Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Effects of polymer solutions on hydraulic fracture

Yujing Du1,2,*, Thomas Cochard2, Ilya Svetlizky3, Congcong Yuan2,4, Yiqiao Song2,5, Lizhi Xiao6,†, and David Weitz2,7,‡

  • *Contact author: yujingdu@utulsa.edu
  • †Contact author: xiaolizhi@cup.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: weitz@seas.harvard.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013083 – Published 26 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p4bp-b8bz

Abstract

Polymer solutions are widely used in hydraulic fracturing operations to enhance proppant transport, suppress turbulence, and reduce fluid loss. However, how their properties influence the local flow field and fracture dynamics, especially in the rapidly evolving region near the fracture tip, remains poorly understood. This study investigates the coupled fluid flow and fracture behavior near the tip of a propagating hydrofracture driven by polymer solutions using high-speed imaging within a transparent, three-dimensional-printed polymethyl methacrylate model. Solutions of high-molecular-weight polymers induce flow and fracture behavior that closely resemble those of water, while viscous Newtonian fluids produce different behavior. This is attributed to pronounced shear thinning, which significantly lowers the effective viscosity under high shear and hence alters the local flow field and stress distribution near the fracture tip. These findings underscore the importance of fluid rheology in shaping both flow patterns and fracture development during hydraulic fracturing.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Corrections

1 June, 2026

Correction: A typographical error in the value given for pressure in the second paragraph of Sec. II has been fixed.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (31)

  1. E. Detournay, Mechanics of hydraulic fractures, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48, 311 (2016).
  2. P. D. Bons, M. A. Elburg, and E. Gomez-Rivas, A review of the formation of tectonic veins and their microstructures, J. Struct. Geol. 43, 33 (2012).
  3. T. Sharmin, N. R. Khan, M. S. Akram, and M. M. Ehsan, A state-of-the-art review on geothermal energy extraction, utilization, and improvement strategies: Conventional, hybridized, and enhanced geothermal systems, Int. J. Thermofluids 18, 100323 (2021).
  4. Y. Jia, C.-F. Tsang, A. Hammar, and A. Niemi, Hydraulic stimulation strategies in enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): A review, Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour. 8, 211 (2022).
  5. H. Belyadi, E. Fathi, and F. Belyadi, Hydraulic Fracturing in Unconventional Reservoirs: Theories, Operations, and Economic Analysis, 2nd ed. (Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, USA, 2019).
  6. C. T. Montgomery and M. B. Smith, Hydraulic fracturing: History of an enduring technology, J. Pet. Technol. 62, 26 (2010).
  7. R. Barati and J.-T. Liang, A review of fracturing fluid systems used for hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131, 40735 (2014).
  8. Q. Li, H. Xing, J. Liu, and X. Liu, A review on hydraulic fracturing of unconventional reservoir, Petroleum 1, 8 (2015).
  9. S. L. Brantley and A. Meyendorff, The Facts on Fracking (New York Times, New York City, NY, USA, 2013).
  10. S. Zhang, F. Wei, P. Liu, L. Shao, and W. Li, Plugging mechanisms of polymer gel used for hydraulic fracture water shutoff, e-Polymers 20, 411 (2020).
  11. B. Chandra, V. Shankar, and D. Das, Early transition, relaminarization and drag reduction in the flow of polymer solutions through microtubes, J. Fluid Mech. 885, A47 (2020).
  12. S. Al-Hajri, B. M. Negash, M. M. Rahman, M. Haroun, and T. M. Al-Shami, Perspective review of polymers as additives in water-based fracturing fluids, ACS Omega 7, 7431 (2022).
  13. J. Schurz, Rheology of polymer solutions of the network type, Prog. Polym. Sci. 16, 1 (1991).
  14. G. Marrucci, F. Greco, and G. Ianniruberto, Rheology of polymer melts and concentrated solutions, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 4, 283 (1999).
  15. R. G. Larson, The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers: Progress and problems, J. Rheol. 49, 1 (2005).
  16. G. B. Thurston, Shear rate dependence of the viscoelasticity of polymer solutions: I. Theoretical model, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 9, 57 (1981).
  17. P. E. Rouse Jr. and K. Sittel, Viscoelastic properties of dilute polymer solutions, J. Appl. Phys. 24, 690 (1953).
  18. J. D. Ferry, Viscoelastic properties of polymer solutions, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 41, 53 (1948).
  19. T. Cochard, I. Svetlizky, G. Albertini, R. C. Viesca, S. M. Rubinstein, F. Spaepen, C. Yuan, M. Denolle, Y.-Q. Song, L. Xiao, and D. A. Weitz, Propagation of extended fractures by local nucleation and rapid transverse expansion of crack-front distortion, Nat. Phys. 20, 660 (2024).
  20. X. Wei, C. Li, C. McCarthy, and J. M. Kolinski, Complexity of crack front geometry enhances toughness of brittle solids, Nat. Phys. 20, 1009 (2024).
  21. C.-Y. Lai, B. Rallabandi, A. Perazzo, Z. Zheng, S. E. Smiddy, and H. A. Stone, Foam-driven fracture, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8082 (2018).
  22. P. Liu, Y. Ju, P. G. Ranjith, Z. Zheng, L. Wang, and A. Wanniarachchi, Visual representation and characterization of three-dimensional hydrofracturing cracks within heterogeneous rock through 3D printing and transparent models, Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 3, 284 (2016).
  23. A. A. Savitski and E. Detournay, Propagation of a penny-shaped fluid-driven fracture in an impermeable rock: Asymptotic solutions, Int. J. Solids Struct. 39, 6311 (2002).
  24. I. Svetlizky, D. S. Kammer, E. Bayart, G. Cohen, and J. Fineberg, Brittle fracture theory predicts the equation of motion of frictional rupture fronts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 125501 (2017).
  25. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/p4bp-b8bz for details of optical contrast-based phase and region identification from the images (Sec. I), break size measurement (Sec. II), fracture thickness estimation (Sec. III), shear rate-viscosity correlations (Sec. IV), and effective viscosity extrapolation (Sec. V).
  26. C. Binetti, G. Florio, N. M. Pugno, S. Giordano, and G. Puglisi, Thermal fluctuations effects on crack nucleation and propagation, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 201, 106157 (2025).
  27. A. Cannizzo and S. Giordano, Thermal effects on fracture and the brittle-to-ductile transition, Phys. Rev. E 107, 035001 (2023).
  28. M. R. Buche and S. J. Grutzik, Statistical mechanical model for crack growth, Phys. Rev. E 109, 015001 (2024).
  29. D. Peck, M. Wrobel, M. Perkowska, and G. Mishuris, Fluid velocity based simulation of hydraulic fracture: A penny shaped model—Part I: The numerical algorithm, Meccanica 53, 3615 (2018).
  30. D. Peck, M. Wrobel, M. Perkowska, and G. Mishuris, Fluid velocity based simulation of hydraulic fracture—A penny shaped model. Part II: New, accurate semi-analytical benchmarks for an impermeable solid, Meccanica 53, 3637 (2018).
  31. Y. Du, T. Cochard, I. Svetlizky, C. Yuan, Y.-Q. Song, L. Xiao, and D. A. Weitz, Data for “Effects of polymer solutions on hydraulic fracture”, Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18193035.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation