Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Electronic structure and dynamical correlations in antiferromagnetic BiFeO3

Yihan Wu1,2,*, Mario Caserta1,*, Tommaso Chiarotti3, and Nicola Marzari1,4,5,†

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: nicola.marzari@epfl.ch

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033375 – Published 29 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/stw8-9mld

Abstract

We study the electronic structure and dynamical correlations in antiferromagnetic BiFeO3, a prototypical room-temperature multiferroic, using a variety of static and dynamical first-principles methods. Conventional static Hubbard corrections (DFT+U, DFT+U+V) incorrectly predict a deep-valence Fe 3d peak (around −7eV) in antiferromagnetic BiFeO3, in contradiction with hard x-ray photoemission. We resolve this failure by using a recent generalization of DFT+U to include a frequency-dependent screening—DFT+U(ω)—or using a dynamical Hubbard functional. The screened Coulomb interaction U(ω), computed with spin-polarized random-phase approximation and projected onto maximally localized Fe 3d Wannier orbitals, is expressed as a sum over poles, yielding a self-energy that augments the Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian. This DFT+U(ω) approach predicts a fundamental band gap of 1.53eV, consistent with experiments, and completely eliminates the unphysical deep-valence peak. The resulting simulated hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectrum reproduces the experimental line shape with an accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art approaches. Our work highlights the critical nature of dynamical screening in complex oxides and of DFT+U(ω) as a predictive and computationally efficient approach to address the electronic structure of correlated materials.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. J. R. Teague, R. Gerson, and W. J. James, Dielectric hysteresis in single crystal BiFeO3, Solid State Commun. 8, 1073 (1970).
  2. S. V. Kiselev, R. P. Ozerov, and G. S. Zhdanov, Detection of magnetic order in ferroelectric BiFeO3 by neutron diffraction, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 7, 742 (1963) [Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 145, 1255 (1962)].
  3. B. Ruette, S. Zvyagin, A. P. Pyatakov, A. Bush, J. F. Li, V. I. Belotelov, A. K. Zvezdin, and D. Viehland, Magnetic-field-induced phase transition in BiFeO3 observed by high-field electron spin resonance: Cycloidal to homogeneous spin order, Phys. Rev. B 69, 064114 (2004).
  4. I. Sosnowska, W. Schäfer, W. A. Kockelmann, and I. Troyanchuk, Neutron diffraction studies of the crystal and magnetic structures of BiMnxFe1-xO3 solid solutions, MSF 378–381, 616 (2001).
  5. F. Kubel and H. Schmid, Structure of a ferroelectric and ferroelastic monodomain crystal of the perovskite BiFeO3, Acta Crystallogr. B: Struct. Sci. 46, 698 (1990).
  6. S. C. Das, S. Katiyal, and T. Shripathi, Impedance spectroscopy of Bi-rich BiFeO3: Twin thermal-activations, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 174101 (2018).
  7. S. Paul, D. Iuşan, P. Thunström, Y. O. Kvashnin, J. Hellsvik, M. Pereiro, A. Delin, R. Knut, D. Phuyal, A. Lindblad, O. Karis, B. Sanyal, and O. Eriksson, Investigation of the spectral properties and magnetism of BiFeO3 by dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 97, 125120 (2018).
  8. J. B. Neaton, C. Ederer, U. V. Waghmare, N. A. Spaldin, and K. M. Rabe, First-principles study of spontaneous polarization in multiferroic BiFeO3, Phys. Rev. B 71, 014113 (2005).
  9. T. J. Inizan, Study of BiFeO3 by extended Hubbard-corrected DFT functional: DFT + U+V, Master's thesis, EPFL, 2018.
  10. D. Mazumdar, R. Knut, F. Thöle, M. Gorgoi, S. Faleev, O. Mryasov, V. Shelke, C. Ederer, N. Spaldin, A. Gupta, and O. Karis, The valence band electronic structure of rhombohedral-like and tetragonal-like BiFeO3 thin films from hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and first-principles theory, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 208, 63 (2016).
  11. G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, K. Haule, V. S. Oudovenko, O. Parcollet, and C. A. Marianetti, Electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 865 (2006).
  12. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
  13. L. Craco, S. S. Carara, and S. Leoni, Electronic structure of BiFeO3 in the presence of strong electronic correlations, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045112 (2019).
  14. A. O. Shorikov, A. V. Lukoyanov, V. I. Anisimov, and S. Y. Savrasov, Pressure-driven metal-insulator transition in BiFeO3 from dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 92, 035125 (2015).
  15. T. Chiarotti, A. Ferretti, and N. Marzari, Energies and spectra of solids from the algorithmic inversion of dynamical Hubbard functionals, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L032023 (2024).
  16. M. Caserta, T. Chiarotti, M. Vanzini, and N. Marzari, Dynamical Hubbard approach to correlated materials: The case of transition-metal monoxides, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, L032026 (2026).
  17. T. Chiarotti, M. Quinzi, A. Pintus, M. Caserta, A. Ferretti, and N. Marzari, Self-consistent dynamical Hubbard functional for correlated solids, arXiv:2508.18194.
  18. M. Vanzini and N. Marzari, Towards a minimal description of dynamical correlation in metals, arXiv:2309.12144.
  19. S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998).
  20. J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008).
  21. N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1419 (2012).
  22. B. Amadon, T. Applencourt, and F. Bruneval, Screened Coulomb interaction calculations: cRPA implementation and applications to dynamical screening and self-consistency in uranium dioxide and cerium, Phys. Rev. B 89, 125110 (2014).
  23. A. Ferretti, T. Chiarotti, and N. Marzari, Green's function embedding using sum-over-pole representations, Phys. Rev. B 110, 045149 (2024).
  24. J. A. Berger, L. Reining, and F. Sottile, Ab initio calculations of electronic excitations: Collapsing spectral sums, Phys. Rev. B 82, 041103(R) (2010).
  25. D. Schmidt, L. You, X. Chi, J. Wang, and A. Rusydi, Anisotropic optical properties of rhombohedral and tetragonal thin film BiFeO3 phases, Phys. Rev. B 92, 075310 (2015).
  26. V. Fruth, E. Tenea, M. Gartner, M. Anastasescu, D. Berger, R. Ramer, and M. Zaharescu, Preparation of BiFeO3 films by wet chemical method and their characterization, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 937 (2007).
  27. K. A. McDonnell, N. Wadnerkar, N. J. English, M. Rahman, and D. Dowling, Photo-active and optical properties of bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3): An experimental and theoretical study, Chem. Phys. Lett. 572, 78 (2013).
  28. Z. B. Ayala, J. J. Peñalva, C. R. Eyzaguirre, H. Loro, A. Lazo, and Y. J. M. Hernández, Study of the optical properties of BiFeO3 under different heat treatment temperatures, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2372, 012005 (2022).
  29. T. Gujar, V. Shinde, and C. Lokhande, Nanocrystalline and highly resistive bismuth ferric oxide thin films by a simple chemical method, Mater. Chem. Phys. 103, 142 (2007).
  30. Y. Wu, M. Caserta, T. Chiarotti, and N. Marzari, Electronic structure and dynamical correlations in antiferromagnetic BiFeO3, Materials Cloud Archive, 2026.61, 2026, https://archive.materialscloud.org/record/2026.61.
  31. P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, et al., Quantum ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
  32. C. Ricca, I. Timrov, M. Cococcioni, N. Marzari, and U. Aschauer, Self-consistent DFT + U + V study of oxygen vacancies in SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023313 (2020).
  33. G. Prandini, A. Marrazzo, I. E. Castelli, N. Mounet, and N. Marzari, Precision and efficiency in solid-state pseudopotential calculations, npj Comput. Mater. 4, 72 (2018).
  34. N. Marzari, D. Vanderbilt, A. De Vita, and M. C. Payne, Thermal contraction and disordering of the Al(110) surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3296 (1999).
  35. H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).
  36. P. E. Blöchl, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Improved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 49, 16223 (1994).
  37. M. J. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. Verstraete, D. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Comput. Phys. Commun. 226, 39 (2018).
  38. K. Nakamura, Y. Yoshimoto, Y. Nomura, T. Tadano, M. Kawamura, T. Kosugi, K. Yoshimi, T. Misawa, and Y. Motoyama, RESPACK: An ab initio tool for derivation of effective low-energy model of material, Comput. Phys. Commun. 261, 107781 (2021).
  39. J. W. Furness, A. D. Kaplan, J. Ning, J. P. Perdew, and J. Sun, Accurate and numerically efficient r2SCAN meta-generalized gradient approximation, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 8208 (2020).
  40. J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003).
  41. C. Adamo and V. Barone, Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158 (1999).
  42. T. Chiarotti, N. Marzari, and A. Ferretti, Unified Green's function approach for spectral and thermodynamic properties from algorithmic inversion of dynamical potentials, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013242 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation