- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Strong electroadhesion at low voltage enabled by nanoscale roughness

Liang Peng1,*, Stefan Kooij1, H. Tunç Çiftçi2, Daniel Bonn1, and Bart Weber1,2

  • *Contact author: l.peng@uva.nl
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033143 – Published 5 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/l1v9-fpps

Abstract

Electroadhesion conventionally relies on kilovolt potentials to bridge macroscopic gaps in many practical applications. Here, we demonstrate that the governing length scale for strong electroadhesion is not the device-level separation but the nanoscale gap distribution imposed by surface roughness. By combining boundary-element rough-contact modeling with macroscopic friction measurements on oxidized silicon interfaces, we establish a quantitative framework that predicts adhesion pressures approaching 100 MPa at voltages below 30 V. Furthermore, we uncover a strong polarity-dependent asymmetry in adhesion and friction, which we attribute to charge trapping at grain boundaries. Our findings demonstrate that strong, low-voltage electroadhesion is viable and identify mechanisms through which undesired electroadhesion can be suppressed.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. Y.-P. Zhao, L. Wang, and T. Yu, Mechanics of adhesion in mems—A review, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 17, 519 (2003).
  2. F. Niklaus, P. Enoksson, E. Kälvesten, and G. Stemme, A method to maintain wafer alignment precision during adhesive wafer bonding, Sens. Actuators, A 107, 273 (2003).
  3. H. Prahlad, R. Pelrine, S. Stanford, J. Marlow, and R. Kornbluh, Electroadhesive robots—Wall climbing robots enabled by a novel, robust, and electrically controllable adhesion technology, in 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2008), pp. 3028–3033.
  4. A. A. Khalili and M. R. Ahmad, A review of cell adhesion studies for biomedical and biological applications, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 18149 (2015).
  5. J. Guo, J. Leng, and J. Rossiter, Electroadhesion technologies for robotics: A comprehensive review, IEEE Trans. Rob. 36, 313 (2020).
  6. P. Huang, Y. Xin, and P. Lee, Soft electroadhesion systems for soft robotics, npj Robotics 3, 29 (2025).
  7. J. Vanelp, P. T. M. Giesen, and A. M. M. de Groof, Low-thermal expansion electrostatic chuck materials and clamp mechanisms in vacuum and air, Microelectron. Eng. 73-74, 941 (2004).
  8. S. Huang, Y. Li, S. Zhang, H. Zhao, S. Song, C. Zhai, and M. Xu, Electroadhesion-driven friction enhancement using electret films, Extreme Mech. Lett. 73, 102270 (2024).
  9. M. Ayyildiz, M. Scaraggi, O. Sirin, C. Basdogan, and B. N. Persson, Contact mechanics between the human finger and a touchscreen under electroadhesion, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12668 (2018).
  10. M. Wolloch, G. Levita, P. Restuccia, and M. Righi, Interfacial charge density and its connection to adhesion and frictional forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026804 (2018).
  11. J. Sun, X. Zhang, S. Du, J. Pu, Y. Wang, Y. Yuan, L. Qian, and J. S. Francisco, Charge density evolution governing interfacial friction, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 5536 (2023).
  12. G. Grosjean and S. Waitukaitis, Single-collision statistics reveal a global mechanism driven by sample history for contact electrification in granular media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 098202 (2023).
  13. M. Liao, A. Cammarata, and T. Polcar, Charge-induced ultralow friction between graphite and atomically flat surfaces, Carbon 223, 119036 (2024).
  14. C. Xu and P. Egberts, Triboelectrification and unique frictional characteristics of germanium-based nanofilms, Small 20, 2309862 (2024).
  15. B. N. Persson, General theory of electroadhesion, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 435001 (2021).
  16. S. Schaller and H. Shea, Measuring electro-adhesion pressure before and after contact, Sci. Rep. 13, 11768 (2023).
  17. C. Xiang, W. Li, and Y. Guan, A variable stiffness electroadhesive gripper based on low melting point alloys, Polymers 14, 4469 (2022).
  18. A. Pradhan et al., The surface-topography challenge: A multi-laboratory benchmark study to advance the characterization of topography, Tribol. Lett. 73, 110 (2025).
  19. C. Gui, M. Elwenspoek, N. Tas, and J. G. Gardeniers, The effect of surface roughness on direct wafer bonding, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 7448 (1999).
  20. F. W. DelRio, M. P. De Boer, J. A. Knapp, E. David Reedy, Jr, P. J. Clews, and M. L. Dunn, The role of van der Waals forces in adhesion of micromachined surfaces, Nat. Mater. 4, 629 (2005).
  21. M. Lessel, P. Loskill, F. Hausen, N. N. Gosvami, R. Bennewitz, and K. Jacobs, Impact of van der Waals interactions on single asperity friction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 035502 (2013).
  22. J. Y. Park, D. Ogletree, P. Thiel, and M. Salmeron, Electronic control of friction in silicon pn junctions, Science 313, 186 (2006).
  23. G. Greenwood, J. M. Kim, S. M. Nahid, Y. Lee, A. Hajarian, S. Nam, and R. M. Espinosa-Marzal, Dynamically tuning friction at the graphene interface using the field effect, Nat. Commun. 14, 5801 (2023).
  24. M. Ciavarella and A. Papangelo, A simplified theory of electroadhesion for rough interfaces, Front. Mech. Eng. 6, 27 (2020).
  25. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/l1v9-fpps for experimental and numerical details; a capacitance-based estimate of the electroadhesion force; and additional results on the effects of bias polarity, wafer doping, normal load, surface roughness, and electrical history, including AFM adhesion, local electric-field and charge-density distributions, current-voltage and Fowler-Nordheim analyses, and capacitance measurements, which includes Refs. [24, 50, 51, 52, 53].
  26. O. Sirin, M. Ayyildiz, B. Persson, and C. Basdogan, Electroadhesion with application to touchscreens, Soft Matter 15, 1758 (2019).
  27. L. Peng, F.-C. Hsia, S. Woutersen, M. Bonn, B. Weber, and D. Bonn, Nonmonotonic friction due to water capillary adhesion and hydrogen bonding at multiasperity interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 256101 (2022).
  28. J. N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 2011).
  29. F.-C. Hsia, C.-C. Hsu, L. Peng, F. M. Elam, C. Xiao, S. Franklin, D. Bonn, and B. Weber, Contribution of capillary adhesion to friction at macroscopic solid–solid interfaces, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034034 (2022).
  30. A. Berman, C. Drummond, and J. Israelachvili, Amontons’ law at the molecular level, Tribol. Lett. 4, 95 (1998).
  31. F.-C. Hsia, S. Franklin, P. Audebert, A. M. Brouwer, D. Bonn, and B. Weber, Rougher is more slippery: How adhesive friction decreases with increasing surface roughness due to the suppression of capillary adhesion, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043204 (2021).
  32. Available at https://www.tribonet.org/cmdownloads/tribosolver-2/.
  33. B. Persson, The dependency of adhesion and friction on electrostatic attraction, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 144701 (2018).
  34. M. H. Müser et al., Meeting the contact-mechanics challenge, Tribol. Lett. 65, 118 (2017).
  35. B. Weber, T. Suhina, T. Junge, L. Pastewka, F. Brouwer, and D. Bonn, Molecular probes reveal deviations from Amontons’ law in multi-asperity frictional contacts, Nat. Commun. 9, 888 (2018).
  36. H. Terwisscha-Dekker, A. M. Brouwer, B. Weber, and D. Bonn, Elastic contact between rough surfaces: Bridging the gap between theory and experiment, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 188, 105676 (2024).
  37. L. Peng, C.-C. Hsu, C. Xiao, D. Bonn, and B. Weber, Controlling macroscopic friction through interfacial siloxane bonding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 226201 (2023).
  38. L. Peng, T. Roch, D. Bonn, and B. Weber, Decrease of static friction coefficient with interface growth from single to multiasperity contact, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 176202 (2025).
  39. T. Plach, K. Hingerl, S. Tollabimazraehno, G. Hesser, V. Dragoi, and M. Wimplinger, Mechanisms for room temperature direct wafer bonding, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 094905 (2013).
  40. M. Itsumi, N. Shiono, and M. Shimaya, Influence of polysilicon gate formation conditions on thin gate oxide (4–6 nm) dielectric and charging properties, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 7515 (1993).
  41. K. Sayfidinov, S. D. Cezan, B. Baytekin, and H. T. Baytekin, Minimizing friction, wear, and energy losses by eliminating contact charging, Sci. Adv. 4, eaau3808 (2018).
  42. T.-J. King, J. P. McVittie, K. C. Saraswat, and J. R. Pfiester, Electrical properties of heavily doped polycrystalline silicon-germanium films, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 41, 228 (1994).
  43. S.-D. Tzeng and S. Gwo, Charge trapping properties at silicon nitride/silicon oxide interface studied by variable-temperature electrostatic force microscopy, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 023711 (2006).
  44. A. Ranjan, A. Padovani, B. Dianat, N. Raghavan, K. L. Pey, and S. J. O’Shea, Adhesion microscopy as a nanoscale probe for oxidation and charge generation at metal-oxide interfaces, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 5, 5176 (2023).
  45. J. Y. Seto, The electrical properties of polycrystalline silicon films, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 5247 (1975).
  46. F. P. Bowden and D. Tabor, The area of contact between stationary and moving surfaces, Proc. R. Soc. London A 169, 391 (1939).
  47. A. Ando, R. Hasunuma, T. Maeda, K. Sakamoto, K. Miki, Y. Nishioka, and T. Sakamoto, Conducting atomic force microscopy studies on local electrical properties of ultrathin SiO2 films, Appl. Surf. Sci. 162–163, 401 (2000).
  48. L. Pastewka and M. O. Robbins, Contact between rough surfaces and a criterion for macroscopic adhesion, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3298 (2014).
  49. A. Tiwari, J. Wang, and B. Persson, Adhesion paradox: Why adhesion is usually not observed for macroscopic solids, Phys. Rev. E 102, 042803 (2020).
  50. B. V. Derjaguin, V. M. Muller, and Y. P. Toporov, Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 53, 314 (1975).
  51. N. D. Arora, J. R. Hauser, and D. J. Roulston, Electron and hole mobilities in silicon as a function of concentration and temperature, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 29, 292 (1982).
  52. M. Wang et al., Breaking the doping limit in silicon by deep impurities, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 054039 (2019).
  53. A. Gharbi, B. Remaki, A. Halimaoui, D. Bensahel, and A. Souifi, p-type silicon doping profiling using electrochemical anodization, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 023715 (2011).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033143– Published 5 August, 2026
  • Received 9 December 2025
  • Accepted 8 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation