Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Blueprint for experiments exploring the quantum recurrence theorem on a coupled multiqubit system

Bayan Karimi1,2,*, Xuntao Wu1, Andrew N. Cleland1,3, and Jukka P. Pekola2,†

  • *Contact author: karimib@uchicago.edu; bayan.karimi@aalto.fi
  • †Contact author: jukka.pekola@aalto.fi

Phys. Rev. Research 8, L012062 – Published 13 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wv9h-x14y

Abstract

The quantum form of the Poincaré recurrence theorem stipulates that a system with a time-independent Hamiltonian and discrete energy levels returns arbitrarily close to its initial state in a finite time. Qubit systems, being highly isolated from their dissipative surroundings, provide a possible experimental test bed for studying this theoretical construct. Here, we investigate an N-qubit system, weakly coupled to its environment. We present quantitative analytical and numerical results on both the revival probability and time, and demonstrate that the system indeed returns arbitrarily close to its initial state, but in a time exponential in the number of qubits N, with revival times that are astronomically large for systems with just a few tens of qubits. Given the lifetimes achievable in present-day superconducting multiqubit systems, we propose a realistic experimental test of this theory and its size scaling. This provides insights into how thermalization emerges in isolated quantum systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (33)

  1. H. Poincaré, Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique. divergence des séries de M. Lindstedt, Acta Math. 13, 1 (1890).
  2. C. Carathéodory, Über den Wiederkehrsatz von Poincaré, Sitz. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys. Math. 34, 580 (1919).
  3. M. Kac, On the distribution of values of trigonometric sums with linearly independent frequencies, Am. J. Math. 65, 609 (1943).
  4. R. Zwanzig, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001).
  5. P. Bocchieri and A. Loinger, Quantum recurrence theorem, Phys. Rev. 107, 337 (1957).
  6. L. S. Schulman, Note on the quantum recurrence theorem, Phys. Rev. A 18, 2379 (1978).
  7. A. Peres, Recurrence phenomena in quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1118 (1982).
  8. A. Peres, Multiple time scales for recurrences of Rydberg states, Phys. Rev. A 47, 5196 (1993).
  9. R. Robinett, Quantum wave packet revivals, Phys. Rep. 392, 1 (2004).
  10. R. Yin, K. Ziegler, F. Thiel, and E. Barkai, Large fluctuations of the first detected quantum return time, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033086 (2019).
  11. F. Haake, S. Gnutzmann, and M. Kuś, Quantum Signatures of Chaos, Springer Series in Synergetics (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2018).
  12. S. Campbell, et al., Roadmap on quantum thermodynamics, Quantum Sci. Technol. 11, 012501 (2026).
  13. F. A. Grünbaum, L. Velázquez, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner, Recurrence for discrete time unitary evolutions, Commun. Math. Phys. 320, 543 (2013).
  14. D. Wallace, Recurrence theorems: A unified account, J. Math. Phys. 56, 022105 (2015).
  15. Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, K. J. Satzinger, M.-H. Chou, A. Bienfait, C. R. Conner, E. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, D. I. Schuster, and A. N. Cleland, Violating Bell's inequality with remotely connected superconducting qubits, Nat. Phys. 15, 741 (2019).
  16. B. Rauer, T. Schweigler, F. Cataldini, M. Tajik, and J. Schmiedmayer, Recurrences in an isolated quantum many-body system, Science 360, 307 (2018).
  17. X.-X. Chen, Y.-J. Wang, A.-N. Zhang, Z. Meng, Q.-Y. Wu, X.-B. Song, and X.-S. Shi, Unmonitored and monitored recurrence in single-photon quantum walks, Phys. Rev. A 110, 012219 (2024).
  18. T. Mori, T. N. Ikeda, E. Kaminishi, and M. Ueda, Thermalization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: A theoretical overview, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 112001 (2018).
  19. R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015).
  20. L. D'Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).
  21. S. Karch, S. Bandyopadhyay, Z.-H. Sun, A. Impertro, S. Huh, I. P. Rodríguez, J. F. Wienand, W. Ketterle, M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Probing quantum many-body dynamics using subsystem Loschmidt echoes, arXiv:2501.16995.
  22. J. P. Pekola and B. Karimi, Heat bath in a quantum circuit, Entropy 26, 429 (2024).
  23. X. Wu, H. Yan, G. Andersson, A. Anferov, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, J. Grebel, Y. J. Joshi, S. Li, J. M. Miller, R. G. Povey, H. Qiao, and A. N. Cleland, Modular quantum processor with an all-to-all reconfigurable router, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041030 (2024).
  24. T. I. Andersen, et al., Thermalization and criticality on an analogue-digital quantum simulator, Nature (London) 638, 79 (2025).
  25. M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braumüller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Superconducting qubits: Current state of play, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369 (2020).
  26. M. Bal, et al., Systematic improvements in transmon qubit coherence enabled by niobium surface encapsulation, npj Quantum Inf. 10, 43 (2024).
  27. M. Tuokkola, Y. Sunada, H. Kivijärvi, J. Albanese, L. Grönberg, J.-P. Kaikkonen, V. Vestervinen, J. Govenius, and M. Möttönen, Methods to achieve near-millisecond energy relaxation and dephasing times for a superconducting transmon qubit, Nat. Commun. 16, 5421 (2025).
  28. J. P. Pekola and B. Karimi, Ultrasensitive calorimetric detection of single photons from qubit decay, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011026 (2022).
  29. H. Bohr, Almost Periodic Function (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 1947).
  30. L. Amerio and G. Prouse, Almost-Periodic Functions and Functional Equations (Springer Science+Business Media, New York, 1971).
  31. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/wv9h-x14y for illustration of the weak-coupling regime and for detailed derivations of the main results in the paper, which also includes Refs. [23, 28, 29, 30, 33].
  32. The population of the qubit j stays below δj for a time δj/G in each period of Δj. Since δ≥δj, the long-time approximation is valid for τ≫δ/G.
  33. J. P. Pekola, Y. Masuyama, Y. Nakamura, J. Bergli, and Y. M. Galperin, Dephasing and dissipation in qubit thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. E 91, 062109 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation