- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Boundary transitions from a single round of measurements on gapless quantum states

Yue Liu1,2, Sara Murciano1,2,3, David F. Mross4, and Jason Alicea1,2,3

PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 023293 – Published 23 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/l4b7-h5cd

Abstract

Measurements can qualitatively alter correlations and entanglement emerging in gapless quantum matter. We show how a single round of measurements on gapless quantum systems can, upon rotating the measurement basis, induce nontrivial transitions separating regimes displaying universal characteristics governed by distinct boundary conformal field theories. We develop the theory of such “measurement-induced boundary transitions” by investigating a gapless parent of the one-dimensional cluster state, obtained by appropriately symmetrizing a commuting projector Hamiltonian for the latter. Projective measurements on the cluster state are known to convert the wave function, after post-selection or decoding, into a long-range-ordered Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state. Similar measurements applied to the gapless parent (i) generate long-range order coexisting with power-law correlations when post-selecting for uniform outcomes, and (ii) yield power-law correlations distinct from those in the pre-measurement state upon decoding. In the post-selection scenario, rotating the measurement basis preserves long-range order up until a critical tilt angle marking a measurement-induced boundary transition to a power-law-ordered regime. Such a transition—which does not exist in the descendant cluster state—establishes new connections between measurement effects on many-body states and nontrivial renormalization-group flows. We extend our analysis to tricritical Ising and three-state Potts critical theories, which also display measurement-induced boundary transitions, and propose general criteria for their existence in other settings.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (71)

  1. Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136 (2018).
  2. B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019).
  3. M. P. A. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 335 (2023).
  4. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, A one-way quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001).
  5. J. Y. Lee, W. Ji, Z. Bi, and M. P. A. Fisher, Decoding measurement-prepared quantum phases and transitions: From Ising model to gauge theory, and beyond, arXiv:2208.11699.
  6. G.-Y. Zhu, N. Tantivasadakarn, A. Vishwanath, S. Trebst, and R. Verresen, Nishimori's cat: Stable long-range entanglement from finite-depth unitaries and weak measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 200201 (2023).
  7. S. J. Garratt, Z. Weinstein, and E. Altman, Measurements conspire nonlocally to restructure critical quantum states, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021026 (2023).
  8. X. Sun, H. Yao, and S.-K. Jian, New critical states induced by measurement, arXiv:2301.11337.
  9. Y. Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Oshikawa, System-environment entanglement phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 094404 (2024).
  10. Q. Tang and X. Wen, A critical state under weak measurement is not critical, arXiv:2411.13705.
  11. Z. Yang, D. Mao, and C.-M. Jian, Entanglement in a one-dimensional critical state after measurements, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165120 (2023).
  12. Z. Weinstein, R. Sajith, E. Altman, and S. J. Garratt, Nonlocality and entanglement in measured critical quantum Ising chains, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245132 (2023).
  13. S. Murciano, P. Sala, Y. Liu, R. S. K. Mong, and J. Alicea, Measurement-altered Ising quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041042 (2023).
  14. P. Sala, S. Murciano, Y. Liu, and J. Alicea, Quantum criticality under imperfect teleportation, PRX Quantum 5, 030307 (2024).
  15. A. Paviglianiti, X. Turkeshi, M. Schirò, and A. Silva, Enhanced entanglement in the measurement-altered quantum Ising chain, Quantum 8, 1576 (2024).
  16. R. A. Patil and A. W. W. Ludwig, Highly complex novel critical behavior from the intrinsic randomness of quantum mechanical measurements on critical ground states—A controlled renormalization group analysis, arXiv:2409.02107.
  17. J. Y. Lee, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, Quantum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement, PRX Quantum 4, 030317 (2023).
  18. Y. Zou, S. Sang, and T. H. Hsieh, Channeling quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 250403 (2023).
  19. R. Ma, Exploring critical systems under measurements and decoherence via Keldysh field theory, arXiv:2304.08277.
  20. S. J. Garratt and E. Altman, Probing postmeasurement entanglement without postselection, PRX Quantum 5, 030311 (2024).
  21. M. McGinley, Postselection-free learning of measurement-induced quantum dynamics, PRX Quantum 5, 020347 (2024).
  22. M. McGinley and M. Fava, Shadow tomography from emergent state designs in analog quantum simulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 160601 (2023).
  23. K. Baweja, D. J. Luitz, and S. J. Garratt, Post-measurement quantum Monte Carlo, arXiv:2410.13844.
  24. D. Rossini and E. Vicari, Measurement-induced dynamics of many-body systems at quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. B 102, 035119 (2020).
  25. T.-C. Lu, L. A. Lessa, I. H. Kim, and T. H. Hsieh, Measurement as a shortcut to long-range entangled quantum matter, PRX Quantum 3, 040337 (2022).
  26. A. Chan, R. M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, and G. Smith, Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224307 (2019).
  27. X. Cao, A. Tilloy, and A. D. Luca, Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring, SciPost Phys. 7, 024 (2019).
  28. Y. Li, X. Chen, A. W. W. Ludwig, and M. P. A. Fisher, Conformal invariance and quantum nonlocality in critical hybrid circuits, Phys. Rev. B 104, 104305 (2021).
  29. A. J. Friedman, C. Yin, Y. Hong, and A. Lucas, Locality and error correction in quantum dynamics with measurement, arXiv:2206.09929.
  30. C.-J. Lin, W. Ye, Y. Zou, S. Sang, and T. H. Hsieh, Probing sign structure using measurement-induced entanglement, Quantum 7, 910 (2023).
  31. M. A. Rajabpour, Entanglement entropy after a partial projective measurement in 1+1 dimensional conformal field theories: Exact results, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 063109.
  32. M. A. Rajabpour, Post-measurement bipartite entanglement entropy in conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. B 92, 075108 (2015).
  33. J. L. Cardy, Conformal invariance and surface critical behavior, Nucl. Phys. B 240, 514 (1984).
  34. D. Qian and J. Wang, Steering-induced phase transition in measurement-only quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024301 (2024).
  35. S. Sang, Z. Li, T. H. Hsieh, and B. Yoshida, Ultrafast entanglement dynamics in monitored quantum circuits, PRX Quantum 4, 040332 (2023).
  36. X. Feng, B. Skinner, and A. Nahum, Measurement-induced phase transitions on dynamical quantum trees, PRX Quantum 4, 030333 (2023).
  37. Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104301 (2020).
  38. A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 060301 (2020).
  39. C.-M. Jian, Y.-Z. You, R. Vasseur, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104302 (2020).
  40. A. Lavasani, Y. Alavirad, and M. Barkeshli, Measurement-induced topological entanglement transitions in symmetric random quantum circuits, Nat. Phys. 17, 342 (2021).
  41. P. Sierant and X. Turkeshi, Controlling entanglement at absorbing state phase transitions in random circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 120402 (2023).
  42. X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Measurement-induced criticality in (2+1)-dimensional hybrid quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014315 (2020).
  43. T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, Hidden symmetry breaking and the Haldane phase in S=1 quantum spin chains, Commun. Math. Phys. 147, 431 (1992).
  44. T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, Hidden Z2×Z2 symmetry breaking in Haldane-gap antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 45, 304 (1992).
  45. L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, Noninvertible duality transformation between symmetry-protected topological and spontaneous symmetry breaking phases, Phys. Rev. B 108, 214429 (2023).
  46. L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, Intrinsically/purely gapless-SPT from non-invertible duality transformations, SciPost Phys. 18, 153 (2025).
  47. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  48. T.-C. Lu, Z. Zhang, S. Vijay, and T. H. Hsieh, Mixed-state long-range order and criticality from measurement and feedback, PRX Quantum 4, 030318 (2023).
  49. R. Verresen, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, One-dimensional symmetry protected topological phases and their transitions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 165124 (2017).
  50. Y. Liu, N. Tantivasadakarn, K. Slagle, D. F. Mross, and J. Alicea, Assembling Kitaev honeycomb spin liquids from arrays of one-dimensional symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184406 (2023).
  51. T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
  52. C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Transmission through barriers and resonant tunneling in an interacting one-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 46, 15233 (1992).
  53. The post-measurement density matrix |ψs〉〈ψs| with sj=1 can be written as limμ→∞eβ∑jXje−μHΔeβ∑jXjTr(e2β∑jXje−μHΔ), which, in the continuum limit, is described by a boson field theory governed by the action of Eq. (16). More intuitively, one can view imaginary times τ<0 as preparing a quantum critical ket while imaginary times τ>0 prepare a quantum critical bra; the measurement applies to those prepared states and hence acts only at τ=0.
  54. It is known that for multichannel Luttinger liquids, higher order contribution coming from 4kF osicillation can sometimes become more relevant than the 2kF oscillation counterpart [51]. In our case we do not have such problem because the first two terms in (22) describe two identical and decoupled Luttinger liquids. In particular, the term cosθcosθ̃ is more relevant than terms like cos(2θ) or cos(2θ̃).
  55. F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, and J. I. Cirac, Criticality, the area law, and the computational power of projected entangled pair states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 220601 (2006).
  56. T. Koffel, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagliacozzo, Entanglement entropy for the long-range Ising chain in a transverse field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 267203 (2012).
  57. D. Vodola, L. Lepori, E. Ercolessi, and G. Pupillo, Long-range Ising and Kitaev models: Phases, correlations and edge modes, New J. Phys. 18, 015001 (2015).
  58. T. Kuwahara and K. Saito, Area law of noncritical ground states in 1D long-range interacting systems, Nat. Commun. 11, 4478 (2020).
  59. P. Fendley, K. Sengupta, and S. Sachdev, Competing density-wave orders in a one-dimensional hard-boson model, Phys. Rev. B 69, 075106 (2004).
  60. K. Slagle, D. Aasen, H. Pichler, R. S. K. Mong, P. Fendley, X. Chen, M. Endres, and J. Alicea, Microscopic characterization of ising conformal field theory in Rydberg chains, Phys. Rev. B 104, 235109 (2021).
  61. E. O'Brien and P. Fendley, Lattice supersymmetry and order-disorder coexistence in the tricritical Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 206403 (2018).
  62. S. Naus, Y. Liu, S. Murciano, P. Sala, M. Endres, and J. Alicea, Practical roadmap to measurement-altered criticality in Rydberg arrays (unpublished).
  63. J. L. Cardy, Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the Verlinde formula, Nucl. Phys. B 324, 581 (1989).
  64. I. Affleck, Edge critical behaviour of the two-dimensional tri-critical Ising model, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, 6473 (2000).
  65. H. Saleur and M. Bauer, On some relations between local height probabilities and conformal invariance, Nucl. Phys. B 320, 591 (1989).
  66. R. S. K. Mong, D. J. Clarke, J. Alicea, N. H. Lindner, and P. Fendley, Parafermionic conformal field theory on the lattice, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 452001 (2014).
  67. Y.-Z. You, Z. Bi, A. Rasmussen, K. Slagle, and C. Xu, Wave function and strange correlator of short-range entangled states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 247202 (2014).
  68. P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997).
  69. P. Chen, Z.-l. Xue, I. P. McCulloch, M.-C. Chung, M. Cazalilla, and S.-K. Yip, Entanglement entropy scaling of the XXZ chain, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2013) P10007.
  70. K. Yamamoto, M. Nakagawa, M. Tezuka, M. Ueda, and N. Kawakami, Universal properties of dissipative Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids: Case study of a non-Hermitian XXZ spin chain, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205125 (2022).
  71. L. Chim, Boundary S matrix for the tricritical Ising model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11, 4491 (1996).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 023293– Published 23 June, 2025
  • Received 19 December 2024
  • Accepted 2 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation