- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Self-consistent tensor network method for correlated super-moiré matter beyond one billion sites

Yitao Sun*, Marcel Niedermeier, Tiago V. C. Antão, Adolfo O. Fumega, and Jose L. Lado

  • *Contact author: yitao.sun@aalto.fi
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043288 – Published 12 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/krjp-mn4v

Abstract

Moiré and super-moiré materials provide exceptional platforms to engineer exotic correlated quantum matter. The vast number of sites required to model moiré systems in real space remains a formidable challenge due to the immense computational resources required. Super-moiré materials push this requirement to the limit, where millions or even billions of sites need to be considered, a requirement beyond the capabilities of conventional methods for interacting systems. Here, we establish a methodology that allows solving correlated states in systems reaching a billion sites, which exploits tensor network representations of real-space Hamiltonians and self-consistent real-space mean-field equations. Our method combines a tensor network kernel polynomial method with quantics tensor cross-interpolation algorithm, enabling us to solve ultralarge models, including those whose single-particle Hamiltonian is too large to be stored explicitly. We demonstrate our methodology with super-moiré systems featuring spatially modulated hoppings, many-body interactions, and domain walls, showing that it allows access to self-consistent symmetry-broken states and spectral functions of real-space models reaching a billion sites. Our methodology provides a strategy to solve exceptionally large interacting problems, providing a widely applicable strategy to compute correlated super-moiré quantum matter.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (102)

  1. J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable strongly coupled superconductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature (London) 590, 249 (2021).
  2. X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 574, 653 (2019).
  3. Y. Zhang, Z. Che, W. Liu, J. Wang, M. Zhao, F. Guan, X. Liu, L. Shi, and J. Zi, Unfolded band structures of photonic quasicrystals and moiré superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 105, 165304 (2022).
  4. M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 363, 1059 (2019).
  5. A. Uri, S. C. de la Barrera, M. T. Randeria, D. Rodan-Legrain, T. Devakul, P. J. D. Crowley, N. Paul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. Lifshitz, L. Fu, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Superconductivity and strong interactions in a tunable moiré quasicrystal, Nature (London) 620, 762 (2023).
  6. D. R. Klein, L.-Q. Xia, D. MacNeill, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Electrical switching of a bistable moiré superconductor, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 331 (2023).
  7. Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Knüppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moiré MoTe2, Nature (London) 622, 69 (2023).
  8. J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe2, Nature (London) 622, 63 (2023).
  9. M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moiré heterostructure, Science 367, 900 (2020).
  10. Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature (London) 626, 759 (2024).
  11. Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature (London) 556, 80 (2018).
  12. W. Zhao, B. Shen, Z. Tao, Z. Han, K. Kang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Gate-tunable heavy fermions in a moiré Kondo lattice, Nature (London) 616, 61 (2023).
  13. H. Kim, Y. Choi, Lantagne-Hurtubise, C. Lewandowski, A. Thomson, L. Kong, H. Zhou, E. Baum, Y. Zhang, L. Holleis, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. F. Young, J. Alicea, and S. Nadj-Perge, Imaging inter-valley coherent order in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature (London) 623, 942 (2023).
  14. V. Vaňo, M. Amini, S. C. Ganguli, G. Chen, J. L. Lado, S. Kezilebieke, and P. Liljeroth, Artificial heavy fermions in a van der Waals heterostructure, Nature (London) 599, 582 (2021).
  15. E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moiré materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 201 (2021).
  16. Q. Fu, P. Wang, C. Huang, Y. V. Kartashov, L. Torner, V. V. Konotop, and F. Ye, Optical soliton formation controlled by angle twisting in photonic moiré lattices, Nat. Photonics 14, 663 (2020).
  17. L. Du, M. R. Molas, Z. Huang, G. Zhang, F. Wang, and Z. Sun, Moiré photonics and optoelectronics, Science 379, 447 (2023).
  18. H. Tang, B. Lou, F. Du, M. Zhang, X. Ni, W. Xu, R. Jin, S. Fan, and E. Mazur, Experimental probe of twist angle-dependent band structure of on-chip optical bilayer photonic crystal, Sci. Adv. 9, eadh8498 (2023).
  19. X.-R. Mao, Z.-K. Shao, H.-Y. Luan, S.-L. Wang, and R.-M. Ma, Magic-angle lasers in nanostructured moiré superlattice, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1099 (2021).
  20. A. A. Arkhipova, Y. V. Kartashov, S. K. Ivanov, S. A. Zhuravitskii, N. N. Skryabin, I. V. Dyakonov, A. A. Kalinkin, S. P. Kulik, V. O. Kompanets, S. V. Chekalin, F. Ye, V. V. Konotop, L. Torner, and V. N. Zadkov, Observation of linear and nonlinear light localization at the edges of moiré arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 083801 (2023).
  21. Y. V. Kartashov, F. Ye, V. V. Konotop, and L. Torner, Multifrequency solitons in commensurate-incommensurate photonic moiré lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 163902 (2021).
  22. H.-Y. Luan, Y.-H. Ouyang, Z.-W. Zhao, W.-Z. Mao, and R.-M. Ma, Reconfigurable moiré nanolaser arrays with phase synchronization, Nature (London) 624, 282 (2023).
  23. A. González-Tudela and J. I. Cirac, Cold atoms in twisted-bilayer optical potentials, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053604 (2019).
  24. T. Salamon, A. Celi, R. W. Chhajlany, I. Frérot, M. Lewenstein, L. Tarruell, and D. Rakshit, Simulating twistronics without a twist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030504 (2020).
  25. J.-C. Yu, S. Bhave, L. Reeve, B. Song, and U. Schneider, Observing the two-dimensional Bose glass in an optical quasicrystal, Nature (London) 633, 338 (2024).
  26. Z. Meng, L. Wang, W. Han, F. Liu, K. Wen, C. Gao, P. Wang, C. Chin, and J. Zhang, Atomic Bose-Einstein condensate in twisted-bilayer optical lattices, Nature (London) 615, 231 (2023).
  27. L. A. Gonzalez-Arraga, J. L. Lado, F. Guinea, and P. San-Jose, Electrically controllable magnetism in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 107201 (2017).
  28. A. Ramires and J. L. Lado, Emulating heavy fermions in twisted trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 026401 (2021).
  29. A. Ferreira and E. R. Mucciolo, Critical delocalization of chiral zero energy modes in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 106601 (2015).
  30. S. M. João, J. M. Viana Parente Lopes, and A. Ferreira, High-resolution real-space evaluation of the self-energy operator of disordered lattices: Gade singularity, spin–orbit effects and p-wave superconductivity, J. Phys. Mater. 5, 045002 (2022).
  31. Y. Mao, D. Guerci, and C. Mora, Supermoiré low-energy effective theory of twisted trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125423 (2023).
  32. S. Carr, S. Fang, and E. Kaxiras, Electronic-structure methods for twisted moiré layers, Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 748 (2020).
  33. Y. Li, M. Xue, H. Fan, C.-F. Gao, Y. Shi, Y. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Tanguchi, Y. Zhao, F. Wu, X. Wang, Y. Shi, W. Guo, Z. Zhang, Z. Fei, and J. Li, Symmetry breaking and anomalous conductivity in a double-moiré superlattice, Nano Lett. 22, 6215 (2022).
  34. M. Kapfer et al., Programming twist angle and strain profiles in 2D materials, Science 381, 677 (2023).
  35. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  36. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259 (2005).
  37. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011).
  38. R. Orús, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 538 (2019).
  39. S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Spin-liquid ground state of the s = 1/2 kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Science 332, 1173 (2011).
  40. Z. Zhu and S. R. White, Spin liquid phase of the s=1/2j1−j2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 92, 041105(R) (2015).
  41. H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollwöck, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model, Science 384, 202 (2024).
  42. H.-C. Jiang and T. P. Devereaux, Superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model and its interplay with next-nearest hopping t′, Science 365, 1424 (2019).
  43. R. Dilip, Y.-J. Liu, A. Smith, and F. Pollmann, Data compression for quantum machine learning, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043007 (2022).
  44. Z.-Y. Han, J. Wang, H. Fan, L. Wang, and P. Zhang, Unsupervised generative modeling using matrix product states, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031012 (2018).
  45. E. Stoudenmire and D. J. Schwab, Supervised learning with tensor networks, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 29, 4799 (2016).
  46. M. Niedermeier, J. L. Lado, and C. Flindt, Simulating the quantum Fourier transform, Grover’s algorithm, and the quantum counting algorithm with limited entanglement using tensor networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033325 (2024).
  47. Y. Zhou, E. M. Stoudenmire, and X. Waintal, What limits the simulation of quantum computers? Phys. Rev. X 10, 041038 (2020).
  48. C. Huang et al., Efficient parallelization of tensor network contraction for simulating quantum computation, Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 578 (2021).
  49. Y. N. Fernández, M. K. Ritter, M. Jeannin, J.-W. Li, T. Kloss, T. Louvet, S. Terasaki, O. Parcollet, J. von Delft, H. Shinaoka, and X. Waintal, Learning tensor networks with tensor cross interpolation: New algorithms and libraries, SciPost Phys. 18, 104 (2025).
  50. M. K. Ritter, Y. Núñez Fernández, M. Wallerberger, J. von Delft, H. Shinaoka, and X. Waintal, Quantics tensor cross interpolation for high-resolution parsimonious representations of multivariate functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056501 (2024).
  51. H. Shinaoka, M. Wallerberger, Y. Murakami, K. Nogaki, R. Sakurai, P. Werner, and A. Kauch, Multiscale space-time ansatz for correlation functions of quantum systems based on quantics tensor trains, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021015 (2023).
  52. A. Erpenbeck, W.-T. Lin, T. Blommel, L. Zhang, S. Iskakov, L. Bernheimer, Y. Núñez Fernández, G. Cohen, O. Parcollet, X. Waintal, and E. Gull, Tensor train continuous time solver for quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245135 (2023).
  53. Y. Núñez Fernández, M. Jeannin, P. T. Dumitrescu, T. Kloss, J. Kaye, O. Parcollet, and X. Waintal, Learning Feynman diagrams with tensor trains, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041018 (2022).
  54. H. Takahashi, R. Sakurai, and H. Shinaoka, Compactness of quantics tensor train representations of local imaginary-time propagators, SciPost Phys. 18, 007 (2025).
  55. M. Jeannin, Y. Núñez Fernández, T. Kloss, O. Parcollet, and X. Waintal, Cross-extrapolation reconstruction of low-rank functions and application to quantum many-body observables in the strong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035124 (2024).
  56. N. Gourianov, M. Lubasch, S. Dolgov, Q. Y. van den Berg, H. Babaee, P. Givi, M. Kiffner, and D. Jaksch, A quantum-inspired approach to exploit turbulence structures, Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 30 (2022).
  57. R. D. Peddinti, S. Pisoni, A. Marini, P. Lott, H. Argentieri, E. Tiunov, and L. Aolita, Quantum-inspired framework for computational fluid dynamics, Commun. Phys. 7, 135 (2024).
  58. N. Gourianov, P. Givi, D. Jaksch, and S. B. Pope, Tensor networks enable the calculation of turbulence probability distributions, Sci. Adv. 11, eads5990 (2025).
  59. A. O. Fumega, M. Niedermeier, and J. L. Lado, Correlated states in super-moiré materials with a kernel polynomial quantics tensor cross interpolation algorithm, 2D Mater. 12, 015018 (2025).
  60. M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases 4 (2022).
  61. https://github.com/tensor4all/Quantics.jl.
  62. M. Ritter and contributors (2022), https://github.com/tensor4all/TensorCrossInterpolation.jl/tree/main.
  63. M. Ritter and contributors (2022), https://github.com/tensor4all/quanticstci.jl.
  64. T. Besard, C. Foket, and B. De Sutter, Effective extensible programming: Unleashing Julia on GPUs, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 30, 827 (2019).
  65. T. Besard, V. Churavy, A. Edelman, and B. D. Sutter, Rapid software prototyping for heterogeneous and distributed platforms, Adv. Eng. Software 132, 29 (2019).
  66. A. Holzner, A. Weichselbaum, I. P. McCulloch, U. Schollwöck, and J. von Delft, Chebyshev matrix product state approach for spectral functions, Phys. Rev. B 83, 195115 (2011).
  67. J. L. Lado and O. Zilberberg, Topological spin excitations in Harper-Heisenberg spin chains, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033009 (2019).
  68. G. Chen, F. Song, and J. L. Lado, Topological spin excitations in non-Hermitian spin chains with a generalized kernel polynomial algorithm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 100401 (2023).
  69. G. Chen, J. L. Lado, and F. Song, Many-body Liouvillian dynamics with a non-Hermitian tensor-network kernel polynomial algorithm, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043182 (2024).
  70. T. V. C. Antão, Y. Sun, A. O. Fumega, and J. L. Lado, Tensor network method for real-space topology in quasicrystal Chern mosaics, arXiv:2506.05230.
  71. A. Weiße, G. Wellein, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, The kernel polynomial method, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 275 (2006).
  72. The expansion in Eq. (5) can be formally applied with conventional sparse matrices HMF; however, the full matrix with elements 〈cα†cβ〉 will be dense even when HMF is sparse.
  73. I. Oseledets and E. Tyrtyshnikov, TT-cross approximation for multidimensional arrays, Linear Algebra Appl. 432, 70 (2010).
  74. I. V. Oseledets, Tensor-train decomposition, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33, 2295 (2011).
  75. P. Wang, Y. Zheng, X. Chen, C. Huang, Y. V. Kartashov, L. Torner, V. V. Konotop, and F. Ye, Localization and delocalization of light in photonic moiré lattices, Nature (London) 577, 42 (2020).
  76. I. Caha, L. Boddapatti, A. ul Ahmad, M. Banobre, A. T. Costa, A. N. Enyashin, W. Li, P. Gargiani, M. Valvidares, J. Fernandez-Rossier, and F. L. Deepak, Magnetic single wall CrI3 nanotubes encapsulated within multiwall carbon nanotubes, arXiv:2405.14967.
  77. D. Park et al., Unconventional domain tessellations in moiré-of-moiré lattices, Nature (London) 641, 896 (2025).
  78. Y. Ma, M. Huang, X. Zhang, W. Hu, Z. Zhou, K. Feng, W. Li, Y. Chen, C. Lou, W. Zhang, H. Ji, Y. Wang, Z. Wu, X. Cui, W. Yao, S. Yan, Z. Y. Meng, and N. Wang, Magnetic bloch states at integer flux quanta induced by super-moiré potential in graphene aligned with twisted boron nitride, Nat. Commun. 16, 1860 (2025).
  79. M. Rösner and J. L. Lado, Inducing a many-body topological state of matter through Coulomb-engineered local interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013265 (2021).
  80. Z. Jiang, S. Haas, and M. Rösner, Plasmonic waveguides from Coulomb-engineered two-dimensional metals, 2D Mater. 8, 035037 (2021).
  81. T. Tan, A. P. Reddy, L. Fu, and T. Devakul, Designing topology and fractionalization in narrow gap semiconductor films via electrostatic engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206601 (2024).
  82. X. Lai, G. Li, A. M. Coe, J. H. Pixley, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and E. Y. Andrei, Moiré periodic and quasiperiodic crystals in heterostructures of twisted bilayer graphene on hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Mater. 24, 1019 (2025).
  83. C.-Y. Hao, Z. Zhan, P. A. Pantaleón, J.-Q. He, Y.-X. Zhao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Guinea, and L. He, Robust flat bands in twisted trilayer graphene moiré quasicrystals, Nat. Commun. 15, 8437 (2024).
  84. J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Pižorn, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011).
  85. S. Paeckel, T. Köhler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Schollwöck, and C. Hubig, Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states, Ann. Phys. 411, 167998 (2019).
  86. M. Niedermeier, A. Moulinas, T. Louvet, J. L. Lado, and X. Waintal, Solving the Gross-Pitaevskii equation on multiple different scales using the quantics tensor train representation, arXiv:2507.04262.
  87. A. Bou-Comas, M. Płodzień, L. Tagliacozzo, and J. J. García-Ripoll, Quantics tensor train for solving Gross-Pitaevskii equation, arXiv:2507.03134.
  88. Q.-C. Chen, I.-K. Liu, J.-W. Li, and C.-M. Chung, Solving the Gross-Pitaevskii equation with quantic tensor trains: Ground states and nonlinear dynamics, arXiv:2507.04279.
  89. J. Thijssen, Computational Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
  90. C. Pisani, R. Dovesi, and C. Roetti, Hartree-Fock Ab Initio Treatment of Crystalline Systems (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012), Vol. 48.
  91. J. Enkovaara et al., Electronic structure calculations with GPAW: A real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 253202 (2010).
  92. P. Haubenwallner and M. Heller, Fully numerical Hartree-Fock calculations for atoms and small molecules with quantized tensor trains, Electron. Struct. 7, 025006 (2025).
  93. https://github.com/YITAOSUN42/SCF_with_MPO.
  94. N. Jolly, Y. N. Fernández, and X. Waintal, Tensorized orbitals for computational chemistry, Phys. Rev. B 111, 245115 (2025).
  95. Y. Yang, S. Iblisdir, J. I. Cirac, and M. C. Bañuls, Probing thermalization through spectral analysis with matrix product operators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 100602 (2020).
  96. Q. Xu, N. Tancogne-Dejean, E. V. Boström, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, A. Rubio, and L. Xian, Engineering 2D square lattice Hubbard models in 90∘ twisted Ge/SnX (X = S, Se) moiré supperlattices, arXiv:2406.05626v1.
  97. P. Giannozzi Jr. et al., Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017).
  98. J. Fernández-Rossier and J. J. Palacios, Magnetism in graphene nanoislands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 177204 (2007).
  99. O. V. Yazyev, Emergence of magnetism in graphene materials and nanostructures, Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 056501 (2010).
  100. T. M. Radchenko, A. A. Shylau, I. V. Zozoulenko, and A. Ferreira, Effect of charged line defects on conductivity in graphene: Numerical Kubo and analytical Boltzmann approaches, Phys. Rev. B 87, 195448 (2013).
  101. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  102. D. Jackson, On approximation by trigonometric sums and polynomials, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 13, 491 (1912).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043288– Published 12 December, 2025
  • Received 13 March 2025
  • Accepted 8 November 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation