- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Foamlike properties in networks of bundled semiflexible polymers

Lukas P. Weise, Tobias A. Kampmann, and Jan Kierfeld*

  • *Contact author: jan.kierfeld@tu-dortmund.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, L012033 – Published 5 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qrgq-v94k

Abstract

We simulate large systems of mutually attractive semiflexible polymers such as actin filaments in quasi-two dimensions with recently developed event-chain Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics techniques. An isotropic initial state generically evolves into a network of bundles of polymers, which slowly coarsens over time. This explains why networks of bundles are frequently observed in cytoskeletal systems, although one single polymer bundle appears to have a lower free energy. The resulting structure aims to minimize the overall bundle length, which gives rise to properties reminiscent of foams. We apply laws and relations characterizing the structure of foams to the polymer bundle networks. While the empirical Feltham law, as well as the Aboav-Weaire relation, apply to our system, Plateau's law is not followed due to anisotropy and bending stiffness. The coarsening dynamics of the bundle networks are found to be very sensitive with respect to details of the polymer interactions and to deviate from a pure power-law growth of the mean enclosed area, albeit qualitative resemblance to foams remains. We develop a scaling theory capturing the observed coarsening process based on a solidlike friction law for polymer motion in a bundle.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (75)

  1. B. Alberts, A. Johnson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and P. Walter, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th ed. (Garland Science, New York, NY, 2007).
  2. D. A. Fletcher and R. D. Mullins, Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton, Nature (London) 463, 485 (2010).
  3. J. Schnauß, T. Händler, and J. A. Käs, Semiflexible biopolymers in bundled arrangements, Polymers 8, 274 (2016).
  4. O. Lieleg, M. M. A. E. Claessens, and A. R. Bausch, Structure and dynamics of cross-linked actin networks, Soft Matter 6, 218 (2010).
  5. P. Zhan, K. Jahnke, N. Liu, and K. Göpfrich, Functional DNA-based cytoskeletons for synthetic cells, Nat. Chem. 14, 958 (2022).
  6. K. Graham, A. Chandrasekaran, L. Wang, A. Ladak, E. M. Lafer, P. Rangamani, and J. C. Stachowiak, Liquid-like vasp condensates drive actin polymerization and dynamic bundling, Nat. Phys. 19, 574 (2023).
  7. S. Novosedlik, F. Reichel, T. van Veldhuisen, Y. Li, H. Wu, H. Janssen, J. Guck, and J. van Hest, Cytoskeleton-functionalized synthetic cells with life-like mechanical features and regulated membrane dynamicity, Nat. Chem. 17, 356 (2025).
  8. J. Kierfeld, T. Kühne, and R. Lipowsky, Discontinuous unbinding transitions of filament bundles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 038102 (2005).
  9. O. Pelletier, E. Pokidysheva, L. S. Hirst, N. Bouxsein, Y. Li, and C. R. Safinya, Structure of actin cross-linked with α-actinin: A network of bundles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 148102 (2003).
  10. J. H. Shin, M. L. Gardel, L. Mahadevan, P. Matsudaira, and D. A. Weitz, Relating microstructure to rheology of a bundled and cross-linked F-actin network in vitro, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9636 (2004).
  11. L. S. Hirst, R. Pynn, R. F. Bruinsma, and C. R. Safinya, Hierarchical self-assembly of actin bundle networks: Gels with surface protein skin layers, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 104902 (2005).
  12. K. M. Schmoller, O. Lieleg, and A. R. Bausch, Internal stress in kinetically trapped actin bundle networks, Soft Matter 4, 2365 (2008).
  13. K. M. Schmoller, O. Lieleg, and A. R. Bausch, Structural and viscoelastic properties of actin/filamin networks: Cross-linked versus bundled networks, Biophys. J. 97, 83 (2009).
  14. K. M. Schmoller, P. Fernández, R. C. Arevalo, D. L. Blair, and A. R. Bausch, Cyclic hardening in bundled actin networks, Nat. Commun. 1, 134 (2010).
  15. S. Deshpande and T. Pfohl, Hierarchical self-assembly of actin in micro-confinements using microfluidics, Biomicrofluidics 6, 034120 (2012).
  16. S. Deshpande and T. Pfohl, Real-time dynamics of emerging actin networks in cell-mimicking compartments, PLoS One 10, e0116521 (2015).
  17. F. Huber, D. Strehle, J. Schnauß, and J. Käs, Formation of regularly spaced networks as a general feature of actin bundle condensation by entropic forces, New J. Phys. 17, 043029 (2015).
  18. I. K. Piechocka, K. A. Jansen, C. P. Broedersz, N. A. Kurniawan, F. C. MacKintosh, and G. H. Koenderink, Multi-scale strain-stiffening of semiflexible bundle networks, Soft Matter 12, 2145 (2016).
  19. Z. G. Sun and M. Murrell, Cofilin-mediated filament softening and crosslinking counterbalance to enhance actin network flexibility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 218402 (2024).
  20. D. A. D. Flormann, L. Kainka, G. Montalvo, C. Anton, J. Rheinlaender, D. Thalla, D. Vesperini, M. O. Pohland, K. H. Kaub, M. Schu, F. Pezzano, V. Ruprecht, E. Terriac, R. J. Hawkins, and F. Lautenschläger, The structure and mechanics of the cell cortex depend on the location and adhesion state, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2320372121 (2024).
  21. S. Köster, D. A. Weitz, R. D. Goldman, U. Aebi, and H. Herrmann, Intermediate filament mechanics in vitro and in the cell: From coiled coils to filaments, fibers and networks, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 32, 82 (2015).
  22. M. G. Hahm, H. Wang, H. Y. Jung, S. Hong, S.-G. Lee, S.-R. Kim, M. Upmanyu, and Y. J. Jung, Bundling dynamics regulates the active mechanics and transport in carbon nanotube networks and their nanocomposites, Nanoscale 4, 3584 (2012).
  23. T. A. Kampmann, D. Müller, L. P. Weise, C. F. Vorsmann, and J. Kierfeld, Event-chain Monte-Carlo simulations of dense soft matter systems, Front. Phys. 9, 635886 (2021).
  24. W. Krauth, Event-chain Monte Carlo: Foundations, applications, and prospects, Front. Phys. 9, 663457 (2021).
  25. A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, lammps—A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  26. M. Illig, K. Jahnke, L. P. Weise, M. Scheffold, U. Mersdorf, H. Drechsler, Y. Zhang, S. Diez, J. Kierfeld, and K. Göpfrich, Triggered contraction of self-assembled micron-scale DNA nanotube rings, Nat. Commun. 15, 2307 (2024).
  27. S. J. Winder and K. R. Ayscough, Actin-binding proteins, J. Cell Sci. 118, 651 (2005).
  28. P. Lappalainen, Actin-binding proteins: The long road to understanding the dynamic landscape of cellular actin networks, Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 2519 (2016).
  29. L. Blanchoin, R. Boujemaa-Paterski, C. Sykes, and J. Plastino, Actin dynamics, architecture, and mechanics in cell motility, Physiol. Rev. 94, 235 (2014).
  30. R. D. Groot, Mesoscale simulation of semiflexible chains. II. Evolution dynamics and stability of fiber bundle networks, J. Chem. Phys. 138, 224904 (2013).
  31. A. Sengab and R. C. Picu, Filamentary structures that self-organize due to adhesion, Phys. Rev. E 97, 032506 (2018).
  32. R. C. Picu and A. Sengab, Structural evolution and stability of non-crosslinked fiber networks with inter-fiber adhesion, Soft Matter 14, 2254 (2018).
  33. E. P. DeBenedictis, Y. Zhang, and S. Keten, Structure and mechanics of bundled semiflexible polymer networks, Macromolecules 53, 6123 (2020).
  34. J. Kierfeld, O. Niamploy, V. Sa-yakanit, and R. Lipowsky, Stretching of semiflexible polymers with elastic bonds, Eur. Phys. J. E 14, 17 (2004).
  35. J. Midya, S. A. Egorov, K. Binder, and A. Nikoubashman, Phase behavior of flexible and semiflexible polymers in solvents of varying quality, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 034902 (2019).
  36. C. Heussinger, M. Bathe, and E. Frey, Statistical mechanics of semiflexible bundles of wormlike polymer chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 048101 (2007).
  37. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/qrgq-v94k for details on the simulation parameters and analysis procedure, figures of structural and dynamical properties of network simulations other than EC-SW g=0.7kBT, derivations, and implementations of the theory presented in the main text, which includes Refs. [69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75].
  38. E. P. Bernard, W. Krauth, and D. B. Wilson, Event-chain Monte Carlo algorithms for hard-sphere systems, Phys. Rev. E 80, 056704 (2009).
  39. S. C. Kapfer and W. Krauth, Sampling from a polytope and hard-disk Monte Carlo, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 454, 012031 (2013).
  40. M. Michel, S. C. Kapfer, and W. Krauth, Generalized event-chain Monte Carlo: Constructing rejection-free global-balance algorithms from infinitesimal steps, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 054116 (2014).
  41. M. Michel, J. Mayer, and W. Krauth, Event-chain Monte Carlo for classical continuous spin models, Europhys. Lett. 112, 20003 (2015).
  42. T. A. Kampmann, H.-H. Boltz, and J. Kierfeld, Monte Carlo simulation of dense polymer melts using event chain algorithms, J. Chem. Phys. 143, 044105 (2015).
  43. J. Harland, M. Michel, T. A. Kampmann, and J. Kierfeld, Event-chain Monte Carlo algorithms for three- and many-particle interactions, Europhys. Lett. 117, 30001 (2017).
  44. A. Khokhlov and A. Semenov, On the theory of liquid-crystalline ordering of polymer chains with limited flexibility, J. Stat. Phys. 38, 161 (1985).
  45. R. Chelakkot, R. Lipowsky, and T. Gruhn, Self-assembling network and bundle structures in systems of rods and crosslinkers—A Monte Carlo study, Soft Matter 5, 1504 (2009).
  46. C. J. Cyron, K. W. Müller, K. M. Schmoller, A. R. Bausch, W. A. Wall, and R. F. Bruinsma, Equilibrium phase diagram of semi-flexible polymer networks with linkers, Europhys. Lett. 102, 38003 (2013).
  47. C. V. Thompson, Grain growth and evolution of other cellular structures, in Solid State Physics, Vol. 55, edited by H. Ehrenreich and F. Spaepen (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001), pp. 269–314.
  48. S. Kumar and S. K. Kurtz, Properties of a two-dimensional Poisson-Voronoi tesselation: A Monte-Carlo study, Mater. Charact. 31, 55 (1993).
  49. D. Aboav, The arrangement of cells in a net, Metallography 13, 43 (1980).
  50. D. Weaire, Some remarks on the arrangement of grains in a polycrystal, Metallography 7, 157 (1974).
  51. F. T. Lewis, The correlation between cell division and the shapes and sizes of prismatic cells in the epidermis of Cucumis, Anat. Rec. 38, 341 (1928); A comparison between the mosaic of polygons in a film of artificial emulsion and the pattern of simple epithelium in surface view (cucumber epidermis and human amnion), 50, 235 (1931); The geometry of growth and cell division in epithelial mosaics, Am. J. Bot. 30, 766 (1943).
  52. J. A. Glazier, S. P. Gross, and J. Stavans, Dynamics of two-dimensional soap froths, Phys. Rev. A 36, 306 (1987).
  53. K. Szeto and W. Tam, Lewis’ law versus Feltham's law in soap froth, Physica A 221, 256 (1995).
  54. W. W. Mullins, The statistical self‐similarity hypothesis in grain growth and particle coarsening, J. Appl. Phys. 59, 1341 (1986).
  55. For a zipping process to occur, polymers must slide along the bundles so that edges can change their lengths. A bundle is torn apart in a rupture event after the polymers have slid half a bundle length along each other.
  56. J. Stavans, Temporal evolution of two-dimensional drained soap froths, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5049 (1990).
  57. W. Mullins, On idealized two dimensional grain growth, Scr. Metall. 22, 1441 (1988).
  58. The horizontal offset is due to the definition of the term “sweep,” which we defined as starting one EC for each particle.
  59. A. Ward, F. Hilitski, W. Schwenger, D. Welch, A. W. C. Lau, V. Vitelli, L. Mahadevan, and Z. Dogic, Solid friction between soft filaments, Nat. Mater. 14, 583 (2015).
  60. G. H. Lai, R. Coridan, O. V. Zribi, R. Golestanian, and G. C. L. Wong, Evolution of growth modes for polyelectrolyte bundles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 187802 (2007).
  61. L. Haviv, N. Gov, Y. Ideses, and A. Bernheim-Groswasser, Thickness distribution of actin bundles in vitro, Eur. Biophys. J. 37, 447 (2008).
  62. G. M. Grason and R. F. Bruinsma, Chirality and equilibrium biopolymer bundles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 098101 (2007).
  63. G. M. Grason, Frustration and packing in curved-filament assemblies: From isometric to isomorphic bundles, Soft Matter 9, 6761 (2013).
  64. C. Wang, B. Xie, Y. Liu, and Z. Xu, Mechanotunable microstructures of carbon nanotube networks, ACS Macro Lett. 1, 1176 (2012).
  65. M. J. Stevens, Bundle binding in polyelectrolyte solutions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 101 (1999).
  66. L. T. Nguyen, W. Yang, Q. Wang, and L. S. Hirst, Molecular dynamics simulation of F-actin reveals the role of cross-linkers in semi-flexible filament assembly, Soft Matter 5, 2033 (2009).
  67. R. J. Pandolfi, L. Edwards, D. Johnston, P. Becich, and L. S. Hirst, Designing highly tunable semiflexible filament networks, Phys. Rev. E 89, 062602 (2014).
  68. L. P. Weise, T. A. Kampmann, and J. Kierfeld, Foam-like properties in networks of bundled semiflexible polymers [Data set], in Physical Review Research, Zenodo (2026), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15481844.
  69. E. A. J. F. Peters and G. de With, Rejection-free Monte Carlo sampling for general potentials, Phys. Rev. E 85, 026703 (2012).
  70. H. Watanabe, N. Ito, and C.-K. Hu, Phase diagram and universality of the Lennard-Jones gas-liquid system, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 204102 (2012).
  71. V. Popov and J. Gray, Prandtl-Tomlinson model: History and applications in friction, plasticity, and nanotechnologies, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 92, 683 (2012).
  72. P. G. de Gennes, Reptation of a polymer chain in the presence of fixed obstacles, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 572 (1971).
  73. O. M. Braun and Y. S. Kivshar, Nonlinear dynamics of the Frenkel–Kontorova model, Phys. Rep. 306, 1 (1998).
  74. F.-J. Elmer, Avalanches in the weakly driven Frenkel-Kontorova model, Phys. Rev. E 50, 4470 (1994).
  75. T. A. Kampmann, H.-H. Boltz, and J. Kierfeld, Controlling adsorption of semiflexible polymers on planar and curved substrates, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 034903 (2013).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, L012033– Published 5 February, 2026
  • Received 27 May 2025
  • Accepted 30 December 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation