Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Optical vortex generation by magnons with spin-orbit-coupled light

Ryusuke Hisatomi1,2,*, Alto Osada3, Kotaro Taga1, Haruka Komiyama1, Takuya Takahashi1, Shutaro Karube1,2, Yoichi Shiota1,2, and Teruo Ono1,2,4

  • *Contact author: hisatomi.ryusuke.2a@kyoto-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 043062 – Published 19 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qr4c-8gnp

Abstract

Light possesses both spin and orbital angular momentum. In spatially inhomogeneous optical fields, which are characterized by a finite distribution of wave vectors in k space, these properties undergo spontaneous coupling, referred to as optical spin-orbit coupling. The study of the coupling has recently become central in modern optics due to its substantial applications in communications, sensing, and quantum control. A key challenge is to clarify the relationship between the origins of spatially inhomogeneous optical fields and the resulting spin-orbit coupling. Current research focuses on materials and configurations exhibiting spatial inhomogeneity, such as focusing lenses, interfaces, inhomogeneous media, and metasurfaces. However, Maxwell’s equations indicate that matter can introduce both spatial inhomogeneity and temporal asymmetry into optical fields. For instance, magnetic ordering breaks the time-reversal symmetry of interacting optical fields via the magneto-optic effect, introducing nonreciprocity in the resulting optical phenomena. Despite the importance, optical phenomena involving both spatially inhomogeneous and temporally asymmetric optical fields remain unexplored. Here, we demonstrate that combining temporal asymmetry and spatial inhomogeneity through magnons and light focusing, respectively, transforms an input Gaussian beam into a specific optical vortex beam in a nonreciprocal manner. This phenomenon is quantitatively explained by integrating the physics of magnon-induced Brillouin light scattering with optical spin-orbit coupling. The observed conservation of total angular momentum, encompassing both magnons and photons, further indicates that magnons can control both spin and orbital angular momentum of light. Finally, we outline future research directions enabled by optical fields exhibiting both spatial inhomogeneity and temporal asymmetry.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185 (1992).
  2. Y. A. Kravtsov and Y. I. Orlov, Geometrical Optics of Inhomogeneous Media (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1990), Vol. 6.
  3. K. Y. Bliokh, Geometrodynamics of polarized light: Berry phase and spin Hall effect in a gradient-indexmedium, J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 094009 (2009).
  4. K. Y. Bliokh, E. A. Ostrovskaya, M. A. Alonso, O. G. Rodríguez-Herrera, D. Lara, and C. Dainty, Spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in focusing, scattering, and imaging systems, Opt. Express 19, 26132 (2011).
  5. K. Y. Bliokh, F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. Nori, and A. V. Zayats, Spin–orbit interactions of light, Nat. Photon. 9, 796 (2015).
  6. L. Marrucci, E. Karimi, S. Slussarenko, B. Piccirillo, E. Santamato, E. Nagali, and F. Sciarrino, Spin-to-orbital conversion of the angular momentum of light and its classical and quantum applications, J. Opt. 13, 064001 (2011).
  7. J. Petersen, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin-orbit interaction of light, Science 346, 67 (2014).
  8. O. G. Rodríguez-Herrera, D. Lara, K. Y. Bliokh, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and C. Dainty, Optical nanoprobing via spin-orbit interaction of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 253601 (2010).
  9. A. H. Hielscher, A. A. Eick, J. R. Mourant, D. Shen, J. P. Freyer, and I. J. Bigio, Diffuse backscattering Mueller matrices of highly scattering media, Opt. Express 1, 441 (1997).
  10. A. González-Tudela, A. Reiserer, J. J. García-Ripoll, and F. J. García-Vidal, Light–matter interactions in quantum nanophotonic devices, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 166 (2024).
  11. C. Junge, D. O’Shea, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Strong coupling between single atoms and nontransversal photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 213604 (2013).
  12. C.-F. Li, Spin and orbital angular momentum of a class of nonparaxial light beams having a globally defined polarization, Phys. Rev. A 80, 063814 (2009).
  13. P. B. Monteiro, P. A. M. Neto, and H. M. Nussenzveig, Angular momentum of focused beams: Beyond the paraxial approximation, Phys. Rev. A 79, 033830 (2009).
  14. K. Y. Bliokh, M. A. Alonso, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and A. Aiello, Angular momenta and spin-orbit interaction of nonparaxial light in free space, Phys. Rev. A 82, 063825 (2010).
  15. K. Y. Bliokh and Y. P. Bliokh, Topological spin transport of photons: The optical Magnus effect and Berry phase, Phys. Lett. A 333, 181 (2004).
  16. M. Onoda, S. Murakami, and N. Nagaosa, Hall effect of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 083901 (2004).
  17. V. S. Liberman and B. Y. Zel’dovich, Spin-orbit interaction of a photon in an inhomogeneous medium, Phys. Rev. A 46, 5199 (1992).
  18. A. Ciattoni, G. Cincotti, and C. Palma, Angular momentum dynamics of a paraxial beam in a uniaxial crystal, Phys. Rev. E 67, 036618 (2003).
  19. Z. Bomzon, G. Biener, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Space-variant Pancharatnam–Berry phase optical elements with computer-generated subwavelength gratings, Opt. Lett. 27, 1141 (2002).
  20. L. Huang, X. Chen, B. Bai, Q. Tan, G. Jin, T. Zentgraf, and S. Zhang, Helicity dependent directional surface plasmon polariton excitation using a metasurface with interfacial phase discontinuity, Light: Sci. Appl. 2, e70 (2013).
  21. N. Yu and F. Capasso, Flat optics with designer metasurfaces, Nat. Mater. 13, 139 (2014).
  22. L. Onsager, Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I. Phys. Rev. 37, 405 (1931).
  23. L. Onsager, Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. II. Phys. Rev. 38, 2265 (1931).
  24. C. Caloz, A. Alù, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, and Z.-L. Deck-Léger, Electromagnetic nonreciprocity, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 047001 (2018).
  25. P. S. Pershan, Nonlinear optical properties of solids: Energy considerations, Phys. Rev. 130, 919 (1963).
  26. P. S. Pershan, Magneto-optical effects, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 1482 (1967).
  27. T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940).
  28. A. E. Willner, H. Huang, Y. Yan, Y. Ren, N. Ahmed, G. Xie, C. Bao, L. Li, Y. Cao, Z. Zhao, J. Wang, M. P. J. Lavery, M. Tur, S. Ramachandran, A. F. Molisch, N. Ashrafi, and S. Ashrafi, Optical communications using orbital angular momentum beams, Adv. Opt. Photon. 7, 66 (2015).
  29. J. Wang, Advances in communications using optical vortices, Photon. Res. 4, B14 (2016).
  30. A. E. Willner, K. Pang, H. Song, K. Zou, and H. Zhou, Orbital angular momentum of light for communications, Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 041312 (2021).
  31. J. Wang, J. Liu, S. Li, Y. Zhao, J. Du, and L. Zhu, Orbital angular momentum and beyond in free-space optical communications, Nanophotonics 11, 645 (2022).
  32. C. Wan, A. Chong, and Q. Zhan, Optical spatiotemporal vortices, eLight 3, 11 (2023).
  33. M. Hafezi and J. M. Taylor, Topological physics with light, Phys. Today 67(5), 68 (2014).
  34. L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Topological photonics, Nat. Photon. 8, 821 (2014).
  35. B. Z. Rameshti, S. Viola Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, Y. M. Blanter, Cavity magnonics, Phys. Rep. 979, 1 (2022).
  36. P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeutel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature (London) 541, 473 (2017).
  37. L. R. Walker, Resonant modes of ferromagnetic spheroids, J. Appl. Phys. 29, 318 (1958).
  38. P. Fletcher, I. H. Solt, and R. Bell, Identification of the magnetostatic modes of ferrimagnetic resonant spheres, Phys. Rev. 114, 739 (1959).
  39. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
  40. R. Hisatomi, A. Osada, Y. Tabuchi, T. Ishikawa, A. Noguchi, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Bidirectional conversion between microwave and light via ferromagnetic magnons, Phys. Rev. B 93, 174427 (2016).
  41. R. Hisatomi, A. Noguchi, R. Yamazaki, Y. Nakata, A. Gloppe, Y. Nakamura, and K. Usami, Helicity-changing Brillouin light scattering by magnons in a ferromagnetic crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 207401 (2019).
  42. J. V. Krandendon and J. H. Van Vleck, Spin waves, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 1 (1958).
  43. Y. R. Shen and N. Bloembergen, Theory of stimulated Brillouin and Raman scattering, Phys. Rev. 137, A1787 (1965).
  44. J. F. Dillon, Magnetostatic modes in ferrimagnetic spheres, Phys. Rev. 112, 59 (1958).
  45. M. Buess, R. Höllinger, T. Haug, K. Perzlmaier, U. Krey, D. Pescia, M. R. Scheinfein, D. Weiss, and C. H. Back, Fourier transform imaging of spin vortex eigenmodes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 077207 (2004).
  46. B. Lyu, Y. Gao, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Wu, Y. Chen, J. Zhang, G. Li, Q. Huang, N. Zhang, Y. Chen, J. Mei, H. Yan, Y. Zhao, L. Huang, and M. Huang, Probing the ferromagnetism and spin wave gap in VI3 by helicity-resolved Raman spectroscopy, Nano Lett. 20, 6024 (2020).
  47. J. Cenker, B. Huang, N. Suri, P. Thijssen, A. Miller, T. Song, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. A. McGuire, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Direct observation of two-dimensional magnons in atomically thin CrI3, Nat. Phys. 17, 20 (2021).
  48. R. Hisatomi, A. Osada, K. Taga, H. Komiyama, T. Takahashi, S. Karube, Y. Shiota, and T. Ono, Dataset for “Optical vortex generation by magnons with spin-orbit-coupled light”, Version v1, Zenodo, 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19547235.
  49. B. A. Auld and D. A. Wilson, Bragg scattering of infrared radiation from coherent spin waves, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 3331 (1967).
  50. K. J. Blow, R. Loudon, S. J. D. Phoenix, and T. J. Shepherd, Continuum fields in quantum optics, Phys. Rev. A 42, 4102 (1990).
  51. M. Fleischhauer and T. Richter, Pulse matching and correlation of phase fluctuations in Λ systems, Phys. Rev. A 51, 2430 (1995).
  52. A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010).
  53. R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1965), Vol. III.
  54. A. Prabhakar and D. D. Stancil, Spin Waves: Theory and Applications (Springer, New York, NY, 2009).
  55. D. D. Stancil, Optical-magnetostatic wave coupled-mode interactions in garnet heterostructures, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27, 61 (1991).
  56. M. Huang and S. Zhang, A new Bi-substituted rare-earth iron garnet for a wideband and temperature-stabilized optical isolator, J. Mater. Res. 15, 1665 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation