Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Benchmarking quantum phase-space methods for near-resonant light propagation

Mojdeh S. Najafabadi1,*, Joel F. Corney2, Luis L. Sánchez-Soto1,3,4, and Gerd Leuchs1,5

  • *Contact author: mojdeh.shikhali-najafabadi@mpl.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023353 – Published 29 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xc3m-hsyx

Abstract

We study the dynamics of light interacting with a near-resonant atomic medium using the truncated Wigner and positive P phase-space representations. By mapping the atomic degrees of freedom via the Jordan-Schwinger transformation, we first analyze the system under unitary evolution before extending the treatment to include an optical reservoir. While both methods capture the main features of the light-matter dynamics, our results demonstrate that the truncated Wigner approximation deviates significantly at higher interaction strengths and in regimes where reservoir-induced noise is prominent.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. V. I. Tatarskii, The Wigner representation in quantum mechanics, Sov. Phys. Usp. 26, 311 (1983).
  2. M. Hillery, R. F. O. Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals, Phys. Rep. 106, 121 (1984).
  3. N. L. Balazs and B. K. Jennings, Wigner's function and other distribution functions in mock phase spaces, Phys. Rep. 104, 347 (1984).
  4. H.-W. Lee, Theory and application of the quantum phase-space distribution functions, Phys. Rep. 259, 147 (1995).
  5. F. E. Schroek, Quantum Mechanics on Phase Space (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996).
  6. A. M. O. de Almeida, The Weyl representation in classical and quantum mechanics, Phys. Rep. 295, 265 (1998).
  7. W. P. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2001).
  8. Edited by C. K. Zachos, D. B. Fairlie, and T. L. Curtright, Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005).
  9. J. Weinbub and D. K. Ferry, Recent advances in Wigner function approaches, Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 041104 (2018).
  10. R. P. Rundle and M. J. Everitt, Overview of the phase space formulation of quantum mechanics with application to quantum technologies, Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2100016 (2021).
  11. N. G. V. Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, 3rd ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2011).
  12. C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
  13. H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).
  14. E. Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).
  15. R. J. Glauber, Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963).
  16. E. C. G. Sudarshan, Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277 (1963).
  17. K. Husimi, Some formal properties of the density matrix, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 22, 264 (1940).
  18. Y. Kano, A new phase‐space distribution function in the statistical theory of the electromagnetic field, J. Math. Phys. 6, 1913 (1965).
  19. S. L. Braunstein, C. M. Caves, and G. J. Milburn, Interpretation for a positive P representation, Phys. Rev. A 43, 1153 (1991).
  20. H. Haken, The Fokker-Planck Equation, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1996).
  21. D. F. Walls and G. J.Milburn, Quantum Optics, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
  22. C. W. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods, 4th ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
  23. P. D. Drummond and C. W. Gardiner, Generalised P-representations in quantum optics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13, 2353 (1980).
  24. A. Gilchrist, C. W. Gardiner, and P. D. Drummond, Positive P representation: Application and validity, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3014 (1997).
  25. R. Schack and A. Schenzle, Positive P representation, Phys. Rev. A 44, 682 (1991).
  26. J. F. Corney, J. Heersink, R. Dong, V. Josse, P. D. Drummond, G. Leuchs, and U. L. Andersen, Simulations and experiments on polarization squeezing in optical fiber, Phys. Rev. A 78, 023831 (2008).
  27. P. Deuar and P. D. Drummond, Correlations in a BEC collision: First-principles quantum dynamics with 150 000 atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 120402 (2007).
  28. P. B. Blakie, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, R. J. Ballagh, and C. W. Gardiner, Dynamics and statistical mechanics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques, Adv. Phys. 57, 363 (2008).
  29. A. Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Ann. Phys. (NY) 325, 1790 (2010).
  30. M. J. Steel, M. K. Olsen, L. I. Plimak, P. D. Drummond, S. M. Tan, M. J. Collett, D. F. Walls, and R. Graham, Dynamical quantum noise in trapped Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4824 (1998).
  31. A. Sinatra, C. Lobo, and Y. Castin, The truncated Wigner method for Bose-condensed gases: Limits of validity and applications, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, 3599 (2002).
  32. G. Dagvadorj, J. M. Fellows, S. Matyjaśkiewicz, F. M. Marchetti, I. Carusotto, and M. H. Szymańska, Nonequilibrium phase transition in a two-dimensional driven open quantum system, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041028 (2015).
  33. P. Comaron, G. Dagvadorj, A. Zamora, I. Carusotto, N. P. Proukakis, and M. H. Szymańska, Dynamical critical exponents in driven-dissipative quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 095302 (2018).
  34. H. Hosseinabadi, O. Chelpanova, and J. Marino, User-friendly truncated Wigner approximation for dissipative spin dynamics, PRX Quantum 6, 030344 (2025).
  35. P. D. Drummond and A. D. Hardman, Simulation of quantum effects in Raman-active waveguides, Europhys. Lett. 21, 279 (1993).
  36. L. I. Plimak, M. K. Olsen, M. Fleischhauer, and M. J. Collett, Beyond the Fokker-Planck equation: Stochastic simulation of complete Wigner representation for the optical parametric oscillator, Europhys. Lett. 56, 372 (2001).
  37. S. E. Hoffmann, J. F. Corney, and P. D. Drummond, Hybrid phase-space simulation method for interacting Bose fields, Phys. Rev. A 78, 013622 (2008).
  38. M. K. Olsen and A. S. Bradley, Numerical representation of quantum states in the positive-P and Wigner representations, Opt. Commun. 282, 3924 (2009).
  39. J. F. Corney and M. K. Olsen, Non-Gaussian pure states and positive Wigner functions, Phys. Rev. A 91, 023824 (2015).
  40. R. Ng and E. S. Sørensen, Exact real-time dynamics of quantum spin systems using the positive-P representation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 065305 (2011).
  41. J. Huber, P. Kirton, and P. Rabl, Phase-space methods for simulating the dissipative many-body dynamics of collective spin systems, SciPost Phys. 10, 045 (2021).
  42. P. D. Drummond and M. G. Raymer, Quantum theory of propagation of nonclassical radiation in a near-resonant medium, Phys. Rev. A 44, 2072 (1991).
  43. R. E. Slusher, Self-induced transparency, Prog. Opt. 12, 53 (1974).
  44. M. S. Najafabadi, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, J. F. Corney, N. Kalinin, A. A. Sorokin, and G. Leuchs, Quantum squeezing via self-induced transparency in a photonic crystal fiber, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023142 (2024).
  45. M. S. Najafabadi, J. F. Corney, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, N. Y. Joly, and G. Leuchs, Squeezing via self-induced transparency in mercury-filled photonic crystal fibers, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 42, 749 (2025).
  46. P. Jordan, Der Zusammenhang der symmetrischen und linearen Gruppen und das Mehrkörperproblem, Z. Phys. 94, 531 (1935).
  47. J. Schwinger, On angular momentum, Technical Report NYO-3071 (U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, DC, 1952.
  48. M. S. Najafabadi, J. F. Corney, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, and G. Leuchs, Jordan-Schwinger phase-space approach to self-induced transparency solitons, in Quantum 2.0 (Optica Publishing Group, Washington, DC, 2025), paper QTu3A.12.
  49. L. Allen and J. H. Eberly, Optical Resonance and Two-Level Atoms (Dover, New York, 1975).
  50. R.-K. Lee and Y. Lai, Quantum squeezing and correlation of self-induced transparency solitons, Phys. Rev. A 80, 033839 (2009).
  51. G. D. Roston and F. S. Obaid, Exact analytical formula for Voigt spectral line profile, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 94, 255 (2005).
  52. P. Deuar and P. D. Drummond, Gauge P representations for quantum-dynamical problems: Removal of boundary terms, Phys. Rev. A 66, 033812 (2002).
  53. P. D. Drummond and P. Deuar, Quantum dynamics with stochastic gauge simulations, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 5, S281 (2003).
  54. S. Wüster, J. F. Corney, J. M. Rost, and P. Deuar, Quantum dynamics of long-range interacting systems using the positive-P and gauge-P representations, Phys. Rev. E 96, 013309 (2017).
  55. U. Vogl, C. Peuntinger, N. Y. Joly, P. S. J. Russell, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, Atomic mercury vapor inside a hollow-core photonic crystal fiber, Opt. Express 22, 29375 (2014).
  56. D. R. Häupl, D. Weller, R. Löw, and N. Y. Joly, Spatially resolved spectroscopy of alkali metal vapour diffusing inside hollow-core photonic crystal fibres, New J. Phys. 24, 113017 (2022).
  57. S. Najafabadi, Mojdeh, Data related to figures in paper, Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20787762.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation