Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Observation and measurement of the S01−P03 transition in an optical lattice clock using the Hg198 bosonic isotope

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033366 – Published 28 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/q28c-kb61

Abstract

We report the observation of the magnetic-field-induced (5d106s2)S01−(5d106s6p)P03 transition in a bosonic isotope of mercury, Hg198, realized in an optical lattice clock. We characterize this Hg198 clock transition at 265.6 nm, determining key features such as the quadratic Zeeman shift, the probe light shift, and the magic frequency. We also report a comparison between the Hg198 optical lattice clock and Sr87. In this comparison, the Hg198 clock has a relative frequency stability of 6×10−16/τ/s and a total relative systematic uncertainty of 6.9×10−16. This comparison yields the first direct determination of the Hg198/Sr87 optical frequency ratio: Hg198/Sr87=2.6293157346841181, with the same relative uncertainty.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. S. Häfner, S. Falke, C. Grebing, S. Vogt, T. Legero, M. Merimaa, C. Lisdat, and U. Sterr, 8×10−17 fractional laser frequency instability with a long room-temperature cavity, Opt. Lett. 40, 2112 (2015).
  2. D. G. Matei, T. Legero, S. Häfner, C. Grebing, R. Weyrich, W. Zhang, L. Sonderhouse, J. M. Robinson, J. Ye, F. Riehle, and U. Sterr, 1.5μm lasers with sub-10 mHz linewidth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 263202 (2017).
  3. W. Zhang, J. M. Robinson, L. Sonderhouse, E. Oelker, C. Benko, J. L. Hall, T. Legero, D. G. Matei, F. Riehle, U. Sterr, and J. Ye, Ultrastable silicon cavity in a continuously operating closed-cycle cryostat at 4 K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 243601 (2017).
  4. L. Yan, S. Lannig, W. R. Milner, M. N. Frankel, B. Lewis, D. Lee, K. Kim, and J. Ye, High-power clock laser spectrally tailored for high-fidelity quantum state engineering, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031055 (2025).
  5. D. Lee, Z. Z. Hu, B. Lewis, A. Aeppli, K. Kim, Z. Yao, T. Legero, D. Nicolodi, F. Riehle, U. Sterr, and J. Ye, Frequency stability of 2.5×10−17 from a Si cavity with AlGaAs crystalline mirrors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 033801 (2026).
  6. A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015).
  7. T. M. Fortier, A. N. Luiten, and H. S. Margolis, Optical atomic clocks: Defining the future of time and frequency metrology, Optica 13, 143 (2026).
  8. M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. J. Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018).
  9. J.-P. Uzan, Fundamental constants: From measurement to the universe, a window on gravitation and cosmology, Living Rev. Relativ. 28, 6 (2025).
  10. C. M. Will, The confrontation between general relativity and experiment, Living Rev. Relativ. 17, 4 (2014).
  11. J. C. Berengut and C. Delaunay, Precision isotope-shift spectroscopy for new physics searches and nuclear insights, Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 119 (2025).
  12. N. Dimarcq et al., Roadmap towards the redefinition of the second, Metrologia 61, 012001 (2024).
  13. H. Hachisu, K. Miyagishi, S. G. Porsev, A. Derevianko, V. D. Ovsiannikov, V. G. Pal’chikov, M. Takamoto, and H. Katori, Trapping of neutral mercury atoms and prospects for optical lattice clocks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 053001 (2008).
  14. B. M. Roberts et al., Search for transient variations of the fine structure constant and dark matter using fiber-linked optical atomic clocks, New J. Phys. 22, 093010 (2020).
  15. E. J. Angstmann, V. A. Dzuba, and V. V. Flambaum, Relativistic effects in two valence-electron atoms and ions and the search for variation of the fine-structure constant, Phys. Rev. A 70, 014102 (2004).
  16. M. Door et al., Probing new bosons and nuclear structure with ytterbium isotope shifts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 063002 (2025).
  17. M. Petersen, R. Chicireanu, S. T. Dawkins, D. V. Magalhaes, C. Mandache, Y. L. Coq, A. Clairon, and S. Bize, Doppler-free spectroscopy of the S01–P03 optical clock transition in laser-cooled fermionic isotopes of neutral mercury, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 183004 (2008).
  18. K. Yamanaka, N. Ohmae, I. Ushijima, M. Takamoto, and H. Katori, Frequency ratio of Hg199 and Sr87 optical lattice clocks beyond the SI limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 230801 (2015).
  19. R. Tyumenev, M. Favier, S. Bilicki, E. Bookjans, R. Le Targat, J. Lodewyck, D. Nicolodi, Y. Le Coq, M. Abgrall, J. Guéna, L. De Sarlo, and S. Bize, Comparing a mercury optical lattice clock with microwave and optical frequency standards, New J. Phys. 18, 113002 (2016).
  20. S. G. Porsev, U. I. Safronova, and M. S. Safronova, Theoretical study of the g factor and lifetime of the 6s6p3P0 state of mercury, Phys. Rev. A 96, 012509 (2017).
  21. M. C. Bigeon, Probabilité de transition de la raie 6S01–6P03 du mercure, J. Phys. France 28, 51 (1967).
  22. N. Hinkley, J. A. Sherman, N. B. Phillips, M. Schioppo, N. D. Lemke, K. Beloy, M. Pizzocaro, C. W. Oates, and A. D. Ludlow, An atomic clock with 10−18 instability, Science 341, 1215 (2013).
  23. A. Al-Masoudi, S. Dörscher, S. Häfner, U. Sterr, and C. Lisdat, Noise and instability of an optical lattice clock, Phys. Rev. A 92, 063814 (2015).
  24. E. Oelker, R. B. Hutson, C. J. Kennedy, L. Sonderhouse, T. Bothwell, A. Goban, D. Kedar, C. Sanner, J. M. Robinson, G. E. Marti, D. G. Matei, T. Legero, M. Giunta, R. Holzwarth, F. Riehle, U. Sterr, and J. Ye, Demonstration of 4.8×10−17 stability at 1 s for two independent optical clocks, Nat. Photon. 13, 714 (2019).
  25. A. V. Taichenachev, V. I. Yudin, C. W. Oates, C. W. Hoyt, Z. W. Barber, and L. Hollberg, Magnetic field-induced spectroscopy of forbidden optical transitions with application to lattice-based optical atomic clocks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 083001 (2006).
  26. X. Baillard, M. Fouché, R. L. Targat, P. G. Westergaard, A. Lecallier, Y. L. Coq, G. D. Rovera, S. Bize, and P. Lemonde, Accuracy evaluation of an optical lattice clock with bosonic atoms, Opt. Lett. 32, 1812 (2007).
  27. T. Takano, R. Mizushima, and H. Katori, Precise determination of the isotope shift of Sr88–Sr87 optical lattice clock by sharing perturbations, Appl. Phys. Express 10, 072801 (2017).
  28. S. Origlia, M. S. Pramod, S. Schiller, Y. Singh, K. Bongs, R. Schwarz, A. Al-Masoudi, S. Dörscher, S. Herbers, S. Häfner, U. Sterr, and C. Lisdat, Towards an optical clock for space: Compact, high-performance optical lattice clock based on bosonic atoms, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053443 (2018).
  29. Z. W. Barber, C. W. Hoyt, C. W. Oates, L. Hollberg, A. V. Taichenachev, and V. I. Yudin, Direct excitation of the forbidden clock transition in neutral Yb174 atoms confined to an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 083002 (2006).
  30. J. Millo, D. V. Magalhães, C. Mandache, Y. Le Coq, E. M. L. English, P. G. Westergaard, J. Lodewyck, S. Bize, P. Lemonde, and G. Santarelli, Ultrastable lasers based on vibration insensitive cavities, Phys. Rev. A 79, 053829 (2009).
  31. S. Dawkins, R. Chicireanu, M. Petersen, J. Millo, D. Magalhães, C. Mandache, Y. Le Coq, and S. Bize, An ultra-stable referenced interrogation system in the deep ultraviolet for a mercury optical lattice clock, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 99, 41 (2010).
  32. S. Mejri, J. J. McFerran, L. Yi, Y. Le Coq, and S. Bize, Ultraviolet laser spectroscopy of neutral mercury in a one-dimensional optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 84, 032507 (2011).
  33. J. J. McFerran, L. Yi, S. Mejri, W. Zhang, S. Di Manno, M. Abgrall, J. Guéna, Y. Le Coq, and S. Bize, Statistical uncertainty of 2.5×10−16 for the Hg199S01–P03 clock transition against a primary frequency standard, Phys. Rev. A 89, 043432 (2014).
  34. C. Guo, V. Cambier, J. Calvert, M. Favier, M. Andia, L. de Sarlo, and S. Bize, Exploiting the two-dimensional magneto-optical trapping of Hg199 for a mercury optical lattice clock, Phys. Rev. A 107, 033116 (2023).
  35. C. Zyskind, An optical lattice clock with a bosonic isotope of mercury, Ph.D. thesis, thèse de doctorat dirigée par Bize, Sébastien Physique Sorbonne Université, 2024, http://www.theses.fr/2024SORUS444.
  36. J. J. McFerran, D. V. Magalhães, C. Mandache, J. Millo, W. Zhang, Y. Le Coq, G. Santarelli, and S. Bize, Laser locking to the Hg199S01–P03 clock transition with 5.4×10−15/τ fractional frequency instability, Opt. Lett. 37, 3477 (2012).
  37. A. Kramida, Re-optimized energy levels and Ritz wavelengths of 198Hg I, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 116, 599 (2011).
  38. E. B. Saloman, Wavelengths, energy level classifications, and energy levels for the spectrum of neutral mercury, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 35, 1519 (2006).
  39. H. Katori, M. Takamoto, V. G. Pal’chikov, and V. D. Ovsiannikov, Ultrastable optical clock with neutral atoms in an engineered light shift trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 173005 (2003).
  40. M. Takamoto and H. Katori, Spectroscopy of the S01–P03 clock transition of Sr87 in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 223001 (2003).
  41. Q. Gao, M. Zhou, C. Han, S. Li, S. Zhang, Y. Yao, B. Li, H. Qiao, D. Ai, G. Lou, M. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Z. Bi, L. Ma, and X. Xu, Systematic evaluation of a Yb171 optical clock by synchronous comparison between two lattice systems, Sci. Rep. 8, 8022 (2018).
  42. The QZS coefficient is extracted from series of measurements with optimal pulses at several currents and several probe powers. A fit to these measurements is used to obtain both the QZS coefficient and the probe ligth shift coefficient.
  43. The additional uncorrelated frequency noise was estimated to be 0.61 Hz, corresponding to the value required to bring the goodness of fit to the nominal value of 0.5, or equivalently, the Birge ratio to 1.
  44. C. Guo, M. Favier, N. Galland, V. Cambier, H. Álvarez Martínez, M. Lours, L. De Sarlo, M. Andia, R. Le Targat, and S. Bize, Accurate laser frequency locking to optical frequency combs under low-signal-to-noise-ratio conditions, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 033202 (2020).
  45. J. Lodewyck, S. Bilicki, E. Bookjans, J.-L. Robyr, C. Shi, G. Vallet, R. Le Targat, D. Nicolodi, Y. Le Coq, J. Guéna, M. Abgrall, P. Rosenbusch, and S. Bize, Optical to microwave clock frequency ratios with a nearly continuous strontium optical lattice clock, Metrologia 53, 1123 (2016).
  46. Sr clocks used in this work are LTE clocks. They are identified by the BIPM as SYRTE-Sr2 and SYRTE-SrB until the end of 2024, and LNEOP-Sr2 and LNEOP-SrB since 1st January 2025.
  47. K. Gibble, Scattering of cold-atom coherences by hot atoms: Frequency shifts from background-gas collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 180802 (2013).
  48. M. Abdel-Hafiz et al., Guidelines for developing optical clocks with 10−18 fractional frequency uncertainty, arXiv:1906.11495.
  49. H. S. Margolis, G. Panfilo, G. Petit, C. Oates, T. Ido, and S. Bize, The CIPM list ‘Recommended values of standard frequencies’: 2021 update, Metrologia 61, 035005 (2024).
  50. V. I. Yudin, A. V. Taichenachev, C. W. Oates, Z. W. Barber, N. D. Lemke, A. D. Ludlow, U. Sterr, C. Lisdat, and F. Riehle, Hyper-Ramsey spectroscopy of optical clock transitions, Phys. Rev. A 82, 011804(R) (2010).
  51. T. Zanon-Willette, R. Lefevre, R. Metzdorff, N. Sillitoe, S. Almonacil, M. Minissale, E. de Clercq, A. V. Taichenachev, V. I. Yudin, and E. Arimondo, Composite laser-pulses spectroscopy for high-accuracy optical clocks: A review of recent progress and perspectives, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 094401 (2018).
  52. R. Hobson, W. Bowden, S. King, P. Baird, I. Hill, and P. Gill, Modified hyper-Ramsey methods for the elimination of probe shifts in optical clocks, Phys. Rev. A 93, 010501(R) (2016).
  53. N. Huntemann, B. Lipphardt, M. Okhapkin, C. Tamm, E. Peik, A. V. Taichenachev, and V. I. Yudin, Generalized Ramsey excitation scheme with suppressed light shift, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 213002 (2012).
  54. The 200ms lifetime reported in this work is attributed to technical limitations, specifically insufficient vacuum levels and excess noise in the lattice trap light. Subsequent investigations identified and mitigated excess noise in the lattice electronics, extending the lifetime to 600 ms, with potential for further improvements. Achieving significantly longer lifetimes will likely require enhancing the vacuum level, which in practice will likely require the development of a new science chamber.
  55. The magnetically induced dipole coupling between the S01 and P03 states results in quenching the P03 state. Based on Ref. [57], we estimate a spontaneous decay time of ∼3 hours at our highest B field.
  56. M. Takamoto, I. Ushijima, N. Ohmae, T. Yahagi, K. Kokado, H. Shinkai, and H. Katori, Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks, Nat. Photon. 14, 411 (2020).
  57. D. Vienne, M. Bigeon, and J. Barrat, Observation de la transition interdite 6S01–P03 pour l’isotope pair du mercure Hg202 dans un champ magnetique, Opt. Commun. 6, 261 (1972).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation