- Open Access
Photon-transmission-loss-independent quantum-enhanced interferometer
Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043110 – Published 28 October, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nmb9-xpx9
Abstract
A quantum-enhanced telescope (interferometer) can have significant advantages in precisely measuring the angular position of remote objects through sending out ancillary quantum entanglement pairs alongside the large baselines of telescopes. In principle, the larger the baseline, the higher the expected measurement resolution. However, the well-known major problem of photon transmission loss would drastically undermine the practical application of all quantum-enhanced telescopes and optical interferometers that transmit photons along the baseline, especially for the large baselines required for high angular resolution. Here, we propose a photon-transmission-loss-independent quantum-enhanced interferometer that is robust to the transmission loss and keeps its advantages unchanged given whatever large baseline. This removes the well-known barrier to the practical application of quantum-enhanced telescopes. Moreover, in contrast to the previous results of quantum-entanglement-enhanced telescopes requesting sophisticated resources—perfect single-photon entanglement, photon-number-resolving detectors, or quantum memories—our method requires only threshold detectors and tunable coherent-state or two-mode squeezed-state sources, which are mature technologies nowadays, and it does not need any quantum memory. We demonstrate the high performance of our method using Fisher information. For the phase difference of weak light from a remote star, the high-quality result of Fisher information remains constant under arbitrarily large transmission loss, and hence all the advantageous results and the performance of our method are actually independent of transmission loss.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (21)
- D. Gottesman, T. Jennewein, and S. Croke, Longer-baseline telescopes using quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 070503 (2012).
- Z. Huang, G. K. Brennen, and Y. Ouyang, Imaging stars with quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 210502 (2022).
- M. M. Marchese and P. Kok, Large baseline optical imaging assisted by single photons and linear quantum optics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 160801 (2023).
- See Supplemental material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/nmb9-xpx9 for photon-transmission-loss-independent quantum-enhanced interferometer.
- M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58 (1994).
- W. R. Clements, P. C. Humphreys, B. J. Metcalf, W. S. Kolthammer, and I. A. Walmsley, Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers, Optica 3, 1460 (2016).
- M. Tsang, Quantum nonlocality in weak-thermal-light interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 270402 (2011).
- E. T. Khabiboulline, J. Borregaard, K. De Greve, and M. D. Lukin, Optical interferometry with quantum networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070504 (2019).
- L. Howard, G. Gillett, M. Pearce, R. Abrahao, T. Weinhold, P. Kok, and A. White, Optimal imaging of remote bodies using quantum detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 143604 (2019).
- C. Lupo, Z. Huang, and P. Kok, Quantum limits to incoherent imaging are achieved by linear interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 080503 (2020).
- Z. Huang and C. Lupo, Quantum hypothesis testing for exoplanet detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 130502 (2021).
- U. Zanforlin, C. Lupo, P. W. Connolly, P. Kok, G. S. Buller, and Z. Huang, Optical quantum super-resolution imaging and hypothesis testing, Nat. Commun. 13, 5373 (2022).
- M. R. Brown, M. Allgaier, V. Thiel, J. D. Monnier, M. G. Raymer, and B. J. Smith, Interferometric imaging using shared quantum entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 210801 (2023).
- Z. Huang and C. Lupo, Quantum hypothesis testing for exoplanet detection and spectroscopy, in Quantum 2.0 (Optica Publishing Group, Washington, DC, 2023), paper QM2B.5.
- Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, and V. O. Lorenz, Superresolution in interferometric imaging of strong thermal sources, Phys. Rev. A 104, 022613 (2021).
- E. T. Khabiboulline, J. Borregaard, K. De Greve, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum-assisted telescope arrays, Phys. Rev. A 100, 022316 (2019).
- J. Bland-Hawthorn, M. J. Sellars, and J. G. Bartholomew, Quantum memories and the double-slit experiment: Implications for astronomical interferometry, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 38, A86 (2021).
- M. Bojer, Z. Huang, S. Karl, S. Richter, P. Kok, and J. von Zanthier, A quantitative comparison of amplitude versus intensity interferometry for astronomy, New J. Phys. 24, 043026 (2022).
- P. Stankus, A. Nomerotski, A. Slosar, and S. Vintskevich, Two-photon amplitude interferometry for precision astrometry, The Open Journal of Astrophysics 5 (2022).
- Z. Chen, A. Nomerotski, A. Slosar, P. Stankus, and S. Vintskevich, Astrometry in two-photon interferometry using an earth rotation fringe scan, Phys. Rev. D 107, 023015 (2023).
- A. Nomerotski, P. Stankus, A. Slosar, S. Vintskevich, S. Andrewski, G. Carini, D. Dolzhenko, D. England, E. Figueroa, S. Gera et al., Quantum-assisted optical interferometers: Instrument requirements, in Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging VII (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2020), Vol. 11446, pp. 290–306.
