- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Effective dynamics from minimizing dissipation

Antonio F. Rotundo*, Paolo Perinotti†, and Alessandro Bisio‡

  • *Contact author: antoniofrancesco.rotundo@unipv.it
  • †Contact author: paolo.perinotti@unipv.it
  • ‡Contact author: alessandro.bisio@unipv.it
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043019 – Published 6 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/t9kf-4342

Abstract

It is known that the same physical system can be described by different effective theories depending on the scale at which it is observed. In this work, we formulate a prescription for finding the unitary that best approximates the large-scale dynamics of a quantum system evolving discretely in time, as it is the case for digital quantum simulators. We consider the situation in which the degrees of freedom of the system can be divided between an IR part that we can observe and a UV part that we cannot observe. Following a principle of minimal dissipation, our goal is to find the unitary dynamics that best approximates the (generally nonunitary) time evolution of the IR degrees of freedom. We first prove that when the IR and UV degrees of freedom are weakly coupled, the unitary that maximizes the fidelity is given by a mean-field dynamics and the error is given by a sum of energy variances. We then apply our results to a one-dimensional quantum walk, which is known to reproduce the Dirac equation in the small-mass and -momentum limit. We find that in this limit the effective IR dynamics is obtained by a mass redefinition.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (59)

  1. J. Polchinski, Effective field theory and the Fermi surface, arXiv:hep-th/9210046.
  2. A. V. Manohar, Effective field theories, in Perturbative and Nonperturbative Aspects of Quantum Field Theory, edited by H. Latal and W. Schweiger (Springer, Berlin, 1997), pp. 311–362.
  3. D. B. Kaplan, Five lectures on effective field theory, arXiv:nucl-th/0510023.
  4. C. P. Burgess, An introduction to effective field theory, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 329 (2007).
  5. K. G. Wilson, Renormalization group and critical phenomena. I. Renormalization group and the Kadanoff scaling picture, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3174 (1971).
  6. J. Polchinski, Renormalization and effective Lagrangians, Nucl. Phys. B 231, 269 (1984).
  7. H. Georgi, On-shell effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 361, 339 (1991).
  8. B. Henning, X. Lu, and H. Murayama, How to use the standard model effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 023.
  9. R. Portugal, Quantum Walks and Search Algorithms, Quantum Science and Technology Vol. 19 (Springer, Nature, Switzerland, AG, 2018).
  10. D. Aharonov, A. Ambainis, J. Kempe, and U. Vazirani, Quantum walks on graphs, in Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2001), pp. 50–59.
  11. A. Ambainis, Quantum walks and their algorithmic applications, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 1, 507 (2003).
  12. S. E. Venegas-Andraca, Quantum walks: A comprehensive review, Quantum Inf. Process. 11, 1015 (2012).
  13. T. Farrelly, A review of quantum cellular automata, Quantum 4, 368 (2020).
  14. P. Arrighi, An overview of quantum cellular automata, Nat. Comput. 18, 885 (2019).
  15. B. Schumacher and R. Werner, Reversible quantum cellular automata, arXiv:quant-ph/0405174.
  16. J. Watrous, On one-dimensional quantum cellular automata, in Proceedings of IEEE 36th Annual Foundations of Computer Science (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1995), pp. 528–537.
  17. A. M. Childs, Universal computation by quantum walk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180501 (2009).
  18. P. Arrighi, V. Nesme, and M. Forets, The Dirac equation as a quantum walk: Higher dimensions, observational convergence, J. Phys. A 47, 465302 (2014).
  19. P. Arnault and F. Debbasch, Quantum walks and discrete gauge theories, Phys. Rev. A 93, 052301 (2016).
  20. P. Arnault, A. Pérez, P. Arrighi, and T. Farrelly, Discrete-time quantum walks as fermions of lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032110 (2019).
  21. G. di Molfetta and F. Debbasch, Discrete-time quantum walks: Continuous limit and symmetries, J. Math. Phys. 53, 123302 (2012).
  22. P. Arrighi, V. Nesme, and R. Werner, Unitarity plus causality implies localizability, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 77, 372 (2011).
  23. P. Arrighi, C. Bény, and T. Farrelly, A quantum cellular automaton for one-dimensional QED, Quantum Inf. Process. 19, 1 (2020).
  24. T. Farrelly and J. Streich, Discretizing quantum field theories for quantum simulation, arXiv:2002.02643.
  25. H. C. Po, L. Fidkowski, T. Morimoto, A. C. Potter, and A. Vishwanath, Chiral Floquet phases of many-body localized bosons, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041070 (2016).
  26. S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science 273, 1073 (1996).
  27. C. Zalka, Efficient simulation of quantum systems by quantum computers, Fortschr. Phys. 46, 877 (1998).
  28. S. P. Jordan, K. S. Lee, and J. Preskill, Quantum algorithms for quantum field theories, Science 336, 1130 (2012).
  29. I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014).
  30. A. M. Childs, Y. Su, M. C. Tran, N. Wiebe, and S. Zhu, Theory of Trotter error with commutator scaling, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011020 (2021).
  31. C. W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, A. B. Balantekin, T. Bhattacharya, M. Carena, W. A. De Jong, P. Draper, A. El-Khadra, N. Gemelke, M. Hanada et al., Quantum simulation for high-energy physics, PRX Quantum 4, 027001 (2023).
  32. E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, T. D. Morris, T. Papenbrock, R. C. Pooser, D. J. Dean, and P. Lougovski, Cloud quantum computing of an atomic nucleus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 210501 (2018).
  33. A. Roggero, A. C. Li, J. Carlson, R. Gupta, and G. N. Perdue, Quantum computing for neutrino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074038 (2020).
  34. C. W. Bauer, B. Nachman, and M. Freytsis, Simulating collider physics on quantum computers using effective field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 212001 (2021).
  35. J. D. Watson, J. Bringewatt, A. F. Shaw, A. M. Childs, A. V. Gorshkov, and Z. Davoudi, Quantum algorithms for simulating nuclear effective field theories, arXiv:2312.05344.
  36. T. J. Osborne and A. Stottmeister, Quantum simulation of conformal field theory, arXiv:2109.14214.
  37. T. J. Osborne and A. Stottmeister, Conformal field theory from lattice fermions, Commun. Math. Phys. 398, 219 (2023).
  38. J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  39. A. M. Childs and Y. Su, Nearly optimal lattice simulation by product formulas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 050503 (2019).
  40. G. M. D'Ariano and P. Perinotti, Derivation of the Dirac equation from principles of information processing, Phys. Rev. A 90, 062106 (2014).
  41. T. C. Farrelly and A. J. Short, Discrete spacetime and relativistic quantum particles, Phys. Rev. A 89, 062109 (2014).
  42. M. Raginsky, A fidelity measure for quantum channels, Phys. Lett. A 290, 11 (2001).
  43. P. Hayden and J. Sorce, A canonical Hamiltonian for open quantum systems, J. Phys. A 55, 225302 (2022).
  44. A. Colla and H.-P. Breuer, Open-system approach to nonequilibrium quantum thermodynamics at arbitrary coupling, Phys. Rev. A 105, 052216 (2022).
  45. A. Bisio, G. M. D'Ariano, and A. Tosini, Quantum field as a quantum cellular automaton: The Dirac free evolution in one dimension, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam, Neth.) 354, 244 (2015).
  46. S. Boettcher, S. Falkner, and R. Portugal, Renormalization and scaling in quantum walks, Phys. Rev. A 90, 032324 (2014).
  47. S. Boettcher, S. Li, and R. Portugal, Renormalization of the unitary evolution equation for coined quantum walks, J. Phys. A 50, 125302 (2017).
  48. P. Arrighi, S. Facchini, and M. Forets, Discrete Lorentz covariance for quantum walks and quantum cellular automata, New J. Phys. 16, 093007 (2014).
  49. O. Duranthon and G. Di Molfetta, Coarse-grained quantum cellular automata, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032224 (2021).
  50. L. S. Trezzini, A. Bisio, and P. Perinotti, Renormalisation of quantum cellular automata, Quantum 9, 1756 (2025).
  51. M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 285 (1975).
  52. In general, if X is an operator with 0≤X≤1 and ρ is a density matrix, then Tr[ρX]=1 iff 〈λ|X|λ〉=1 for every eigenvector |λ〉 of ρ. In our case, one can easily show that X:=(OUV†OUV)/dIR2 satisfies 0≤X≤1UV. If ρUV has full rank and Tr[ρX]=1, then X=1UV, which implies that OUV/dIR is unitary.
  53. C. Agon, V. Balasubramanian, S. Kasko, and A. Lawrence, Coarse grained quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 98, 025019 (2018).
  54. A. Ahlbrecht, A. Alberti, D. Meschede, V. B. Scholz, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner, Molecular binding in interacting quantum walks, New J. Phys. 14, 073050 (2012).
  55. A. Bisio, G. M. D'Ariano, P. Perinotti, and A. Tosini, Thirring quantum cellular automaton, Phys. Rev. A 97, 032132 (2018).
  56. O. Kabernik, Quantum coarse graining, symmetries, and reducibility of dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 97, 052130 (2018).
  57. O. Kabernik, J. Pollack, and A. Singh, Quantum state reduction: Generalized bipartitions from algebras of observables, Phys. Rev. A 101, 032303 (2020).
  58. P. Zanardi, E. Dallas, F. Andreadakis, and S. Lloyd, Operational quantum mereology and minimal scrambling, Quantum 8, 1406 (2024).
  59. A. Rotundo, A. Bisio, and P. Perinotti, Effective dynamics from minimising dissipation, Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15773088.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043019– Published 6 October, 2025
  • Received 18 December 2024
  • Accepted 15 May 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation