- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Coupled dimerized alternating-bond quantum spin chains in the distorted honeycomb-lattice magnet Cu5SbO6

C. Piyakulworawat1,2, K. Morita3, Y. Fukumoto4, W.-Y. Hsieh5,6, W.-T. Chen5,6,7, K. Nakajima8, S. Ohira-Kawamura8, Y. Zhao9,10, S. Wannapaiboon11 et al.

P. Piyawongwatthana8, T. J. Sato12,13, and K. Matan1,2,*

  • *Contact author: kittiwit.mat@mahidol.ac.th
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013247 – Published 6 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vdgg-d128

Abstract

We analyze powder-averaged inelastic neutron scattering and magnetization data for the distorted honeycomb compound Cu5SbO6 using a first-order dimer expansion calculation and quantum Monte Carlo simulations. We show that, in contrast to the previously proposed honeycomb-lattice model, Cu5SbO6 accommodates interacting dimerized spin chains with alternating ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic couplings along the chain. Moreover, unlike the typical couplings observed in other Cu2+-based distorted honeycomb magnets, the spin chains in Cu5SbO6 primarily couple through an antiferromagnetic coupling that arises between the honeycomb layers, rather than the expected interchain coupling in the layers. This finding reveals a different magnetic coupling scheme for Cu5SbO6. In addition, utilizing x-ray spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy, we also refine the crystal structure and stacking-fault model of the compound.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (76)

  1. S. Sachdev, Quantum magnetism and criticality, Nat. Phys. 4, 173 (2008).
  2. A. Vasiliev, O. Volkova, E. Zvereva, and M. Markina, Milestones of low-D quantum magnetism, npj Quantum Mater. 3, 18 (2018).
  3. T. Nikuni, M. Oshikawa, A. Oosawa, and H. Tanaka, Bose-Einstein condensation of dilute magnons in TlCuCl3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5868 (2000).
  4. C. Rüegg, N. Cavadini, A. Furrer, H.-U. Gudel, K. Krämer, H. Mutka, A. Wildes, K. Habicht, and P. Vorderwisch, Bose–Einstein condensation of the triplet states in the magnetic insulator TlCuCl3, Nature (London) 423, 62 (2003).
  5. M. Jaime, V. F. Correa, N. Harrison, C. D. Batista, N. Kawashima, Y. Kazuma, G. A. Jorge, R. Stein, I. Heinmaa, S. A. Zvyagin, Y. Sasago, and K. Uchinokura, Magnetic-field-induced condensation of triplons in Han Purple pigment BaCuSi2O6, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 087203 (2004).
  6. V. S. Zapf, D. Zocco, B. R. Hansen, M. Jaime, N. Harrison, C. D. Batista, M. Kenzelmann, C. Niedermayer, A. Lacerda, and A. Paduan-Filho, Bose-Einstein condensation of S=1 nickel spin degrees of freedom in NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 077204 (2006).
  7. T. Giamarchi, C. Rüegg, and O. Tchernyshyov, Bose–Einstein condensation in magnetic insulators, Nat. Phys. 4, 198 (2008).
  8. A. A. Aczel, Y. Kohama, C. Marcenat, F. Weickert, M. Jaime, O. E. Ayala-Valenzuela, R. D. McDonald, S. D. Selesnic, H. A. Dabkowska, and G. M. Luke, Field-induced Bose-Einstein condensation of triplons up to 8 K in Sr3Cr2O8, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 207203 (2009).
  9. V. Zapf, M. Jaime, and C. D. Batista, Bose-Einstein condensation in quantum magnets, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 563 (2014).
  10. E. C. Samulon, Y. Kohama, R. D. McDonald, M. C. Shapiro, K. A. Al-Hassanieh, C. D. Batista, M. Jaime, and I. R. Fisher, Asymmetric quintuplet condensation in the frustrated S=1 spin dimer compound Ba3Mn2O8, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 047202 (2009).
  11. S. E. Sebastian, N. Harrison, C. D. Batista, L. Balicas, M. Jaime, P. A. Sharma, N. Kawashima, and I. R. Fisher, Dimensional reduction at a quantum critical point, Nature (London) 441, 617 (2006).
  12. C. Rüegg, B. Normand, M. Matsumoto, A. Furrer, D. F. McMorrow, K. W. Krämer, H.-U. Güdel, S. N. Gvasaliya, H. Mutka, and M. Boehm, Quantum magnets under pressure: Controlling elementary excitations in TlCuCl3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 205701 (2008).
  13. P. A. McClarty, F. Krüger, T. Guidi, S. F. Parker, K. Refson, A. W. Parker, D. Prabhakaran, and R. Coldea, Topological triplon modes and bound states in a Shastry–Sutherland magnet, Nat. Phys. 13, 736 (2017).
  14. A. Koga and N. Kawakami, Quantum phase transitions in the Shastry-Sutherland model for SrCu2(BO3)2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4461 (2000).
  15. M. E. Zayed et al., 4-spin plaquette singlet state in the Shastry–Sutherland compound SrCu2(BO3)2, Nat. Phys. 13, 962 (2017).
  16. E. Fogh, M. Nayak, O. Prokhnenko, M. Bartkowiak, K. Munakata, J.-R. Soh, A. A. Turrini, M. E. Zayed, E. Pomjakushina, H. Kageyama, H. Nojiri, K. Kakurai, B. Normand, F. Mila, and H. M. Rønnow, Field-induced bound-state condensation and spin-nematic phase in SrCu2(BO3)2 revealed by neutron scattering up to 25.9 T, Nat. Commun. 15, 442 (2024).
  17. M. Takigawa, M. Horvatić, T. Waki, S. Krämer, C. Berthier, F. Lévy-Bertrand, I. Sheikin, H. Kageyama, Y. Ueda, and F. Mila, Incomplete Devil’s staircase in the magnetization curve of SrCu2(BO3)2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 067210 (2013).
  18. P. Corboz and F. Mila, Crystals of bound states in the magnetization plateaus of the Shastry-Sutherland model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 147203 (2014).
  19. D. A. Tennant, B. Lake, A. J. A. James, F. H. L. Essler, S. Notbohm, H.-J. Mikeska, J. Fielden, P. Kögerler, P. C. Canfield, and M. T. F. Telling, Anomalous dynamical line shapes in a quantum magnet at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B 85, 014402 (2012).
  20. E. S. Klyushina, A. T. M. N. Islam, J. T. Park, E. A. Goremychkin, E. Wheeler, B. Klemke, and B. Lake, Hamiltonian of the S=12 dimerized antiferromagnetic-ferromagnetic quantum spin chain BaCu2V2O8, Phys. Rev. B 98, 104413 (2018).
  21. K. Kodama, H. Harashina, H. Sasaki, M. Kato, M. Sato, K. Kakurai, and M. Nishi, Neutron scattering study on the quasi-one-dimensional spin-gap system CuNb2O6, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 237 (1999).
  22. M. B. Stone, W. Tian, M. D. Lumsden, G. E. Granroth, D. Mandrus, J.-H. Chung, N. Harrison, and S. E. Nagler, Quantum spin correlations in an organometallic alternating-sign chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 087204 (2007).
  23. Y. Miura, R. Hirai, Y. Kobayashi, and M. Sato, Spin-gap behavior of Na3Cu2SbO6 with distorted honeycomb structure, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 084707 (2006).
  24. Y. Miura, Y. Yasui, T. Moyoshi, M. Sato, and K. Kakurai, Magnetic excitations of spin-gap system Na3Cu2SbO6 with distorted honeycomb structure, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 104709 (2008).
  25. H.-J. Koo and M.-H. Whangbo, Analysis of the spin lattice model for the spin-gapped layered compounds Na3Cu2SbO6 and Na2Cu2TeO6 on the basis of electronic structure calculations, Inorg. Chem. 47, 128 (2008).
  26. C. N. Kuo, T. S. Jian, and C. S. Lue, Characterization of the spin gap nature in Na3Cu2SbO6 using Na23 NMR, J. Alloys Compd. 531, 1 (2012).
  27. M. Schmitt, O. Janson, S. Golbs, M. Schmidt, W. Schnelle, J. Richter, and H. Rosner, Microscopic magnetic modeling for the S=12 alternating-chain compounds Na3Cu2SbO6 and Na2Cu2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B 89, 174403 (2014).
  28. C. Koo, E. A. Zvereva, I. L. Shukaev, M. Richter, M. I. Stratan, A. N. Vasiliev, V. B. Nalbandyan, and R. Klingeler, Static and dynamic magnetic response of fragmented Haldane-like spin chains in layered Li3Cu2SbO6, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 084702 (2016).
  29. E. Vavilova, S. Nishimoto, T. Salikhov, T. Vasilchikova, V. Nalbandyan, A. Vasiliev, and E. Zvereva, Spin dynamics in the alternating chain system Li3Cu2SbO6 with defects probed by nuclear magnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. B 103, 094415 (2021).
  30. S. Gao, L.-F. Lin, A. F. May, B. K. Rai, Q. Zhang, E. Dagotto, A. D. Christianson, and M. B. Stone, Weakly coupled alternating S=1/2 chains in the distorted honeycomb lattice compound Na2Cu2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B 102, 220402(R) (2020).
  31. Y. Shangguan, S. Bao, Z.-Y. Dong, Z. Cai, W. Wang, Z. Huang, Z. Ma, J. Liao, X. Zhao, R. Kajimoto, K. Iida, D. Voneshen, S.-L. Yu, J.-X. Li, and J. Wen, Evidence for strong correlations at finite temperatures in the dimerized magnet Na2Cu2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B 104, 224430 (2021).
  32. L.-F. Lin, R. Soni, Y. Zhang, S. Gao, A. Moreo, G. Alvarez, A. D. Christianson, M. B. Stone, and E. Dagotto, Electronic structure, magnetic properties, and pairing tendencies of the copper-based honeycomb lattice Na2Cu2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B 105, 245113 (2022).
  33. J. M. S. Skakle, M. A. Castellanos R., S. T. Tovar, and A. R. West, Synthesis of Li3Cu2SbO6, a new partially ordered rock salt structure, J. Solid State Chem. 131, 115 (1997).
  34. V. B. Nalbandyan, M. Avdeev, and M. A. Evstigneeva, Crystal structure of Li4ZnTeO6 and revision of Li3Cu2SbO6, J. Solid State Chem. 199, 62 (2013).
  35. K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011).
  36. V. Kumar, A. Gupta, and S. Uma, Formation of honeycomb ordered monoclinic Li2M2TeO6 (M=Cu, Ni) and disordered orthorhombic Li2Ni2TeO6 oxides, Dalton Trans. 42, 14992 (2013).
  37. O. A. Smirnova, V. B. Nalbandyan, A. A. Petrenko, and M. Avdeev, Subsolidus phase relations in Na2O–CuO–Sb2On system and crystal structure of new sodium copper antimonate Na3Cu2SbO6, J. Solid State Chem. 178, 1165 (2005).
  38. J. Xu, A. Assoud, N. Soheilnia, S. Derakhshan, H. L. Cuthbert, J. E. Greedan, M. H. Whangbo, and H. Kleinke, Synthesis, structure, and magnetic properties of the layered copper(II) oxide Na2Cu2TeO6, Inorg. Chem. 44, 5042 (2005).
  39. R. Sankar, I. P. Muthuselvam, G. J. Shu, W. T. Chen, S. K. Karna, R. Jayavel, and F. C. Chou, Crystal growth and magnetic ordering of Na2Ni2TeO6 with honeycomb layers and Na2Cu2TeO6 with Cu spin dimers, CrystEngComm. 16, 10791 (2014).
  40. T. Murtaza, R. Kalaivanan, G. Madeswaran, K. Bayikadi, and R. Sankar, Magnetic properties of honeycomb spin lattice compounds Na2M2TeO6 (M = Co, Ni) and spin dimer compound Na2Cu2TeO6 single crystals by flux-growth, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 14, 1601 (2021).
  41. K. Morimoto, Y. Itoh, K. Yoshimura, M. Kato, and K. Hirota, Hole doping effects on spin-gapped Na2Cu2TeO6 via topochemical Na deficiency, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 083709 (2006).
  42. S. Derakhshan, H. L. Cuthbert, J. E. Greedan, B. Rahaman, and T. Saha-Dasgupta, Electronic structures and low-dimensional magnetic properties of the ordered rocksalt oxides Na3Cu2SbO6 and Na2Cu2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B 76, 104403 (2007).
  43. S. Patil and S. D. Kaushik, Investigating structure and physical properties of quaternary layered transition metal oxide Na2Cu2TeO6, arXiv:2508.16219.
  44. P. W. Anderson, Antiferromagnetism. Theory of superexchange interaction, Phys. Rev. 79, 350 (1950).
  45. J. B. Goodenough, Theory of the role of covalence in the perovskite-type manganites [La, M(II)]]MnO3, Phys. Rev. 100, 564 (1955).
  46. J. B. Goodenough, An interpretation of the magnetic properties of the perovskite-type mixed crystals La1−xSrxCoO3−λ, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 6, 287 (1958).
  47. A. S. Moskvin, N. S. Ovanesyan, and V. A. Trukhtanov, Angular dependence of the superexchange interaction Fe3+−O2−−Cr3+, Hyperfine Interact. 1, 265 (1975).
  48. E. Climent-Pascual, P. Norby, N. H. Andersen, P. W. Stephens, H. W. Zandbergen, J. Larsen, and R. J. Cava, Spin 1/2 delafossite honeycomb compound Cu5SbO6, Inorg. Chem. 51, 557 (2012).
  49. P. Sae-Fu et al. (unpublished).
  50. K. Nakajima et al., AMATERAS: A cold-neutron disk chopper spectrometer, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, SB028 (2011).
  51. J. W. Lynn, Y. Chen, S. Chang, Y. Zhao, S. Chi, W. Ratcliff, B. G. Ueland, and R. W. Erwin, Double-focusing thermal triple-axis spectrometer at the NCNR, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 117, 61 (2012).
  52. Y. Inamura, T. Nakatani, J. Suzuki, and T. Otomo, Development status of software “Utsusemi” for Chopper spectrometers at MLF, J-PARC, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, SA031 (2013).
  53. V. Petříček, M. Dušek, and L. Palatinus, Crystallographic computing system JANA2006: General features, Z. Kristallogr.—Cryst. Mater. 229, 345 (2014).
  54. H. M. Rietveld, A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2, 65 (1969).
  55. J. Rodríguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica B 192, 55 (1993).
  56. B. Ravel and M. Newville, ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for x-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537 (2005).
  57. M. Newville, Fundamentals of XAFS, Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 78, 33 (2014).
  58. J. Bréger, M. Jiang, N. Dupré, Y. S. Meng, Y. Shao-Horn, G. Ceder, and C. P. Grey, High-resolution X-ray diffraction, DIFFaX, NMR and first principles study of disorder in the Li2MnO3–Li[Ni1/2Mn1/2]O2 solid solution, J. Solid State Chem. 178, 2575 (2005).
  59. S. K. Choi, R. Coldea, A. N. Kolmogorov, T. Lancaster, I. I. Mazin, S. J. Blundell, P. G. Radaelli, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, K. R. Choi, S.-W. Cheong, P. J. Baker, C. Stock, and J. Taylor, Spin waves and revised crystal structure of honeycomb iridate Na2IrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 127204 (2012).
  60. M. M. J. Treacy, J. M. Newsam, and M. W. Deem, A general recursion method for calculating diffracted intensities from crystals containing planar faults, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 433, 499 (1991).
  61. M. Casas-Cabanas, J. Rodríguez-Carvajal, and M. Palacín, Faults, a new program for refinement of powder diffraction patterns from layered structures, in Ninth European Powder Diffraction Conference (Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, München, 2006), pp. 243–248.
  62. M. Casas-Cabanas, M. Reynaud, J. Rikarte, P. Horbach, and J. Rodríguez-Carvajal, FAULTS: A program for refinement of structures with extended defects, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 2259 (2016).
  63. S. Todo and K. Kato, Cluster algorithms for general-S quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 047203 (2001).
  64. H. G. Evertz, The loop algorithm, Adv. Phys. 52, 1 (2003).
  65. B. Bauer, L. D. Carr, H. G. Evertz, A. Feiguin, J. Freire, S. Fuchs, L. Gamper, J. Gukelberger, E. Gull, S. Guertler, A. Hehn, R. Igarashi, S. V. Isakov, D. Koop, P. N. Ma, P. Mates, H. Matsuo, O. Parcollet, G. Pawłowski, J. D. Picon, et al., The ALPS project release 2.0: Open source software for strongly correlated systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2011) P05001.
  66. D. C. Johnston, R. K. Kremer, M. Troyer, X. Wang, A. Klümper, S. L. Bud’ko, A. F. Panchula, and P. C. Canfield, Thermodynamics of spin S=1/2 antiferromagnetic uniform and alternating-exchange Heisenberg chains, Phys. Rev. B 61, 9558 (2000).
  67. O. F. Syljuåsen and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum Monte Carlo with directed loops, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046701 (2002).
  68. O. F. Syljuåsen, Directed loop updates for quantum lattice models, Phys. Rev. E 67, 046701 (2003).
  69. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/vdgg-d128 for raw inelastic neutron scattering data at 4 and 200 K, integrated magnetic scattering intensity, density of states for the J1−J2−J3−J4 model, and details of the powder inelastic neutron scattering simulation.
  70. G. Xu, C. L. Broholm, Y.-A. Soh, G. Aeppli, J. F. Ditusa, Y. Chen, M. Kenzelmann, C. D. Frost, T. Ito, K. Oka, and H. Takagi, Mesoscopic phase coherence in a quantum spin fluid, Science 317, 1049 (2007).
  71. F. H. L. Essler and R. M. Konik, Finite-temperature lineshapes in gapped quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 78, 100403(R) (2008).
  72. I. Exius, K. P. Schmidt, B. Lake, D. A. Tennant, and G. S. Uhrig, Vertex corrections in the dynamic structure factor in spin ladders, Phys. Rev. B 82, 214410 (2010).
  73. B. Normand and C. Rüegg, Complete bond-operator theory of the two-chain spin ladder, Phys. Rev. B 83, 054415 (2011).
  74. F. Verstraete, M. Popp, and J. I. Cirac, Entanglement versus correlations in spin systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 027901 (2004).
  75. B.-Q. Jin and V. E. Korepin, Localizable entanglement in antiferromagnetic spin chains, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062314 (2004).
  76. Č. Brukner, V. Vedral, and A. Zeilinger, Crucial role of quantum entanglement in bulk properties of solids, Phys. Rev. A 73, 012110 (2006).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013247– Published 6 March, 2026
  • Received 7 November 2025
  • Accepted 6 February 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation