Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Dynamical Hubbard approach to correlated materials: The case of transition-metal monoxides

Mario Caserta1,*,†, Tommaso Chiarotti2,†, Marco Vanzini3, and Nicola Marzari1,4,5

  • 1Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS), and National Centre for Computational Design and Discovery of Novel Materials (MARVEL), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 2Department of Applied Physics and Materials Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 3Collège Champittet, Pully, Switzerland
  • 4Theory of Condensed Matter, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0US, United Kingdom
  • 5PSI Center for Scientific Computing, Theory and Data, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland

  • *Contact author: mario.caserta@epfl.ch
  • These authors contributed equally to this work.

Phys. Rev. Research 8, L032026 – Published 19 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/y7gb-q22g

Abstract

Electronic correlations beyond static mean-field theories are of fundamental importance in describing the properties of complex materials—such as transition-metal oxides—where the low-energy physics is driven by localized d or f electrons. Here, we show that it is possible to capture these correlations with a local and dynamical self-energy, extending to the spin-polarized and multisite case in our recently introduced dynamical Hubbard functional formulation. We apply this formalism to the prototypical transition-metal monoxide series of MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO in their ground state, finding excellent agreement with experiments for the spectral properties. The results are comparable or improved with respect to state-of-the-art theories, both for the densities of states and for the spectral functions—including band renormalization and spectral weight transfer—in a numerically efficient and physically insightful treatment of correlations amenable to the study of realistic, complex materials.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (61)

  1. G. A. Sawatzky and J. W. Allen, Magnitude and origin of the band gap in NiO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2339 (1984).
  2. J. van Elp, R. H. Potze, H. Eskes, R. Berger, and G. A. Sawatzky, Electronic structure of MnO, Phys. Rev. B 44, 1530 (1991).
  3. R. Zimmermann, P. Steiner, R. Claessen, F. Reinert, S. Hüfner, P. Blaha, and P. Dufek, Electronic structure of 3d-transition-metal oxides: On-site Coulomb repulsion versus covalency, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 1657 (1999).
  4. Z.-X. Shen, J. W. Allen, P. A. P. Lindberg, D. S. Dessau, B. O. Wells, A. Borg, W. Ellis, J. S. Kang, S.-J. Oh, I. Lindau, and W. E. Spicer, Photoemission study of CoO, Phys. Rev. B 42, 1817 (1990).
  5. Z.-X. Shen, R. S. List, D. S. Dessau, B. O. Wells, O. Jepsen, A. J. Arko, R. Barttlet, C. K. Shih, F. Parmigiani, J. C. Huang, and P. A. P. Lindberg, Electronic structure of NiO: Correlation and band effects, Phys. Rev. B 44, 3604 (1991).
  6. H. Kuhlenbeck, G. Odörfer, R. Jaeger, G. Illing, M. Menges, T. Mull, H.-J. Freund, M. Pöhlchen, V. Staemmler, S. Witzel, C. Scharfschwerdt, K. Wennemann, T. Liedtke, and M. Neumann, Molecular adsorption on oxide surfaces: Electronic structure and orientation of NO on NiO(100)/Ni(100) and on NiO(100) as determined from electron spectroscopies and ab initio cluster calculations, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1969 (1991).
  7. J. Kuneš, V. I. Anisimov, S. L. Skornyakov, A. V. Lukoyanov, and D. Vollhardt, NiO: Correlated band structure of a charge-transfer insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 156404 (2007).
  8. S. Mandal, K. Haule, K. M. Rabe, and D. Vanderbilt, Influence of magnetic ordering on the spectral properties of binary transition metal oxides, Phys. Rev. B 100, 245109 (2019).
  9. S. Mandal, K. Haule, K. M. Rabe, and D. Vanderbilt, Systematic beyond-DFT study of binary transition metal oxides, npj Comput. Mater. 5, 115 (2019).
  10. M. S. Abdallah and A. Pasquarello, Quasiparticle self-consistent GW with effective vertex corrections in the polarizability and the self-energy applied to MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155105 (2024).
  11. Y. Zhang, J. Furness, R. Zhang, Z. Wang, A. Zunger, and J. Sun, Symmetry-breaking polymorphous descriptions for correlated materials without interelectronic U, Phys. Rev. B 102, 045112 (2020).
  12. M. Cococcioni and S. de Gironcoli, Linear response approach to the calculation of the effective interaction parameters in the LDA+U method, Phys. Rev. B 71, 035105 (2005).
  13. J. Zaanen, G. A. Sawatzky, and J. W. Allen, Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 418 (1985).
  14. V. I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, and O. K. Andersen, Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I, Phys. Rev. B 44, 943 (1991).
  15. F. Aryasetiawan and O. Gunnarsson, Electronic structure of NiO in the GW approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3221 (1995).
  16. V. I. Anisimov, F. Aryasetiawan, and A. I. Lichtenstein, First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: The LDA+U method, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 767 (1997).
  17. H. Jiang, R. I. Gomez-Abal, P. Rinke, and M. Scheffler, First-principles modeling of localized d states with the GW@LDA+U approach, Phys. Rev. B 82, 045108 (2010).
  18. S. Das, J. E. Coulter, and E. Manousakis, Convergence of quasiparticle self-consistent GW calculations of transition-metal monoxides, Phys. Rev. B 91, 115105 (2015).
  19. C. Rödl, F. Fuchs, J. Furthmüller, and F. Bechstedt, Quasiparticle band structures of the antiferromagnetic transition-metal oxides MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO, Phys. Rev. B 79, 235114 (2009).
  20. B. Cunningham, M. Grüning, D. Pashov, and M. Van Schilfgaarde, QSGŴ: Quasiparticle self-consistent GW with ladder diagrams in W, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165104 (2023).
  21. J. M. Tomczak, M. Casula, T. Miyake, and S. Biermann, Asymmetry in band widening and quasiparticle lifetimes in SrVO3: Competition between screened exchange and local correlations from combined GW and dynamical mean-field theory GW+DMFT, Phys. Rev. B 90, 165138 (2014).
  22. L. Boehnke, F. Nilsson, F. Aryasetiawan, and P. Werner, When strong correlations become weak: Consistent merging of GW and DMFT, Phys. Rev. B 94, 201106 (2016).
  23. K. Held, I. A. Nekrasov, G. Keller, V. Eyert, N. Blümer, A. K. McMahan, R. T. Scalettar, T. Pruschke, V. I. Anisimov, and D. Vollhardt, Realistic investigations of correlated electron systems with LDA + DMFT, Phys. Status Solidi B 243, 2599 (2006).
  24. G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, K. Haule, V. S. Oudovenko, O. Parcollet, and C. A. Marianetti, Electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 865 (2006).
  25. A. Paul and T. Birol, Applications of DFT + DMFT in materials science, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 49, 31 (2019).
  26. P. W. Anderson, Localized magnetic states in metals, Phys. Rev. 124, 41 (1961).
  27. E. Gull, A. J. Millis, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, M. Troyer, and P. Werner, Continuous-time Monte Carlo methods for quantum impurity models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 349 (2011).
  28. P. Werner, Dynamical mean-field theory of correlated electrons, Forschungszentrum Jülich 12 (2022).
  29. S. Iskakov, C.-N. Yeh, E. Gull, and D. Zgid, Ab initio self-energy embedding for the photoemission spectra of NiO and MnO, Phys. Rev. B 102, 085105 (2020).
  30. T. Zhu and G. K.-L. Chan, Ab initio full cell GW+DMFT for correlated materials, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021006 (2021).
  31. J. van Elp, J. L. Wieland, H. Eskes, P. Kuiper, G. A. Sawatzky, F. M. F. de Groot, and T. S. Turner, Electronic structure of CoO, Li-doped CoO, and LiCoO2, Phys. Rev. B 44, 6090 (1991).
  32. T. Chiarotti, A. Ferretti, and N. Marzari, Energies and spectra of solids from the algorithmic inversion of dynamical Hubbard functionals, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L032023 (2024).
  33. S. Backes, T. C. Rödel, F. Fortuna, E. Frantzeskakis, P. Le Fèvre, F. Bertran, M. Kobayashi, R. Yukawa, T. Mitsuhashi, M. Kitamura, et al., Hubbard band versus oxygen vacancy states in the correlated electron metal SrVO3, Phys. Rev. B 94, 241110 (2016).
  34. F. Petocchi, F. Nilsson, F. Aryasetiawan, and P. Werner, Screening from eg states and antiferromagnetic correlations in d(1,2,3) perovskites: A GW+EDMFT investigation, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013191 (2020).
  35. The double-counting correction of the dynH functional is defined in Eq. (7) of Ref. [32]. The constant c allows to fix the gauge of the static double counting term. In the present calculations, this static term is taken to be the averaged local matrix elements of the bare screened interaction, i.e., the high-frequency limit U(ωU).
  36. The spin dependence of the local basis is related to spin dependence of the Wannier functions used as projectors in the U(ω) calculation, to the orthoatomic projectors used in Eq. (1), which bear no spin dependency. The MLWF [49] was built from the TM 3d, 3p, 4s, and O 2p orbitals.
  37. D. Golze, M. Dvorak, and P. Rinke, The GW compendium: A practical guide to theoretical photoemission spectroscopy, Front. Chem. 7, 377 (2019) .
  38. S. Höfner, P. Steiner, I. Sander, F. Reinert, and H. Schmitt, The optical gap of NiO, Z. Phys. B 86, 207 (1992).
  39. S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998).
  40. M. Vanzini and N. Marzari, Towards a minimal description of dynamical correlation in metals, arXiv:2309.12144.
  41. T. Chiarotti, N. Marzari, and A. Ferretti, Unified Green's function approach for spectral and thermodynamic properties from algorithmic inversion of dynamical potentials, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013242 (2022).
  42. R. N. Silver, D. S. Sivia, and J. E. Gubernatis, Maximum-entropy method for analytic continuation of quantum Monte Carlo data, Phys. Rev. B 41, 2380 (1990).
  43. See Supplemental Material at https://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/y7gb-q22g for the DFT electronic structure obtained with r2SCAN, the sum-over-poles representation of the local screened Coulomb interaction U(ω), the role of dynamical screening and a comparison with static DFT+U, the DFT+dynH projected densities of states, and full computational details, which includes Refs. [44, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61].
  44. J. W. Furness, A. D. Kaplan, J. Ning, J. P. Perdew, and J. Sun, Accurate and numerically efficient r2SCAN meta-generalized gradient approximation, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 8208 (2020).
  45. In passing, we note that with LDA/PBEsol functionals, owing to their wrong metallic solutions for FeO and CoO, the effective screened interactions for the two compounds are overscreened. The choice to use r2SCAN as the DFT starting point has then the advantage of properly capture the insulating nature of the ground states for all four compounds, thus allowing for a better quantitative prediction of gap magnitudes.
  46. J. Bała, A. M. Oleś, and J. Zaanen, Zhang-Rice localization, quasiparticle dispersions, and the photoemission of NiO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2600 (1994).
  47. F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective Hamiltonian for the superconducting Cu oxides, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3759 (1988).
  48. Note that this is consistent with the high-spin 5/2 configuration of the d5 shell in Mn2+ being more mean-field-like.
  49. N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1419 (2012).
  50. P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, et al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
  51. D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013).
  52. M. J. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G. M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Comput. Phys. Commun. 226, 39 (2018).
  53. K. Nakamura, Y. Yoshimoto, Y. Nomura, T. Tadano, M. Kawamura, T. Kosugi, K. Yoshimi, T. Misawa, and Y. Motoyama, RESPACK: An ab initio tool for derivation of effective low-energy model of material, Comput. Phys. Commun. 261, 107781 (2021).
  54. T. Chiarotti, Spectral and thermodynamic properties of interacting electrons with dynamical functionals, Ph.D. thesis, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2023.
  55. H. Fjellvåg, F. Grønvold, S. Stølen, and B. Hauback, On the crystallographic and magnetic structures of nearly stoichiometric iron monoxide, J. Solid State Chem. 124, 52 (1996).
  56. A. Cheetham and D. Hope, Magnetic ordering and exchange effects in the antiferromagnetic solid solutions MnxNi1xO, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6964 (1983).
  57. W. Johnston and R. Heikes, A study of the LixMn(1x)Osystem, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78, 3255 (1956).
  58. C. McCammon and L.-G. Liu, The effects of pressure and temperature on nonstoichiometric wöstite, FexO: The iron-rich phase boundary, Phys Chem Minerals 10, 106 (1984).
  59. M. Carey, F. Spada, A. Berkowitz, W. Cao, and G. Thomas, Preparation and structural characterization of sputtered CoO, NiO, and Ni0.5Co0.5O thin epitaxial films, J. Mater. Res. 6, 2680 (1991).
  60. L. Bartel and B. Morosin, Exchange striction in NiO, Phys. Rev. B 3, 1039 (1971).
  61. D. Herrmann-Ronzaud, P. Burlet, and J. Rossat-Mignod, Equivalent type-II magnetic structures: CoO, a collinear antiferromagnet, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 11, 2123 (1978).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation