Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing atom-surface interactions from tunneling-time measurements via rotation transport on an atom chip

J-B. Gerent1,*, R. Veyron2, V. Mancois3,4, R. Huang5, E. Beraud5, and S. Bernon5,†

  • *Contact author: jean-baptiste.gerent@institutoptique.fr
  • Contact author: simon.bernon@institutoptique.fr

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033289 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qcq3-c6ph

Abstract

We propose a method to measure the interaction between an ultracold gas of neutral atoms and a surface. This solution combines an optical dipole trap reflected by the surface, a magnetic trap formed by current carrying wires embedded below the surface, and a rotation of the surface itself. It allows to adiabatically transport a Rb87 Bose-Einstein condensate from few micrometers to few hundred nanometers of the surface. At such distances, atom-surface interaction strongly affects the trapping potential, causing an increase of the tunneling rate toward the surface. In this paper, we show that the measurement of the lifetime of the cloud and its comparison to a tunneling model will allow to extract the Casimir-Polder force coefficient in the retarded regime (c4). Our model includes noise-induced heating, calibration biases of experimentally controlled parameters, and accuracy of the atom lifetime measurement. Using typical trapping parameters and experimental uncertainties, we numerically estimate the relative uncertainty of c4 to be 10%. This method can be implemented with any atomic species that can be magnetically and optically trapped.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (69)

  1. L. Amico et al., Roadmap on atomtronics: State of the art and perspective, AVS Quantum Sci. 3, 039201 (2021).
  2. M. Gullans, T. G. Tiecke, D. E. Chang, J. Feist, J. D. Thompson, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Nanoplasmonic lattices for ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 235309 (2012).
  3. J. D. Hood et al., Atom-atom interactions around the band edge of a photonic crystal waveguide, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10507 (2016).
  4. J. S. Douglas et al., Quantum many-body models with cold atoms coupled to photonic crystals, Nat. Photonics 9, 326 (2015).
  5. F. London, Zur Theorie und systematik der molekularkrafte, Z. Phys. 63, 245 (1930).
  6. J. E. Lennard-Jones, Processes of adsorption and diffusion on solid surfaces, Trans. Faraday Soc. 28, 333 (1932).
  7. S. Y. Buhmann et al., Impact of anisotropy on the interaction of an atom with a one-dimensional nano-grating, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31, 1641029 (2016).
  8. P. Barcellona et al., Van der Waals interactions between excited atoms in generic environments, Phys. Rev. A 94, 012705 (2016).
  9. C. Abbas et al., Strong thermal and electrostatic manipulation of the Casimir force in graphene multilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 126101 (2017).
  10. P.-P. Crépin et al., Casimir-Polder shifts on quantum levitation states, Phys. Rev. A 95, 032501 (2017).
  11. J. M. Obrecht et al., Measurement of the temperature dependence of the Casimir-Polder force, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 063201 (2007).
  12. H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder, The influence of retardation on the London-van der Waals forces, Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948).
  13. D. M. Harber et al., Measurement of the Casimir-Polder force through center-of-mass oscillations of a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 72, 033610 (2005).
  14. Y. Balland et al., Quectonewton local force sensor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 113403 (2024).
  15. A. Landragin et al., Measurement of the van der Waals force in an atomic mirror, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1464 (1996).
  16. T. A. Pasquini et al., Quantum reflection from a solid surface at normal incidence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 223201 (2004).
  17. C. Stehle et al., Plasmonically tailored micropotentials for ultracold atoms, Nat. Photonics 5, 494 (2011).
  18. H. Bender et al., Probing atom-surface interactions by diffraction of Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. X 4, 011029 (2014).
  19. C. I. Sukenik et al., Measurement of the Casimir-Polder force, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 560 (1993).
  20. J. Morley et al., Characterising a tunable, pulsed atomic beam using matter-wave interferometry, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 54, 155301 (2021).
  21. C. Garcion et al., Intermediate-range Casimir-Polder interaction probed by high-order slow atom diffraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 170402 (2021).
  22. J. Lecoffre et al., Measurement of Casimir-Polder interaction for slow atoms through a material grating, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013232 (2025).
  23. A. P. Mosk et al., Optical excitation of atomic hydrogen bound to the surface of liquid helium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4440 (1998).
  24. M. Oria et al., Spectral observation of surface-induced van der Waals attraction on atomic vapour, Europhys. Lett. 14, 527 (1991).
  25. M. Fichet et al., Exploring the van der Waals atom-surface attraction in the nanometric range, Europhys. Lett. 77, 54001 (2007).
  26. Whittaker et al., Optical response of gas-phase atoms at less than λ/80 from a dielectric surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 253201 (2014).
  27. R. Folman et al., Controlling cold atoms using nanofabricated surfaces: Atom chips, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4749 (2000).
  28. J. Reichel et al., Microchip traps and Bose–Einstein condensation, Appl. Phys. B 74, 469 (2002).
  29. T. L. Gustavson et al., Transport of Bose-Einstein condensates with optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 020401 (2001).
  30. J. Trisnadi et al., Design and construction of a quantum matter synthesizer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 083203 (2022).
  31. J. I. Gillen et al., Two-dimensional quantum gas in a hybrid surface trap Phys. Rev. A 80, 021602(R) (2009).
  32. P. Treutlein et al., Coherence in microchip traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 203005 (2004).
  33. D. E. Chang et al., Trapping atoms using nanoscale quantum vacuum forces, Nat. Commun. 5, 4343 (2014).
  34. M. Bellouvet et al., Doubly dressed states for near-field trapping and subwavelength lattice structuring, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023429 (2018).
  35. Y.-J. Lin, I. Teper, C. Chin, and V. Vuletić, Impact of the Casimir-Polder potential and Johnson noise on Bose-Einstein condensate stability near surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 050404 (2004).
  36. P. G. Petrov et al., Trapping cold atoms using surface-grown carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. A 79, 043403 (2009).
  37. R. Salem et al., Nanowire atomchip traps for sub-micron atom–surface distances, New J. Phys. 12, 023039 (2010).
  38. W. Hänsel et al., Bose–Einstein condensation on a microelectronic chip, Nature (London) 413, 498 (2001).
  39. J.-B. Gerent, Transport and coupling of ultra-cold atoms to nano-structured surfaces, PhD. thesis, Université de Bordeaux, 2024.
  40. S. J. Orfanidis, Electromagnetic waves and antennas, (1999–2016), https://ece.rutgers.edu/orfanidis.
  41. R. Grimm, M. Weidemüller, and Y. B. Ovchinnikov, Optical Dipole Traps for Neutral Atoms, Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 42, edited by B. Bederson and H. Walther (Academic Press, 2000), pp. 95–170.
  42. M. Bellouvet, Condensation de Bose-Einstein et simulation d’une méthode de piégeage d’atomes froids dans des potentiels sublongueur d’onde en champ proche d’une surface nanostructurée, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Bordeaux, 2018.
  43. J. Berroir et al., Nanotrappy: An open-source versatile package for cold-atom trapping close to nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013079 (2022).
  44. A. Bouscal, Slow-mode nanophotonics and cold atoms: Towards a versatile waveguide QED platform, PhD. thesis, Sorbonne Université, 2024.
  45. H. Friedrich et al., Quantum reflection by Casimir–van der Waals potential tails, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032902 (2002).
  46. N. P. Stern et al., Simulations of atomic trajectories near a dielectric surface, New J. Phys. 13, 085004 (2011).
  47. A. Aspect and J. Dalibard, Measurement of the atom-wall interaction: From London to Casimir-Polder, in Poincaré Seminar 2002, edited by B. Duplantier and V. Rivasseau (Birkhäuser Basel, Basel, 2003).
  48. D. Yakubovsky et al., Optical constants and structural properties of thin gold films, Opt. Express 25, 25574 (2017).
  49. D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018), 3rd ed.
  50. ThorlabsS120C, https://www.thorlabs.com/item/s120c.
  51. L. P. Pitaevskii, Dynamics of collapse of a confined Bose gas, Phys. Lett. A 221, 14 (1996).
  52. NIST calibration services, https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=42110C&cclcl=en_US, accessed 13 July 2026.
  53. J. Hadler et al., NIST measurement services, https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication250-75.pdf.
  54. E. A. Burt et al., Coherence, correlations, and collisions: What one learns about Bose-Einstein condensates from their decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 337 (1997).
  55. M. J. Davis and E. J. Heller, Quantum dynamical tunneling in bound states, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 246 (1981).
  56. T. A. Savard et al., Laser-noise-induced heating in far-off resonance optical traps, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1095 (1997).
  57. M. E. Gehm et al., Dynamics of noise-induced heating in atom traps, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3914 (1998).
  58. New Focus picomotor 8321, https://www.newport.com/p/8321.
  59. Tekceleo WLG-75, https://www.tekceleo.com/wlg-75-r-motor/.
  60. Y. Balland, Mesure des interactions atomes-surface avec un capteur quantique à atomes froids, Thèse de doctorat, Sorbonne université, 2024.
  61. O. Cherry, J. D. Carter, and J. D. D. Martin, Fabrication of an atom chip for Rydberg atom-metal surface interaction studies, arXiv:2510.11902.
  62. T. Arpornthip, C. A. Sackett, and K. J. Hughes, Vacuum-pressure measurement using a magneto-optical trap, Phys. Rev. A 85, 033420 (2012).
  63. G. Rosenblatt et al., Nonmodal plasmonics: Controlling the forced optical response of nanostructures, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011071 (2020).
  64. H. Reddy et al., Temperature-dependent optical properties of gold thin films, Opt. Mater. Express 6, 2776 (2016).
  65. P. K. Rekdal et al., Thermal spin flips in atom chips, Phys. Rev. A 70, 013811 (2004).
  66. S. Scheel et al., Atomic spin decoherence near conducting and superconducting films, Phys. Rev. A 72, 042901 (2005).
  67. D. M. Harber et al., Thermally induced losses in ultra-cold atoms magnetically trapped near room-temperature surfaces, J. Low Temp. Phys. 133, 229 (2003).
  68. M. P. A. Jones et al., Spin coupling between cold atoms and the thermal fluctuations of a metal surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 080401 (2003).
  69. M. Antezza et al., New asymptotic behavior of the surface-atom force out of thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 113202 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation