Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Using B+→K+νν¯ to search for the QCD axion

Merna Abumusabh1,*, Giulio Dujany1,†, Diego Guadagnoli2,‡, Axel Iohner2,§, and Claudio Toni2,∥

  • *Contact author: merna.abumusabh@iphc.cnrs.fr
  • †Contact author: giulio.dujany@iphc.cnrs.fr
  • ‡Contact author: diego.guadagnoli@lapth.cnrs.fr
  • §Contact author: axel.iohner@lapth.cnrs.fr
  • ∥Contact author: claudio.toni@lapth.cnrs.fr

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023129 – Published 7 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nw6q-6nhz

Abstract

We introduce a model-independent framework to reinterpret Belle II results using only public data, analytically reconstructing the mapping between true and reconstructed kinematic variables within the statistically dominant Inclusive Tagging Analysis. This enables rare-decay measurements to probe light invisible particles—such as the QCD axion or axionlike particles, collectively denoted by a—without relying on internal simulations. Applying the method to B+→K+νν¯ yields the strongest bound on the branching fraction for B+→K+a, improving existing limits by about a factor of 9 and constraining the axion's fundamental flavor-changing coupling to b and s quarks. The approach establishes B+→K+νν¯ as a dual probe—simultaneously testing short-distance new physics and light invisible states, the two probes working independently to an excellent approximation—and provides a general strategy for model-independent reinterpretation of collider data.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102, 89 (2018).
  2. G. Lanfranchi, M. Pospelov, and P. Schuster, The search for feebly interacting particles, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 279 (2021).
  3. P. Sikivie, Invisible axion search methods, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015004 (2021).
  4. G. G. Raffelt, Astrophysical methods to constrain axions and other novel particle phenomena, Phys. Rep. 198, 1 (1990).
  5. G. G. Raffelt, Astrophysical axion bounds, Lect. Notes Phys. 741, 51 (2008).
  6. A. Caputo and G. Raffelt, Astrophysical axion bounds: The 2024 edition, in 1st Training School of the COST Action COSMIC WISPers (CA21106) (2024), PoS (COSMICWISPers), 041 (2024).
  7. D. J. E. Marsh, Axion cosmology, Phys. Rep. 643, 1 (2016).
  8. J. E. Kim and G. Carosi, Axions and the strong CP problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 557 (2010); 91, 049902(E) (2019).
  9. L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rep. 870, 1 (2020).
  10. K. Choi, S. H. Im, and C. Sub Shin, Recent progress in the physics of axions and axion-like particles, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 225 (2021).
  11. J. E. Kim, Weak interaction singlet and strong CP invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979).
  12. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Can confinement ensure natural CP invariance of strong interactions? Nucl. Phys. B 166, 493 (1980).
  13. M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A simple solution to the strong CP problem with a harmless axion, Phys. Lett. B 104, 199 (1981).
  14. A. R. Zhitnitsky, On possible suppression of the axion hadron interactions (in Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980).
  15. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
  16. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977).
  17. S. Weinberg, A new light boson? Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
  18. F. Wilczek, Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
  19. L. Ubaldi, Effects of theta on the deuteron binding energy and the triple-alpha process, Phys. Rev. D 81, 025011 (2010).
  20. M. Dine, L. Stephenson Haskins, L. Ubaldi, and D. Xu, Some remarks on anthropic approaches to the strong CP problem, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 171.
  21. J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. B 120, 127 (1983).
  22. L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A cosmological bound on the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. B 120, 133 (1983).
  23. M. Dine and W. Fischler, The not so harmless axion, Phys. Lett. B 120, 137 (1983).
  24. T. Abe et al. (Belle-II), Belle II technical design report, arXiv:1011.0352.
  25. The spread, or bite, around these momenta is tiny and completely negligible for the purposes of this paper.
  26. The charge-conjugate mode is assumed to be included throughout.
  27. H. Georgi, D. B. Kaplan, and L. Randall, Manifesting the invisible axion at low-energies, Phys. Lett. B 169, 73 (1986).
  28. The sign difference in the fa-defining aGG̃ term in Eq. ( (1) with respect to Ref. [9] arises from our use of opposite ε-tensor conventions.
  29. N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Dispersive analysis of B→K(*) and Bs→ϕ form factors, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 153; 01 (2025) 125.
  30. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  31. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*)Emiss, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055001 (2024); 111, 039903(E) (2025).
  32. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II), Evidence for B+→K+νν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
  33. M. T. Prim et al. (Belle), Search for B+→μ+νμ and B+→μ+N with inclusive tagging, Phys. Rev. D 101, 032007 (2020).
  34. F. Abudinén et al. (Belle-II), Search for B+→K+νν¯ decays using an inclusive tagging method at Belle II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 181802 (2021).
  35. W. G. Parrott, C. Bouchard, and C. T. H. Davies (HPQCD), Standard Model predictions for B→Kℓ+ℓ−, B→Kℓ1−ℓ2+ and B→Kνν¯ using form factors from Nf=2+1+1 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014511 (2023); HPQCD), 107, 119903(E) (2023).
  36. D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, Revisiting B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 252 (2023).
  37. A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff, and D. M. Straub, B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the Standard Model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 184.
  38. J. Brod, M. Gorbahn, and E. Stamou, Two-loop electroweak corrections for the K→πνν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034030 (2011).
  39. V. Bertacchi et al. (Belle II Tracking Group), Track finding at Belle II, Comput. Phys. Commun. 259, 107610 (2021).
  40. The below-2% NB error has a negligible impact on our analysis, because nνν¯,bkgi have an error approaching 10%.
  41. K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, Decoding the B→Kνν excess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115006 (2024).
  42. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Impact of new invisible particles on B→K(*)Emiss observables, Phys. Rev. D 112, 035010 (2025).
  43. C. Praz, Search for B → Kvv decays with a machine learning method at the Belle II experiment, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 2022.
  44. A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach, D. Guadagnoli, and G. Isidori, On the Standard Model prediction for B(Bs,d→μ+μ−), Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2172 (2012).
  45. The suppression arises because the lightest charged emitter is the K+, which makes the exponent b in B(B→Kνν¯(+nγ))=2ΔEmBα4πbB(B→Kνν¯),parametrically small. Here, ΔE denotes the minimal photon energy in the B rest frame required for detectability—a “theoretical” scale usually proxied by the q2 resolution.
  46. T. Keck et al., The full event interpretation: An exclusive tagging algorithm for the Belle II experiment, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 3, 6 (2019).
  47. The dominant effect is that a few events with small positive q2 migrate to slightly negative reconstructed values, thus shifting between adjacent bins of the Belle II spectrum.
  48. Reference [53] obtains a bound slightly above 1×10−6 for the branching ratio in the low-ma regime, based on a projected dataset of 0.5 ab−1. Since Ref. [53] predates Ref. [32], a detailed numerical comparison of the limits is not straightforward. We note, however, that we achieve a very similar sensitivity—see results in Table 1—using 0.362ab−1 of actual data, dominated by the ITA selection.
  49. W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯? Phys. Rev. D 109, 075008 (2024).
  50. J. Alda, M. Fuentes Zamoro, L. Merlo, X. Ponce Díaz, and S. Rigolin, Comprehensive ALP searches in meson decays, arXiv:2507.19578.
  51. M. Cavan-Piton, D. Guadagnoli, A. Iohner, D. Martinez Santos, and L. Vittorio, Probing QCD axions or axion-like particles in three-body K decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 039.
  52. J. M. Camalich, M. Pospelov, P. N. H. Vuong, R. Ziegler, and J. Zupan, Quark flavor phenomenology of the QCD axion, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015023 (2020).
  53. T. Ferber, A. Filimonova, R. Schäfer, and S. Westhoff, Displaced or invisible? ALPs from B decays at Belle II, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 131.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation