Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Inference of three-dimensional hot-spot and shell morphology in inertial confinement fusion experiments using a convolutional neural network

K. M. Woo1,*, J. Buck2, K. Churnetski1, R. Betti1, C. A. Thomas1, C. Stoeckl1, P. V. Heuer1, C. Kanan3, P. B. Radha1 et al.

J. Carroll-Nellenback1, K. S. Anderson1, T. J. B. Collins1, L. Ceurvorst1, V. Gopalaswamy1, and S. T. Ivancic1

  • 1Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
  • 3Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14623, USA

  • *Contact author: kwoo@lle.rochester.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 023272 – Published 17 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/krtw-bkc3

Abstract

The performance of inertial confinement fusion (ICF) implosions is sensitive to the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of the hot-spot and shell configurations. The ability to infer shell-mass uniformity and reconstruct 3D hot spots is crucial for quantifying the degradation of ignition criteria and improving symmetry in ICF implosion experiments. In this work, we present a deep-learning convolutional neural network (CNN) for reconstructing 3D hot-spot and shell structures for ICF capsules. The 3D geometry of the hot spot is reconstructed from x-ray images measured from multiple lines of sight on OMEGA. The shell configuration is inferred indirectly through machine learning using a convolutional neural network extensively trained on a dec3d simulation database. This simulation-dependent approach yields consistent agreement between reconstructed 3D shell densities and machine-learning optimized dec3d simulation results. This work demonstrates a CNN framework that successfully reconstructs 3D capsule structures from two-dimensional images in ICF implosions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. S. Atzeni and J. Meyer-ter-Vehn, The Physics of Inertial Fusion: Beam Plasma Interaction, Hydrodynamics, Hot Dense Matter (Oxford University, New York, 2004).
  2. E. Moses, The National Ignition Facility: An experimental platform for studying behavior of matter under extreme conditions, Astrophys. Space Sci. 336, 3 (2011).
  3. A. L. Kritcher et al., Design of inertial fusion implosions reaching the burning plasma regime, Nat. Phys. 18, 251 (2022).
  4. T. R. Boehly et al., Initial performance results of the OMEGA laser system, Opt. Commun. 133, 495 (1997).
  5. R. L. McCrory et al., OMEGA ICF experiments and preparation for direct drive ignition on NIF, Nucl. Fusion 41, 1413 (2001).
  6. S. X. Hu, D. T. Michel, A. K. Davis, R. Betti, P. B. Radha, E. M. Campbell, D. H. Froula, and C. Stoeckl, Understanding the effects of laser imprint on plastic-target implosions on OMEGA, Phys. Plasmas 23, 102701 (2016).
  7. K. S. Anderson et al., Effect of cross-beam energy transfer on target-offset asymmetry in direct-drive inertial confinement fusion implosions, Phys. Plasmas 27, 112713 (2020).
  8. O. M. Mannion et al., Mitigation of mode-one asymmetry in laser-direct-drive inertial confinement fusion implosions, Phys. Plasmas 28, 042701 (2021).
  9. O. M. Mannion, J. P. Knauer, V. Yu. Glebov, C. J. Forrest, A. Liu, Z. L. Mohamed, M. H. Romanofsky, T. C. Sangster, C. Stoeckl, and S. P. Regan, A suite of neutron time-of-flight detectors to measure hot-spot motion in direct-drive inertial confinement fusion experiments on OMEGA, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 964, 163774 (2020).
  10. V. Y. Glebov, C. J. Forrest, K. L. Marshall, M. Romanofsky, T. C. Sangster, M. J. Shoup III, and C. Stoeckl, A new neutron time-of-flight detector for fuel-areal-density measurements on OMEGA, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 11E102 (2014).
  11. Z. L. Mohamed, O. M. Mannion, J. P. Knauer, C. J. Forrest, V. Yu. Glebov, C. Stoeckl, and M. H. Romanofsky, Application of an energy-dependent instrument response function to analysis of nTOF data from cryogenic DT experiments, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 043546 (2021).
  12. F. J. Marshall and J. A. Oertel, A framed monochromatic x-ray microscope for ICF, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 735 (1997).
  13. F. J. Marshall, R. E. Bahr, V. N. Goncharov, V. Yu. Glebov, B. Peng, S. P. Regan, T. C. Sangster, and C. Stoeckl, A framed, 16-image Kirkpatrick-Baez x-ray microscope, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 093702 (2017).
  14. W. Theobald et al., The single-line-of-sight, time-resolved x-ray imager diagnostic on OMEGA, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 10G117 (2018).
  15. D. Cao, R. C. Shah, S. P. Regan, R. Epstein, I. V. Igumenshchev, V. Gopalaswamy, A. R. Christopherson, W. Theobald, P. B. Radha, and V. N. Goncharov, Interpreting the electron temperature inferred from x-ray continuum emission for direct-drive inertial confinement fusion implosions on OMEGA, Phys. Plasmas 26, 082709 (2019).
  16. P. L. Volegov, C. R. Danly, D. Fittinghoff, V. Geppert-Kleinrath, G. Grim, F. E. Merrill, and C. H. Wilde, Three-dimensional reconstruction of neutron, gamma-ray, and x-ray sources using spherical harmonic decomposition, J. Appl. Phys. 122, 175901 (2017).
  17. K. M. Woo et al., Analysis of core asymmetries in inertial confinement fusion implosions using three-dimensional hot-spot reconstruction, Phys. Plasmas 29, 082705 (2022).
  18. K. Churnetski et al., Three-dimensional hot-spot x-ray emission tomography from cryogenic deuterium–tritium direct-drive implosions on OMEGA, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 093530 (2022).
  19. K. W. Wong and B. Bachmann, Three-dimensional electron temperature measurement of inertial confinement fusion hotspots using x-ray emission tomography, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 073501 (2022).
  20. L. Wu, S. Yoo, A. F. Suzana, T. A. Assefa, J. Diao, R. J. Harder, W. Cha, and I. K. Robinson, Three-dimensional coherent x-ray diffraction imaging via deep convolutional neural networks, npj Comput. Mater. 7, 175 (2021).
  21. O. A. Hurricane et al., An analytic asymmetric-piston model for the impact of mode-1 shell asymmetry on ICF implosions, Phys. Plasmas 27, 062704 (2020).
  22. O. A. Hurricane et al., Extensions of a classical mechanics “piston-model” for understanding the impact of asymmetry on ICF implosions: The cases of mode 2, mode 2/1 coupling, time-dependent asymmetry, and the relationship to coast-time, Phys. Plasmas 29, 012703 (2022).
  23. D. T. Casey et al., A multi-rocket piston model to study three-dimensional asymmetries in implosions at the National Ignition Facility, High Energy Density Phys. 54, 101172 (2025).
  24. A. L. Kritcher et al., Metrics for long wavelength asymmetries in inertial confinement fusion implosions on the National Ignition Facility, Phys. Plasmas 21, 042708 (2014).
  25. K. M. Woo et al., Effects of residual kinetic energy on yield degradation and ion temperature asymmetries in inertial confinement fusion implosions, Phys. Plasmas 25, 052704 (2018).
  26. K. Churnetski et al., Three-dimensional reconstruction of inertial confinement fusion hot-spot plasma from x-ray and nuclear diagnostics on OMEGA, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.PI02.00003 (2024).
  27. K. Churnetski et al., Mitigation of low-mode perturbations with 3-D hot-spot x-ray emission tomography on laser-direct-drive implosions on OMEGA, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.NO07.00004 (2023).
  28. K. M. Woo et al., Experimental demonstration of 3D hot-spot shape symmetry control in laser direct-drive inertial confinement fusion implosions, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.TO07.00010 (2024).
  29. M. T. Hagan, H. B. Demuth, M. H. Beale, and O. De Jesús, Neural Network Design (Hagan, Oklahoma, 2014).
  30. D. J. Schlossberg et al., Observation of hydrodynamic flows in imploding fusion plasmas on the National Ignition Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 125001 (2021).
  31. D. T. Casey et al., Evidence of three-dimensional asymmetries seeded by high-density carbon-ablator nonuniformity in experiments at the National Ignition Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 025002 (2021).
  32. D. T. Casey et al., Diagnosing the origin and impact of low-mode asymmetries in ignition experiments at the National Ignition Facility, Phys. Rev. E 108, L053203 (2023).
  33. K. D. Humbird, J. L. Peterson, J. Salmonson, and B. K. Spears, Cognitive simulation models for inertial confinement fusion: Combining simulation and experimental data, Phys. Plasmas 28, 042709 (2021).
  34. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex, J. Physiol. 160, 106 (1962).
  35. K. Fukushima, Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position, Biol. Cybernetics 36, 193 (1980).
  36. Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, Proc. IEEE 86, 2278 (1998).
  37. G. Litjens, T. Kooi, B. E. Bejnordi, A. A. A. Setio, F. Ciompi, M. Ghafoorian, J. A. W. M. van der Laak, B. van Ginneken, and C. I. Sánchez, A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis, Med. Image Anal. 42, 60 (2017).
  38. S.-C. B. Lo, S.-L.A. Lou, J.-S. Lin, M. T. Freedman, M. V. Chien, and S. K. Mun, Artificial convolution neural network techniques and applications for lung nodule detection, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 14, 711 (1995).
  39. K. Churnetski et al., Three-dimensional reconstruction of laser-direct-drive inertial confinement fusion hot-spot plasma from x-ray diagnostics on the OMEGA laser facility, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 95, 103521 (2024).
  40. T. Ma et al., The role of hot spot mix in the low-foot and high-foot implosions on the NIF, Phys. Plasmas 24, 056311 (2017).
  41. Y. B. Zel'dovichand and Yu. P. Raizer, Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Dover, New York, 2002).
  42. K. S. Anderson, J. A. Marozas, S. C. Miller, T. J. Collins, K. M. Woo, V. N. Goncharov, A. Shvydky, S. M. Sepke, and M. M. Marinak, Progress in 3D modeling of direct-drive inertial confinement implosions using hydra, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. NO07.00006 (2024).
  43. M. M. Marinak, G. D. Kerbel, N. A. Gentile, O. Jones, D. Munro, S. Pollaine, T. R. Dittrich, and S. W. Haan, Three-dimensional hydra simulations of National Ignition Facility targets, Phys. Plasmas 8, 2275 (2001).
  44. J. A. Frenje et al., First measurements of the absolute neutron spectrum using the magnetic recoil spectrometer at OMEGA, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 10E502 (2008).
  45. J. J. MacFarlane, I. E. Golovkin, P. Wang, P. R. Woodruff, N. A. Pereyra, SPECT3D: A multi-dimensional collisional-radiative code for generating diagnostic signatures based on hydrodynamics and PIC simulation output, High Energy Density Phys. 3, 181 (2007).
  46. F. Weilacher, P. B. Radha, and C. Forrest, Three-dimensional modeling of the neutron spectrum to infer plasma conditions in cryogenic inertial confinement fusion implosions, Phys. Plasmas 25, 042704 (2018).
  47. K. M. Woo, R. Betti, O. M. Mannion, C. J. Forrest, J. P. Knauer, V. N. Goncharov, P. B. Radha, D. Patel, V. Gopalaswamy, and V. Yu. Glebov, Inferring thermal ion temperature and residual kinetic energy from nuclear measurements in inertial confinement fusion implosions, Phys. Plasmas 27, 062702 (2020).
  48. J. H. Kunimune et al., Knock-on deuteron imaging for diagnosing the morphology of an ICF implosion at OMEGA, Phys. Plasmas 29, 072711 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation