Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Double-exchange ferromagnetism of fermionic atoms in a p-orbital hexagonal lattice

Haoran Sun1, Erhai Zhao2, Youjin Deng1, and W. Vincent Liu3,*

  • *Contact author: wvliu@pitt.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033173 – Published 11 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/tspx-7mly

Abstract

A broad class of correlated quantum materials features strong Hund’s coupling, yet cold-atom quantum simulators have so far focused primarily on single-orbital Fermi-Hubbard systems near a Mott insulator. Here, we show that repulsively interacting fermions loaded into the p bands of a hexagonal lattice offer a unique platform to study the interplay of “Hundness” and “Mottness.” Our theory predicts that the orbital degrees of freedom, despite geometric frustration, produce a rich phase diagram featuring a competing itinerant ferromagnetic (FM) metal and a spin-1 antiferromagnetic (AFM) insulator. While FM order is known to emerge at low fillings near the flat-band limit, we show that this itinerant ferromagnetism is remarkably robust, persisting to stronger interactions and higher fillings well beyond the flat-band regime. More importantly, we identify that near half filling, FM is stabilized by a different mechanism: the double exchange with spins aligning to avoid Hund-rule penalties at the expense of the kinetic energy of Dirac fermions. The competition between the kinetic and double-exchange energies leads to, within our approximations, a first-order transition between FM and AFM orders in the chemical potential-interaction strength plane. Our analysis suggests that p-orbital Fermi gases—as multiorbital systems with coexisting localized and itinerant spins—reveal a rich competition between correlated “Hund metals” and other unconventional states driven by quantum fluctuations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Orbital physics in transition-metal oxides, Science 288, 462 (2000).
  2. F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective Hamiltonian for the superconducting Cu oxides, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3759 (1988).
  3. W. Chen, C. N. Breiø, F. Massee, M. P. Allan, C. Petrovic, J. C. S. Davis, P. J. Hirschfeld, B. M. Andersen, and A. Kreisel, Interplay of hidden orbital order and superconductivity in CeCoIn5, Nat. Commun. 14, 2984 (2023).
  4. K. M. Stadler, G. Kotliar, A. Weichselbaum, and J. von Delft, Hundness versus Mottness in a three-band Hubbard–Hund model: On the origin of strong correlations in Hund metals, Ann. Phys. 405, 365 (2019).
  5. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).
  6. M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039 (1998).
  7. X. Li and W. V. Liu, Physics of higher orbital bands in optical lattices: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 116401 (2016).
  8. X. Li, E. Zhao, and W. V. Liu, Topological states in a ladder-like optical lattice containing ultracold atoms in higher orbital bands, Nat. Commun. 4, 1523 (2013).
  9. S. Zhang, H.-H. Hung, and C. Wu, Proposed realization of itinerant ferromagnetism in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 82, 053618 (2010).
  10. E. Zhao and W. V. Liu, Orbital order in Mott insulators of spinless p-band fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 160403 (2008).
  11. C. Wu, Orbital ordering and frustration of p-band Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 200406 (2008).
  12. H. Zou, B. Liu, E. Zhao, and W. V. Liu, A continuum of compass spin models on the honeycomb lattice, New J. Phys. 18, 053040 (2016).
  13. L. Wang, X. Dai, S. Chen, and X. C. Xie, Magnetism of cold fermionic atoms on the p band of an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 78, 023603 (2008).
  14. Y. Li, J. Yuan, X. Zhou, and X. Li, Spin-induced orbital frustration in a hexagonal optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033274 (2021).
  15. C. Wu, D. Bergman, L. Balents, and S. D. Sarma, Flat bands and Wigner crystallization in the honeycomb optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 070401 (2007).
  16. Z. Zhou, E. Zhao, and W. V. Liu, Spin-orbital exchange of strongly interacting fermions in the p band of a two-dimensional optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 100406 (2015).
  17. C. Zener, Interaction between the d-shells in the transition metals. II. Ferromagnetic compounds of manganese with perovskite structure, Phys. Rev. 82, 403 (1951).
  18. P. W. Anderson, Considerations on double exchange, Phys. Rev. 100, 675 (1955).
  19. E. Koch, Correlated Electrons: From Models to Materials (Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, 2012), Vol. 2, pp. 214–217.
  20. P. O. Bugnion and G. J. Conduit, Exploring exchange mechanisms with a cold-atom gas, Phys. Rev. A 88, 013601 (2013).
  21. G. Wirth, M. Olschlager, and A. Hemmerich, Evidence for orbital superfluidity in the P-band of a bipartite optical square lattice, Nat. Phys. 7, 147 (2011).
  22. P. Soltan-Panahi, D.-S. Lühmann, J. Struck, P. Windpassinger, and K. Sengstock, Quantum phase transition to unconventional multi-orbital superfluidity in optical lattices, Nat. Phys. 8, 71 (2012).
  23. M. Hachmann, Y. Kiefer, J. Riebesehl, R. Eichberger, and A. Hemmerich, Quantum degenerate Fermi gas in an orbital optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 033201 (2021).
  24. Y. Kiefer, M. Hachmann, and A. Hemmerich, Ultracold Feshbach molecules in an orbital optical lattice, Nat. Phys. 19, 794 (2023).
  25. S. Jin, X. Chen, and X. Zhou, The manipulation of ultracold atoms of high orbitals in optical lattices, Front. Phys. 10, 957151 (2022).
  26. W. V. Liu and C. Wu, Atomic matter of nonzero-momentum Bose-Einstein condensation and orbital current order, Phys. Rev. A 74, 013607 (2006).
  27. A. Isacsson and S. M. Girvin, Multiflavor bosonic Hubbard models in the first excited Bloch band of an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 72, 053604 (2005).
  28. A. Georges, L. de' Medici, and J. Mravlje, Strong correlations from Hund’s coupling, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 137 (2013).
  29. P. Fazekas, Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism, Series in Modern Condensed Matter Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999), Vol. 5.
  30. Z. Koinov, A field-theoretical approach to the extended Hubbard model, Physica C 470, 144 (2010).
  31. A. Mielke and H. Tasaki, Ferromagnetism in the Hubbard model, Commun. Math. Phys. 158, 341 (1993).
  32. R. Pons, A. Mielke, and T. Stauber, Flat-band ferromagnetism in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 102, 235101 (2020).
  33. M. Raczkowski, R. Peters, T. T. Phùng, N. Takemori, F. F. Assaad, A. Honecker, and J. Vahedi, Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice: From static and dynamical mean-field theories to lattice quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. B 101, 125103 (2020).
  34. J. Ostmeyer, E. Berkowitz, S. Krieg, T. A. Lähde, T. Luu, and C. Urbach, Semimetal–Mott insulator quantum phase transition of the Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245105 (2020).
  35. M.-H. Zeng, Y.-J. Wang, and T. Ma, Phase diagram of the Hubbard model on a honeycomb lattice: A cluster slave-spin study, Phys. Rev. B 105, 035155 (2022).
  36. M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, V. Ahufinger, B. Damski, A. S. De, and U. Sen, Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: Mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond, Adv. Phys. 56, 243 (2007).
  37. W. S. Bakr, J. I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. Fölling, and M. Greiner, A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice, Nature (London) 462, 74 (2009).
  38. J. F. Sherson, C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator, Nature (London) 467, 68 (2010).
  39. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
  40. K. Van Houcke, F. Werner, E. Kozik, N. Prokof'ev, B. Svistunov, M. J. H. Ku, A. T. Sommer, L. W. Cheuk, A. Schirotzek, and M. W. Zwierlein, Feynman diagrams versus Fermi-gas Feynman emulator, Nat. Phys. 8, 366 (2012).
  41. D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108 (1998).
  42. R. A. Hart, P. M. Duarte, T.-L. Yang, X. Liu, T. Paiva, E. Khatami, R. T. Scalettar, N. Trivedi, D. A. Huse, and R. G. Hulet, Observation of antiferromagnetic correlations in the Hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Nature (London) 519, 211 (2015).
  43. M. F. Parsons, A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, Site-resolved measurement of the spin-correlation function in the Fermi-Hubbard model, Science 353, 1253 (2016).
  44. A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kanász-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, A cold-atom Fermi–Hubbard antiferromagnet, Nature (London) 545, 462 (2017).
  45. H.-J. Shao, Y.-X. Wang, D.-Z. Zhu, Y.-S. Zhu, H.-N. Sun, S.-Y. Chen, C. Zhang, Z.-J. Fan, Y. Deng, X.-C. Yao, Y.-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Antiferromagnetic phase transition in a 3D fermionic Hubbard model, Nature (London) 632, 267 (2024).
  46. S. Yunoki, J. Hu, A. L. Malvezzi, A. Moreo, N. Furukawa, and E. Dagotto, Phase separation in electronic models for manganites, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 845 (1998).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation