Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Information flow-enhanced precision in collisional quantum thermometry

Taysa M. Mendonça1,2,*, Diogo O. Soares-Pinto1,†, and Mauro Paternostro3,2,‡

  • *Contact author: tmendonca@ifsc.usp.br
  • †Contact author: dosp@ifsc.usp.br
  • ‡Contact author: mauro.paternostro@unipa.it

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043203 – Published 21 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ymjl-hpm4

Abstract

We describe and analyze a quantum thermometer based on a multilayered collisional model. We propose a qubit system whose architecture provides significant sensitivity even for short interaction times between the ancillae that compose the thermometer probe and the system to be probed. The assessment of the flow of information taking place within the layered thermometer and between system and thermometer reveals that the tuning of the mutual backflow of information has a positive influence on the precision of thermometry, and helps unveiling the information-theoretic mechanisms behind the working principles of the proposed architecture.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (28)

  1. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401 (2006).
  2. L. Maccone, Intuitive reason for the usefulness of entanglement in quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042109 (2013).
  3. Z. Huang, C. Macchiavello, and L. Maccone, Usefulness of entanglement-assisted quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A 94, 012101 (2016).
  4. K. Micadei, D. A. Rowlands, F. A. Pollock, L. C. Céleri, R. M. Serra, and K. Modi, Coherent measurements in quantum metrology, New J. Phys. 17, 023057 (2015).
  5. D. P. Pires, I. A. Silva, E. R. deAzevedo, D. O. Soares-Pinto, and J. G. Filgueiras, Coherence orders, decoherence, and quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032101 (2018).
  6. A. Castellini, R. Lo Franco, L. Lami, A. Winter, G. Adesso, and G. Compagno, Indistinguishability-enabled coherence for quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A 100, 012308 (2019).
  7. L. Maccone and A. Riccardi, Squeezing metrology: A unified framework, Quantum 4, 292 (2020).
  8. A. De Pasquale and T. M. Stace, Quantum thermometry, in Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Fundamental Aspects and New Directions, edited by F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018), pp. 503–527.
  9. F. Ciccarello, S. Lorenzo, V. Giovannetti, and G. M. Palma, Quantum collision models: Open system dynamics from repeated interactions, Phys. Rep. 954, 1 (2022).
  10. F. Ciccarello, Collision models in quantum optics, Quantum Meas. Quantum Metrol. 4, 53 (2017).
  11. F. L. S. Rodrigues, G. De Chiara, M. Paternostro, and G. T. Landi, Thermodynamics of weakly coherent collisional models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140601 (2019).
  12. S. Filippov, Multipartite correlations in quantum collision models, Entropy 24, 508 (2022).
  13. G. T. Landi, Battery charging in collision models with Bayesian risk strategies, Entropy 23, 1627 (2021).
  14. R. McCloskey and M. Paternostro, Non-Markovianity and system-environment correlations in a microscopic collision model, Phys. Rev. A 89, 052120 (2014).
  15. E. O'Connor, B. Vacchini, and S. Campbell, Stochastic collisional quantum thermometry, Entropy 23, 1634 (2021).
  16. Q. Bouton, J. Nettersheim, S. Burgardt, D. Adam, E. Lutz, and A. Widera, A quantum heat engine driven by atomic collisions, Nat. Commun. 12, 2063 (2021).
  17. S. Seah, S. Nimmrichter, D. Grimmer, J. P. Santos, V. Scarani, and G. T. Landi, Collisional quantum thermometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 180602 (2019).
  18. M. G. A. Paris, Quantum estimation for quantum technology, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 07, 125 (2009).
  19. A. Shu, S. Seah, and V. Scarani, Surpassing the thermal Cramér-Rao bound with collisional thermometry, Phys. Rev. A 102, 042417 (2020).
  20. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009).
  21. E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and H.-P. Breuer, Measure for the non-Markovianity of quantum processes, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062115 (2010).
  22. T. M. Mendonça, L. C. Céleri, M. Paternostro, and D. O. Soares-Pinto, System-environment quantum information flow, Phys. Rev. A 110, L040401 (2024).
  23. H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, New York, 2002).
  24. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016).
  25. A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum non-Markovianity: Characterization, quantification and detection, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 094001 (2014).
  26. L. Li, M. J. Hall, and H. M. Wiseman, Concepts of quantum non-Markovianity: A hierarchy, Phys. Rep. 759, 1 (2018).
  27. D. Chrúciński, Dynamical maps beyond Markovian regime, Phys. Rep. 992, 1 (2022).
  28. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation