- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Remote synchronization from remote propagation

Siyu Huo*

  • The Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Institute of Health and Rehabilitation Science, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, People’s Republic of China and Research Center for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, People’s Republic of China

  • *Contact author: syhuo@xjtu.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033171 – Published 11 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/t6ns-8cpb

Abstract

Remote synchronization (RS), in which nonadjacent nodes synchronize while directly connected nodes remain incoherent, and remote propagation (RP), in which signals are transmitted to distant nodes while intermediate nodes remain dynamically inactive, are two fundamental phenomena whose connection remains unclear. Here, we show that remote signal transmission can generate RS in a driven star network of Stuart-Landau oscillators and in empirical human brain subnetworks. In the minimal network, a periodic input propagates frequency selectively to remote nodes, as indicated by their locking to the driving frequency, while the hub remains unlocked, producing RP. When multiple remote nodes receive the same propagated signal, they form an RS state with strong mutual coherence despite weak hub coherence. Parameter-space maps show that the RS and RP regimes coincide, and empirical brain-subnetwork simulations confirm this mechanism beyond the minimal architecture. A coupling-based analysis explains the transition as network-mediated frequency-selective entrainment to a common propagated frequency. These results establish a dynamical route from remote signal transmission to long-range coherent dynamics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (27)

  1. A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, J. Kurths, and A. Synchronization, A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1985).
  2. A. Arenas, A. Díaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, Synchronization in complex networks, Phys. Rep. 469, 93 (2008).
  3. A. Bergner, M. Frasca, G. Sciuto, A. Buscarino, E. J. Ngamga, L. Fortuna, and J. Kurths, Remote synchronization in star networks, Phys. Rev. E 85, 026208 (2012).
  4. V. Nicosia, M. Valencia, M. Chavez, A. Díaz-Guilera, and V. Latora, Remote synchronization reveals network symmetries and functional modules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174102 (2013).
  5. L. V. Gambuzza, A. Cardillo, A. Fiasconaro, L. Fortuna, J. Gómez-Gardenes, and M. Frasca, Analysis of remote synchronization in complex networks, Chaos 23, 043103 (2013).
  6. L. Zhang, A. E. Motter, and T. Nishikawa, Incoherence-mediated remote synchronization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 174102 (2017).
  7. V. Vlasov and A. Bifone, Hub-driven remote synchronization in brain networks, Sci. Rep. 7, 10403 (2017).
  8. Z. Yang, D. Chen, G. Hu, and Z. Liu, Partial remote synchronization in star-like networks with partial connections among leaf nodes, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043253 (2023).
  9. R. Gao, Z. Lu, and Z. Liu, Bridge links induced remote synchronization in multiple connected star graphs, Chaos Solitons Fractals 186, 115223 (2024).
  10. S. Huo, N. Yao, Z.-G. Huang, and Z. Liu, Remote synchronization induced by external signals in star networks, Chaos Solitons Fractals 196, 116345 (2025).
  11. S. Huo, N. Yao, Z.-G. Huang, C. Grebogi, and Z. Liu, Noise-induced remote synchronization in star networks, Chaos Solitons Fractals 207, 118045 (2026).
  12. G. Deco, V. K. Jirsa, and A. R. McIntosh, Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 43 (2011).
  13. S. Huo, C. Tian, M. Zheng, S. Guan, C. Zhou, and Z. Liu, Spatial multi-scaled chimera states of cerebral cortex network and its inherent structure-dynamics relationship in human brain, Natl. Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa125 (2021).
  14. S. Huo and Z. Liu, Condensation of eigenmodes in functional brain network and its correlation to chimera state, Commun. Phys. 6, 285 (2023).
  15. S. Huo, C. Tian, L. Kang, and Z. Liu, Chimera states of neuron networks with adaptive coupling, Nonlinear Dyn. 96, 75 (2019).
  16. S. Huo, A. Chen, Y. Zou, G. Hu, S. Boccaletti, and Z. Liu, Topology-enhanced signal detection in large-scale brain networks, Chaos Solitons Fractals 211, 118753 (2026).
  17. A. S. Pikovsky, M. G. Rosenblum, G. V. Osipov, and J. Kurths, Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators by external driving, Physica D 104, 219 (1997).
  18. J. A. Acebrón, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. Pérez Vicente, F. Ritort, and R. Spigler, The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 137 (2005).
  19. S. Huo, Y. Zou, M. Kaiser, and Z. Liu, Time-limited self-sustaining rhythms and state transitions in brain networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023076 (2022).
  20. L. Deng, S. Huo, A. Chen, and Z. Liu, Coupling resonance of signal responses induced by heterogeneously mixed positive and negative couplings in cognitive subnetworks, Chaos Solitons Fractals 180, 114505 (2024).
  21. Q. Shen and Z. Liu, Remote firing propagation in the neural network of C. elegans, Phys. Rev. E 103, 052414 (2021).
  22. Z. Wang and Z. Liu, Effect of remote signal propagation in an empirical brain network, Chaos 31, 063126 (2021).
  23. D. Chen, R. Gao, Z. Yang, S. Huo, and Z. Liu, Firing propagation in empirical cognitive networks of human brain, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013116 (2025).
  24. C. J. Honey, O. Sporns, L. Cammoun, X. Gigandet, J.-P. Thiran, R. Meuli, and P. Hagmann, Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2035 (2009).
  25. P. Hagmann, L. Cammoun, X. Gigandet, R. Meuli, C. J. Honey, V. J. Wedeen, and O. Sporns, Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex, PLoS Biol. 6, e159 (2008).
  26. E. Bullmore and O. Sporns, Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186 (2009).
  27. A. Fornito, A. Zalesky, and M. Breakspear, The connectomics of brain disorders, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 159 (2015).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033171– Published 11 August, 2026
  • Received 25 March 2026
  • Accepted 22 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation