Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Spatially structured flocking in a proliferating population of self-propelled organisms without explicit alignment interactions

Seiya Takamura and Nen Saito*

  • Graduate School of Integrated Science for Life, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima City, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan

  • *Contact author: nensaito@hiroshima-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033299 – Published 29 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/v3gm-vhry

Abstract

While it is well established that self-propelled particles with alignment interactions can exhibit orientational order, the impact of self-replication and annihilation, which are key characteristics in cellular systems, on spatiotemporal order remains poorly understood. To explore the interplay between self-propulsion and self-replication, we introduce the active Brownian bug model, in which self-propelled agents undergo stochastic, density-dependent replication and constant-rate death. Despite the absence of alignment interactions, the system exhibits flocking behavior characterized by high orientational order, while maintaining ordered hexagonal arrays. This emergent order arises from stochastic birth and death processes, offering a mechanism for flocking in proliferating cellular populations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (37)

  1. T. Vicsek, A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226 (1995).
  2. P. Baconnier, O. Dauchot, V. Démery, G. Düring, S. Henkes, C. Huepe, and A. Shee, Self-aligning polar active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 015007 (2025).
  3. E. O. Budrene and H. C. Berg, Complex patterns formed by motile cells of Escherichia coli, Nature (London) 349, 630 (1991).
  4. E. O. Budrene and H. C. Berg, Dynamics of formation of symmetrical patterns by chemotactic bacteria, Nature (London) 376, 49 (1995).
  5. M. Matsushita, J. Wakita, H. Itoh, I. Rafols, T. Matsuyama, H. Sakaguchi, and M. Mimura, Interface growth and pattern formation in bacterial colonies, Physica A 249, 517 (1998).
  6. E. Ben-Jacob, From snowflake formation to growth of bacterial colonies II: Cooperative formation of complex colonial patterns, Contemp. Phys. 38, 205 (1997).
  7. K. Kawasaki, A. Mochizuki, M. Matsushita, T. Umeda, and N. Shigesada, Modeling spatio-temporal patterns generated by Bacillus subtilis, J. Theor. Biol. 188, 177 (1997).
  8. E. Ben-Jacob, O. Schochet, A. Tenenbaum, I. Cohen, A. Czirok, and T. Vicsek, Generic modeling of cooperative growth patterns in bacterial colonies, Nature (London) 368, 46 (1994).
  9. W. R. Young, A. J. Roberts, and G. Stuhne, Reproductive pair correlations and the clustering of organisms, Nature (London) 412, 328 (2001).
  10. Y. Iwasa and E. Teramoto, Branching-diffusion model for the formation of distributional patterns in populations, J. Math. Biol. 19, 109 (1984).
  11. E. Kuno, Studies on the population dynamics of rice leafhoppers in a paddy field, Bull. Kyushu Agric. Expl. Stn. 14, 131 (1968).
  12. E. Hernández-García and C. López, Clustering, advection, and patterns in a model of population dynamics with neighborhood-dependent rates, Phys. Rev. E 70, 016216 (2004).
  13. F. Ramos, C. López, E. Hernández-García, and M. A. Munoz, Crystallization and melting of bacteria colonies and Brownian bugs, Phys. Rev. E, 77, 021102 (2008).
  14. E. Heinsalu, E. Hernández-Garcia, and C. López, Clustering determines who survives for competing Brownian and lévy walkers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 258101 (2013).
  15. P. V. Martín, A. Koldaeva, and S. Pigolotti, Coalescent dynamics of planktonic communities, Phys. Rev. E 106, 044408 (2022).
  16. D. J. Jörg, Y. Kitadate, S. Yoshida, and B. D. Simons, Stem cell populations as self-renewing many-particle systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 12, 135 (2021).
  17. H. Yamaguchi, K. Kawaguchi, and T. Sagawa, Dynamical crossover in a stochastic model of cell fate decision, Phys. Rev. E 96, 012401 (2017).
  18. O. Hallatschek, S. S. Datta, K. Drescher, J. Dunkel, J. Elgeti, B. Waclaw, and N. S. Wingreen, Proliferating active matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 407 (2023).
  19. H. Soares, B. Carmona, S. Nolasco, and L. V. Melo, Polarity in ciliate models: From cilia to cell architecture, Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 7, 240 (2019).
  20. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/v3gm-vhry for further computational details and additional results.
  21. Y. Ideses, Y. Brill-Karniely, L. Haviv, A. Ben-Shaul, and A. Bernheim-Groswasser, Arp2/3 branched actin network mediates filopodia-like bundles formation in vitro, PLoS One 3, e3297 (2008).
  22. M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase separation, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 219 (2015).
  23. A. Almodóvar, T. Galla, and C. López, Liquid-hexatic-solid phases in active and passive Brownian particles determined by stochastic birth and death events, Phys. Rev. E 106, 054130 (2022).
  24. D. Bi, X. Yang, M. C. Marchetti, and M. L. Manning, Motility-driven glass and jamming transitions in biological tissues, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021011 (2016).
  25. N. Saito and S. Ishihara, Cell deformability drives fluid-to-fluid phase transition in active cell monolayers, Sci. Adv. 10, eadi8433 (2024).
  26. A. Almodóvar, T. Galla, and C. López, Extinction and coexistence in a binary mixture of proliferating motile disks, Phys. Rev. E 109, 064140 (2024).
  27. P. K. Mishra and S. Mishra, Active polar flock with birth and death, Phys. Fluids 34, 057110 (2022).
  28. J. Cremer, T. Honda, Y. Tang, J. Wong-Ng, M. Vergassola, and T. Hwa, Chemotaxis as a navigation strategy to boost range expansion, Nature (London) 575, 658 (2019).
  29. H. Chaté, F. Ginelli, G. Grégoire, and F. Raynaud, Collective motion of self-propelled particles interacting without cohesion, Phys. Rev. E 77, 046113 (2008).
  30. R. Kürsten and T. Ihle, Dry active matter exhibits a self-organized cross sea phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 188003 (2020).
  31. L. Barberis and F. Peruani, Large-scale patterns in a minimal cognitive flocking model: Incidental leaders, nematic patterns, and aggregates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 248001 (2016).
  32. S. Das, M. Ciarchi, Z. Zhou, J. Yan, J. Zhang, and R. Alert, Flocking by turning away, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031008 (2024).
  33. F. Giavazzi, M. Paoluzzi, M. Macchi, D. Bi, G. Scita, M. L. Manning, R. Cerbino, and M. C. Marchetti, Flocking transitions in confluent tissues, Soft Matter 14, 3471 (2018).
  34. A. Dinelli, J. O’Byrne, A. Curatolo, Y. Zhao, P. Sollich, and J. Tailleur, Non-reciprocity across scales in active mixtures, Nat. Commun. 14, 6644 (2023).
  35. T. Oki, T. S. Hatakeyama, S. Nishikawa, S. Ishihara, and T. Namba, Anti-aligning self-propelled model of two species: Emergence of self-organized heterogeneous aligned and clustered order, arXiv:2502.16821.
  36. R. Mandal, S. S. Jaramillo, and P. Sollich, Robustness of traveling states in generic nonreciprocal mixtures, Phys. Rev. E 109, L062602 (2024).
  37. https://github.com/NenSaito/Active-Brownian-Bugs.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation