Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Topology of the simplest gene switch

Aleksandra Nelson1, Peter Wolynes1,2,3,4, and Evelyn Tang1,3,*

  • 1Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  • 2Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  • 4Department of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA

  • *Contact author: e.tang@rice.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043115 – Published 29 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rr6n-fn82

Abstract

Complex gene regulatory networks often display emergent simple behavior. Sometimes this simplicity can be traced to a nearly equivalent energy landscape, but not always. Here, we show how a topological theory for stochastic and biochemical networks can predict phase transitions between dynamical regimes, where the simplest landscape paradigm would fail. We demonstrate the utility of this topological approach for a simple gene network, revealing a new oscillatory regime in addition to previously recognized multimodal stationary phases. We show how local winding numbers predict the steady-state locations in the single-mode and bimodal phases, and a flux analysis predicts the respective strengths of the steady-state peaks.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. A. D. Lander, The edges of understanding, BMC Biol. 8, 40 (2010).
  2. M. S. Zaghloul Salem, Biological networks: An introductory review, J. Proteomics Genomics Res. 2, 41 (2018).
  3. A. D. Goldberg, C. D. Allis, and E. Bernstein, Epigenetics: A landscape takes shape, Cell 128, 635 (2007).
  4. M. Sasai and P. G. Wolynes, Stochastic gene expression as a many-body problem, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2374 (2003).
  5. B. Zhang and P. G. Wolynes, Stem cell differentiation as a many-body problem, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10185 (2014).
  6. S. Tripathi, D. A. Kessler, and H. Levine, Biological networks regulating cell fate choice are minimally frustrated, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 088101 (2020).
  7. D. A. Potoyan and P. G. Wolynes, On the dephasing of genetic oscillators, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2391 (2014).
  8. M. Aldana, S. Coppersmith, and L. P. Kadanoff, Boolean dynamics with random couplings, in Perspectives and Problems in Nonlinear Science: A Celebratory, Volume in Honor of Lawrence Sirovich, edited by E. Kaplan, J. E. Marsden, and K. R. Sreenivasan (Springer, New York, 2003), pp. 23–89.
  9. M. L. Heltberg, S. Krishna, L. P. Kadanoff, and M. H. Jensen, A tale of two rhythms: Locked clocks and chaos in biology, Cell Syst. 12, 291 (2021).
  10. J. Wang, Landscape and flux theory of non-equilibrium dynamical systems with application to biology, Adv. Phys. 64, 1 (2015).
  11. J. Wang, L. Xu, and E. Wang, Potential landscape and flux framework of nonequilibrium networks: Robustness, dissipation, and coherence of biochemical oscillations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12271 (2008).
  12. K. Zhang, M. Sasai, and J. Wang, Eddy current and coupled landscapes for nonadiabatic and nonequilibrium complex system dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14930 (2013).
  13. J. E. Moore, The birth of topological insulators, Nature (London) 464, 194 (2010).
  14. J. Agudo-Canalejo and E. Tang, Topological phases in discrete stochastic systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 88 102601 (2025).
  15. M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  16. X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  17. C. L. Kane and T. C. Lubensky, Topological boundary modes in isostatic lattices, Nat. Phys. 10, 39 (2014).
  18. S. D. Huber, Topological mechanics, Nat. Phys. 12, 621 (2016).
  19. S. Zheng, G. Duan, and B. Xia, Progress in topological mechanics, Appl. Sci. 12, (1987) (2022).
  20. L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Topological photonics, Nat. Photon. 8, 821 (2014).
  21. T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019).
  22. F. Serra, U. Tkalec, and T. Lopez-Leon, Editorial: Topological soft matter, Front. Phys. 8, 373 (2020).
  23. S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 380 (2022).
  24. J. Mecke, J. O. Nketsiah, R. Li, and Y. Gao, Emergent phenomena in chiral active matter, Natl. Sci. Open 3, 20230086 (2024).
  25. K. Dasbiswas, K. K. Mandadapu, and S. Vaikuntanathan, Topological localization in out-of-equilibrium dissipative systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E9031 (2018).
  26. A. Murugan and S. Vaikuntanathan, Topologically protected modes in non-equilibrium stochastic systems, Nat. Commun. 8, 13881 (2017).
  27. J. Knebel, P. M. Geiger, and E. Frey, Topological phase transition in coupled rock-paper-scissors cycles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 258301 (2020).
  28. E. Tang, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, Topology protects chiral edge currents in stochastic systems, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031015 (2021).
  29. T. Sawada, K. Sone, R. Hamazaki, Y. Ashida, and T. Sagawa, Role of topology in relaxation of one-dimensional stochastic processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 046602 (2024).
  30. A. Nelson and E. Tang, Nonreciprocity is necessary for robust dimensional reduction and strong responses in stochastic topological systems, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155116 (2024).
  31. C. Zheng and E. Tang, A topological mechanism for robust and efficient global oscillations in biological networks, Nat. Commun. 15, 6453 (2024).
  32. J. E. M. Hornos, D. Schultz, G. C. P. Innocentini, J. Wang, A. M. Walczak, J. N. Onuchic, and P. G. Wolynes, Self-regulating gene: An exact solution, Phys. Rev. E 72, 051907 (2005).
  33. D. Schultz, J. N. Onuchic, and P. G. Wolynes, Understanding stochastic simulations of the smallest genetic networks, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 245102 (2007).
  34. P. J. Choi, X. S. Xie, and E. I. Shakhnovich, Stochastic switching in gene networks can occur by a single-molecule event or many molecular steps, J. Mol. Biol. 396, 230 (2010).
  35. D. Schultz, A. M. Walczak, J. N. Onuchic, and P. G. Wolynes, Extinction and resurrection in gene networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19165 (2008).
  36. N. A. Sinitsyn and I. Nemenman, The berry phase and the pump flux in stochastic chemical kinetics, Europhys. Lett. 77, 58001 (2007).
  37. Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Higashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018).
  38. A. M. Walczak, J. N. Onuchic, and P. G. Wolynes, Absolute rate theories of epigenetic stability, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18926 (2005).
  39. B. Huang, M. Lu, D. Jia, E. Ben-Jacob, H. Levine, and J. N. Onuchic, Interrogating the topological robustness of gene regulatory circuits by randomization, PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005456 (2017).
  40. A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Coherence of biochemical oscillations is bounded by driving force and network topology, Phys. Rev. E 95, 062409 (2017).
  41. W. van Saarloos, V. Vitelli, and Z. Zeravcic, Active matter, in Soft Matter: Concepts, Phenomena, and Applications, 1st ed., edited by I. Gnerlich and W. Rauenhorst (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2024).
  42. M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature (London) 592, 363 (2021).
  43. F. E. Öztürk, T. Lappe, G. Hellmann, J. Schmitt, J. Klaers, F. Vewinger, J. Kroha, and M. Weitz, Observation of a non-Hermitian phase transition in an optical quantum gas, Science 372, 88 (2021).
  44. N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020).
  45. D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non-Hermitian boundary modes and topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 056802 (2020).
  46. T. Sawada, K. Sone, K. Yokomizo, Y. Ashida, and T. Sagawa, Bulk-Boundary correspondence in ergodic and nonergodic one-dimensional stochastic processes, arXiv:2405.00458.
  47. R. Bianco and R. Resta, Mapping topological order in coordinate space, Phys. Rev. B 84, 241106 (2011).
  48. M. A. Shea and G. K. Ackers, The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda: A physical-chemical model for gene regulation, J. Mol. Biol. 181, 211 (1985).
  49. G. D. Amoutzias, D. L. Robertson, Y. Van De Peer, and S. G. Oliver, Choose your partners: Dimerization in eukaryotic transcription factors, Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 220 (2008).
  50. S. T. Smale, Dimer-specific regulatory mechanisms within the NF-κB family of transcription factors, Immunol. Rev. 246, 193 (2012).
  51. H. Feng, B. Han, and J. Wang, Adiabatic and non-adiabatic non-equilibrium stochastic dynamics of single regulating genes, J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 1254 (2011).
  52. Z. Wang, D. A. Potoyan, and P. G. Wolynes, Molecular stripping, targets and decoys as modulators of oscillations in the NF−κB/IκBα/DNA genetic network, J. R. Soc. Interface 13, 20160606 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation