- Open Access
Using to search for the QCD axion
Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023129 – Published 7 May, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nw6q-6nhz
Abstract
We introduce a model-independent framework to reinterpret Belle II results using only public data, analytically reconstructing the mapping between true and reconstructed kinematic variables within the statistically dominant Inclusive Tagging Analysis. This enables rare-decay measurements to probe light invisible particles—such as the QCD axion or axionlike particles, collectively denoted by —without relying on internal simulations. Applying the method to yields the strongest bound on the branching fraction for , improving existing limits by about a factor of 9 and constraining the axion's fundamental flavor-changing coupling to and quarks. The approach establishes as a dual probe—simultaneously testing short-distance new physics and light invisible states, the two probes working independently to an excellent approximation—and provides a general strategy for model-independent reinterpretation of collider data.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (53)
- I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102, 89 (2018).
- G. Lanfranchi, M. Pospelov, and P. Schuster, The search for feebly interacting particles, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 279 (2021).
- P. Sikivie, Invisible axion search methods, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015004 (2021).
- G. G. Raffelt, Astrophysical methods to constrain axions and other novel particle phenomena, Phys. Rep. 198, 1 (1990).
- G. G. Raffelt, Astrophysical axion bounds, Lect. Notes Phys. 741, 51 (2008).
- A. Caputo and G. Raffelt, Astrophysical axion bounds: The 2024 edition, in 1st Training School of the COST Action COSMIC WISPers (CA21106) (2024), PoS (COSMICWISPers), 041 (2024).
- D. J. E. Marsh, Axion cosmology, Phys. Rep. 643, 1 (2016).
- J. E. Kim and G. Carosi, Axions and the strong problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 557 (2010); 91, 049902(E) (2019).
- L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rep. 870, 1 (2020).
- K. Choi, S. H. Im, and C. Sub Shin, Recent progress in the physics of axions and axion-like particles, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 225 (2021).
- J. E. Kim, Weak interaction singlet and strong invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979).
- M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Can confinement ensure natural invariance of strong interactions? Nucl. Phys. B 166, 493 (1980).
- M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A simple solution to the strong problem with a harmless axion, Phys. Lett. B 104, 199 (1981).
- A. R. Zhitnitsky, On possible suppression of the axion hadron interactions (in Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980).
- R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
- R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints imposed by conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977).
- S. Weinberg, A new light boson? Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
- F. Wilczek, Problem of strong and invariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
- L. Ubaldi, Effects of theta on the deuteron binding energy and the triple-alpha process, Phys. Rev. D 81, 025011 (2010).
- M. Dine, L. Stephenson Haskins, L. Ubaldi, and D. Xu, Some remarks on anthropic approaches to the strong problem, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 171.
- J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. B 120, 127 (1983).
- L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A cosmological bound on the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. B 120, 133 (1983).
- M. Dine and W. Fischler, The not so harmless axion, Phys. Lett. B 120, 137 (1983).
- T. Abe et al. (Belle-II), Belle II technical design report, arXiv:1011.0352.
- The spread, or bite, around these momenta is tiny and completely negligible for the purposes of this paper.
- The charge-conjugate mode is assumed to be included throughout.
- H. Georgi, D. B. Kaplan, and L. Randall, Manifesting the invisible axion at low-energies, Phys. Lett. B 169, 73 (1986).
- The sign difference in the -defining term in Eq. ( (1) with respect to Ref. [9] arises from our use of opposite -tensor conventions.
- N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Dispersive analysis of and form factors, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 153; 01 (2025) 125.
- S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
- P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Signatures of light new particles in , Phys. Rev. D 110, 055001 (2024); 111, 039903(E) (2025).
- I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II), Evidence for decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
- M. T. Prim et al. (Belle), Search for and with inclusive tagging, Phys. Rev. D 101, 032007 (2020).
- F. Abudinén et al. (Belle-II), Search for decays using an inclusive tagging method at Belle II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 181802 (2021).
- W. G. Parrott, C. Bouchard, and C. T. H. Davies (HPQCD), Standard Model predictions for and using form factors from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014511 (2023); HPQCD), 107, 119903(E) (2023).
- D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, Revisiting decays in the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 252 (2023).
- A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff, and D. M. Straub, decays in the Standard Model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 184.
- J. Brod, M. Gorbahn, and E. Stamou, Two-loop electroweak corrections for the decays, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034030 (2011).
- V. Bertacchi et al. (Belle II Tracking Group), Track finding at Belle II, Comput. Phys. Commun. 259, 107610 (2021).
- The below-2% error has a negligible impact on our analysis, because have an error approaching 10%.
- K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, Decoding the excess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115006 (2024).
- P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Impact of new invisible particles on observables, Phys. Rev. D 112, 035010 (2025).
- C. Praz, Search for B → decays with a machine learning method at the Belle II experiment, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 2022.
- A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach, D. Guadagnoli, and G. Isidori, On the Standard Model prediction for , Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2172 (2012).
- The suppression arises because the lightest charged emitter is the , which makes the exponent in parametrically small. Here, denotes the minimal photon energy in the rest frame required for detectability—a “theoretical” scale usually proxied by the resolution.
- T. Keck et al., The full event interpretation: An exclusive tagging algorithm for the Belle II experiment, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 3, 6 (2019).
- The dominant effect is that a few events with small positive migrate to slightly negative reconstructed values, thus shifting between adjacent bins of the Belle II spectrum.
- Reference [53] obtains a bound slightly above for the branching ratio in the low- regime, based on a projected dataset of 0.5 . Since Ref. [53] predates Ref. [32], a detailed numerical comparison of the limits is not straightforward. We note, however, that we achieve a very similar sensitivity—see results in Table 1—using of actual data, dominated by the ITA selection.
- W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, Light new physics in ? Phys. Rev. D 109, 075008 (2024).
- J. Alda, M. Fuentes Zamoro, L. Merlo, X. Ponce Díaz, and S. Rigolin, Comprehensive ALP searches in meson decays, arXiv:2507.19578.
- M. Cavan-Piton, D. Guadagnoli, A. Iohner, D. Martinez Santos, and L. Vittorio, Probing QCD axions or axion-like particles in three-body decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 039.
- J. M. Camalich, M. Pospelov, P. N. H. Vuong, R. Ziegler, and J. Zupan, Quark flavor phenomenology of the QCD axion, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015023 (2020).
- T. Ferber, A. Filimonova, R. Schäfer, and S. Westhoff, Displaced or invisible? ALPs from B decays at Belle II, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 131.