Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

QuGrav: Bringing gravitational waves to light with qumodes

Dmitri E. Kharzeev

Azadeh Maleknejad*

Saba Shalamberidze

  • Center for Nuclear Theory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, New York 11794-3800, USA and Energy and Photon Sciences Directorate, Condensed Matter and Materials Sciences Division, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, Stony Brook 11973-5000, New York, USA

  • Department of Physics, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom

  • Center for Nuclear Theory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook 11794-3800, New York, USA

  • *Contact author: azadeh.maleknejad@swansea.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013140 – Published 9 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nbzp-1yn7

Abstract

We propose using qumodes, quantum bosonic modes, for detecting high-frequency gravitational waves via the inverse Gertsenshtein effect, where a gravitational wave resonantly converts into a single photon in a magnetized cavity. For an occupation number n of the photon field in a qumode, the conversion probability is enhanced by a factor of n+1 due to Bose-Einstein statistics. Unlocking this increased sensitivity entails the ability to continuously prepare the qumode and perform nondemolition measurement on the qumode-qubit system within the qumode coherence time. Our results indicate that, at microwave frequencies and with existing technology, the proposed setup can attain sensitivities within 1.7 orders of magnitude of the cosmological bound. With anticipated near-future improvements, it has the potential to surpass this limit and pave the way for the first exploration of high-frequency cosmological gravitational wave backgrounds. At optical frequencies, it can enhance the sensitivity of current detectors by one order of magnitude. That further enhances their potential in reaching the single-graviton level.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (49)

  1. M. E. Gertsenshtein, Wave resonance of light and gravitational waves, Sov. Phys. JETP 14, 84 (1962).
  2. A. Ejlli, D. Ejlli, A. M. Cruise, G. Pisano, and H. Grote, Upper limits on the amplitude of ultra-high-frequency gravitational waves from graviton to photon conversion, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 1032 (2019).
  3. R. Ballou, et al., New exclusion limits on scalar and pseudoscalar axionlike particles from light shining through a wall, Phys. Rev. D 92, 092002 (2015).
  4. C. Albrecht, S. Barbanotti, H. Hintz, K. Jensch, R. Klos, W. Maschmann, O. Sawlanski, M. Stolper, and D. Trines, Straightening of superconducting HERA dipoles for the any-light-particle-search experiment ALPS II, EPJ Tech. Instrum. 8, 5 (2021).
  5. V. Anastassopoulos, et al., New CAST limit on the axion-photon interaction, Nat. Phys. 13, 584 (2017).
  6. A. Abeln, et al., Conceptual design of BabyIAXO, the intermediate stage towards the International Axion Observatory, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 137.
  7. E. Armengaud, et al., Physics potential of the International Axion Observatory (IAXO), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2019) 047.
  8. J. Beacham, et al., Physics beyond colliders at CERN: Beyond the standard model working group report, J. Phys. G 47, 010501 (2020).
  9. N. Aggarwal, et al., Challenges and opportunities of gravitational wave searches above 10 kHz, Living Rev. Relativ. 28, 10 (2025).
  10. A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021).
  11. T. J. Stavenger, E. Crane, K. C. Smith, C. T. Kang, S. M. Girvin, and N. Wiebe, C2QA—bosonic qiskit, in 26th IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) (IEEE, USA, 2022), pp. 1–8.
  12. J. Y. Araz, M. Grau, J. Montgomery, and F. Ringer, Hybrid quantum simulations with qubits and qumodes on trapped-ion platforms, Phys. Rev. A 112, 012620 (2025).
  13. H. J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, M. R. Andrews, D. S. Durfee, S. Inouye, and W. Ketterle, Bosonic stimulation in the formation of a Bose-Einstein condensate, Science 279, 1005 (1998).
  14. Y.-K. Lu, Y. Margalit, and W. Ketterle, Bosonic stimulation of atom–light scattering in an ultracold gas, Nat. Phys. 19, 210 (2023).
  15. R. W. Heeres, B. Vlastakis, E. Holland, S. Krastanov, V. V. Albert, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity state manipulation using photon-number selective phase gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 137002 (2015).
  16. A. Eickbusch, V. Sivak, A. Z. Ding, S. S. Elder, S. R. Jha, J. Venkatraman, B. Royer, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Fast universal control of an oscillator with weak dispersive coupling to a qubit, Nat. Phys. 18, 1464 (2022).
  17. R. Cheng, Y. Zhou, S. Wang, M. Shen, T. Taher, and H. X. Tang, A 100-pixel photon-number-resolving detector unveiling photon statistics, Nat. Photon. 17, 112 (2023).
  18. W. Ratzinger, S. Schenk, and P. Schwaller, A coordinate-independent formalism for detecting high-frequency gravitational waves, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 195.
  19. G. Tobar, S. K. Manikandan, T. Beitel, and I. Pikovski, Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing, Nat. Commun. 15, 7229 (2024).
  20. A. Agrawal, A. V. Dixit, T. Roy, S. Chakram, K. He, R. K. Naik, D. I. Schuster, and A. Chou, Stimulated emission of signal photons from dark matter waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 140801 (2024).
  21. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/nbzp-1yn7 for details of the extended discussion, which includes Refs. [31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49].
  22. F. Dyson, Is a graviton detectable? Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1330041 (2013).
  23. T. Rothman and S. Boughn, Can gravitons be detected? Found. Phys. 36, 1801 (2006).
  24. D. Carney, V. Domcke, and N. L. Rodd, Graviton detection and the quantization of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044009 (2024).
  25. D. I. Schuster, et al., Resolving photon number states in a superconducting circuit, Nature (London) 445, 515 (2007).
  26. M. Reagor, et al.,  Reaching 10 ms single photon lifetimes for superconducting aluminum cavities, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 192604 (2013).
  27. T. Kessler, C. Hagemann, C. Grebing, T. Legero, U. Sterr, F. Riehle, M. J. Martin, L. Chen, and J. Ye, A sub-40-mHz-linewidth laser based on a silicon single-crystal optical cavity, Nat. Photon. 6, 687 (2012).
  28. R. Lescanne, S. Deléglise, E. Albertinale, U. Réglade, T. Capelle, E. Ivanov, T. Jacqmin, Z. Leghtas, and E. Flurin, Irreversible qubit-photon coupling for the detection of itinerant microwave photons, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021038 (2020).
  29. A. V. Dixit, S. Chakram, K. He, A. Agrawal, R. K. Naik, D. I. Schuster, and A. Chou, Searching for dark matter with a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141302 (2021).
  30. A. Ringwald, J. Schütte-Engel, and C. Tamarit, Gravitational waves as a big bang thermometer, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 054.
  31. D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
  32. H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1 (Springer, Berlin, 1999).
  33. C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
  34. S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond, Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons (Oxford University Press, 2006).
  35. C. P. Poole, H. A. Farach, R. J. Creswick, and R. Prozorov, Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, 2007).
  36. R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 3rd ed. (Elsevier Academic Press, 2008).
  37. P. Kumar, Quantum frequency conversion, Opt. Lett. 15, 1476 (1990).
  38. D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed. (Wiley, New Delhi, 2012).
  39. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
  40. C. K. Hong and L. Mandel, Experimental realization of a localized one-photon state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 58 (1986).
  41. A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299 (2009).
  42. A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, Quantum-to-classical transition with single-photon-added coherent states of light, Sci. 306, 660 (2004).
  43. A. Ourjoumtsev, et al., Generation of optical Schrödinger cats from photon number states, Nature (London) 448, 784 (2007).
  44. M. Hofheinz, et al., Generation of Fock states in a superconducting quantum circuit, Nature (London) 454, 310 (2008).
  45. M. Hofheinz, et al., Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator, Nature (London) 459, 546 (2009).
  46. C. Santori, et al., Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device, Nature (London) 419, 594 (2002).
  47. J. McKeever, et al., Deterministic generation of single photons from one atom trapped in a cavity, Science 303, 1992 (2004).
  48. P. Maunz, et al., Quantum interference of photon pairs from two remote trapped atomic ions, Nat. Phys. 3, 538 (2007).
  49. M. Gimeno-Segovia, et al., From three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states to ballistic universal quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020502 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation