- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Layer thickness and substrate effects on superconductivity in epitaxial FeSe films on BLG/SiC(0001)

Yongsong Wang1,*, Haojie Guo1,*,†, Ane Etxebarria2, Sandra Sajan1, Sara Barja1,2,3,4, and Miguel M. Ugeda1,3,4,‡

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: haojie.guo@dipc.org
  • ‡Contact author: mmugeda@dipc.org
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 023288 – Published 20 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qv7j-53y7

Abstract

The layered nature and simple structure of FeSe reveal this iron-based superconductor as a unique building block for the design of artificial heterostructure materials. While superconductivity develops in ultrathin films of FeSe on SrTiO3 substrates, it remains unclear whether it can be developed on more chemically inert, layered materials such as graphene. Here, we report on the characterization of the structural, chemical, and electronic properties of few-layer and multilayer FeSe on bilayer graphene grown on SiC(0001) using low-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). STM imaging of our FeSe films with thicknesses up to three layers exhibits the tetragonal crystal structure of bulk FeSe, which is supported by XPS spectra consistent with the FeSe bulk counterpart. While our STS measurements at 340 mK reveal a metallic character for few-layer FeSe on BLG/SiC(0001), they show an absence of superconductivity, as the low-lying electronic structure exhibits a spatially anisotropic dip-like feature robust against magnetic fields. However, we find that superconductivity in FeSe/BLG/SiC(0001) starts to emerge from a thickness of five layers. Cooper pairing strength increases with film thickness, reaching critical temperatures up to 6 K above 20 layers. Our results underscore the significance of the substrate and thickness as key factors driving the suppression of superconductivity in FeSe in the 2D limit.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (85)

  1. A. Chubukov, Pairing mechanism in Fe-based superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 57 (2012).
  2. R. M. Fernandes, A. V. Chubukov, and J. Schmalian, What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors? Nat. Phys. 10, 97 (2014).
  3. Q. M. Si, R. Yu, and E. Abrahams, High-temperature superconductivity in iron pnictides and chalcogenides, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16017 (2016).
  4. A. E. Böhmer and A. Kreisel, Nematicity, magnetism and superconductivity in FeSe, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 30, 023001 (2018).
  5. R. M. Fernandes, A. I. Coldea, H. Ding, I. R. Fisher, P. J. Hirschfeld, and G. Kotliar, Iron pnictides and chalcogenides: A new paradigm for superconductivity, Nature (London) 601, 35 (2022).
  6. H. H. Kuo, J. H. Chu, J. C. Palmstrom, S. A. Kivelson, and I. R. Fisher, Ubiquitous signatures of nematic quantum criticality in optimally doped Fe-based superconductors, Science 352, 958 (2016).
  7. P. Zhang et al., Multiple topological states in iron-based superconductors, Nat. Phys. 15, 41 (2019).
  8. J. Paglione and R. L. Greene, High-temperature superconductivity in iron-based materials, Nat. Phys. 6, 645 (2010).
  9. X. Liu et al. Electronic structure and superconductivity of FeSe-related superconductors, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 27, 183201 (2015).
  10. G. Li, M. Li, X. T. Zhou, and H. J. Gao, Toward large-scale, ordered and tunable Majorana-zero-modes lattice on iron-based superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 016501 (2024).
  11. J. E. Hoffman, Spectroscopic scanning tunneling microscopy insights into Fe-based superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 124513 (2011).
  12. F. Wang and D. H. Lee, The electron-pairing mechanism of iron-based superconductors, Science 332, 200 (2011).
  13. D. Huang and J. E. Hoffman, Monolayer FeSe on SrTiO3, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 311 (2017).
  14. H. Hosono and K. Kuroki, Iron-based superconductors: Current status of materials and pairing mechanism, Physica C 514, 399 (2015).
  15. N. N. Hao and J. P. Hu, Topological phases in the single-layer FeSe, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031053 (2014).
  16. Z. Q. Wang, C. F. Liu, Y. Liu, and J. Wang, High-temperature superconductivity in one-unit-cell FeSe films, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 29, 153001 (2017).
  17. A. I. Coldea and M. D. Watson, The key ingredients of the electronic structure of FeSe, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter 9, 125 (2018).
  18. C. F. Liu and J. Wang, Heterostructural one-unit-cell FeSe/SrTiO3: From high-temperature superconductivity to topological states, 2D Mater. 7, 022006 (2020).
  19. A. Subedi, L. J. Zhang, D. J. Singh, and M. H. Du, Density functional study of FeS, FeSe, and FeTe: Electronic structure, magnetism, phonons, and superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 78, 134514 (2008).
  20. J. K. Glasbrenner, Mazin II, H. O. Jeschke, P. J. Hirschfeld, R. M. Fernandes, and R. Valentí, Effect of magnetic frustration on nematicity and superconductivity in iron chalcogenides, Nat. Phys. 11, 953 (2015).
  21. F. C. Hsu et al., Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure α-FeSe, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 105, 14262 (2008).
  22. J. F. Ge, Z. L. Liu, C. H. Liu, C. L. Gao, D. Qian, Q. K. Xue, Y. Liu, and J. F. Jia, Superconductivity above 100 K in single-layer FeSe films on doped SrTiO3, Nat. Mater. 14, 285 (2015).
  23. C. L. Song et al., Direct observation of nodes and twofold symmetry in FeSe superconductor, Science 332, 1410 (2011).
  24. D. F. Liu et al., Electronic origin of high-temperature superconductivity in single-layer FeSe superconductor, Nat. Commun. 3, 931 (2012).
  25. C. L. Song, Y. L. Wang, Y. P. Jiang, L. L. Wang, K. He, X. Chen, J. E. Hoffman, X. C. Ma, and Q. K. Xue, Suppression of superconductivity by twin boundaries in FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 137004 (2012).
  26. J. Bang et al., Atomic and electronic structures of single-layer FeSe on SrTiO3 (001): The role of oxygen deficiency, Phys. Rev. B 87, 220503 (2013).
  27. S. L. He et al., Phase diagram and electronic indication of high-temperature superconductivity at 65 K in single-layer FeSe films, Nat. Mater. 12, 605 (2013).
  28. S. Y. Tan et al., Interface-induced superconductivity and strain-dependent spin density waves in FeSe/SrTiO3 thin films, Nat. Mater. 12, 634 (2013).
  29. J. J. Lee et al., Interfacial mode coupling as the origin of the enhancement of Tc in FeSe films on SrTiO3, Nature (London) 515, 245 (2014).
  30. Z. Li et al., Molecular beam epitaxy growth and post-growth annealing of FeSe films on SrTiO3 a scanning tunneling microscopy study, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 26, 265002 (2014).
  31. R. Peng et al., Measurement of an enhanced superconducting phase and a pronounced anisotropy of the energy gap of a strained FeSe single layer in FeSe/Nb:SrTiO3/KTaO3 heterostructures using photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 107001 (2014).
  32. C. L. Song et al., Imaging the electron-boson coupling in superconducting FeSe films using a scanning tunneling microscope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 057002 (2014).
  33. W. H. Zhang et al., Direct observation of high-temperature superconductivity in one-unit-cell FeSe films, Chin. Phys. Lett. 31, 017401 (2014).
  34. Q. Fan et al., Plain s-wave superconductivity in single-layer Fe Se on SrTiO3 probed by scanning tunnelling microscopy, Nat. Phys. 11, 946 (2015).
  35. Z. Li et al., Visualizing superconductivity in FeSe nanoflakes on SrTiO3 by scanning tunneling microscopy, Phys. Rev. B 91, 060509 (2015).
  36. S. Rössler, C. Koz, L. Jiao, U. K. Rössler, F. Steglich, U. Schwarz, and S. Wirth, Emergence of an incipient ordering mode in FeSe, Phys. Rev. B 92, 060505 (2015).
  37. H. Ding, Y. F. Lv, K. Zhao, W. L. Wang, L. L. Wang, C. L. Song, X. Chen, X. C. Ma, and Q. K. Xue, High-temperature superconductivity in single-unit-cell FeSe films on anatase TiO2 (001), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 067001 (2016).
  38. Z. F. Wang et al., Topological edge states in a high-temperature superconductor FeSe/SrTiO3 (001) film, Nat. Mater. 15, 968 (2016).
  39. G. Y. Zhou et al., Interface-induced high temperature superconductivity in single unit-cell FeSe on SrTiO3 (110), Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 202603 (2016).
  40. Y. Hu, Y. Xu, Q. Y. Wang, L. Zhao, S. L. He, J. W. Huang, C. Li, G. D. Liu, and X. J. Zhou, Identification of a large amount of excess Fe in superconducting single-layer FeSe/SrTiO3 films, Phys. Rev. B 97, 224512 (2018).
  41. K. L. Bu et al., Study of intrinsic defect states of FeSe with scanning tunneling microscopy, Phys. Rev. B 100, 155127 (2019).
  42. X. Q. Yu, M. Q. Ren, Y. M. Zhang, J. Q. Fan, S. Han, C. L. Song, X. C. Ma, and Q. K. Xue, Stoichiometry and defect superstructures in epitaxial FeSe films on SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 051402 (2020).
  43. H. M. Zhang, Z. Z. Ge, M. Weinert, and L. Li, Sign changing pairing in single layer FeSe/SrTiO3 revealed by nonmagnetic impurity bound states, Commun. Phys. 3, 75 (2020).
  44. Z. Ren, H. Li, H. Zhao, S. Sharma, Z. Q. Wang, and I. Zeljkovic, Nanoscale decoupling of electronic nematicity and structural anisotropy in FeSe thin films, Nat. Commun. 12, 10 (2021).
  45. A. K. Pedersen, S. Ichinokura, T. Tanaka, R. Shimizu, T. Hitosugi, and T. Hirahara, Interfacial superconductivity in FeSe ultrathin films on SrTiO3 probed by in situ independently driven four-point-probe measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 227002 (2020).
  46. X. Liu et al., Dichotomy of the electronic structure and superconductivity between single-layer and double-layer FeSe/SrTiO3 films, Nat. Commun. 5, 5047 (2014).
  47. C. Chen, Q. Liu, W. C. Bao, Y. J. Yan, Q. H. Wang, T. Zhang, and D. L. Feng, Observation of discrete conventional caroli-de gennes-matricon states in the vortex core of single-layer FeSe/SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 097001 (2020).
  48. Y. H. Yuan, X. M. Fan, X. T. Wang, K. He, Y. Zhang, Q. K. Xue, and W. Li, Incommensurate smectic phase in close proximity to the high−Tc superconductor FeSe/SrTiO3, Nat. Commun. 12, 2196 (2021).
  49. S. Coh, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Large electron-phonon interactions from FeSe phonons in a monolayer, New J. Phys. 17, 073027 (2015).
  50. M. M. Ugeda et al., Characterization of collective ground states in single-layer NbSe2, Nat. Phys. 12, 92 (2016).
  51. M. M. Ugeda et al., Observation of topologically protected states at crystalline phase boundaries in single-layer WSe2, Nat. Commun. 9, 3401 (2018).
  52. W. Ruan et al., Evidence for quantum spin liquid behaviour in single-layer 1T−TaSe2 from scanning tunnelling microscopy, Nat. Phys. 17, 1154 (2021).
  53. P. Dreher et al., Proximity effects on the charge density wave order and superconductivity in single-layer NbSe2, ACS Nano 15, 19430 (2021).
  54. C. L. Song, Y. L. Wang, Y. P. Jiang, Z. Li, L. L. Wang, K. He, X. Chen, X. C. Ma, and Q. K. Xue, Molecular-beam epitaxy and robust superconductivity of stoichiometric FeSe crystalline films on bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 84, 020503 (2011).
  55. W. T. Huang, H. C. Lin, C. Zheng, Y. G. Yin, X. Chen, and S. H. Ji, Superconducting FeSe monolayer with millielectronvolt Fermi energy, Phys. Rev. B 103, 094502 (2021).
  56. H. C. Lin et al., Real-space BCS-BEC crossover in FeSe monolayers, Phys. Rev. B 107, 104517 (2023).
  57. I. I. Mazin, Symmetry analysis of possible superconducting states in KxFeySe2 superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 84, 024529 (2011).
  58. M. Khodas and A. V. Chubukov, Interpocket Pairing and Gap Symmetry in Fe-Based Superconductors with Only Electron Pockets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 247003 (2012).
  59. P. M. Eugenio and O. Vafek, Classification of symmetry derived pairing at the M point in FeSe, Phys. Rev. B 98, 014503 (2018).
  60. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/qv7j-53y7 for additional information regarding STM topography image on bilayer and trilayer FeSe; the dip structure characterization near Fermi level in few-layers FeSe; the structural, electronic and superconducting properties characterization of multilayers FeSe.
  61. I. Horcas, R. Fernandez, J. M. Gomez-Rodriguez, J. Colchero, J. Gomez-Herrero, and A. M. Baro, WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 013705 (2007).
  62. J. Hass, W. A. de Heer, and E. H. Conrad, The growth and morphology of epitaxial multilayer graphene, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 20, 323202 (2008).
  63. Y. Mizuguchi, F. Tomioka, S. Tsuda, T. Yamaguchi, and Y. Takano, Superconductivity at 27 K in tetragonal FeSe under high pressure, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 152505 (2008).
  64. S. Medvedev et al., Electronic and magnetic phase diagram of β−Fe1.01Se with superconductivity at 36.7 K under pressure, Nat. Mater. 8, 630 (2009).
  65. A. Yamasaki et al., Electron correlation in the FeSe superconductor studied by bulk-sensitive photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 82, 184511 (2010).
  66. J. A. Sánchez, M. L. Amigó, C. H. Belussi, M. V. A. Crivillero, S. Suárez, J. Guimpel, G. Nieva, J. E. Gayone, and Y. Fasano, Impact of atomic defects in the electronic states of FeSe1−xSx superconducting crystals, J. Phys. Mater. 5, 044008 (2022).
  67. M. Aichhorn, S. Biermann, T. Miyake, A. Georges, and M. Imada, Theoretical evidence for strong correlations and incoherent metallic state in FeSe, Phys. Rev. B 82, 064504 (2010).
  68. J. Yu, L. J. Meng, J. F. Wu, and Y. Z. Li, Correlation effect on the electronic properties of pair-checkerboard AFM monolayer FeSe: A first-principles study, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 31, 305502 (2019).
  69. D. Y. Qiu, S. Coh, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Comparison of GW band structure to semiempirical approach for an FeSe monolayer, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235154 (2020).
  70. Y. H. Song et al., Observation of Coulomb gap in the quantum spin Hall candidate single-layer 1T′−WTe2, Nat. Commun. 9, 4071 (2018).
  71. W. Wan, R. Harsh, P. Dreher, F. de Juan, and M. M. Ugeda, Superconducting dome by tuning through a van Hove singularity in a two-dimensional metal, npj 2D Mater. Appl. 7, 41 (2023).
  72. A. L. Efros and B. I. Shklovskii, Coulomb gap and low-temperature conductivity of disordered systems, J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 8, L49 (1975).
  73. Y. B. Zhang, V. W. Brar, F. Wang, C. Girit, Y. Yayon, M. Panlasigui, A. Zettl, and M. F. Crommie, Giant phonon-induced conductance in scanning tunnelling spectroscopy of gate-tunable graphene, Nat. Phys. 4, 627 (2008).
  74. S. Kasahara et al., Field-induced superconducting phase of FeSe in the BCS-BEC cross-over, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16309 (2014).
  75. T. Watashige et al., Evidence for time-reversal symmetry breaking of the superconducting state near twin-boundary interfaces in fese revealed by scanning tunneling spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031022 (2015).
  76. L. Jiao, C. L. Huang, S. Rössler, C. Koz, U. K. Rössler, U. Schwarz, and S. Wirth, Superconducting gap structure of FeSe, Sci. Rep. 7, 44024 (2017).
  77. H. B. Yang et al., Phonon modes and electron-phonon coupling at the FeSe/SrTiO3 interface, Nature (London) 635, 332 (2024).
  78. A. Eich et al., Absence of superconductivity in ultrathin layers of FeSe synthesized on a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 94, 125437 (2016).
  79. U. R. Singh, J. Warmuth, V. Markmann, J. Wiebe, and R. Wiesendanger, Structural and electronic properties of ultrathin FeSe films grown on Bi2Se3 (0001) studied by STM/STS, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 29, 025004 (2017).
  80. R. Schneider, A. G. Zaitsev, D. Fuchs, and H. von Löhneysen, Superconductor-insulator quantum phase transition in disordered FeSe thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 257003 (2012).
  81. L. S. Farrar, M. Bristow, A. A. Haghighirad, A. McCollam, S. J. Bending, and A. I. Coldea, Suppression of superconductivity and enhanced critical field anisotropy in thin flakes of FeSe, npj Quantum Mater. 5, 29 (2020).
  82. S. Thiel, G. Hammerl, A. Schmehl, C. W. Schneider, and J. Mannhart, Tunable quasi-two-dimensional electron gases in oxide heterostructures, Science 313, 1942 (2006).
  83. N. Reyren et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides, Science 317, 1196 (2007).
  84. M. Z. Cieplak, M. Berkowski, S. Guha, E. Cheng, A. S. Vagelos, D. J. Rabinowitz, B. Wu, I. E. Trofimov, and P. Lindenfeld, Thickness dependence of La2−xSrxCuO4 films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 3383 (1994).
  85. T. L. Meyer, L. Jiang, S. Park, T. Egami, and H. N. Lee, Strain-relaxation and critical thickness of epitaxial La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 films, APL Mater. 3, 126102 (2015).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 023288– Published 20 June, 2025
  • Received 24 January 2025
  • Accepted 28 May 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation