Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Collinear altermagnets and their Landau theories

Hana Schiff1,*, Paul McClarty2,†, Jeffrey G. Rau3,‡, and Judit Romhányi1,§

  • *Contact author: hschiff@uci.edu
  • †Contact author: paul.mcclarty@cea.fr
  • ‡Contact author: jrau@uwindsor.ca
  • §Contact author: jromhany@uci.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033301 – Published 30 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/q44z-ynbr

Abstract

Altermagnets exhibit spontaneously spin-split electronic bands in the zero spin-orbit coupling (SOC) limit arising from the presence of collinear compensated magnetic order. The distinctive magnetocrystalline symmetries of altermagnets ensure that these spin splittings have a characteristic anisotropy in crystal momentum space. These systems have attracted a great deal of interest due to their potential for applications in spintronics. In this paper, we provide a general Landau theory that encompasses all three-dimensional altermagnets where the magnetic order does not enlarge the unit cell. We identify all crystal structures that admit altermagnetism and then reduce these to a relatively small set of distinct possible Landau theories governing such systems. In the zero SOC limit, we determine the possible local multipolar orders that are tied to the spin splitting of the band structure. We make precise the connection between altermagnetism as defined at zero SOC (“ideal” altermagnets) and the effects of weak SOC. In particular, we examine which response functions allowed by symmetry when SOC is present are guaranteed by the spin-orbit free theory and spell out the distinctive properties of altermagnets in comparison with conventional collinear antiferromagnets. Finally, we show how these ideas can be applied by considering a number of altermagnetic candidate materials.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (114)

  1. M. Dyakonov and V. Perel, Current-induced spin orientation of electrons in semiconductors, Phys. Lett. A 35, 459 (1971).
  2. J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin Hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015).
  3. D. Hou, Z. Qiu, and E. Saitoh, Spin transport in antiferromagnetic insulators: Progress and challenges, NPG Asia Mater. 11, 35 (2019).
  4. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022).
  5. T. Okugawa, K. Ohno, Y. Noda, and S. Nakamura, Weakly spin-dependent band structures of antiferromagnetic perovskite LaMO3 (M = Cr, Mn, Fe), J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 075502 (2018).
  6. M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019).
  7. H. Kusunose, R. Oiwa, and S. Hayami, Complete multipole basis set for single-centered electron systems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 104704 (2020).
  8. L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6 (2020).
  9. M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Perovskite as a spin current generator, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125114 (2021).
  10. I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. González-Hernández, and L. Šmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2108924118 (2021).
  11. I. Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—A new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022).
  12. Y. Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, Momentum-dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting MnO2: A density functional calculation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 13294 (2016).
  13. K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneš, Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk instability, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019).
  14. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019).
  15. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022).
  16. P. G. Radaelli, Tensorial approach to altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 214428 (2024).
  17. R. González-Hernández, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, Y. Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. Železný, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021).
  18. H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021).
  19. P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176702 (2024).
  20. M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Anomalous Hall effect in κ-type organic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075112 (2020).
  21. Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022).
  22. M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnetic perovskites, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195149 (2022).
  23. L. Han, X. Fu, R. Peng, X. Cheng, J. Dai, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai, Y. Zhou, S. Liang, C. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Chen, L. Yang, Y. Zhang, C. Song, J. Liu, and F. Pan, Electrical 180∘ switching of Néel vector in spin-splitting antiferromagnet, Sci. Adv. 10 (2024).
  24. L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020).
  25. R. Hoyer, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, K.-H. Ahn, L. Šmejkal, and A. Mook, Spontaneous crystal thermal Hall effect in insulating altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, L020412 (2025).
  26. T. Aoyama and K. Ohgushi, Piezomagnetic properties in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, L041402 (2024).
  27. D. Kriegner, H. Reichlova, J. Grenzer, W. Schmidt, E. Ressouche, J. Godinho, T. Wagner, S. Y. Martin, A. B. Shick, V. V. Volobuev, G. Springholz, V. Holý, J. Wunderlich, T. Jungwirth, and K. Výborný, Magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetic hexagonal mnte, Phys. Rev. B 96, 214418 (2017).
  28. D. Kriegner, K. Výborný, K. Olejník, H. Reichlová, V. Novák, X. Marti, J. Gazquez, V. Saidl, P. Němec, V. V. Volobuev, G. Springholz, V. Holý, and T. Jungwirth, Multiple-stable anisotropic magnetoresistance memory in antiferromagnetic mnte, Nat. Commun. 7, 11623 (2016).
  29. R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless Zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024404 (2024).
  30. J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo et al., Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206401 (2024).
  31. J. Krempaský, L. Šmejkal et al., Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy, Nature (London) 626, 517 (2024).
  32. Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156702 (2024).
  33. V. C. Morano, Z. Maesen, S. E. Nikitin, J. Lass, D. G. Mazzone, and O. Zaharko, Absence of altermagnetic magnon band splitting in MnF2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 226702 (2025).
  34. Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, Spin-split collinear antiferromagnets: A large-scale ab-initio study, Mater. Today Phys. 32, 100991 (2023).
  35. V. Leeb, A. Mook, L. Šmejkal, and J. Knolle, Spontaneous formation of altermagnetism from orbital ordering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236701 (2024).
  36. S. Giuli, C. Mejuto-Zaera, and M. Capone, Altermagnetism from interaction-driven itinerant magnetism, Phys. Rev. B 111, L020401 (2025).
  37. R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, V.-K. Bharadwaj, W. Campos, R. Zarzuela, N. Biniskos, R. M. Fernandes, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, and L. Šmejkal, Atomic altermagnetism, arXiv:2503.10797.
  38. S.-W. Cheong and F.-T. Huang, Altermagnetism with non-collinear spins, npj Quantum Mater. 9, 13 (2024).
  39. M. Hu, O. Janson, C. Felser, P. McClarty, J. van den Brink, and M. G. Vergniory, Spin hall and edelstein effects in novel chiral noncollinear altermagnets, arXiv:2410.17993.
  40. W. F. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Theory of spin-space gGroups, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 294, 343 (1966).
  41. W. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Space group theory for spin waves, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 1457 (1966).
  42. D. B. Litvin, Spin point groups, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 33, 279 (1977).
  43. D. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin groups, Physica 76, 538 (1974).
  44. A. Corticelli, R. Moessner, and P. A. McClarty, Spin-space groups and magnon band topology, Phys. Rev. B 105, 064430 (2022).
  45. J. Yang, Z.-X. Liu, and C. Fang, Symmetry invariants and classes of quasiparticles in magnetically ordered systems having weak spin-orbit coupling, Nat. Commun. 15, 10203 (2024).
  46. Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031039 (2024).
  47. X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031038 (2024).
  48. Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031037 (2024).
  49. P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021016 (2022).
  50. H. Schiff, A. Corticelli, A. Guerreiro, J. Romhányi, and P. McClarty, The crystallographic spin point groups and their representations, SciPost Phys. 18, 109 (2025).
  51. R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, V. K. Bharadwaj, T. Jungwirth, L. Šmejkal, and J. Sinova, Supercell altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094425 (2024).
  52. C.-C. Wei, E. Lawrence, A. Tran, and H. Ji, Crystal chemistry and design principles of altermagnets, ACS Org. Inorg. Au 4, 604 (2024).
  53. M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal models for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144412 (2024).
  54. M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, C. Capillas, E. Kroumova, S. Ivantchev, G. Madariaga, A. Kirov, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao crystallographic server: I. Databases and crystallographic computing programs, Z. Kristallogr. - Cryst. Mater. 221, 15 (2006).
  55. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Bottom-up design of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: Procedure on the basis of augmented multipoles, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144441 (2020).
  56. S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Unified description of electronic orderings and cross correlations by complete multipole representation, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 072001 (2024).
  57. M.-T. Suzuki, T. Koretsune, M. Ochi, and R. Arita, Cluster multipole theory for anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094406 (2017).
  58. P. Toledano and J. Toledano, Landau Theory Of Phase Transitions, The: Application To Structural, Incommensurate, Magnetic And Liquid Crystal Systems, World Scientific Lecture Notes In Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
  59. H. A. Jahn, Note on the Bhagavantam–Suranarayana method of enumerating the physical constants of crystals, Acta Crystallogr. 2, 30 (1949).
  60. S. V. Gallego, J. Etxebarria, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, and J. M. Perez-Mato, Automatic calculation of symmetry-adapted tensors in magnetic and non-magnetic materials: A new tool of the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, Acta Crystallogr. A: Found. Adv. 75, 438 (2019).
  61. R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zubáč, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. Šobáň, G. Springholz, K. Olejník, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, S. T. B. Goennenwein, A. Thomas, H. Reichlová, J. Železný, and D. Kriegner, Spontaneous anomalous Hall effect arising from an unconventional compensated magnetic phase in a semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 036702 (2023).
  62. S. Greenwald, The antiferromagnetic structure deformations in CoO and MnTe, Acta Crystallogr. 6, 396 (1953).
  63. M. Podgorny and J. Oleszkiewicz, Electronic structure of antiferromagnetic MnTe, J. Phys. C 16, 2547 (1983).
  64. E. Przeździecka, E. Kamiska, E. Dynowska, R. Butkut, W. Dobrowolski, H. Kpa, R. Jakiela, M. Aleszkiewicz, E. Usakowska, E. Janik, and J. Kossut, Preparation and characterization of hexagonal MnTe and ZnO layers, Phys. Status Solidi C 2, 1218 (2005).
  65. T. Komatsubara, M. Murakami, and E. Hirahara, Magnetic properties of manganese telluride single crystals, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 18, 356 (1963).
  66. W. Szuszkiewicz, B. Hennion, B. Witkowska, E. Łusakowska, and A. Mycielski, Neutron scattering study of structural and magnetic properties of hexagonal MnTe, Phys. Status Solidi C 2, 1141 (2005).
  67. S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically ordered magnetic octupoles in d-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011019 (2024).
  68. N. Kunitomi, Y. Hamaguchi, and S. Anzai, Neutron diffraction study on manganese telluride, J. Phys. France 25, 568 (1964).
  69. M. Roig, Y. Yu, R. C. Ekman, A. Kreisel, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Quasi-symmetry constrained spin ferromagnetism in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 016703 (2025).
  70. R.-C. Xiao, H. Li, H. Han, W. Gan, M. Yang, D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, Y. Gao, M. Tian, and J. Zhou, Anomalous-hall Néel textures in altermagnetic materials, arXiv:2411.10147.
  71. L. Attias, A. Levchenko, and M. Khodas, Intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 094425 (2024).
  72. T. Chatterji and T. C. Hansen, Magnetoelastic effects in Jahn–Teller distorted CrF2 and CuF2 studied by neutron powder diffraction, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 276007 (2011).
  73. J. W. Cable, M. K. Wilkinson, and E. O. Wollan, Neutron diffraction studies of antiferromagnetism in CrF2 and CrCl2, Phys. Rev. 118, 950 (1960).
  74. P. Fischer, W. Hälg, D. Schwarzenbach, and H. Gamsjäger, Magnetic and crystal structure of copper(ii) fluoride, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 35, 1683 (1974).
  75. I. V. Solovyev, Magneto-optical effect in the weak ferromagnets LaMO3 (M = Cr, Mn, and Fe), Phys. Rev. B 55, 8060 (1997).
  76. K. Yamada, E. Kudo, Y. Endoh, Y. Hidaka, M. Oda, M. Suzuki, and T. Murakami, The effect of the heat treatments on the antiferromagnetism in La2CuO4−δ single crystals, Solid State Commun. 64, 753 (1987).
  77. D. Vaknin, S. K. Sinha, D. E. Moncton, D. C. Johnston, J. M. Newsam, C. R. Safinya, and H. E. King, Antiferromagnetism in La2 CuO4−y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2802 (1987).
  78. J. D. Jorgensen, B. Dabrowski, S. Pei, D. G. Hinks, L. Soderholm, B. Morosin, J. E. Schirber, E. L. Venturini, and D. S. Ginley, Superconducting phase of La2CuO4+δ: A superconducting composition resulting from phase separation, Phys. Rev. B 38, 11337 (1988).
  79. M. A. Kastner, R. J. Birgeneau, G. Shirane, and Y. Endoh, Magnetic, transport, and optical properties of monolayer copper oxides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 897 (1998).
  80. M. Reehuis, C. Ulrich, K. Prokeš, A. Gozar, G. Blumberg, S. Komiya, Y. Ando, P. Pattison, and B. Keimer, Crystal structure and high-field magnetism of La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 73, 144513 (2006).
  81. C. Lane, J. W. Furness, I. G. Buda, Y. Zhang, R. S. Markiewicz, B. Barbiellini, J. Sun, and A. Bansil, Antiferromagnetic ground state of La2CuO4: A parameter-free ab initio description, Phys. Rev. B 98, 125140 (2018).
  82. T. Thio, T. R. Thurston, N. W. Preyer, P. J. Picone, M. A. Kastner, H. P. Jenssen, D. R. Gabbe, C. Y. Chen, R. J. Birgeneau, and A. Aharony, Antisymmetric exchange and its influence on the magnetic structure and conductivity of La2 CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 38, 905 (1988).
  83. T. Thio and A. Aharony, Weak ferromagnetism and tricriticality in pure La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 894 (1994).
  84. W. H. Baur, Uber die Verfeinerung der Kristallstrukturbestimmung einiger Vertreter des Rutiltyps. II. Die Difluoride von Mn, Fe, Co, Ni und Zn, Acta Crystallogr. 11, 488 (1958).
  85. W. H. Baur and A. A. Khan, Rutile-type compounds. IV. SiO2, GeO2 and a comparison with other rutile-type structures, Acta Crystallogr B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. 27, 2133 (1971).
  86. J. W. Stout and H. E. Adams, Magnetism and the third law of thermodynamics: The heat capacity of manganous fluoride from 13 to 320∘K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 64, 1535 (1942).
  87. I. de P. R. Moreira, R. Dovesi, C. Roetti, V. R. Saunders, and R. Orlando, Ab initio study of MF2 (M=Mn,Fe,Co,Ni) rutile-type compounds using the periodic unrestricted Hartree-Fock approach, Phys. Rev. B 62, 7816 (2000).
  88. S. López-Moreno, A. H. Romero, J. Mejía-López, and A. Muñoz, First-principles study of pressure-induced structural phase transitions in MnF2, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 33250 (2016).
  89. M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. M. Perez-Mato, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao Crystallographic Server. II. Representations of crystallographic point groups and space groups, Acta Crystallogr. A: Found Crystallogr. 62, 115 (2006).
  90. R. A. Erickson, Neutron diffraction studies of antiferromagnetism in manganous fluoride and some isomorphous compounds, Phys. Rev. 90, 779 (1953).
  91. O. Nikotin, P. A. Lindgård, and O. W. Dietrich, Magnon dispersion relation and exchange interactions in MnF2, J. Phys. C 2, 1168 (1969).
  92. F. J. Morin, Magnetic susceptibility of αFe2O3 and αFe2O3 with added titanium, Phys. Rev. 78, 819 (1950).
  93. I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958).
  94. T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960).
  95. A. H. Hill, F. Jiao, P. G. Bruce, A. Harrison, W. Kockelmann, and C. Ritter, Neutron diffraction study of mesoporous and bulk hematite, α−Fe2 O3, Chem. Mater. 20, 4891 (2008).
  96. T. Dannegger, A. Deák, L. Rózsa, E. Galindez-Ruales, S. Das, E. Baek, M. Kläui, L. Szunyogh, and U. Nowak, Magnetic properties of hematite revealed by an ab initio parameterized spin model, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184426 (2023).
  97. R. Lebrun, A. Ross, O. Gomonay, V. Baltz, U. Ebels, A.-L. Barra, A. Qaiumzadeh, A. Brataas, J. Sinova, and M. Kläui, Long-distance spin-transport across the morin phase transition up to room temperature in ultra-low damping single crystals of the antiferromagnet α−Fe2 O3, Nat. Commun. 11, 6332 (2020).
  98. T. S. Santoshi, S. Bharadwaj, M. C. Varma, V. Dhand, and G. Choudary, Structural and magnetic properties of α−Fe2 O3 with lithium ferrite prepared using co-precipitation method and annealed at different temperatures, Chem. Phys. Impact 9, 100717 (2024).
  99. E. Galindez-Ruales, L. Šmejkal, S. Das, E. Baek, C. Schmitt, F. Fuhrmann, A. Ross, R. González-Hernández, A. Rothschild, J. Sinova, C. Y. You, G. Jakob, and M. Kläui, Altermagnetism in the hopping regime, Adv. Mater. e05019 (2025).
  100. R. Hoyer, P. P. Stavropoulos, A. Razpopov, R. Valentí, L. Šmejkal, and A. Mook, Altermagnetic splitting of magnons in hematite (α−Fe2O3), Phys. Rev. B 112, 064425 (2025).
  101. Y. Yu, M. B. Lyngby, T. Shishidou, M. Roig, A. Kreisel, M. Weinert, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Odd-parity magnetism driven by antiferromagnetic exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 046701 (2025).
  102. E. Wigner, Group Theory: And Its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2012).
  103. J. O. Dimmock, Representation theory for nonunitary groups, J. Math. Phys. 4, 1307 (1963).
  104. M. Damnjanović, Symmetry in Quantum Non-Relativistic Physics (2014).
  105. C. J. Bradley and A. P. Cracknell, The Mathematical Theory of Symmetry in Solids: Representation Theory for Point Groups and Space Groups (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1972).
  106. H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, and J. S. Kim, Images of physically irreducible representations of the 230 space groups, Acta Crystallogr. A: Found Crystallogr. 43, 81 (1987).
  107. W. Hergert and R. Geilhufe, Group Theory in Solid State Physics and Photonics: Problem Solving with Mathematica (Wiley, New York, 2018).
  108. M. Damnjanović and M. Vujičic, Subgroups of weak-direct products and magnetic axial point groups, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 14, 1055 (1981).
  109. D. Litvin, Magnetic Group Tables (International Union of Crystallography, Chester, UK, 2014), pp. 1055–1063.
  110. V. Petříček, J. Fuksa, and M. Dušek, Magnetic space and superspace groups, representation analysis: Competing or friendly concepts? Acta Crystallogr. A: Found Crystallogr. 66, 649 (2010).
  111. S. Keppeler, Birdtracks for SU(N), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 3 (2018).
  112. M. Damnjanović and I. Milošević, Modified group projector technique: Induced representations, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28, 1669 (1995).
  113. G. F. Koster, Matrix elements of symmetric operators, Phys. Rev. 109, 227 (1958).
  114. J.-Q. Chen, M.-J. Gao, and G.-Q. Ma, The representation group and its application to space groups, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 211 (1985).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation