168495 (2021).
  43. S. Ahn and S. Das Sarma, Fragile versus stable two-dimensional fermionic quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. B 104, 125118 (2021).
  44. G. B. Arfken, H.-J. Weber, and F. E. Harris, Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide, 7th ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2013).
  45. S. M. Girvin and K. Yang, Modern Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019).
  46. P. J. W. Moll, P. Kushwaha, N. Nandi, B. Schmidt, and A. P. Mackenzie, Evidence for hydrodynamic electron flow in PdCoO2, Science 351, 1061 (2016).
  47. N. Ben-Shachar, J. T. Johnson, M. Madadi, D. R. Brumley, J. Nassios, and J. E. Sader, Hall field and odd viscosity in near-hydrodynamic electron flows, Phys. Rev. B 111, L121107 (2025).
  48. N. Ben-Shachar, J. T. Johnson, M. Madadi, D. R. Brumley, J. Nassios, and J. E. Sader, Near-hydrodynamic electron flow according to the linearized Boltzmann equation, Phys. Rev. B 111, 125145 (2025).
  49. K. Gottfried and T.-M. Yan, Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 2003).
  50. For head-on scattering, φ2=π, this reproduces what is known in 2D [21].
  51. G. Baker, D. Valentinis, and A. P. Mackenzie, On non-local electrical transport in anisotropic metals, Low Temp. Phys. 49, 1338 (2023).
  52. D. Valentinis, G. Baker, D. A. Bonn, and J. Schmalian, Kinetic theory of the nonlocal electrodynamic response in anisotropic metals: Skin effect in 2D systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013212 (2023).
  53. G. Baker, T. W. Branch, J. Bobowski, J. Day, D. Valentinis, M. Oudah, P. McGuinness, S. Khim, P. Surówka, Y. Maeno, T. Scaffidi, R. Moessner, J. Schmalian, A. P. Mackenzie, and D. Bonn, Nonlocal electrodynamics in ultrapure PdCoO2, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011018 (2024).
  54. Y. Fang, G. Grissonnanche, A. Legros, S. Verret, F. Laliberté, C. Collignon, A. Ataei, M. Dion, J. Zhou, D. Graf, M. J. Lawler, P. A. Goddard, L. Taillefer, and B. J. Ramshaw, Fermi surface transformation at the pseudogap critical point of a cuprate superconductor, Nat. Phys. 18, 558 (2022).
  55. S. Musser, D. Chowdhury, P. A. Lee, and T. Senthil, Interpreting angle-dependent magnetoresistance in layered materials: Application to cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 105, 125105 (2022).
  56. This is the convention when working with Euler angles [44].

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013176– Published 17 February, 2026
  • Received 2 September 2025
  • Accepted 16 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by Bibsam.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation