Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Flocking with random nonreciprocal interactions

Jiwon Choi1, Jae Dong Noh2, and Heiko Rieger1,*

  • *Contact author: heiko.rieger@uni-saarland.de

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L042059 – Published 11 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/y26b-qfym

Abstract

Flocking is ubiquitous in nature and emerges due to short- or long-range alignment interactions among self-propelled agents. Two unfriendly species that antialign or even interact nonreciprocally show more complex collective phenomena, ranging from parallel and antiparallel flocking over run-and-chase behavior to chiral phases. Whether flocking or any of these collective phenomena can survive in the presence of a large number of species with random nonreciprocal interactions remained elusive so far. As a first step here, the extreme case of a Vicsek-like model with fully random nonreciprocal interactions between the individual particles is considered. For infinite-range interaction, as soon as the alignment bias is of the same order as the random interactions, the ordered flocking phase occurs, but deep within this phase, the random nonreciprocal interactions can still support global chiral and oscillating states in which the collective movement direction rotates or oscillates slowly. For short-range interactions, moreover, even without alignment bias self-organized cliques emerge, in which medium-size clusters of particles that have predominantly aligning interactions meet accidentally and stay together for macroscopic times. These results may serve as a starting point for the study of multispecies flocking models with nonrandom but complex nonreciprocal interspecies interactions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (59)

  1. M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013).
  2. S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 323 (2010).
  3. C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. Löwen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045006 (2016).
  4. M. R. Shaebani, A. Wysocki, R. G. Winkler, G. Gompper, and H. Rieger, Computational models for active matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 181 (2020).
  5. T. Vicsek, A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226 (1995).
  6. M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase separation, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 219 (2015).
  7. A. Bricard, J.-B. Caussin, N. Desreumaux, O. Dauchot, and D. Bartolo, Emergence of macroscopic directed motion in populations of motile colloids, Nature (London) 503, 95 (2013).
  8. V. Schaller, C. Weber, C. Semmrich, E. Frey, and A. R. Bausch, Polar patterns of driven filaments, Nature (London) 467, 73 (2010).
  9. I. Theurkauff, C. Cottin-Bizonne, J. Palacci, C. Ybert, and L. Bocquet, Dynamic clustering in active colloidal suspensions with chemical signaling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 268303 (2012).
  10. J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine, and P. M. Chaikin, Living crystals of light-activated colloidal surfers, Science 339, 936 (2013).
  11. F. A. Lavergne, H. Wendehenne, T. Bäuerle, and C. Bechinger, Group formation and cohesion of active particles with visual perception-dependent motility, Science 364, 70 (2019).
  12. L. Barberis and F. Peruani, Large-scale patterns in a minimal cognitive flocking model: Incidental leaders, nematic patterns, and aggregates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 248001 (2016).
  13. M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature (London) 592, 363 (2021).
  14. K. L. Kreienkamp and S. H. L. Klapp, Nonreciprocal alignment induces asymmetric clustering in active mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 258303 (2024).
  15. M. Mangeat, S. Chatterjee, J. D. Noh, and H. Rieger, Emergent complex phases in a discrete flocking model with reciprocal and non-reciprocal interactions, Commun. Phys. 8, 186 (2025).
  16. Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Nonreciprocal Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 117103 (2025).
  17. Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Dynamical phase transitions in the nonreciprocal Ising model, Phys. Rev. E 111, 034124 (2025).
  18. Z. You, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciprocity as a generic route to traveling states, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 19767 (2020).
  19. F. Brauns and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciprocal pattern formation of conserved fields, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021014 (2024).
  20. D. Banerjee, A. Souslov, A. G. Abanov, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity in chiral active fluids, Nat. Commun. 8, 1573 (2017).
  21. C. Scheibner, A. Souslov, D. Banerjee, P. Surówka, W. T. M. Irvine, and V. Vitelli, Odd elasticity, Nat. Phys. 16, 475 (2020).
  22. C. Hargus, J. M. Epstein, and K. K. Mandadapu, Odd diffusivity of chiral random motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 178001 (2021).
  23. E. Kalz, H. D. Vuijk, I. Abdoli, J.-U. Sommer, H. Löwen, and A. Sharma, Collisions enhance self-diffusion in odd-diffusive systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 090601 (2022).
  24. H. Sompolinsky and I. Kanter, Temporal association in asymmetric neural networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2861 (1986).
  25. A. Crisanti and H. Sompolinsky, Dynamics of spin systems with randomly asymmetric bonds: Langevin dynamics and a spherical model, Phys. Rev. A 36, 4922 (1987).
  26. H. Rieger, M. Schreckenberg, and J. Zittartz, Glauber dynamics of neural network models, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 21, L263 (1988).
  27. H. Sompolinsky, A. Crisanti, and H. J. Sommers, Chaos in random neural networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 259 (1988).
  28. H. Rieger, Solvable model of a complex ecosystem with randomly interacting species, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22, 3447 (1989).
  29. A. Altieri, F. Roy, C. Cammarota, and G. Biroli, Properties of equilibria and glassy phases of the random Lotka-Volterra model with demographic noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 258301 (2021).
  30. V. Ros, F. Roy, G. Biroli, G. Bunin, and A. M. Turner, Generalized Lotka-Volterra equations with random, nonreciprocal interactions: The typical number of equilibria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 257401 (2023).
  31. G. Garcia Lorenzana, A. Altieri, and G. Biroli, Interactions and migration rescuing ecological diversity, Phys. Rev. X Life 2, 013014 (2024).
  32. G. Parisi, A simple model for the immune network, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 429 (1990).
  33. J. C. Stiller and G. Radons, Dynamics of nonlinear oscillators with random interactions, Phys. Rev. E 58, 1789 (1998).
  34. A. Prüser, S. Rosmej, and A. Engel, Nature of the volcano transition in the fully disordered Kuramoto model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 187201 (2024).
  35. A. Prüser and A. Engel, Role of coupling asymmetry in the fully disordered Kuramoto model, Phys. Rev. E 110, 064214 (2024).
  36. R. Hanai, Nonreciprocal frustration: Time crystalline order-by-disorder phenomenon and a spin-glass-like state, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011029 (2024).
  37. L. Parkavousi, N. Rana, R. Golestanian, and S. Saha, Enhanced stability and chaotic condensates in multispecies nonreciprocal mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 148301 (2025).
  38. Y. Duan, B. Mahault, Y.-q. Ma, X.-q. Shi, and H. Chaté, Breakdown of ergodicity and self-averaging in polar flocks with quenched disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 178001 (2021).
  39. O. Chepizhko, E. G. Altmann, and F. Peruani, Optimal noise maximizes collective motion in heterogeneous media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 238101 (2013).
  40. A. Chardac, S. Shankar, M. C. Marchetti, and D. Bartolo, Emergence of dynamic vortex glasses in disordered polar active fluids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018218118 (2021).
  41. A. Morin, N. Desreumaux, J.-B. Caussin, and D. Bartolo, Distortion and destruction of colloidal flocks in disordered environments, Nat. Phys. 13, 63 (2016).
  42. J. Codina, B. Mahault, H. Chaté, J. Dobnikar, I. Pagonabarraga, and X.-q. Shi, Small obstacle in a large polar flock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 218001 (2022).
  43. S. Ro, Y. Kafri, M. Kardar, and J. Tailleur, Disorder-induced long-ranged correlations in scalar active matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 048003 (2021).
  44. Y. Ben Dor, S. Ro, Y. Kafri, M. Kardar, and J. Tailleur, Disordered boundaries destroy bulk phase separation in scalar active matter, Phys. Rev. E 105, 044603 (2022).
  45. S. Chatterjee, M. Mangeat, C.-U. Woo, H. Rieger, and J. D. Noh, Flocking of two unfriendly species: The two-species Vicsek model, Phys. Rev. E 107, 024607 (2023).
  46. G. Grégoire and H. Chaté, Onset of collective and cohesive motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 025702 (2004).
  47. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/y26b-qfym for additional analysis of finite-size scaling at the critical point, discussion of chiral states in infinite- and finite-range interactions, emergence of single-cluster phase, and description of supplemental movies.
  48. H. J. Sommers, A. Crisanti, H. Sompolinsky, and Y. Stein, Spectrum of large random asymmetric matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1895 (1988).
  49. G. G. Lorenzana, A. Altieri, G. Biroli, M. Fruchart, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal spin-glass transition and aging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 187402 (2025).
  50. F. Roy, G. Biroli, G. Bunin, and C. Cammarota, Numerical implementation of dynamical mean field theory for disordered systems: Application to the Lotka–Volterra model of ecosystems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 484001 (2019).
  51. K. Buchin, M. Buchin, M. V. Kreveld, B. Speckmann, and F. Staals, Trajectory grouping structure, J. Comput. Geom. 6, 75 (2015).
  52. R. Hanai and P. B. Littlewood, Critical fluctuations at a many-body exceptional point, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033018 (2020).
  53. C. P. Zelle, R. Daviet, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, Universal phenomenology at critical exceptional points of nonequilibrium O(N) models, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021052 (2024).
  54. T. Suchanek, K. Kroy, and S. A. M. Loos, Time-reversal and parity-time symmetry breaking in non-Hermitian field theories, Phys. Rev. E 108, 064123 (2023).
  55. H. Chaté, F. Ginelli, G. Grégoire, and F. Raynaud, Collective motion of self-propelled particles interacting without cohesion, Phys. Rev. E 77, 046113 (2008).
  56. L. Barberis, Emergence of a single cluster in Vicsek’s model at very low noise, Phys. Rev. E 98, 032607 (2018).
  57. E. Lardet, R. Voituriez, S. Grigolon, and T. Bertrand, Disordered yet directed: The emergence of polar flocks with disordered interactions, arXiv:2409.10768.
  58. J. Choi and H. Rieger (unpublished).
  59. S. Osat and R. Golestanian, Non-reciprocal multifarious self-organization, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 79 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation