- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Adding photonic entanglement to superradiance by using multilevel atoms

Amir Sivan* and Meir Orenstein

  • *Contact author: amirsi@campus.technion.ac.il
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033170 – Published 20 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yv7y-pyjk

Abstract

We show here that the photonic states emitted by ensembles of multilevel atoms via a superradiance process exhibit entanglement in the modal (frequency) degree of freedom, making this collective emission process a favorable candidate for a fast, bright, and deterministic source of entangled photons. This entanglement is driven by two mechanisms: (i) selective excitation of the atomic ensemble to a superposition state, and (ii) degeneracies of the optical transitions owing to the internal structure of the emitting atoms. The latter induces intricate nonradiative virtual transitions in the ensemble, which create interatomic correlations that are imprinted onto the emitted photons. One of the important outcomes of this complexity is the generation of mode-independent entangled multiphoton states. In addition, we study the dynamics of the correlations of the superradiating multilevel atom ensembles, and demonstrate a case where they exhibit beating in steady state as a result of the aforementioned virtual transitions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (117)

  1. C. Fabre and N. Treps, Modes and states in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 035005 (2020).
  2. F. Dell’Anno, S. DeSiena, and F. Illuminati, Multiphoton quantum optics and quantum state engineering, Phys. Rep. 428, 53 (2006).
  3. U. L. Andersen, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, P. van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Hybrid discrete-and continuous-variable quantum information, Nat. Phys. 11, 713 (2015).
  4. A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299 (2009).
  5. S. L. Braunstein and P. Van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005).
  6. J. L. O'brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, Photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photon. 3, 687 (2009).
  7. S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, and S. Lloyd, Advances in photonic quantum sensing, Nat. Photon. 12, 724 (2018).
  8. P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135 (2007).
  9. M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 365 (2020).
  10. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  11. M. A. Nielsen, Optical quantum computation using cluster states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040503 (2004).
  12. J. W. Pan, Z. B. Chen, C. Y. Lu, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, and M. Żukowski, Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 777 (2012).
  13. T. Nagata, R. Okamoto, J. L. O'brien, K. Sasaki, and S. Takeuchi, Beating the standard quantum limit with four-entangled photons, Science 316, 726 (2007).
  14. S. Lloyd, Enhanced sensitivity of photodetection via quantum illumination, Science 321, 1463 (2008).
  15. M. W. Mitchell, J. S. Lundeen, and A. M. Steinberg, Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state, Nature (London) 429, 161 (2004).
  16. E. D. Lopaeva, I. Ruo Berchera, I. P. Degiovanni, S. Olivares, G. Brida, and M. Genovese, Experimental realization of quantum illumination, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 153603 (2013).
  17. X. Deng, S. Li, Z. J. Chen, Z. Ni, Y. Cai, J. Mai, L. Zhang, P. Zheng, H. Yu, C. Zou et al., Quantum-enhanced metrology with large Fock states, Nat. Phys. 20, 1874 (2024).
  18. N. Akopian, N. H. Lindner, E. Poem, Y. Berlatzky, J. Avron, D. Gershoni, B. D. Geradot, and P. M. Petroff, Entangled photon pairs from semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 130501 (2006).
  19. A. J. Shields, Semiconductor quantum light sources, Nat. Photon. 1, 215 (2007).
  20. R. Uppu, L. Midolo, X. Zhou, J. Carolan, and P. Lodahl, Quantum-dot-based deterministic photon–emitter interfaces for scalable photonic quantum technology, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1308 (2021).
  21. A. Orieux, M. A. Versteegh, K. D. Jöns, and S. Ducci, Semiconductor devices for entangled photon pair generation: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076001 (2017).
  22. M. A. Versteegh, M. E. Reimer, K. D. Jöns, D. Dalacu, P. J. Poole, A. Gulinatti, A. Giudice, and V. Zwiller, Observation of strongly entangled photon pairs from a nanowire quantum dot, Nat. Commun. 5, 5298 (2014).
  23. A. Hayat, P. Ginzburg, D. Neiman, S. Rosenblum, and M. Orenstein, Hyperentanglement source by intersubband two-photon emission from semiconductor quantum wells, Opt. Lett. 33, 1168 (2008).
  24. A. Dousse, J. Suffczyński, A. Beveratos, O. Krebs, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, P. Voisin, and P. Senellart, Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs, Nature (London) 466, 217 (2010).
  25. H. Wang, H. Hu, T. H. Chung, J. Qin, X. Yang, J. P. Li, R. Z. Liu, H. S. Zhong, Y. M. He, X. Ding, Y. H. Deng, Q. Dai, Y. H. Huo, S. Höfling, C. Y. Lu, and J. W. Pan, On-demand semiconductor source of entangled photons which simultaneously has high fidelity, efficiency, and indistinguishability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 113602 (2019).
  26. C. Schimpf, M. Reindl, D. Huber, B. Lehner, S. F. Covre da Silva, S. Manna, M. Vyvlecka, P. Walther, and A. Rastelli, Quantum cryptography with highly entangled photons from semiconductor quantum dots, Sci. Adv. 7, eabe8905 (2021).
  27. C. Zhu and G. Huang, Giant Kerr nonlinearity, controlled entangled photons and polarization phase gates in coupled quantum-well structures, Opt. Express 19, 23364 (2011).
  28. A. Hayat, P. Ginzburg, and M. Orenstein, High-rate entanglement source via two-photon emission from semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 76, 035339 (2007).
  29. N. H. Lindner and T. Rudolph, Proposal for pulsed on-demand sources of photonic cluster state strings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 113602 (2009).
  30. D. Cogan, Z. E. Su, O. Kenneth, and D. Gershoni, Deterministic generation of indistinguishable photons in a cluster state, Nat. Photon. 17, 324 (2023).
  31. I. Schwartz, D. Cogan, E. R. Schmidgall, Y. Don, L. Gantz, O. Kenneth, N. H. Lindner, and D. Gershoni, Deterministic generation of a cluster state of entangled photons, Science 354, 434 (2016).
  32. A. Sivan and M. Orenstein, Controlled emission of entangled multiphoton states from cascaded quantum wells, ACS Photon. 10, 4133 (2023).
  33. R. W. Boyd, A. L. Gaeta, and E. Giese, Nonlinear optics, in Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Springer, New York, 2008), pp. 1097–1111.
  34. H. Hübel, D. R. Hamel, A. Fedrizzi, S. Ramelow, K. J. Resch, and T. Jennewein, Direct generation of photon triplets using cascaded photon-pair sources, Nature (London) 466, 601 (2010).
  35. S. Chakram, K. He, A. V. Dixit, A. E. Oriani, R. K. Naik, N. Leung, H. Kwon, W. Ma, L. Jiang, and D. I. Schuster, Multimode photon blockade, Nat. Phys. 18, 879 (2022).
  36. E. Pomarico, B. Sanguinetti, N. Gisin, R. Thew, H. Zbinden, G. Schreiber, A. Thomas, and W. Sohler, Waveguide-based OPO source of entangled photon pairs, New J. Phys. 11, 113042 (2009).
  37. D. E. Chang, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics—Photon by photon, Nat. Photon. 8, 685 (2014).
  38. C. Autebert, N. Bruno, A. Martin, A. Lemaitre, C. G. Carbonell, I. Favero, G. Leo, H. Zbinden, and S. Ducci, Integrated AlGaAs source of highly indistinguishable and energy-time entangled photons, Optica 3, 143 (2016).
  39. P. Kultavewuti, E. Y. Zhu, L. Qian, V. Pusino, M. Sorel, and J. Stewart Aitchison, Correlated photon pair generation in AlGaAs nanowaveguides via spontaneous four-wave mixing, Opt. Express 24, 3365 (2016).
  40. N. Quesada and J. E. Sipe, Time-ordering effects in the generation of entangled photons using nonlinear optical processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 093903 (2015).
  41. R. Johne, N. A. Gippius, G. Pavlovic, D. D. Solnyshkov, I. A. Shelykh, and G. Malpuech, Entangled photon pairs produced by a quantum dot strongly coupled to a microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 240404 (2008).
  42. A. Karnieli and S. Fan, Jaynes-Cummings interaction between low-energy free electrons and cavity photons, Sci. Adv. 9, eadh2425 (2023).
  43. Z. Zhang, C. Yuan, S. Shen, H. Yu, R. Zhang, H. Wang, H. Li, Y. Wang, G. Deng, Z. Wang et al., High-performance quantum entanglement generation via cascaded second-order nonlinear processes, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 123 (2021).
  44. T. Guerreiro, A. Martin, B. Sanguinetti, J. S. Pelc, C. Langrock, M. M. Fejer, N. Gisin, H. Zbinden, N. Sangouard, and R. T. Thew, Nonlinear interaction between single photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 173601 (2014).
  45. A. S. Solntsev and A. A. Sukhorukov, Path-entangled photon sources on nonlinear chips, Rev. Phys. 2, 19 (2017).
  46. L. Caspani, C. Reimer, M. Kues, P. Roztocki, M. Clerici, B. Wetzel, Y. Jestin, M. Ferrera, M. Peccianti, A. Pasquazi et al., Multifrequency sources of quantum correlated photon pairs on-chip: A path toward integrated quantum frequency combs, Nanophotonics 5, 351 (2016).
  47. A. Riazi, C. Chen, E. Y. Zhu, A. V. Gladyshev, P. G. Kazansky, J. E. Sipe, and L. Qian, Biphoton shaping with cascaded entangled-photon sources, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 77 (2019).
  48. L. Caspani, C. Xiong, B. J. Eggleton, D. Bajoni, M. Liscidini, M. Galli, R. Morandotti, and D. J. Moss, Integrated sources of photon quantum states based on nonlinear optics, Light Sci. Appl. 6, e17100 (2017).
  49. A. Anwar, C. Perumangatt, F. Steinlechner, T. Jennewein, and A. Ling, Entangled photon-pair sources based on three-wave mixing in bulk crystals, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 041101 (2021).
  50. P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1026 (2017).
  51. C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987).
  52. R. Lopes, A. Imanaliev, A. Aspect, M. Cheneau, D. Boiron, and C. I. Westbrook, Atomic Hong–Ou–Mandel experiment, Nature (London) 520, 66 (2015).
  53. R. W. Heeres, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and V. Zwiller, Quantum interference in plasmonic circuits, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 719 (2013).
  54. N. Kiesel, C. Schmid, U. Weber, R. Ursin, and H. Weinfurter, Linear optics controlled-phase gate made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210505 (2005).
  55. C. Schmid, N. Kiesel, U. K. Weber, R. Ursin, A. Zeilinger, and H. Weinfurter, Quantum teleportation and entanglement swapping with linear optics logic gates, New J. Phys. 11, 033008 (2009).
  56. P. van Loock, C. Weedbrook, and M. Gu, Building Gaussian cluster states by linear optics, Phys. Rev. A 76, 032321 (2007).
  57. N. C. Menicucci, Temporal-mode continuous-variable cluster states using linear optics, Phys. Rev. A 83, 062314 (2011).
  58. J. Carolan, C. Harrold, C. Sparrow, E. Martín-López, N. J. Russell, J. W. Silverstone, P. J. Shadbolt, N. Matsuda, M. Oguma, M. Itoh et al., Universal linear optics, Science 349, 711 (2015).
  59. J. Gao, L. Santos, G. Krishna, Z. S. Xu, A. Iovan, S. Steinhauer, O. Gühne, P. J. Poole, D. Dalacu, V. Zeiller, and A. W. Elshaari, Scalable generation and detection of on-demand W states in nanophotonic circuits, Nano Lett. 23, 5350 (2023).
  60. R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954).
  61. A. Sivan and M. Orenstein, Enhanced superradiance of quantum sources near nanoscaled media, Phys. Rev. B 99, 115436 (2019).
  62. V. N. Pustovit and T. V. Shahbazyan, Plasmon-mediated superradiance near metal nanostructures, Phys. Rev. B 82, 075429 (2010).
  63. A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential improvement in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031024 (2017).
  64. A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakinskiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon correlations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 015002 (2023).
  65. S. Cardenas-Lopez, S. J. Masson, Z. Zager, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Many-body superradiance and dynamical mirror symmetry breaking in waveguide QED, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 033605 (2023).
  66. X. Zhou, H. Tamura, T. H. Chang, and C. L. Hung, Trapped atoms and superradiance on an integrated nanophotonic microring circuit, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031004 (2024).
  67. W. K. Mok, A. Asenjo-Garcia, T. C. Sum, and L. C. Kwek, Dicke superradiance requires interactions beyond nearest neighbors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 213605 (2023).
  68. S. Longhi, Superradiance paradox in waveguide lattices, Opt. Lett. 45, 3297 (2020).
  69. S. John and T. Quang, Localization of superradiance near a photonic band gap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3419 (1995).
  70. S. Choudhary, I. DeLeon, S. Swiecicki, K. M. Awan, S. A. Schulz, J. Upham, M. Z. Alam, J. E. Sipe, and R. W. Boyd, Weak superradiance in arrays of plasmonic nanoantennas, Phys. Rev. A 100, 043814 (2019).
  71. T. Laurent, Y. Todorov, A. Vasanelli, A. Delteil, C. Sirtori, I. Sagnes, and G. Beaudoin, Superradiant emission from a collective excitation in a semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 187402 (2015).
  72. P. Solano, P. Barberis-Blostein, F. K. Fatemi, L. A. Orozco, and S. L. Rolston, Super-radiance reveals infinite-range dipole interactions through a nanofiber, Nat. Commun. 8, 1857 (2017).
  73. H. Varguet, S. Guérin, H. Jauslin, and G. Colasdes Francs, Cooperative emission in quantum plasmonic superradiance, Phys. Rev. B 100, 041115 (2019).
  74. E. Sierra, S. J. Masson, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Dicke superradiance in ordered lattices: Dimensionality matters, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023207 (2022).
  75. G. Tóth, Detection of multipartite entanglement in the vicinity of symmetric Dicke states, JOSA B 24, 275 (2007).
  76. X. W. Hou and B. Hu, Decoherence, entanglement, and chaos in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. A 69, 042110 (2004).
  77. S. Schneider and G. J. Milburn, Entanglement in the steady state of a collective-angular-momentum (Dicke) model, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042107 (2002).
  78. R. T. Sutherland and F. Robicheaux, Superradiance in inverted multilevel atomic clouds, Phys. Rev. A 95, 033839 (2017).
  79. G. D. Lin and S. F. Yelin, Superradiance in spin-j particles: Effects of multiple levels, Phys. Rev. A 85, 033831 (2012).
  80. W. K. Mok, S. J. Masson, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, T. Zelevinsky, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Ground-state selection via many-body superradiant decay, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L022015 (2025).
  81. A. Crubellier, S. Liberman, D. Pavolini, and P. Pillet, Superradiance and subradiance. I. Interatomic interference and symmetry properties in three-level systems, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Phys. 18, 3811 (1985).
  82. A. Crubellier and D. Pavolini, Superradiance and subradiance. II. Atomic systems with degenerate transitions, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Phys. 19, 2109 (1986).
  83. A. Crubellier and D. Pavolini, Superradiance and subradiance. IV. Atomic cascades between degenerate levels, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Phys. 20, 1451 (1987).
  84. A. Crubellier, S. Liberman, and P. Pillet, Superradiance theory and random polarisation, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Phys. 19, 2959 (1986).
  85. M. Hebenstreit, B. Kraus, L. Ostermann, and H. Ritsch, Subradiance via entanglement in atoms with several independent decay channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 143602 (2017).
  86. A. Crubellier and M. G. Schweighofer, Level-degeneracy effects in super-radiance theory. Calculations for j=12 to j′=12 dipole transition, Phys. Rev. A 18, 1797 (1978).
  87. A. Crubellier, S. Liberman, and P. Pillet, Superradiance and subradiance in three-level systems, Optics Commun. 33, 143 (1980).
  88. V. A. Reshetov, Super-radiance from degenerate levels, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 26, 3749 (1993).
  89. S. J. Masson, J. P. Covey, S. Will, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Dicke superradiance in ordered arrays of multilevel atoms, PRX Quantum 5, 010344 (2024).
  90. Y. Xu, D. Fallas Padilla, and H. Pu, Multicriticality and quantum fluctuation in a generalized Dicke model, Phys. Rev. A 104, 043708 (2021).
  91. A. P. Orioli, J. K. Thompson, and A. M. Rey, Emergent dark states from superradiant dynamics in multilevel atoms in a cavity, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011054 (2022).
  92. B. Sundar, D. Barberena, A. M. Rey, and A. P. Orioli, Squeezing multilevel atoms in dark states via cavity superradiance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 033601 (2024).
  93. A. Baksic, P. Nataf, and C. Ciuti, Superradiant phase transitions with three-level systems, Phys. Rev. A 87, 023813 (2013).
  94. A. N. Poddubny, S. Rosenblum, and B. Dayan, How single-photon switching is quenched with multiple Λ–level atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 113601 (2024).
  95. M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission, Phys. Rep. 93, 301 (1982).
  96. R. Bonifacio, P. Schwendimann, and F. Haake, Quantum statistical theory of superradiance. I, Phys. Rev. A 4, 302 (1971).
  97. R. Bonifacio, P. Schwendimann, and F. Haake, Quantum statistical theory of superradiance. II, Phys. Rev. A 4, 854 (1971).
  98. G. S. Agarwal, Quantum statistical theories of spontaneous emission and their relation to other approaches, in Quantum Optics, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, Berlin, 2006), Vol. 70, pp. 1–128.
  99. V. Weisskopf and E. P. Wigner, Berechnung der natürlichen linienbreite auf grund der diracschen lichttheorie, Z. für Phys. 63, 54 (1930).
  100. A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
  101. K. Życzkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Volume of the set of separable states, Phys. Rev. A 58, 883 (1998).
  102. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).
  103. N. J. Cerf and C. Adami, Negative entropy and information in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5194 (1997).
  104. A. Winter, Tight uniform continuity bounds for quantum entropies: Conditional entropy, relative entropy distance and energy constraints, Commun. Math. Phys. 347, 291 (2016).
  105. J. Sperling, A. Perez-Leija, K. Busch, and C. Silberhorn, Mode-independent quantum entanglement for light, Phys. Rev. A 100, 062129 (2019).
  106. D. Paneru, E. Cohen, R. Fickler, R. W. Boyd, and E. Karimi, Entanglement: Quantum or classical? Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 064001 (2020).
  107. F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, F. Franchini, and U. Marzolino, Entanglement in indistinguishable particle systems, Phys. Rep. 878, 1 (2020).
  108. C. E. Lopetegui, M. Isoard, N. Treps, and M. Walschaers, Detection of mode-intrinsic quantum entanglement, Optica Quantum 3, 312 (2025).
  109. U. Chabaud and M. Walschaers, Resources for bosonic quantum computational advantage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 090602 (2023).
  110. A. Pizzi, A. Gorlach, N. Rivera, A. Nunnenkamp, and I. Kaminer, Light emission from strongly driven many-body systems, Nat. Phys. 19, 551 (2023).
  111. M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
  112. M. F. Fang and S. Y. Zhu, Entanglement between a Λ-type three-level atom and its spontaneous emission fields, Physica A 369, 475 (2006).
  113. A. Royer, Wigner function as the expectation value of a parity operator, Phys. Rev. A 15, 449 (1977).
  114. A. V. Chizhov and B. K. Murzakhmetov, Photon statistics and phase properties of two-mode squeezed number states, Phys. Lett. A 176, 33 (1993).
  115. K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber, Ordered expansions in boson amplitude operators, Phys. Rev. 177, 1857 (1969).
  116. R. Franco and V. Penna, Discrete Wigner distribution for two qubits: A characterization of entanglement properties, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 39, 5907 (2006).
  117. M. Walschaers, C. Fabre, V. Parigi, and N. Treps, Entanglement and Wigner function negativity of multimode non-Gaussian states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 183601 (2017).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033170– Published 20 August, 2025
  • Received 9 January 2025
  • Accepted 27 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation