Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Phase-dependent quantum optical coherence tomography

Mayte Y. Li-Gomez1,*, Taras Hrushevskyi1, Kayla McArthur1, Pablo Yepiz-Graciano2, Alfred B. U’Ren2, and Shabir Barzanjeh1,†

  • *Contact author: mayte.ligomez@ucalgary.ca
  • †Contact author: shabir.barzanjeh@ucalgary.ca

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043039 – Published 10 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nxhw-7nf6

Abstract

Two-photon interference is a cornerstone of quantum optics, enabling imaging, sensing, and precision measurements that surpass classical limits. By harnessing the quantum interference of photon pairs, as demonstrated by the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect, this approach offers superior axial resolution and intrinsic dispersion cancellation, along with strong noise suppression arising from the precise temporal correlations between photons. Building on these principles, we present the theoretical framework and experimental realization of phase-dependent quantum optical coherence tomography (QOCT), a technique that employs phase-modulated two-photon interference for noninvasive morphological analysis of multilayered samples. We demonstrate that introducing controlled phase shifts to photon pairs in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer effectively eliminates artifacts caused by reflections at different sample layers, thereby greatly improving the accuracy and reliability of QOCT measurements. This work advances the fundamental understanding and practical deployment of two-photon interference, overcoming a key limitation in applying QOCT to real-world applications such as biomedical imaging and materials characterization.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (24)

  1. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  2. N. Aslam, H. Zhou, E. K. Urbach, M. J. Turner, R. L. Walsworth, M. D. Lukin, and H. Park, Quantum sensors for biomedical applications, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 157 (2023).
  3. S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, and S. Lloyd, Advances in photonic quantum sensing, Nat. Photon. 12, 724 (2018).
  4. S. Barzanjeh, S. Pirandola, D. Vitali, and J. M. Fink, Microwave quantum illumination using a digital receiver, Sci. Adv. 6, eabb0451 (2020).
  5. S. Barzanjeh, S. Guha, C. Weedbrook, D. Vitali, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Pirandola, Microwave quantum illumination, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 080503 (2015).
  6. R. Gallego Torromé and S. Barzanjeh, Advances in quantum radar and quantum LiDAR, Prog. Quantum Electron. 93, 100497 (2024).
  7. T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien, Quantum computers, Nature (London) 464, 45 (2010).
  8. A. W. Harrow and A. Montanaro, Quantum computational supremacy, Nature (London) 549, 203 (2017).
  9. C. Couteau, S. Barz, T. Durt, T. Gerrits, J. Huwer, R. Prevedel, J. Rarity, A. Shields, and G. Weihs, Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 326 (2023).
  10. S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018).
  11. A. F. Abouraddy, M. B. Nasr, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V. Sergienko, and M. C. Teich, Quantum-optical coherence tomography with dispersion cancellation, Phys. Rev. A 65, 053817 (2002).
  12. A. F. Fercher, W. Drexler, C. K. Hitzenberger, and T. Lasser, Optical coherence tomography—Principles and applications, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 239 (2003).
  13. M. B. Nasr, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V. Sergienko, and M. C. Teich, Demonstration of dispersion-canceled quantum-optical coherence tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 083601 (2003).
  14. M. B. Nasr, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V. Sergienko, and M. C. Teich, Dispersion-cancelled and dispersion-sensitive quantum optical coherence tomography, Opt. Express 12, 1353 (2004).
  15. B. I. Erkmen and J. H. Shapiro, Phase-conjugate optical coherence tomography, Phys. Rev. A 74, 041601 (2006).
  16. S. Carrasco, J. P. Torres, L. Torner, A. Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Enhancing the axial resolution of quantum optical coherence tomography by chirped quasi-phase matching, Opt. Lett. 29, 2429 (2004).
  17. M. B. Nasr, D. P. Goode, N. Nguyen, G. Rong, L. Yang, B. M. Reinhard, B. E. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Quantum optical coherence tomography of a biological sample, Opt. Commun. 282, 1154 (2009).
  18. P. Yepiz-Graciano, Z. Ibarra-Borja, R. Ramírez Alarcón, G. Gutiérrez-Torres, H. Cruz-Ramírez, D. Lopez-Mago, and A. B. U’Ren, Quantum optical coherence microscopy for bioimaging applications, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 034060 (2022).
  19. M. Y. Li-Gomez, P. Yepiz-Graciano, T. Hrushevskyi, O. Calderón-Losada, E. Saglamyurek, D. Lopez-Mago, V. Salari, T. Ngo, A. B. U’Ren, and S. Barzanjeh, Quantum enhanced probing of multilayered samples, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023170 (2023).
  20. P. Y. Graciano, A. M. Martínez, D. Lopez-Mago, G. Castro-Olvera, M. Rosete-Aguilar, J. Garduño-Mejía, R. R. Alarcón, H. C. Ramírez, and A. B. U’Ren, Interference effects in quantum-optical coherence tomography using spectrally engineered photon pairs, Sci. Rep. 9, 8954 (2019).
  21. P. Yepiz-Graciano, A. M. Martínez, D. Lopez-Mago, H. Cruz-Ramirez, and A. B. U’Ren, Spectrally resolved Hong–Ou–Mandel interferometry for quantum-optical coherence tomography, Photon. Res. 8, 1023 (2020).
  22. S. M. Kolenderska, F. Vanholsbeeck, and P. Kolenderski, Quantum-inspired detection for spectral domain optical coherence tomography, Opt. Lett. 45, 3443 (2020).
  23. S. M. Kolenderska and M. Szkulmowski, Artefact-removal algorithms for Fourier domain quantum optical coherence tomography, Sci. Rep. 11, 18585 (2021).
  24. S. M. Kolenderska, C. V. de Brito, and P. Kolenderski, Demonstration of Fourier-domain quantum optical coherence tomography for a fast tomographic quantum imaging, arXiv:2502.08372.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation