Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Defect positioning in combinatorial metamaterials

Chaviva Sirote-Katz1,*, Yotam M. Y. Feldman2, Guy Cohen2,3, Tamás Kálmán4,5,†, and Yair Shokef6,7,3,8,5,‡

  • *Contact author: chavivas@mail.tau.ac.il
  • †Contact author: kalman@math.titech.ac.jp
  • ‡Contact author: shokef@tau.ac.il

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033005 – Published 1 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mvrj-b33t

Abstract

Combinatorial mechanical metamaterials are made of anisotropic, flexible blocks, such that multiple metamaterials may be constructed using a single block type, and the system's response depends on the frustration (or its absence) due to the mutual orientations of the blocks within the lattice. Specifically, any minimal loop of blocks that may not simultaneously deform in their softest mode defines a mechanical defect at the vertex (in two dimensions) or edge (in three dimensions) that the loop encircles. Defects stiffen the metamaterial, and allow one to design the spatial patterns of stress and deformation as the system is externally loaded. We study the ability to place defects at arbitrary positions in metamaterials made of a family of block types that we recently introduced for the square, honeycomb, and cubic lattices. Alongside blocks for which we show that any defect configuration is possible, we identify situations in which not all sets are realizable as defects. One of the restrictions is that in three dimensions, defected edges form closed curves. Even in cases when not all geometries of defect lines are possible, we show how to produce defect lines of arbitrary knottedness.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Breaking mechanical holography in combinatorial metamaterials

Chaviva Sirote-Katz, Ofri Palti, Naomi Spiro, Tamás Kálmán, and Yair Shokef
Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033004 (2025)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. K. Bertoldi, V. Vitelli, J. Christensen, and M. van Hecke, Flexible mechanical metamaterials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17066 (2017).
  2. K.-I. Jang, H. U. Chung, S. Xu, C. H. Lee, H. Luan, J. Jeong, H. Cheng, G.-T. Kim, S. Y. Han, J. W. Lee, J. Kim, M. Cho, F. Miao, Y. Yang, H. N. Jung, M. Flavin, H. Liu, G. W. Kong, K. J. Yu, S. I. Rhee et al., Soft network composite materials with deterministic and bio-inspired designs, Nat. Commun. 6, 6566 (2015).
  3. M. Czajkowski, C. Coulais, M. van Hecke, and D. Z. Rocklin, Conformal elasticity of mechanism-based metamaterials, Nat. Commun. 13, 211 (2022).
  4. X. Guo, M. Guzmán, D. Carpentier, D. Bartolo, and C. Coulais, Non-orientable order and non-commutative response in frustrated metamaterials, Nature (London) 618, 506 (2023).
  5. C. Sirote-Katz, D. Shohat, C. Merrigan, Y. Lahini, C. Nisoli, and Y. Shokef, Emergent disorder and mechanical memory in periodic metamaterials, Nat. Commun. 15, 4008 (2024).
  6. L. J. Kwakernaak and M. van Hecke, Counting and sequential information processing in mechanical metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 268204 (2023).
  7. C. Coulais, E. Teomy, K. de Reus, Y. Shokef, and M. van Hecke, Combinatorial design of textured mechanical metamaterials, Nature (London) 535, 529 (2016).
  8. R. Moessner and A. P. Ramirez, Geometrical frustration, Phys. Today 59, 24 (2006).
  9. G. H. Wannier, Antiferromagnetism. The triangular Ising net, Phys. Rev. 79, 357 (1950).
  10. S. T. Bramwell and M. J. P. Gingras, Spin ice state in frustrated magnetic pyrochlore materials, Science 294, 1495 (2001).
  11. M. J. Morrison, T. R. Nelson, and C. Nisoli, Unhappy vertices in artificial spin ice: New degeneracies from vertex frustration, New J. Phys. 15, 045009 (2013).
  12. C. Nisoli, V. Kapaklis, and P. Schiffer, Deliberate exotic magnetism via frustration and topology, Nat. Phys. 13, 200 (2017).
  13. Y. Han, Y. Shokef, A. M. Alsayed, P. Yunker, T. C. Lubensky, and A. G. Yodh, Geometric frustration in buckled colloidal monolayers, Nature (London) 456, 898 (2008).
  14. Y. Shokef, A. Souslov, and T. C. Lubensky, Order by disorder in the antiferromagnetic Ising model on an elastic triangular lattice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11804 (2011).
  15. F. Leoni and Y. Shokef, Attraction controls the inversion of order by disorder in buckled colloidal monolayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 218002 (2017).
  16. A. Libál, C. Reichhardt, and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Realizing colloidal artificial ice on arrays of optical traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 228302 (2006).
  17. A. Ortiz-Ambriz and P. Tierno, Engineering of frustration in colloidal artificial ices realized on microfeatured grooved lattices, Nat. Commun. 7, 10575 (2016).
  18. E. C. Oğuz, A. Ortiz-Ambriz, H. Shem-Tov, E. Babià-Soler, P. Tierno, and Y. Shokef, Topology restricts quasidegeneracy in sheared square colloidal ice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 238003 (2020).
  19. S. H. Kang, S. Shan, A. Košmrlj, W. L. Noorduin, S. Shian, J. C. Weaver, D. R. Clarke, and K. Bertoldi, Complex ordered patterns in mechanical instability induced geometrically frustrated triangular cellular structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 098701 (2014).
  20. J. P. Udani and A. F. Arrieta, Taming geometric frustration by leveraging structural elasticity, Mater. Design 221, 110809 (2022).
  21. P. Mellado, A. Concha, and L. Mahadevan, Macroscopic magnetic frustration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 257203 (2012).
  22. H. A. Teixeira, M. F. Bernardo, F. S. Nascimento, M. D. Saccone, F. Caravelli, C. Nisoli, and C. I. L. de Araujo, Macroscopic magnetic monopoles in a 3D-printed mechano-magnet, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 596, 171929 (2024).
  23. G. Toulouse, Theory of the frustration effect in spin glasses: I, Commun. Phys. 2, 115 (1977).
  24. P. W. Anderson, The concept of frustration in spin glasses, J. Less-Common Met. 62, 291 (1978).
  25. K. Binder and A. P. Young, Spin glasses: Experimental facts, theoretical concepts, and open questions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801 (1986).
  26. G. P. Alexander, B. G.-G. Chen, E. A. Matsumoto, and R. D. Kamien, Colloquium: Disclination loops, point defects, and all that in nematic liquid crystals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 497 (2012).
  27. P. Dieleman, N. Vasmel, S. Waitukaitis, and M. van Hecke, Jigsaw puzzle design of pluripotent origami, Nat. Phys. 16, 63 (2020).
  28. A. S. Meeussen, E. C. Oğuz, Y. Shokef, and M. van Hecke, Topological defects produce exotic mechanics in complex metamaterials, Nat. Phys. 16, 307 (2020).
  29. B. Pisanty, E. C. Oğuz, C. Nisoli, and Y. Shokef, Putting a spin on metamaterials: Mechanical incompatibility as magnetic frustration, SciPost Phys. 10, 136 (2021).
  30. A. Bossart, D. M. J. Dykstra, J. van der Laan, and C. Coulais, Oligomodal metamaterials with multifunctional mechanics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018610118 (2021).
  31. R. van Mastrigt, M. Dijkstra, M. van Hecke, and C. Coulais, Machine learning of implicit combinatorial rules in mechanical metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 198003 (2022).
  32. R. van Mastrigt, C. Coulais, and M. van Hecke, Emergent nonlocal combinatorial design rules for multimodal metamaterials, Phys. Rev. E 108, 065002 (2023).
  33. C. Sirote-Katz, O. Palti, N. Spiro, T. Kálmán, and Y. Shokef, companion paper, Breaking mechanical holography in combinatorial metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033004 (2025).
  34. R. D. Resch, Geometrical device having articulated relatively movable sections, US Patent No. 3,201,894 (1965).
  35. K. Bertoldi, P. M. Reis, S. Willshaw, and T. Mullin, Negative Poisson's ratio behavior induced by an elastic instability, Adv. Mater. 22, 361 (2010).
  36. Y. Bar-Sinai, G. Librandi, K. Bertoldi, and M. Moshe, Geometric charges and nonlinear elasticity of two-dimensional elastic metamaterials, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10195 (2020).
  37. B. Deng, S. Yu, A. E. Forte, V. Tournat, and K. Bertoldi, Characterization, stability, and application of domain walls in flexible mechanical metamaterials, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31002 (2020).
  38. C. Merrigan, C. Nisoli, and Y. Shokef, Topologically protected steady cycles in an icelike mechanical metamaterial, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023174 (2021).
  39. The code for the program that searches block orientations that yield prescribed defect sets for Blocks C2 and C6 is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14050887.
  40. W. Liu, T. A. Sigalov, C. Coulais, and Y. Shokef, Combinatorial design of floppy modes and frustrated loops in metamaterials arXiv:2503.12867.
  41. J. K. Fichte, D. L. Berre, M. Hecher, and S. Szeider, The silent (r)evolution of SAT, Commun. ACM 66, 64 (2023).
  42. N. Sörensson, MINISAT 2.2 and MINISAT++ 1.1, A short description in SAT Race 2010 (2010).
  43. A. Ignatiev, A. Morgado, and J. Marques-Silva, PySAT: A Python toolkit for prototyping with SAT oracles, in Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2018, edited by O. Beyersdorff and C. Wintersteiger, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10929 (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 428–437.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation