- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Magnetar field dynamics shaped by chiral anomalies and helicity

Clara Dehman* and José A. Pons

  • *Contact author: clara.dehman@ua.es
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033231 – Published 9 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rhv5-nd4v

Abstract

The chiral magnetic effect (CME)—a macroscopic manifestation of the quantum chiral anomaly—induces currents along magnetic field lines, facilitating mutual conversion between chiral asymmetry and magnetic helicity. Although the finite electron mass suppresses chiral asymmetry through spin-flip processes, we demonstrate that the CME effectively shapes magnetar field evolution. Magnetic helicity acts as a persistent internal source of chiral asymmetry, which mediates the redistribution of magnetic energy across spatial scales, without requiring an external energy source. Our three-dimensional magnetothermal simulations of the neutron star crust reveal a mechanism that significantly reconfigures the magnetic field inherited at birth, amplifying both toroidal and poloidal large-scale dipolar components (crucial for spin-down) to strengths of >1014 G within just a century, at the expense of small-scale structures. This astrophysical application of the CME, distinct and complementary to conventional hydrodynamic dynamo models, offers an innovative framework for understanding magnetar field dynamics and provides a transformative solution to the origin of their exceptionally strong, large-scale fields.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. S. Mereghetti, J. A. Pons, and A. Melatos, Magnetars: Properties, origin and evolution, Space Sci. Rev. 191, 315 (2015).
  2. P. Esposito, N. Rea, and G. L. Israel, Magnetars: A short review and some sparse considerations, in Timing Neutron Stars: Pulsations, Oscillations and Explosions, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, edited by T. M. Belloni, M. Méndez, and C. Zhang (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2021), Vol. 461, pp. 97–142.
  3. S. A. Balbus and J. F. Hawley, A powerful local shear instability in weakly magnetized disks. I. Linear analysis, Astrophys. J. 376, 214 (1991).
  4. M. Obergaulinger, H. T. Janka, and M. A. Aloy, Magnetic field amplification and magnetically supported explosions of collapsing, non-rotating stellar cores, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 3169 (2014).
  5. R. Raynaud, J. Guilet, H.-T. Janka, and T. Gastine, Magnetar formation through a convective dynamo in protoneutron stars, Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2732 (2020).
  6. A. Reboul-Salze, J. Guilet, R. Raynaud, and M. Bugli, A global model of the magnetorotational instability in protoneutron stars, Astron. Astrophys. 645, A109 (2021).
  7. M. Á. Aloy and M. Obergaulinger, Magnetorotational core collapse of possible GRB progenitors—II. Formation of protomagnetars and collapsars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500, 4365 (2021).
  8. Y. Masada, K. Kotake, T. Takiwaki, and N. Yamamoto, Chiral magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083018 (2018).
  9. J. Matsumoto, N. Yamamoto, and D.-L. Yang, Chiral plasma instability and inverse cascade from nonequilibrium left-handed neutrinos in core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123029 (2022).
  10. K. Kamada, N. Yamamoto, and D.-L. Yang, Chiral effects in astrophysics and cosmology, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 129, 104016 (2023).
  11. D. Grabowska, D. B. Kaplan, and S. Reddy, Role of the electron mass in damping chiral plasma instability in supernovae and neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 91, 085035 (2015).
  12. G. Sigl and N. Leite, Chiral magnetic effect in protoneutron stars and magnetic field spectral evolution, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2016) 025.
  13. A. Boyarsky, J. Fröhlich, and O. Ruchayskiy, Self-consistent evolution of magnetic fields and chiral asymmetry in the early universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 031301 (2012).
  14. H. Tashiro, T. Vachaspati, and A. Vilenkin, Chiral effects and cosmic magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 86, 105033 (2012).
  15. P. Pavlović, N. Leite, and G. Sigl, Chiral magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Phys. Rev. D 96, 023504 (2017).
  16. D. B. Kaplan, S. Reddy, and S. Sen, Energy conservation and the chiral magnetic effect, Phys. Rev. D 96, 016008 (2017).
  17. S. L. Adler, Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969).
  18. J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle: π0→γγ in the σ-model, Nuovo Cimento A 60, 47 (1969).
  19. Note that definitions of μ5 vary in the literature, sometimes differing by a sign [12] or a factor of 2 [16], depending on the source.
  20. A. Vilenkin, Equilibrium parity-violating current in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 22, 3080 (1980).
  21. J. A. Pons and D. Viganò, Magnetic, thermal and rotational evolution of isolated neutron stars, Living Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 5, 3 (2019).
  22. I. Rogachevskii, O. Ruchayskiy, A. Boyarsky, J. Fröhlich, N. Kleeorin, A. Brandenburg, and J. Schober, Laminar and turbulent dynamos in chiral magnetohydrodynamics. I. Theory, Astrophys. J. 846, 153 (2017).
  23. R. I. Epstein and C. J. Pethick, Lepton loss and entropy generation in stellar collapse, Astrophys. J. 243, 1003 (1981).
  24. D. Biskamp, Nonlinear Magnetohydrodynamics, Cambridge Monographs on Plasma Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997).
  25. M. Dvornikov and V. B. Semikoz, Energy source for the magnetic field growth in magnetars driven by the electron-nucleon interaction, Phys. Rev. D 92, 083007 (2015).
  26. P. Haensel, A. Y. Potekhin, and D. G. Yakovlev, Neutron Stars 1: Equation of State and Structure, Astrophysics and Space Science Library (Springer, New York, 2007), Vol. 326.
  27. E. G. Blackman and G. B. Field, New dynamical mean-field dynamo theory and closure approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 265007 (2002).
  28. C. Dehman, D. Viganò, J. A. Pons, and N. Rea, 3D code for magneto-thermal evolution in isolated neutron stars, MATINS: The magnetic field formalism, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 518, 1222 (2022).
  29. C. Dehman, D. Viganò, S. Ascenzi, J. A. Pons, and N. Rea, 3D evolution of neutron star magnetic fields from a realistic core-collapse turbulent topology, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 523, 5198 (2023).
  30. S. Ascenzi, D. Viganò, C. Dehman, J. A. Pons, N. Rea, and R. Perna, 3D code for magneto-thermal evolution in isolated neutron stars, MATINS: Thermal evolution and lightcurves, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 533, 201 (2024).
  31. http://www.ioffe.ru/astro/conduct/.
  32. A. Y. Potekhin, J. A. Pons, and D. Page, Neutron stars—Cooling and transport, Space Sci. Rev. 191, 239 (2015).
  33. https://compose.obspm.fr/.
  34. J. M. Pearson, N. Chamel, A. Y. Potekhin, A. F. Fantina, C. Ducoin, A. K. Dutta, and S. Goriely, Unified equations of state for cold non-accreting neutron stars with Brussels-Montreal functionals—I. Role of symmetry energy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481, 2994 (2018).
  35. A. Brandenburg, Importance of magnetic helicity in dynamos, in Cosmic Magnetic Fields, edited by R. Wielebinski and R. Beck (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005), Vol. 664, p. 219.
  36. A. Brandenburg, Hall cascade with fractional magnetic helicity in neutron star crusts, Astrophys. J. 901, 18 (2020).
  37. C. Dehman and A. Brandenburg, Reality of inverse cascading in neutron star crusts, Astron. Astrophys. 694, A39 (2025).
  38. A single-mode helical field is force-free, with the current everywhere parallel to the magnetic field [(∇×B)∥B], leading to a zero Lorentz force. However, combining modes with different wave numbers generally does not produce a force-free condition due to mode interactions.
  39. A. Reisenegger, Stable magnetic equilibria and their evolution in the upper main sequence, white dwarfs, and neutron stars, Astron. Astrophys. 499, 557 (2009).
  40. Y. Masada, T. Takiwaki, and K. Kotake, Convection and dynamo in newly born neutron stars, Astrophys. J. 924, 75 (2022).
  41. P. Esposito et al., A very young radio-loud magnetar, Astrophys. J. Lett. 896, L30 (2020).
  42. U. Frisch, A. Pouquet, J. Leorat, and A. Mazure, Possibility of an inverse cascade of magnetic helicity in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 68, 769 (1975).
  43. C. Dehman, D. Viganò, N. Rea, J. A. Pons, R. Perna, and A. Garcia-Garcia, On the rate of crustal failures in young magnetars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 902, L32 (2020).
  44. U. Geppert, J. Gil, G. Melikidze, J. Pons, and D. Viganò, Hall drift in the crust of neutron stars—necessary for radio pulsar activity? in Electromagnetic Radiation from Pulsars and Magnetars, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, edited by W. Lewandowski, O. Maron, and J. Kijak, Vol. 466 (Astronomical Society of the pacific, San Francisco, CA, 2012), p. 187.
  45. D. Viganò, N. Rea, J. A. Pons, R. Perna, D. N. Aguilera, and J. A. Miralles, Unifying the observational diversity of isolated neutron stars via magneto-thermal evolution models, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 434, 123 (2013).
  46. K. N. Gourgouliatos and J. A. Pons, Nonaxisymmetric hall instability: A key to understanding magnetars, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 032049 (2019).
  47. D. De Grandis, R. Taverna, R. Turolla, A. Gnarini, S. B. Popov, S. Zane, and T. S. Wood, X-ray emission from isolated neutron stars revisited: 3D magnetothermal simulations, Astrophys. J. 914, 118 (2021).
  48. S. Chandrasekhar and P. C. Kendall, On force-free magnetic fields., Astrophys. J. 126, 457 (1957).
  49. U. Geppert and H. J. Wiebicke, Amplification of neutron star magnetic fields by thermoelectric effects. I—General formalism, Astron. Astrophys. 87, 217 (1991).
  50. F. Krause and K.-H. Rädler, Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980).
  51. D. N. Aguilera, J. A. Pons, and J. A. Miralles, 2D cooling of magnetized neutron stars, Astron. Astrophys. 486, 255 (2008).
  52. R. Durrer and C. Caprini, Primordial magnetic fields and causality, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2003) 010.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033231– Published 9 September, 2025
  • Received 19 May 2025
  • Accepted 18 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation