- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Satellite-assisted quantum communication with single photon sources and atomic memories

V. Domínguez Tubío1,2, M. Badás Aldecocea3, J. van Dam1,2,4, A. S. Sørensen5, and J. Borregaard1,6

PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013099 – Published 29 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/z1vn-11m5

Abstract

Satellite-based quantum repeaters are a promising means of reaching global distances in quantum networking due to the polynomial decrease of optical transmission with distance in free space, in contrast to the exponential decrease in optical fibers. We propose a satellite-based quantum repeater architecture with trapped individual atomic qubits, which can serve both as quantum memories and true single-photon sources. This hardware allows for nearly deterministic Bell measurements and exhibits long coherence times, without the need for costly cryogenic technology in space. We develop a detailed analytical model of the repeater, which includes the main imperfections of the quantum hardware and the optical link, assuming high-altitude ground stations, and consequently working in a regime of weak atmospheric turbulence. Our model allows us to estimate that high-rate and high-fidelity entanglement distribution can be achieved over intercontinental distances. In particular, we find that high-fidelity entanglement distribution over thousands of kilometres at a rate of 100 Hz can be achieved with orders of magnitude fewer memory modes than conventional architectures based on optical Bell state measurements.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (60)

  1. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Theor. Comput. Sci. 560, 7 (2014).
  2. A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
  3. S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, J. L. Pereira, M. Razavi, J. S. Shaari, M. Tomamichel, V. C. Usenko, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and P. Wallden, Advances in quantum cryptography, Adv. Opt. Photon. 12, 1012 (2020).
  4. P. Kómár, E. M. Kessler, M. Bishof, L. Jiang, A. S. Sørensen, J. Ye, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum network of clocks, Nat. Phys. 10, 582 (2014).
  5. X. Guo, C. R. Breum, J. Borregaard, S. Izumi, M. V. Larsen, T. Gehring, M. Christandl, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous-variable entangled network, Nat. Phys. 16, 281 (2020).
  6. L.-Z. Liu, Y.-Z. Zhang, Z.-D. Li, R. Zhang, X.-F. Yin, Y.-Y. Fei, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, F. Xu, Y.-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Distributed quantum phase estimation with entangled photons, Nat. Photon. 15, 137 (2021).
  7. H. Buhrman and H. Röhrig, Distributed quantum computing, in Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by B. Rovan and P. Vojtáš (Springer, Bratislava, Slovakia, 2003), pp. 1–20.
  8. Z. Tang, P. Zhang, W. O. Krawec, and L. Wang, Quantum networks for resilient power grids: Theory and simulated evaluation, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 38, 1189 (2023).
  9. B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, D. P. Nadlinger, P. Drmota, D. Main, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lucas, An elementary quantum network of entangled optical atomic clocks, Nature (London) 609, 689 (2022).
  10. W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, A single quantum cannot be cloned, Nature (London) 299, 802 (1982).
  11. L. M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics, Nature (London) 414, 413 (2001).
  12. N. Sangouard, C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 33 (2011).
  13. S. Muralidharan, J. Kim, N. Lütkenhaus, M. D. Lukin, and L. Jiang, Ultrafast and fault-tolerant quantum communication across long distances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 250501 (2014).
  14. W. J. Munro, A. M. Stephens, S. J. Devitt, K. A. Harrison, and K. Nemoto, Quantum communication without the necessity of quantum memories, Nat. Photon. 6, 777 (2012).
  15. L. de Forges de Parny, O. Alibart, J. Debaud, S. Gressani, A. Lagarrigue, A. Martin, A. Metrat, M. Schiavon, T. Troisi, E. Diamanti, P. Gélard, E. Kerstel, S. Tanzilli, and M. Van Den Bossche, Satellite-based quantum information networks: Use cases, architecture, and roadmap, Commun. Phys. 6, 12 (2023).
  16. C. Liorni, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Quantum repeaters in space, New J. Phys. 23, 053021 (2021).
  17. M. Gündoğan, J. S. Sidhu, V. Henderson, L. Mazzarella, J. Wolters, D. K. L. Oi, and M. Krutzik, Proposal for space-borne quantum memories for global quantum networking, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 128 (2021).
  18. J. Wallnöfer, F. Hahn, M. Gündoğan, J. S. Sidhu, F. Wiesner, N. Walk, J. Eisert, and J. Wolters, Simulating quantum repeater strategies for multiple satellites, Commun. Phys. 5, 169 (2022).
  19. S. Khatri, A. J. Brady, R. A. Desporte, M. P. Bart, and J. P. Dowling, Spooky action at a global distance: Analysis of space-based entanglement distribution for the quantum internet, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 4 (2021).
  20. K. Boone, J.-P. Bourgoin, E. Meyer-Scott, K. Heshami, T. Jennewein, and C. Simon, Entanglement over global distances via quantum repeaters with satellite links, Phys. Rev. A 91, 052325 (2015).
  21. D. L. Bakker, Y. Jong, B. P. F. Dirks, and G. C. Amaral, A best-path approach to the design of a hybrid space–ground quantum network with dynamic constraints, Photonics 11, 268 (2024).
  22. J. Yin, Y. Cao, Y.-H. Li, J.-G. Ren, S.-K. Liao, L. Zhang, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, B. Li, H. Dai, M. Li, Y.-M. Huang, L. Deng, L. Li, Q. Zhang, N.-L. Liu, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, R. Shu, C.-Z. Peng et al., Satellite-to-ground entanglement-based quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 200501 (2017).
  23. S.-K. Liao, W.-Q. Cai, J. Handsteiner, B. Liu, J. Yin, L. Zhang, D. Rauch, M. Fink, J.-G. Ren, W.-Y. Liu, Y. Li, Q. Shen, Y. Cao, F.-Z. Li, J.-F. Wang, Y.-M. Huang, L. Deng, T. Xi, L. Ma, T. Hu et al., Satellite-relayed intercontinental quantum network, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030501 (2018).
  24. J. Yin, Y.-H. Li, S.-K. Liao, M. Yang, Y. Cao, L. Zhang, J.-G. Ren, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, S.-L. Li, R. Shu, Y.-M. Huang, L. Deng, L. Li, Q. Zhang, N.-L. Liu, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, X.-B. Wang, F. Xu et al., Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres, Nature (London) 582, 501 (2020).
  25. A. Anwar, C. Perumangatt, A. Villar, A. Lohrmann, and A. Ling, Development of compact entangled photon-pair sources for satellites, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 220503 (2022).
  26. C. Schimpf, M. Reindl, F. Basso Basset, K. D. Jöns, R. Trotta, and A. Rastelli, Quantum dots as potential sources of strongly entangled photons: Perspectives and challenges for applications in quantum networks, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 100502 (2021).
  27. K. C. Chen, P. Dhara, M. Heuck, Y. Lee, W. Dai, S. Guha, and D. Englund, Zero-added-loss entangled-photon multiplexing for ground- and space-based quantum networks, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054029 (2023).
  28. Q. Zhang, X.-H. Bao, C.-Y. Lu, X.-Q. Zhou, T. Yang, T. Rudolph, and J.-W. Pan, Demonstration of a scheme for the generation of “event-ready” entangled photon pairs from a single-photon source, Phys. Rev. A 77, 062316 (2008).
  29. J. McKeever, A. Boca, A. D. Boozer, R. Miller, J. R. Buck, A. Kuzmich, and H. J. Kimble, Deterministic generation of single photons from one atom trapped in a cavity, Science 303, 1992 (2004).
  30. D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays, Nature (London) 604, 451 (2022).
  31. A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, W. R. Milner, D. Kedar, M. A. Norcia, E. Oelker, N. Schine, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Half-minute-scale atomic coherence and high relative stability in a tweezer clock, Nature (London) 588, 408 (2020).
  32. H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170503 (2019).
  33. Z. Fu, P. Xu, Y. Sun, Y.-Y. Liu, X.-D. He, X. Li, M. Liu, R.-B. Li, J. Wang, L. Liu, and M.-S. Zhan, High-fidelity entanglement of neutral atoms via a rydberg-mediated single-modulated-pulse controlled-phase gate, Phys. Rev. A 105, 042430 (2022).
  34. S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature (London) 622, 268 (2023).
  35. W. Huie, S. G. Menon, H. Bernien, and J. P. Covey, Multiplexed telecommunication-band quantum networking with atom arrays in optical cavities, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043154 (2021).
  36. J. P. Covey, H. Weinfurter, and H. Bernien, Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes, npj Quantum Inf. 9, 90 (2023).
  37. L. C. Andrews and R. L. Phillips, Laser Beam Propagation Through Random Media (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2005).
  38. S. D. Barrett and P. Kok, Efficient high-fidelity quantum computation using matter qubits and linear optics, Phys. Rev. A 71, 060310 (2005).
  39. C. Cabrillo, J. I. Cirac, P. García-Fernández, and P. Zoller, Creation of entangled states of distant atoms by interference, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1025 (1999).
  40. E. Deist, J. A. Gerber, Y.-H. Lu, J. Zeiher, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Superresolution microscopy of optical fields using tweezer-trapped single atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 083201 (2022).
  41. H. Levine, D. Bluvstein, A. Keesling, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Dispersive optical systems for scalable Raman driving of hyperfine qubits, Phys. Rev. A 105, 032618 (2022).
  42. Y. Li and J. Thompson, High-rate and high-fidelity modular interconnects between neutral atom quantum processors, PRX Quantum 5, 020363 (2024).
  43. D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Côté, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000).
  44. S. Jandura and G. Pupillo, Time-optimal two- and three-qubit gates for rydberg atoms, Quantum 6, 712 (2022).
  45. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/z1vn-11m5 for the quantum and optical hardware's mathematical model referenced in the text, which include Ref. [53].
  46. E. Brattich, E. Serrano Castillo, F. Giulietti, J.-B. Renard, S. N. Tripathi, K. Ghosh, G. Berthet, D. Vignelles, and L. Tositti, Measurements of aerosols and charged particles on the BEXUS18 stratospheric balloon, Ann. Geophys. 37, 389 (2019).
  47. O. A. Collins, S. D. Jenkins, A. Kuzmich, and T. A. B. Kennedy, Multiplexed memory-insensitive quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 060502 (2007).
  48. N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Quantum cryptography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002).
  49. F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo, and J.-W. Pan, Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025002 (2020).
  50. M. Victora, S. Tserkis, S. Krastanov, A. S. de la Cerda, S. Willis, and P. Narang, Entanglement purification on quantum networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033171 (2023).
  51. A. Belenchia, M. Carlesso, Ömer Bayraktar, D. Dequal, I. Derkach, G. Gasbarri, W. Herr, Y. L. Li, M. Rademacher, J. Sidhu, D. K. Oi, S. T. Seidel, R. Kaltenbaek, C. Marquardt, H. Ulbricht, V. C. Usenko, L. Wörner, A. Xuereb, M. Paternostro, and A. Bassi, Quantum physics in space, Phys. Rep. 951, 1 (2022) .
  52. D. E. Bruschi, C. Sabén, A. White, V. Baccetti, D. K. L. Oi, and I. Fuentes, Testing the effects of gravity and motion on quantum entanglement in space-based experiments, New J. Phys. 16, 053041 (2014).
  53. V. Dominguez Tubio, M. Badas Aldecocea, J. van Dam, A. Sorensen, and J. Borregaard, Data underlying the publication "satellite-assisted quantum communication with single photon sources and atomic memories” (2024), https://doi.org/10.4121/61635423-89d3-46cb-b9bc-bc06f158b9a5.
  54. D. V. Reddy, R. R. Nerem, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and V. B. Verma, Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550 nm, Optica 7, 1649 (2020) .
  55. I. Esmaeil Zadeh, J. W. N. Los, R. B. M. Gourgues, V. Steinmetz, G. Bulgarini, S. M. Dobrovolskiy, V. Zwiller, and S. N. Dorenbos, Single-photon detectors combining high efficiency, high detection rates, and ultra-high timing resolution, APL Photonics 2, 111301 (2017).
  56. Y. Han and A. Zhang, Cryogenic technology for infrared detection in space, Sci. Rep. 12, 2349 (2022).
  57. A. Carrasco-Casado, K. Shiratama, D. Kolev, P. Trinh, T. Fuse, S. Fuse, K. Kawaguchi, Y. Hashimoto, M. Hyodo, T. Sakamoto, T. Kunisada, and M. Toyoshima, Prototype development and validation of a beam-divergence control system for free-space laser communications, Front. Phys. 10, 878488 (2022).
  58. D. Giggenbach and A. Shrestha, Atmospheric absorption and scattering impact on optical satellite-ground links, Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw. 40, 157 (2022).
  59. J. Yin, Y. Cao, Y.-H. Li, S.-K. Liao, L. Zhang, J.-G. Ren, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, B. Li, H. Dai, G.-B. Li, Q.-M. Lu, Y.-H. Gong, Y. Xu, S.-L. Li, F.-Z. Li, Y.-Y. Yin, Z.-Q. Jiang, M. Li, J.-J. Jia et al., Satellite-based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers, Science 356, 1140 (2017).
  60. D. Vasylyev, W. Vogel, and F. Moll, Satellite-mediated quantum atmospheric links, Phys. Rev. A 99, 053830 (2019).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013099– Published 29 January, 2026
  • Received 19 November 2024
  • Accepted 11 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation