Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Rapid optimal work extraction from a quantum-dot information engine

Kushagra Aggarwal1,*, Alberto Rolandi2,3,*, Yikai Yang1, Joseph Hickie4, Daniel Jirovec5, Andrea Ballabio6, Daniel Chrastina6, Giovanni Isella6, Mark T. Mitchison7,8,9 et al.

Martí Perarnau-Llobet10,2,† and Natalia Ares1,‡

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: marti.perarnau@uab.cat
  • ‡Contact author: natalia.ares@eng.ox.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L032017 – Published 15 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/q3dx-kyqj

Abstract

The conversion of thermal energy into work is usually more efficient in the slow-driving regime, where the power output is vanishingly small. Efficient work extraction for fast-driving protocols remains an outstanding challenge at the nanoscale, where fluctuations play a significant role. In this Letter, we use a quantum-dot Szilard engine to extract work from thermal fluctuations with maximum efficiency over two decades of driving speed. We design and implement a family of optimized protocols ranging from the slow- to the fast-driving regime, and we measure the engine's efficiency as well as the mean and variance of its power output in each case. These optimized protocols exhibit significant improvements in power and efficiency compared to the naive approach. Our results also show that, when optimizing for efficiency, boosting the power output of a Szilard engine inevitably comes at the cost of increased power fluctuations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (46)

  1. N. Shiraishi, K. Saito, and H. Tasaki, Universal trade-off relation between power and efficiency for heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190601 (2016).
  2. M. Campisi and R. Fazio, The power of a critical heat engine, Nat. Commun. 7, 11895 (2016).
  3. P. Pietzonka and U. Seifert, Universal trade-off between power, efficiency, and constancy in steady-state heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 190602 (2018).
  4. L. Szilard, On the decrease of entropy in a thermodynamic system by the intervention of intelligent beings, Syst. Res. 9, 301 (1964).
  5. R. Landauer, Information is physical, Phys. Today 44, 23 (1991).
  6. J. M. R. Parrondo, J. M. Horowitz, and T. Sagawa, Thermodynamics of information, Nat. Phys. 11, 131 (2015).
  7. J. du Buisson, D. A. Sivak, and J. Bechhoefer, Performance limits of information engines, Adv. Phys.: X 9 (2024).
  8. M. Josefsson, A. Svilans, A. M. Burke, E. A. Hoffmann, S. Fahlvik, C. Thelander, M. Leijnse, and H. Linke, A quantum-dot heat engine operating close to the thermodynamic efficiency limits, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 920 (2018).
  9. B. Karimi, F. Brange, P. Samuelsson, and J. P. Pekola, Reaching the ultimate energy resolution of a quantum detector, Nat. Commun. 11, 367 (2020).
  10. D. Majidi, M. Josefsson, M. Kumar, M. Leijnse, L. Samuelson, H. Courtois, C. B. Winkelmann, and V. F. Maisi, Quantum confinement suppressing electronic heat flow below the wiedemann–franz law, Nano Lett. 22, 630 (2022).
  11. D. Majidi, J. P. Bergfield, V. Maisi, J. Höfer, H. Courtois, and C. B. Winkelmann, Heat transport at the nanoscale and ultralow temperatures—Implications for quantum technologies, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 140504 (2024).
  12. J. C. Maxwell, Theory of Heat (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).
  13. R. Landauer, Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process, IBM J. Res. Dev. 5, 183 (1961).
  14. S. Ciliberto, Experiments in stochastic thermodynamics: Short history and perspectives, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021051 (2017).
  15. N. M. Myers, O. Abah, and S. Deffner, Quantum thermodynamic devices: From theoretical proposals to experimental reality, AVS Quantum Sci. 4, 027101 (2022).
  16. S. Toyabe, T. Sagawa, M. Ueda, E. Muneyuki, and M. Sano, Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized jarzynski equality, Nat. Phys. 6, 988 (2010).
  17. A. Bérut, A. Arakelyan, A. Petrosyan, S. Ciliberto, R. Dillenschneider, and E. Lutz, Experimental verification of landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics, Nature (London) 483, 187 (2012).
  18. Y. Jun, M.  Gavrilov, and J. Bechhoefer, High-precision test of landauer's principle in a feedback trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 190601 (2014).
  19. G. Paneru, D. Y. Lee, T. Tlusty, and H. K. Pak, Lossless brownian information engine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 020601 (2018).
  20. T. Admon, S. Rahav, and Y. Roichman, Experimental realization of an information machine with tunable temporal correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180601 (2018).
  21. J. V. Koski, V. F. Maisi, J. P. Pekola, and D. V. Averin, Experimental realization of a Szilard engine with a single electron, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13786 (2014).
  22. D. Barker, M. Scandi, S. Lehmann, C. Thelander, K. A. Dick, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and V. F. Maisi, Experimental verification of the work fluctuation-dissipation relation for information-to-work conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 040602 (2022).
  23. M. Scandi, D. Barker, S. Lehmann, K. A. Dick, V. F. Maisi, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Minimally dissipative information erasure in a quantum dot via thermodynamic length, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 270601 (2022).
  24. A. Kumar, T.-Y. Wu, F. Giraldo, and D. S. Weiss, Sorting ultracold atoms in a three-dimensional optical lattice in a realization of maxwell's demon, Nature (London) 561, 83 (2018).
  25. P. A. Camati, J. P. Peterson, T. B. Batalhão, K. Micadei, A. M. Souza, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, and R. M. Serra, Experimental rectification of entropy production by maxwell's demon in a quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 240502 (2016).
  26. N. Cottet, S. Jezouin, L. Bretheau, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, Q. Ficheux, J. Anders, A. Auffèves, R. Azouit, P. Rouchon, and B. Huard, Observing a quantum maxwell demon at work, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7561 (2017).
  27. Y. Masuyama, K. Funo, Y. Murashita, A. Noguchi, S. Kono, Y. Tabuchi, R. Yamazaki, M. Ueda, and Y. Nakamura, Information-to-work conversion by maxwell's demon in a superconducting circuit quantum electrodynamical system, Nat. Commun. 9, 1291 (2018).
  28. M. Esposito, R. Kawai, K. Lindenberg, and C. V. den Broeck, Finite-time thermodynamics for a single-level quantum dot, Europhys. Lett. 89, 20003 (2010).
  29. S. Blaber, M. D. Louwerse, and D. A. Sivak, Steps minimize dissipation in rapidly driven stochastic systems, Phys. Rev. E 104, L022101 (2021).
  30. A. Rolandi, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and H. J. D. Miller, Optimal control of dissipation and work fluctuations for rapidly driven systems, New J. Phys. 25, 073005 (2023).
  31. M. Scandi and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Thermodynamic length in open quantum systems, Quantum 3, 197 (2019).
  32. C. Jarzynski, Equalities and inequalities: Irreversibility and the second law of thermodynamics at the nanoscale, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2, 329 (2011).
  33. G. Scappucci, C. Kloeffel, F. A. Zwanenburg, D. Loss, M. Myronov, J.-J. Zhang, S. De Franceschi, G. Katsaros, and M. Veldhorst, The germanium quantum information route, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 926 (2020).
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/q3dx-kyqj for additional details. There we cover the characterization of the device, the full analytical derivation, and data analysis from the experiment.
  35. Y. Guryanova, N. Friis, and M. Huber, Ideal projective measurements have infinite resource costs, Quantum 4, 222 (2020).
  36. P. Taranto, F. Bakhshinezhad, A. Bluhm, R. Silva, N. Friis, M. P. Lock, G. Vitagliano, F. C. Binder, T. Debarba, E. Schwarzhans, F. Clivaz, and M. Huber, Landauer versus nernst: What is the true cost of cooling a quantum system? PRX Quantum 4, 010332 (2023).
  37. A. Rolandi and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Finite-time Landauer principle beyond weak coupling, Quantum 7, 1161 (2023).
  38. P. A. Erdman, A. Rolandi, P. Abiuso, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and F. Noé, Pareto-optimal cycles for power, efficiency and fluctuations of quantum heat engines using reinforcement learning, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022017 (2023).
  39. A. Rolandi, P. Abiuso, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Collective advantages in finite-time thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 210401 (2023).
  40. P. Abiuso and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Optimal cycles for low-dissipation heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 110606 (2020).
  41. J. Weber, Fluctuation dissipation theorem, Phys. Rev. 101, 1620 (1956).
  42. R. Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255 (1966).
  43. H. J. D. Miller, M. Scandi, J. Anders, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Work fluctuations in slow processes: Quantum signatures and optimal control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 230603 (2019).
  44. T. Denzler, J. F. G. Santos, E. Lutz, and R. M. Serra, Nonequilibrium fluctuations of a quantum heat engine, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 045017 (2024).
  45. T. Denzler and E. Lutz, Power fluctuations in a finite-time quantum carnot engine, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L032041 (2021).
  46. K. Aggarwal, Raw data for “Rapid optimal work extraction from a quantum-dot information engine”, Zenodo, 2024, https://zenodo.org/records/14516010.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation