Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Substrate properties and actin polymerization speed dictate universal modes of cell migration: Gripping, slipping, and stick-slip

Yiyang Ye1 and Jie Lin1,2,*

  • *Contact author: linjie@pku.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023216 – Published 28 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s3kr-3dlk

Abstract

Understanding how cells sense mechanical cues and regulate migration is crucial in the development, fibrosis, and oncogenesis processes. However, a comprehensive physical picture of cell migration remains lacking, given the diverse environmental properties and cell physiologies. Here, we generalize the motor-clutch model to the whole-cell level and systematically investigate the effects of substrate stiffness, friction, and actin polymerization speed on cell migration. We unveil three distinct migration modes: gripping, slipping, and stick-slip. Notably, stiffness sensing occurs exclusively in the stick-slip mode, which requires a low substrate stiffness and a minimum actin polymerization speed as necessary conditions. Intriguingly, the optimal substrate stiffness that maximizes the migration speed is inversely proportional to the actin polymerization speed. Moreover, the maximal speed only depends on the nature of the clutch molecules, independent of substrate properties. We reveal the boundary criteria among the three migration modes and demonstrate that fast- and slow-migrating cells can coexist in an isogenic cell population without the need for biochemical feedback loops.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (74)

  1. S. V. Plotnikov and C. M. Waterman, Guiding cell migration by tugging, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25, 619 (2013).
  2. R. J. Petrie, A. D. Doyle, and K. M. Yamada, Random versus directionally persistent cell migration, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 538 (2009).
  3. R. Alert and X. Trepat, Physical models of collective cell migration, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 77 (2020).
  4. C. Pérez-González, R. Alert, C. Blanch-Mercader, M. Gómez-González, T. Kolodziej, E. Bazellieres, J. Casademunt, and X. Trepat, Active wetting of epithelial tissues, Nat. Phys. 15, 79 (2019).
  5. S. Even-Ram, V. Artym, and K. M. Yamada, Matrix control of stem cell fate, Cell 126, 645 (2006).
  6. F. Guilak, D. M. Cohen, B. T. Estes, J. M. Gimble, W. Liedtke, and C. S. Chen, Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix, Cell Stem Cell 5, 17 (2009).
  7. H. T. Nia, L. L. Munn, and R. K. Jain, Physical traits of cancer, Science 370, eaaz0868 (2020).
  8. V. Ajeti, A. P. Tabatabai, A. J. Fleszar, M. F. Staddon, D. S. Seara, C. Suarez, M. S. Yousafzai, D. Bi, D. R. Kovar, S. Banerjee, et al., Wound healing coordinates actin architectures to regulate mechanical work, Nat. Phys. 15, 696 (2019).
  9. S. Xia and P. Kanchanawong, Nanoscale mechanobiology of cell adhesions, Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 71, 53 (2017).
  10. P. Kanchanawong and D. A. Calderwood, Organization, dynamics and mechanoregulation of integrin-mediated cell–ECM adhesions, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 142 (2023).
  11. T. Mitchison and M. Kirschner, Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth, Neuron 1, 761 (1988).
  12. J. A. Theriot and T. J. Mitchison, Actin microfilament dynamics in locomoting cells, Nature (London) 352, 126 (1991).
  13. J. Lee, A. Ishihara, J. A. Theriot, and K. Jacobson, Principles of locomotion for simple-shaped cells, Nature (London) 362, 167 (1993).
  14. T. D. Pollard, L. Blanchoin, and R. D. Mullins, Molecular mechanisms controlling actin filament dynamics in nonmuscle cells, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 29, 545 (2000).
  15. C. Wilson, M. Tsuchida, G. Allen, E. Barnhart, K. Applegate, P. Yam, L. Ji, K. Keren, G. Danuser, and J. Theriot, Myosin II contributes to cell-scale actin network treadmilling via network disassembly, Nature (London) 465, 373 (2010).
  16. G. Danuser, J. Allard, and A. Mogilner, Mathematical modeling of eukaryotic cell migration: Insights beyond experiments, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 29, 501 (2013).
  17. B. L. Bangasser and D. J. Odde, Master equation-based analysis of a motor-clutch model for cell traction force, Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 6, 449 (2013).
  18. B. Bangasser, S. Rosenfeld, and D. Odde, Determinants of maximal force transmission in a motor-clutch model of cell traction in a compliant microenvironment, Biophys. J. 105, 581 (2013).
  19. M. Leoni and P. Sens, Model of cell crawling controlled by mechanosensitive adhesion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 228101 (2017).
  20. A. Elosegui-Artola, X. Trepat, and P. Roca-Cusachs, Control of mechanotransduction by molecular clutch dynamics, Trends Cell Biol. 28, 356 (2018).
  21. P. Sens, Stick–slip model for actin-driven cell protrusions, cell polarization, and crawling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24670 (2020).
  22. R. Alonso-Matilla, P. P. Provenzano, and D. J. Odde, Optimal cell traction forces in a generalized motor-clutch model, Biophys. J. 122, 3369 (2023).
  23. Z. Xu, F. Xu, and B. Cheng, The motor-clutch model in mechanobiology and mechanomedicine, Mechanobiol. Med. 2, 100067 (2024).
  24. P. S. De and R. De, Emergence of biphasic versus monotonic response of actin retrograde flow and cell traction force with varying substrate rigidity, Phys. Rev. E 110, 054414 (2024).
  25. B. Shen and Y. Zhang, Factors influencing the stability of the motor-clutch model on compliant substrates under external load, Phys. Rev. E 111, 014417 (2025).
  26. C. E. Chan and D. J. Odde, Traction dynamics of filopodia on compliant substrates, Science 322, 1687 (2008).
  27. A. Elosegui-Artola, E. Bazellières, M. D. Allen, I. Andreu, R. Oria, R. Sunyer, J. J. Gomm, J. F. Marshall, J. L. Jones, X. Trepat, et al., Rigidity sensing and adaptation through regulation of integrin types, Nat. Mater. 13, 631 (2014).
  28. B. L. Bangasser, G. A. Shamsan, C. E. Chan, K. N. Opoku, E. Tüzel, B. W. Schlichtmann, J. A. Kasim, B. J. Fuller, B. R. McCullough, S. S. Rosenfeld, et al., Shifting the optimal stiffness for cell migration, Nat. Commun. 8, 15313 (2017).
  29. O. Chaudhuri, L. Gu, M. Darnell, D. Klumpers, S. A. Bencherif, J. C. Weaver, N. Huebsch, and D. J. Mooney, Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading, Nat. Commun. 6, 6365 (2015).
  30. M. Bennett, M. Cantini, J. Reboud, J. M. Cooper, P. Roca-Cusachs, and M. Salmeron-Sanchez, Molecular clutch drives cell response to surface viscosity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1192 (2018).
  31. Z. Gong, S. E. Szczesny, S. R. Caliari, E. E. Charrier, O. Chaudhuri, X. Cao, Y. Lin, R. L. Mauck, P. A. Janmey, J. A. Burdick, et al., Matching material and cellular timescales maximizes cell spreading on viscoelastic substrates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2686 (2018).
  32. P. S. De and R. De, Stick-slip dynamics of migrating cells on viscoelastic substrates, Phys. Rev. E 100, 012409 (2019).
  33. B. Cheng, M. Li, W. Wan, H. Guo, G. M. Genin, M. Lin, and F. Xu, Predicting YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation in response to ECM mechanosensing, Biophys. J. 122, 43 (2023).
  34. A. Elosegui-Artola, R. Oria, Y. Chen, A. Kosmalska, C. Pérez-González, N. Castro, C. Zhu, X. Trepat, and P. Roca-Cusachs, Mechanical regulation of a molecular clutch defines force transmission and transduction in response to matrix rigidity, Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 540 (2016).
  35. R. Oria, T. Wiegand, J. Escribano, A. Elosegui-Artola, J. J. Uriarte, C. Moreno-Pulido, I. Platzman, P. Delcanale, L. Albertazzi, D. Navajas, et al., Force loading explains spatial sensing of ligands by cells, Nature (London) 552, 219 (2017).
  36. I. Andreu, B. Falcones, S. Hurst, N. Chahare, X. Quiroga, A.-L. Le Roux, Z. Kechagia, A. E. Beedle, A. Elosegui-Artola, X. Trepat, et al., The force loading rate drives cell mechanosensing through both reinforcement and cytoskeletal softening, Nat. Commun. 12, 4229 (2021).
  37. X. Trepat, Z. Chen, and K. Jacobson, Cell migration, Compr. Physiol. 2, 2369 (2012).
  38. C. Jurado, J. R. Haserick, and J. Lee, Slipping or gripping? Fluorescent speckle microscopy in fish keratocytes reveals two different mechanisms for generating a retrograde flow of actin, Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 507 (2005).
  39. K. Keren, Z. Pincus, G. M. Allen, E. L. Barnhart, G. Marriott, A. Mogilner, and J. A. Theriot, Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells, Nature (London) 453, 475 (2008).
  40. Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2023), Vol. 112, 4th ed.
  41. L. P. Cramer, Molecular mechanism of actin-dependent retrograde flow in lamellipodia of motile cells, FBL 2, 260 (1997).
  42. G. I. Bell, Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells: A theoretical framework for adhesion mediated by reversible bonds between cell surface molecules, Science 200, 618 (1978).
  43. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/s3kr-3dlk for additional information, which includes Refs. [17, 24, 25, 26, 31, 32, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74].
  44. P. Roca-Cusachs, T. Iskratsch, and M. P. Sheetz, Finding the weakest link—Exploring integrin-mediated mechanical molecular pathways, J. Cell Sci. 125, 3025 (2012).
  45. M. F. Fournier, R. Sauser, D. Ambrosi, J.-J. Meister, and A. B. Verkhovsky, Force transmission in migrating cells, J. Cell Biol. 188, 287 (2010).
  46. R. M. Corless, G. H. Gonnet, D. E. Hare, D. J. Jeffrey, and D. E. Knuth, On the Lambert W function, Adv. Comput. Math. 5, 329 (1996).
  47. M. L. Gardel, B. Sabass, L. Ji, G. Danuser, U. S. Schwarz, and C. M. Waterman, Traction stress in focal adhesions correlates biphasically with actin retrograde flow speed, J. Cell Biol. 183, 999 (2008).
  48. A. Isomursu, K.-Y. Park, J. Hou, B. Cheng, M. Mathieu, G. A. Shamsan, B. Fuller, J. Kasim, M. M. Mahmoodi, T. J. Lu, et al., Directed cell migration towards softer environments, Nat. Mater. 21, 1081 (2022).
  49. K. M. Stroka and H. Aranda-Espinoza, Neutrophils display biphasic relationship between migration and substrate stiffness, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 66, 328 (2009).
  50. J. E. Ron, P. Monzo, N. C. Gauthier, R. Voituriez, and N. S. Gov, One-dimensional cell motility patterns, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033237 (2020).
  51. C. Blanch-Mercader and J. Casademunt, Spontaneous motility of actin lamellar fragments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 078102 (2013).
  52. F. Jülicher, K. Kruse, J. Prost, and J.-F. Joanny, Active behavior of the cytoskeleton, Phys. Rep. 449, 3 (2007).
  53. D. Wessels, D. R. Soll, D. Knecht, W. F. Loomis, A. De Lozanne, and J. Spudich, Cell motility and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium amebae lacking myosin heavy chain, Dev. Biol. 128, 164 (1988).
  54. M. L. Lombardi, D. A. Knecht, M. Dembo, and J. Lee, Traction force microscopy in Dictyostelium reveals distinct roles for myosin II motor and actin-crosslinking activity in polarized cell movement, J. Cell Sci. 120, 1624 (2007).
  55. Z. Liu, L. A. van Grunsven, E. Van Rossen, B. Schroyen, J.-P. Timmermans, A. Geerts, and H. Reynaert, Blebbistatin inhibits contraction and accelerates migration in mouse hepatic stellate cells, Br. J. Pharmacol. 159, 304 (2010).
  56. C.-M. Lo, D. B. Buxton, G. C. Chua, M. Dembo, R. S. Adelstein, and Y.-L. Wang, Nonmuscle myosin IIb is involved in the guidance of fibroblast migration, Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 982 (2004).
  57. J. Jacobelli, F. C. Bennett, P. Pandurangi, A. J. Tooley, and M. F. Krummel, Myosin-IIa and ICAM-1 regulate the interchange between two distinct modes of T cell migration, J. Immunol. 182, 2041 (2009).
  58. A. D. Doyle, M. L. Kutys, M. A. Conti, K. Matsumoto, R. S. Adelstein, and K. M. Yamada, Micro-environmental control of cell migration—Myosin IIA is required for efficient migration in fibrillar environments through control of cell adhesion dynamics, J. Cell Sci. 125, 2244 (2012).
  59. D. J. Solecki, N. Trivedi, E.-E. Govek, R. A. Kerekes, S. S. Gleason, and M. E. Hatten, Myosin II motors and F-actin dynamics drive the coordinated movement of the centrosome and soma during CNS glial-guided neuronal migration, Neuron 63, 63 (2009).
  60. S. L. Guest, K. B. Velle, S. M. Jacques, Y. Park, J. Man, M. A. Titus, and L. K. Fritz-Laylin, Myosin 2 drives actin contractility in fast-crawling species outside of the amoeban lineage, Curr. Biol. 35, 5696 (2025).
  61. A. Z. Carpio, M. Colomer-Rosell, B. Ciraulo, R. Molkenbu, P. Lanzerstorfer, F. Pezzano, C. Agazzi, R. Hauschild, S. Jain, J. M. Jacques, et al., Myosin II regulates cellular thermo-adaptability and efficiency of immune responses, Dev. Cell 61, 356 (2025).
  62. S. Even-Ram, A. D. Doyle, M. A. Conti, K. Matsumoto, R. S. Adelstein, and K. M. Yamada, Myosin IIA regulates cell motility and actomyosin–microtubule crosstalk, Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 299 (2007).
  63. D. Shao, W.-J. Rappel, and H. Levine, Computational model for cell morphodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 108104 (2010).
  64. A. F. Marée, A. Jilkine, A. Dawes, V. A. Grieneisen, and L. Edelstein-Keshet, Polarization and movement of keratocytes: A multiscale modelling approach, Bull. Math. Biol. 68, 1169 (2006).
  65. T. Singha and P. Sens, Contractility-driven cell motility against a viscoelastic resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 068401 (2025).
  66. A. L. Godeau, M. Leoni, J. Comelles, T. Guyomar, M. Lieb, H. Delanoë-Ayari, A. Ott, S. Harlepp, P. Sens, and D. Riveline, 3D single cell migration driven by temporal correlation between oscillating force dipoles, eLife 11, e71032 (2022).
  67. D. T. Gillespie, Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58, 35 (2007).
  68. G. Jiang, G. Giannone, D. R. Critchley, E. Fukumoto, and M. P. Sheetz, Two-piconewton slip bond between fibronectin and the cytoskeleton depends on talin, Nature (London) 424, 334 (2003).
  69. T. P. Lele, C. K. Thodeti, J. Pendse, and D. E. Ingber, Investigating complexity of protein–protein interactions in focal adhesions, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 369, 929 (2008).
  70. C. Rackauckas and Q. Nie, DifferentialEquations.jl—A performant and feature-rich ecosystem for solving differential equations in Julia, J. Open Res. Software 5, 15 (2017).
  71. P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, et al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
  72. M. Dembo, L. Tuckerman, and W. Goad, Motion of polymorphonuclear leukocytes: Theory of receptor redistribution and the frictional force on a moving cell, Cell Motil. 1, 205 (1981).
  73. M. Srinivasan and S. Walcott, Binding site models of friction due to the formation and rupture of bonds: State-function formalism, force-velocity relations, response to slip velocity transients, and slip stability, Phys. Rev. E 80, 046124 (2009).
  74. T. Tominaga, T. Kurokawa, H. Furukawa, Y. Osada, and J. P. Gong, Friction of a soft hydrogel on rough solid substrates, Soft Matter 4, 1645 (2008).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation