- Open Access
Tight qubit uncertainty relations studied through weak values in neutron interferometry
Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043334 – Published 26 December, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pthn-81pm
Abstract
In its original formulation, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle describes a trade-off relation between the error of a quantum measurement and the thereby induced disturbance on the measured object. However, this relation is not valid in general. An alternative universally valid relation was derived by Ozawa in 2003, defining error and disturbance in a general concept, experimentally accessible via a tomographic method. Later, it was shown by Hall that these errors correspond to the statistical deviation between a physical property and its estimate. Recently, it was discovered that these errors can be observed experimentally when weak values are determined through a procedure named “feedback compensation.” Here, we apply this procedure for the complete experimental characterization of the error-disturbance relation between a which-way observable in an interferometer and another observable associated with the output of the interferometer, confirming the theoretically predicted relation. As expected for pure states, the uncertainty is tightly fulfilled.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (29)
- W. Heisenberg, Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik, Z. Phys. 43, 172 (1927).
- E. H. Kennard, Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungs- typen, Z. Phys. 44, 326 (1927).
- H. P. Robertson, The uncertainty principle, Phys. Rev. 34, 163 (1929).
- E. Arthurs and M. S. Goodman, Quantum correlations: A generalized Heisenberg uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2447 (1988).
- M. Ozawa, Quantum limits of measurements and uncertainty principle, in Quantum Aspects of Optical Communications, edited by C. Bendjaballah, O. Hirota, and S. Reynaud, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 378 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991), pp. 1–17.
- M. Ozawa, Universally valid reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle on noise and disturbance in measurement, Phys. Rev. A 67, 042105 (2003).
- P. Busch, P. Lahti, and R. F. Werner, Proof of Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 160405 (2013).
- M. Ozawa, Physical content of Heisenberg's uncertainty relation: Limitation and reformulation, Phys. Lett. A 318, 21 (2003).
- M. J. W. Hall, Prior information: How to circumvent the standard joint-measurement uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052113 (2004).
- C. Branciard, Error-tradeoff and error-disturbance relations for incompatible quantum measurements, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6742 (2013).
- P. Busch, P. Lahti, and R. F. Werner, Heisenberg uncertainty for qubit measurements, Phys. Rev. A 89, 012129 (2014).
- P. Busch, P. Lahti, and R. F. Werner, Colloquium: Quantum root-mean-square error and measurement uncertainty relations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1261 (2014).
- F. Buscemi, M. J. Hall, M. Ozawa, and M. M. Wilde, Noise and disturbance in quantum measurements: An information-theoretic approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 050401 (2014).
- A. Barchielli, M. Gregoratti, and A. Toigo, Measurement uncertainty relations for discrete observables: Relative entropy formulation, Commun. Math. Phys. 357, 1253 (2018).
- Y.-L. Mao, Z.-H. Ma, R.-B. Jin, Q.-C. Sun, S.-M. Fei, Q. Zhang, J. Fan, and J.-W. Pan, Error-disturbance trade-off in sequential quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 090404 (2019).
- R. F. Werner, The uncertainty relation for joint measurement of position and momentum, Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 546 (2004).
- M. Ozawa, Uncertainty relations for noise and disturbance in generalized quantum measurements, Ann. Phys. 311, 350 (2004).
- J. Erhart, S. Sponar, G. Sulyok, G. Badurek, M. Ozawa, and Y. Hasegawa, Experimental demonstration of a universally valid error-disturbance uncertainty relation in spin-measurements, Nat. Phys. 8, 185 (2012).
- S.-Y. Baek, F. Kaneda, M. Ozawa, and K. Edamatsu, Experimental violation and reformulation of the Heisenberg's error-disturbance uncertainty relation, Sci. Rep. 3, 2221 (2013).
- M. Ringbauer, D. N. Biggerstaff, M. A. Broome, A. Fedrizzi, C. Branciard, and A. G. White, Experimental joint quantum measurements with minimum uncertainty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 020401 (2014).
- G. Sulyok and S. Sponar, Heisenberg's error-disturbance uncertainty relation: Experimental study of competing approaches, Phys. Rev. A 96, 022137 (2017).
- A. P. Lund and H. M. Wiseman, Measuring measurement disturbance relationships with weak values, New J. Phys. 12, 093011 (2010).
- L. A. Rozema, A. Darabi, D. H. Mahler, A. Hayat, Y. Soudagar, and A. M. Steinberg, Violation of Heisenberg's measurement-disturbance relationship by weak measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 100404 (2012).
- H. F. Hofmann, Direct evaluation of measurement uncertainties by feedback compensation of decoherence, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L012011 (2021).
- H. Lemmel, N. Geerits, A. Danner, H. F. Hofmann, and S. Sponar, Quantifying the presence of a neutron in the paths of an interferometer, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023075 (2022).
- M. Ozawa, Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables, J. Math. Phys. 25, 79 (1984).
- H. F. Hofmann, Uncertainty limits for quantum metrology obtained from the statistics of weak measurements, Phys. Rev. A 83, 022106 (2011).
- S. Sponar, A. Dvorak, Y. Hasegawa, H. Lemmel, and I. V. Masiello, Neutron presence in the paths of an interferometer and the corresponding uncertainty relation (2023), doi: 10.5291/ILL-DATA.3-16-13.
- R. Wagner, W. Kersten, A. Danner, H. Lemmel, A. K. Pan, and S. Sponar, Direct experimental test of commutation relation via imaginary weak value, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023243 (2021).
