- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Topological analysis of brain dynamical signals indicates signatures of seizure susceptibility

Maxime Lucas1,2,*, Damien Francois3,4, Laurent Mombaerts4, Cristina Donato4, Alexander Skupin4,5,6,†, and Daniele Proverbio7,‡

  • *Contact author: maxime.lucas.work@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: alexander.skupin@uni.lu
  • ‡Contact author: daniele.proverbio@unitn.it
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043259 – Published 5 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pqr6-znq7

Abstract

Epilepsy is known to drastically alter brain dynamics during seizures (ictal periods), but its effects on background (nonictal) brain dynamics remain poorly understood. To investigate this, we analyzed an in-house dataset of brain activity recordings from epileptic zebrafish, focusing on two controlled genetic conditions across two fishlines. After using machine learning to segment and label recordings, we applied time-delay embedding and persistent homology—a noise-robust method from topological data analysis (TDA)—to uncover topological patterns in brain activity. We find that ictal and nonictal periods can be distinguished based on the topology of their dynamics, independent of genetic condition or fishline, which validates our approach. Remarkably, within a single wild-type fishline, we identified topological differences in nonictal periods between seizure-prone and seizure-free individuals. These findings suggest that epilepsy leaves detectable topological signatures in brain dynamics even outside of ictal periods. Overall, this study demonstrates the utility of TDA as a quantitative framework to screen for topological markers of epileptic susceptibility, with potential applications across species.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (69)

  1. W. H. Organization, Epilepsy, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/epilepsy.
  2. R. G. Andrzejak, H. P. Zaveri, A. Schulze-Bonhage, M. G. Leguia, W. C. Stacey, M. P. Richardson, L. Kuhlmann, and K. Lehnertz, Seizure forecasting: Where do we stand? Epilepsia 64, S62 (2023).
  3. K. Rasheed, A. Qayyum, J. Qadir, S. Sivathamboo, P. Kwan, L. Kuhlmann, T. O’Brien, and A. Razi, Machine learning for predicting epileptic seizures using EEG signals: A review, IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 139 (2020).
  4. V. K. Jirsa, W. C. Stacey, P. P. Quilichini, A. I. Ivanov, and C. Bernard, On the nature of seizure dynamics, Brain 137, 2210 (2014).
  5. M. G. Leguia, R. G. Andrzejak, C. Rummel, J. M. Fan, E. A. Mirro, T. K. Tcheng, V. R. Rao, and M. O. Baud, Seizure cycles in focal epilepsy, JAMA Neurol. 78, 454 (2021).
  6. P. Perucca, M. Bahlo, and S. F. Berkovic, The genetics of epilepsy, Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 21, 205 (2020).
  7. S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, 2nd ed. (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 2014).
  8. M. Breakspear, Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity, Nat. Neurosci. 20, 340 (2017).
  9. F. Freyer, K. Aquino, P. A. Robinson, P. Ritter, and M. Breakspear, Bistability and non-Gaussian fluctuations in spontaneous cortical activity, J. Neurosci. 29, 8512 (2009).
  10. D. Proverbio, A. Skupin, and J. Gonçalves, Systematic analysis and optimization of early warning signals for critical transitions using distribution data, iScience 26, 107156 (2023).
  11. P. J. Menck, J. Heitzig, N. Marwan, and J. Kurths, How basin stability complements the linear-stability paradigm, Nat. Phys. 9, 89 (2013).
  12. D. Proverbio, R. Katz, and G. Giordano, Bridging robustness and resilience for dynamical systems in nature, IFAC Pap. OnLine 58, 43 (2024).
  13. H. Chu, C. K. Chung, W. Jeong, and K.-H. Cho, Predicting epileptic seizures from scalp EEG based on attractor state analysis, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 143, 75 (2017).
  14. F. H. L. da Silva, W. Blanes, S. N. Kalitzin, J. Parra, P. Suffczynski, and D. N. Velis, Dynamical diseases of brain systems: Different routes to epileptic seizures, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50, 540 (2003).
  15. M. Breakspear, J. A. Roberts, J. R. Terry, S. Rodrigues, N. Mahant, and P. A. Robinson, A unifying explanation of primary generalized seizures through nonlinear brain modeling and bifurcation analysis, Cereb. Cortex 16, 1296 (2006).
  16. A. Patania, F. Vaccarino, and G. Petri, Topological analysis of data, EPJ Data Sci. 6, 1 (2017).
  17. N. Atienza, R. Gonzalez-Diaz, and M. Rucco, Separating topological noise from features using persistent entropy, in Federation of International Conferences on Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations (Springer, Cham, 2016), pp. 3–12.
  18. P. Expert, L.-D. Lord, M. L. Kringelbach, and G. Petri, Topological neuroscience, Natw. Neurosci. 3, 653 (2019).
  19. K. Benjamin, A. Bhandari, J. D. Kepple, R. Qi, Z. Shang, Y. Xing, Y. An, N. Zhang, Y. Hou, T. L. Crockford et al., Multiscale topology classifies cells in subcellular spatial transcriptomics, Nature (London) 630, 943 (2024).
  20. X. Xu, N. Drougard, and R. N. Roy, Topological data analysis as a new tool for EEG processing, Front. Neurosci. 15, 761703 (2021).
  21. H. Osterhage and K. Lehnertz, Nonlinear time series analysis in epilepsy, Int. J. Bifur. Chaos 17, 3305 (2007).
  22. M. I. Maturana, C. Meisel, K. Dell, P. J. Karoly, W. D'souza, D. B. Grayden, A. N. Burkitt, P. Jiruska, J. Kudlacek, J. Hlinka et al., Critical slowing down as a biomarker for seizure susceptibility, Nat. Commun. 11, 2172 (2020).
  23. T. Wilkat, T. Rings, and K. Lehnertz, No evidence for critical slowing down prior to human epileptic seizures, Chaos 29, 091104 (2019).
  24. M. K. Siddiqui, R. Morales-Menendez, X. Huang, and N. Hussain, A review of epileptic seizure detection using machine learning classifiers, Brain Inf. 7, 5 (2020).
  25. X. Ding, W. Nie, X. Liu, X. Wang, and Q. Yuan, Compact convolutional neural network with multi-headed attention mechanism for seizure prediction, Int. J. Neural Syst. 33, 2350014 (2023).
  26. F. Takens, Dynamical Systems and Turbulence (Springer, Warwick, 1980)
  27. G. Petri, P. Expert, F. Turkheimer, R. Carhart-Harris, D. Nutt, P. J. Hellyer, and F. Vaccarino, Homological scaffolds of brain functional networks, J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140873 (2014).
  28. Y. Wang, H. Ombao, and M. K. Chung, Topological data analysis of single-trial electroencephalographic signals, Ann. Appl. Stat. 12, 1506 (2018).
  29. C. Giusti, R. Ghrist, and D. S. Bassett, Two's company, three (or more) is a simplex, J. Comput. Neurosci. 41, 1 (2016).
  30. E. Ibáñez-Marcelo, L. Campioni, A. Phinyomark, G. Petri, and E. L. Santarcangelo, Topology highlights mesoscopic functional equivalence between imagery and perception: The case of hypnotizability, NeuroImage 200, 437 (2019).
  31. A. E. Sizemore, J. E. Phillips-Cremins, R. Ghrist, and D. S. Bassett, The importance of the whole: Topological data analysis for the network neuroscientist, Netw. Neurosci. 3, 656 (2019).
  32. J. Billings, R. Tivadar, M. M. Murray, B. Franceschiello, and G. Petri, Topological features of electroencephalography are robust to re-referencing and preprocessing, Brain Topogr. 35, 79 (2022).
  33. Y. Ren, F. Liu, S. Xia, S. Shi, L. Chen, and Z. Wang, Dynamic ecg signal quality evaluation based on persistent homology and GoogLeNet method, Front. Neurosci. 17, 1153386 (2023).
  34. A. Santoro, F. Battiston, M. Lucas, G. Petri, and E. Amico, Higher-order connectomics of human brain function reveals local topological signatures of task decoding, individual identification, and behavior, Nat. Commun. 15, 10244 (2024).
  35. A. Karan and A. Kaygun, Time series classification via topological data analysis, Expert Syst. Appl. 183, 115326 (2021).
  36. M. Gidea and Y. Katz, Topological data analysis of financial time series: Landscapes of crashes, Physica A 491, 820 (2018).
  37. S. Emrani, T. Gentimis, and H. Krim, Persistent homology of delay embeddings and its application to wheeze detection, IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 21, 459 (2014).
  38. X. Fernández and D. Mateos, Topological biomarkers for real-time detection of epileptic seizures, arXiv:2211.02523.
  39. M. Piangerelli, M. Rucco, L. Tesei, and E. Merelli, Topological classifier for detecting the emergence of epileptic seizures, BMC Res. Notes 11, 392 (2018).
  40. E. Merelli, M. Piangerelli, M. Rucco, and D. Toller, A topological approach for multivariate time series characterization: The epileptic brain, in EAI International Conference on Bio-inspired Information and Communications Technologies (BICT) (ACM, New York, 2015), p. 5.
  41. B. P. Grone and S. C. Baraban, Animal models in epilepsy research: Legacies and new directions, Nat. Neurosci. 18, 339 (2015).
  42. O. Devinsky, J. M. Boesch, S. Cerda-Gonzalez, B. Coffey, K. Davis, D. Friedman, B. Hainline, K. Houpt, D. Lieberman, P. Perry et al., A cross-species approach to disorders affecting brain and behaviour, Nat. Rev. Neurol. 14, 677 (2018).
  43. D. Barkmeier and J. Loeb, An animal model to study the clinical significance of interictal spiking, Clin. EEG Neurosci. 40, 234 (2009).
  44. L. Wei, H. Boutouil, R. R. Gerbatin, O. Mamad, M. Heiland, C. R. Reschke, F. Del Gallo, P. F. Fabene, D. C. Henshall, M. Lowery et al., Detection of spontaneous seizures in eegs in multiple experimental mouse models of epilepsy, J. Neural Eng. 18, 056060 (2021).
  45. B. Hunyadi, A. Siekierska, J. Sourbron, D. Copmans, and P. A. de Witte, Automated analysis of brain activity for seizure detection in zebrafish models of epilepsy, J. Neurosci. Methods 287, 13 (2017).
  46. B. D. Fontana, N. J. Mezzomo, A. V. Kalueff, and D. B. Rosemberg, The developing utility of zebrafish models of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders: A critical review, Exp. Neurol. 299, 157 (2018).
  47. V. T. Cunliffe, R. A. Baines, C. N. Giachello, W.-H. Lin, A. Morgan, M. Reuber, C. Russell, M. C. Walker, and R. S. Williams, Epilepsy research methods update: Understanding the causes of epileptic seizures and identifying new treatments using non-mammalian model organisms, Seizure 24, 44 (2015).
  48. A. D. Smith, P. Dłotko, and V. M. Zavala, Topological data analysis: Concepts, computation, and applications in chemical engineering, Comput. Chem. Eng. 146, 107202 (2021).
  49. W. Löscher, H. Potschka, S. M. Sisodiya, and A. Vezzani, Drug resistance in epilepsy: Clinical impact, potential mechanisms, and new innovative treatment options, Pharmacol. Rev. 72, 606 (2020).
  50. E. Krook-Magnuson, C. Armstrong, M. Oijala, and I. Soltesz, On-demand optogenetic control of spontaneous seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy, Nat. Commun. 4, 1376 (2013).
  51. M. O. Baud, J. K. Kleen, E. A. Mirro, J. C. Andrechak, D. King-Stephens, E. F. Chang, and V. R. Rao, Multi-day rhythms modulate seizure risk in epilepsy, Nat. Commun. 9, 88 (2018).
  52. B. H. Brinkmann, P. J. Karoly, E. S. Nurse, S. B. Dumanis, M. Nasseri, P. F. Viana, A. Schulze-Bonhage, D. R. Freestone, G. Worrell, M. P. Richardson et al., Seizure diaries and forecasting with wearables: Epilepsy monitoring outside the clinic, Front. Neurol. 12, 690404 (2021).
  53. https://github.com/Espritdelescalier/SeizureDetectionTool.
  54. https://github.com/maximelucas/tda_epilepsy.
  55. M. Lucas, D. François, L. Mombaerts, C. Donato, A. Skupin, and D. Proverbio, Topological analysis of brain dynamical signals indicates signatures of seizure susceptibility, LCSB R3, doi: 10.17881/8hpj-0f07.
  56. M. Moein, K. Grzyb, T. Gonçalves Martins, S. Komoto, F. Peri, A. D. Crawford, A. Fouquier d’Herouel, and A. Skupin, CaSiAn: A calcium signaling analyzer tool, Bioinformatics 34, 3052 (2018).
  57. T. G. Martins, R. Soliman, M. L. Cordero-Maldonado, C. Donato, C. Ameli, L. Mombaerts, A. Skupin, F. Peri, and A. D. Crawford, Seizure-induced increase in microglial cell population in the developing zebrafish brain, Epilepsy Res. 195, 107203 (2023).
  58. C. B. Kimmel, W. W. Ballard, S. R. Kimmel, B. Ullmann, and T. F. Schilling, Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish, Dev. Dyn. 203, 253 (1995).
  59. C. Vonesch, T. Blu, and M. Unser, Generalized Daubechies wavelet families, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 55, 4415 (2007).
  60. A. N. Montanari, L. Freitas, D. Proverbio, and J. Gonçalves, Functional observability and subspace reconstruction in nonlinear systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043195 (2022).
  61. M. B. Kennel, R. Brown, and H. D. Abarbanel, Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3403 (1992).
  62. G. Tauzin, U. Lupo, L. Tunstall, J. B. Pérez, M. Caorsi, A. M. Medina-Mardones, A. Dassatti, and K. Hess, giotto-tda: A topological data analysis toolkit for machine learning and data exploration, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 22, 1 (2021).
  63. Edelsbrunner, Letscher, and Zomorodian, Topological persistence and simplification, Discrete Comput. Geom. 28, 511 (2002).
  64. G. Tauzin, U. Fugacci, S. Scaramuccia, F. Iuricich, L. De Floriani et al., Persistent homology: A step-by-step introduction for newcomers, in STAG: Smart Tools and Apps in Computer Graphics (2016), pp. 1–10.
  65. V. Salnikov, D. Cassese, and R. Lambiotte, Simplicial complexes and complex systems, Eur. J. Phys. 40, 014001 (2019).
  66. E. Carlsson, G. Carlsson, and V. De Silva, An algebraic topological method for feature identification, Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl. 16, 291 (2006).
  67. A. Zomorodian and G. Carlsson, Computing persistent homology, in Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (ACM, Brooklyn, 2004), pp. 347–356.
  68. A. Cerri, B. D. Fabio, M. Ferri, P. Frosini, and C. Landi, Betti numbers in multidimensional persistent homology are stable functions, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 36, 1543 (2013).
  69. N. Atienza, R. González-Díaz, and M. Soriano-Trigueros, On the stability of persistent entropy and new summary functions for topological data analysis, Pattern Recognit. 107, 107509 (2020).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043259– Published 5 December, 2025
  • Received 6 April 2025
  • Accepted 23 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation