Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Emergent quantization from a dynamic vacuum

Harold White*, Jerry Vera, Andre Sylvester, and Leonard Dudzinski

  • Casimir, Inc., 16441 Space Center Boulevard, Bldg. D-200, Houston, Texas 77058, USA

  • *Contact author: sonny@casimirspace.com

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013264 – Published 9 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/l8y7-r3rm

Abstract

We show that adding quadratic temporal dispersion to a dynamic-vacuum acoustic model yields a fully analytic, exactly isospectral mapping to the hydrogenic Coulomb problem. In the regime ω=Dq2 with D=/(2meff), a proton-imprinted constitutive profile produces an inverse sound speed 1/cs2(r)=A(ω)+C(ω)/r and hence a time-harmonic operator (2+keff2) that is Coulombic at each bound eigenfrequency. Separation of variables yields the exact hydrogenic eigenfunctions Rn(r)Ym(θ,ϕ); the angular labels (,m) emerge naturally from the Laplace-Beltrami spectrum on S2 via rotational symmetry and boundary conditions (as in standard quantum mechanics), while localization follows from A(ωn)<0 in a reactive stop band consistent with causal, passive dispersion. While angular-momentum quantization follows directly from rotational symmetry and boundary conditions in standard quantum mechanics (consistent with Noether's theorem), here it emerges within a classical-like dispersive acoustic framework without introducing additional wave-mechanical postulates beyond symmetry and self-adjointness. This highlights dispersion's role in bridging a hydrodynamic description to quantumlike spectral structure. Identifying qnκn maps spatial scale to frequency, giving ωn=Dκn21/n2 and reproducing the Rydberg ladder. Calibration to the reduced-mass Rydberg frequency (ω*=2πcRH) fixes D=/(2μ) and meff=μ, with no free parameters. We determine the frequency dependence of A(ωn) and C(ωn) consistent with the underlying dispersive physics and demonstrate agreement with hydrogenic mode shapes and transition lines. The framework also predicts isotope shifts [μμ(M)] and symmetry-respecting Stark/Zeeman analogues. Dispersion thus renders quantization an emergent consequence of symmetry, boundary conditions, and causal response in a dynamic vacuum.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (15)

  1. H. White, J. Vera, P. Bailey, P. March, T. Lawrence, A. Sylvester, and D. Brady, Acoustic derivation from Schrödinger and numerical evidence for orbital resonances in a dynamic vacuum, Phys. Open 1, 100009 (2019).
  2. The Madelung/Bogoliubov linearization refers to expressing the Schrödinger or Gross-Pitaevskii equation in hydrodynamic form (via Madelung's transformation) and then linearizing about a uniform background density to obtain small-amplitude wave equations. This procedure yields the Bogoliubov dispersion relation ω2=cs2k2+2k4/4m2, where the first term corresponds to acoustic (phononlike) behavior and the second term arises from quantum-pressure effects. At low k (long wavelengths), the first term dominates and gives acoustic behavior (ωk); at high k (short wavelengths or quantum-pressure-dominated regime), the second term dominates, yielding a quadratic dependence ωk2.
  3. E. Madelung, Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form, Z. Phys. 40, 322 (1927).
  4. N. N. Bogoliubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J. Phys. (USSR) 11, 23 (1947).
  5. L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016), Chaps. 2 and 3.
  6. R. D. Mindlin, Micro-structure in linear elasticity, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 16, 51 (1964).
  7. In this construction, the coefficients α(ω) and β(ω) represent the effective response of the dispersive medium, analogous to the energy and Coulomb coupling terms in the hydrogenic Schrödinger equation. Because the medium is causal and frequency dependent, these coefficients vary with ω; however, the physically relevant solutions occur only at discrete eigenfrequencies ωn. Evaluating the coefficients at these eigenfrequencies and imposing α(ωn)=κn2 ensures that the effective propagation constant is imaginary, corresponding to a bound (evanescent) spatial mode. Setting β(ωn)=β, independent of n, keeps the 1/r coupling strength constant across all eigenstates. With these assignments, the radial equation reduces to the hydrogenic Coulomb equation. Thus, the quantized hydrogenic structure emerges naturally from the dispersive acoustic formulation without introducing it as an external assumption.
  8. The condition A(ω)<0 designates a reactive regime of the dispersive medium in which the effective squared wave number becomes negative, producing evanescent (spatially decaying) solutions rather than propagating waves. Physically, this corresponds to a stop band in which the stored reactive energy exceeds the kinetic component, confining the mode and creating a discrete bound state. In this sense, A<0 plays the same role as negative total energy E<0 in the Schrödinger formulation of hydrogen, marking the transition from continuum to bound eigenmodes.
  9. With ρ(r)=γ/r4 and B(r)=βB/r3, one has ρ/B=(γ/βB)r1 exactly; including a background B preserves the Coulombic 1/r core for r(βB/B)1/3 while allowing a tunable constant term A(ω)=ρ(ω)/B(ω).
  10. With domain uL2((0,),dr), the radial operator is self-adjoint, ensuring a real, discrete spectrum (Sturm-Liouville theory [12]).
  11. D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018).
  12. A. Zettl, Sturm-Liouville Theory (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2005).
  13. G. B. Arfken, H. J. Weber, and F. E. Harris, Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 7th ed. (Academic Press, Oxford, 2013).
  14. E. Tiesinga, P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Taylor, CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025010 (2021).
  15. A. Kramida, Y. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and NIST ASD team, NIST atomic spectra database, version 5.x, https://physics.nist.gov/asd.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation