Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Function extraction via Chebyshev interpolation of quantum integral estimates

Gumaro Rendón*

  • *Contact author: grendon@fujitsu.com

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023095 – Published 30 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/r6xs-236q

Abstract

We present an algorithm for extracting a smooth, positive-definite function ψ(x) encoded in a quantum state vector of size 2n, while avoiding exponentially suppressed subnormalization of a naive extraction step. The method addresses a known limitation in quantum algorithms for differential equations, namely, the efficient retrieval of classical information from quantum-encoded solutions. It applies to settings where the target solution is smooth and positive definite, such as certain instances of the heat equation and related diffusive models arising in fluid dynamics and finance.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (24)

  1. A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009).
  2. D. W Berry, High-order quantum algorithm for solving linear differential equations, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 105301 (2014).
  3. D. W. Berry, A. M. Childs, A. Ostrander, and G. Wang, Quantum algorithm for linear differential equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision, Commun. Math. Phys. 356, 1057 (2017).
  4. A. M. Childs, R. Kothari, and R. D. Somma, Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision, SIAM J. Comput. 46, 1920 (2017).
  5. A. M. Childs, J.-P. Liu, and A. Ostrander, High-precision quantum algorithms for partial differential equations, Quantum 5, 574 (2021).
  6. A. M. Childs and J.-P. Liu, Quantum spectral methods for differential equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 375, 1427 (2020).
  7. A. Gilyén, Y. Su, G. H. Low, and N. Wiebe, Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: Exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics, in Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2019), pp. 193–204.
  8. D. Fang, L. Lin, and Y. Tong, Time-marching based quantum solvers for time-dependent linear differential equations, Quantum 7, 955 (2023).
  9. G. Brassard, P. Hoyer, M. Mosca, and A. Tapp, Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation, arXiv:quant-ph/0005055.
  10. H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements, Nat. Phys. 16, 1050 (2020).
  11. K. Miyamoto and H. Ueda, Extracting a function encoded in amplitudes of a quantum state by tensor network and orthogonal function expansion, Quantum Inf. Process. 22, 239 (2023).
  12. Y. Fang, C. Xue, T.-P. Sun, X.-F. Xu, X.-N. Zhuang, Y.-J. Wang, C.-C. Ye, T.-Y. Ma, J.-X. Zhang, H.-Y. Liu, et al., PolyQROM: Orthogonal-polynomial-based quantum reduced-order model for flow field analysis, arXiv:2504.21567.
  13. C. Xue, Z.-Y. Chen, X.-N. Zhuang, Y.-J. Wang, T.-P. Sun, J.-C. Wang, H.-Y. Liu, Y.-C. Wu, Z.-L. Wang, and G.-P. Guo, End-to-end quantum vision transformer: Towards practical quantum speedup in large-scale models, arXiv:2402.18940.
  14. N. Linden, A. Montanaro, and C. Shao, Quantum vs. classical algorithms for solving the heat equation, Commun. Math. Phys. 395, 601 (2022).
  15. E. Devereux and A. Datta, Quantum algorithms for solving a drift-diffusion equation: A complexity analysis, Phys. Rev. A 112, 042419 (2025).
  16. M. Lubasch, Y. Kikuchi, L. Wright, and C. Mc Keever, Quantum circuits for partial differential equations in Fourier space, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043326 (2025).
  17. Y. Yuan, C. Wang, B. Wang, Z.-Y. Chen, M.-H. Dou, Y.-C. Wu, and G.-P. Guo, An improved QFT-based quantum comparator and extended modular arithmetic using one ancilla qubit, New J. Phys. 25, 103011 (2023).
  18. S. Wang, X. Li, W. J. B. Lee, S. Deb, E. Lim, and A. Chattopadhyay, A comprehensive study of quantum arithmetic circuits, Philos. Trans. A 383, 20230392 (2025).
  19. G. Rendon, All you need is Trotter, arXiv:2311.01533v2.
  20. G. Rendon, J. Watkins, and N. Wiebe, Improved accuracy for Trotter simulations using Chebyshev interpolation, Quantum 8, 1266 (2024).
  21. M. Kuian, L. Reichel, and S. Shiyanovskii, Optimally conditioned Vandermonde-like matrices, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 40, 1399 (2019).
  22. F. L. Bauer and C. T. Fike, Norms and exclusion theorems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 2, 137 (1960).
  23. R. M. Corless, G. H. Gonnet, D. E. G. Hare, D. J. Jeffrey, and D. E. Knuth, On the LambertW function, Adv. Comput. Math. 5, 329 (1996).
  24. M. Hassani and A. Hoorfar, Inequalities on the Lambert function and hyperpower function, JIPAM J. Inequal. Pure App. Math. 9, 51 (2008).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation