Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Impulse measurements enhanced with squeezed readout light

Tsai-Chen Lee1,2,*, Jacob L. Beckey3,4,†, Giacomo Marocco1,‡, and Daniel Carney1,§

  • *Contact author: tsaichen_lee@berkeley.edu
  • †Contact author: jbeckey@illinois.edu
  • ‡Contact author: gmarocco@lbl.gov
  • §Contact author: carney@lbl.gov

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033041 – Published 8 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kcm9-bqs8

Abstract

We quantify how squeezed light can reduce quantum measurement noise to levels below the standard quantum limit in impulse measurements with mechanical detectors. The broadband nature of the signal implies that frequency-dependent squeezing performs better than frequency-independent squeezing. We calculate the optimal scaling of the impulse sensitivity with the squeezing strength and quantify degradations due to photodetection losses. Even for lossless measurement, we find there exists a fundamental limit to the benefit of squeezing that depends only on the system's mechanical properties.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (58)

  1. G. M. Harry et al. (LIGO Collaboration), Advanced LIGO: The next generation of gravitational wave detectors, Class. Quantum Grav. 27, 084006 (2010).
  2. K. Somiya (KAGRA Collaboration), Detector configuration of KAGRA—The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector, Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 124007 (2012).
  3. F. Acernese et al. (VIRGO Collaboration), Advanced VIRGO: A second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 024001 (2015).
  4. B. M. Brubaker, First results from the HAYSTAC axion search, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, 2017.
  5. A. V. Dixit, S. Chakram, K. He, A. Agrawal, R. K. Naik, D. I. Schuster, and A. Chou, Searching for dark matter with a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141302 (2021).
  6. C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981).
  7. J. Aasi, J. Abadie, B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Abernathy, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari et al., Enhanced sensitivity of the ligo gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light, Nat. Photon. 7, 613 (2013).
  8. L. McCuller et al., Frequency-dependent squeezing for advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 171102 (2020).
  9. K. M. Backes, D. A. Palken, S. A. Kenany, B. M. Brubaker, S. Cahn, A. Droster, G. C. Hilton, S. Ghosh, H. Jackson, S. K. Lamoreaux et al., A quantum enhanced search for dark matter axions, Nature (Lond.) 590, 238 (2021).
  10. M. Malnou, D. A. Palken, B. M. Brubaker, L. R. Vale, G. C. Hilton, and K. W. Lehnert, Squeezed vacuum used to accelerate the search for a weak classical signal, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021023 (2019).
  11. S. Ghosh, M. A. Feldman, S. Hong, C. E. Marvinney, A. M. Marino, R. C. Pooser, and J. M. Taylor, Combining quantum noise reduction resources: A practical approach, arXiv:2211.14460.
  12. J. Beckey, D. Carney, and G. Marocco, Quantum measurements in fundamental physics: A user's manual, arXiv:2311.07270.
  13. U. Delić, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V. Vuletić, N. Kiesel, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cooling of a levitated nanoparticle to the motional quantum ground state, Science 367, 892 (2020).
  14. F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space, Nature (Lond.) 595, 378 (2021).
  15. L. Magrini, P. Rosenzweig, C. Bach, A. Deutschmann-Olek, S. G. Hofer, S. Hong, N. Kiesel, A. Kugi, and M. Aspelmeyer, Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room temperature, Nature (Lond.) 595, 373 (2021).
  16. A. Ranfagni, K. Børkje, F. Marino, and F. Marin, Two-dimensional quantum motion of a levitated nanosphere, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033051 (2022).
  17. M. Kamba, R. Shimizu, and K. Aikawa, Optical cold damping of neutral nanoparticles near the ground state in an optical lattice, Opt. Express 30, 26716 (2022).
  18. D. C. Moore, A. D. Rider, and G. Gratta, Search for millicharged particles using optically levitated microspheres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 251801 (2014).
  19. F. Monteiro, W. Li, G. Afek, C.-L. Li, M. Mossman, and D. C. Moore, Force and acceleration sensing with optically levitated nanogram masses at microkelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053835 (2020).
  20. D. C. Moore and A. A. Geraci, Searching for new physics using optically levitated sensors, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 014008 (2021).
  21. C. P. Blakemore, A. Fieguth, A. Kawasaki, N. Priel, D. Martin, A. D. Rider, Q. Wang, and G. Gratta, Search for non-Newtonian interactions at micrometer scale with a levitated test mass, Phys. Rev. D 104, L061101 (2021).
  22. C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, and O. Romero-Isart, Levitodynamics: Levitation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum, Science 374, eabg3027 (2021).
  23. D. Mason, J. Chen, M. Rossi, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser, Continuous force and displacement measurement below the standard quantum limit, Nat. Phys. 15, 745 (2019).
  24. F. Monteiro, G. Afek, D. Carney, G. Krnjaic, J. Wang, and D. C. Moore, Search for composite dark matter with optically levitated sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 181102 (2020).
  25. D. Carney, K. G. Leach, and D. C. Moore, Searches for massive neutrinos with mechanical quantum sensors, PRX Quantum 4, 010315 (2023).
  26. A. A. Clerk, Quantum-limited position detection and amplification: A linear response perspective, Phys. Rev. B 70, 245306 (2004).
  27. S. Ghosh, D. Carney, P. Shawhan, and J. M. Taylor, Backaction-evading impulse measurement with mechanical quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. A 102, 023525 (2020).
  28. W. G. Unruh, Quantum noise in the interferometer detector, in Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravity, and Measurement Theory (Plenum Press, New York, 1983), pp. 647–660.
  29. H. J. Kimble, Y. Levin, A. B. Matsko, K. S. Thorne, and S. P. Vyatchanin, Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nondemolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics, Phys. Rev. D 65, 022002 (2001).
  30. D. Ganapathy et al., Broadband quantum enhancement of the LIGO detectors with frequency-dependent squeezing, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041021 (2023).
  31. J. Wang, T. W. Penny, J. Recoaro, B. Siegel, Y.-H. Tseng, and D. C. Moore, Mechanical detection of nuclear decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 023602 (2024).
  32. J. Millen, T. S. Monteiro, R. Pettit, and A. N. Vamivakas, Optomechanics with levitated particles, Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 026401 (2020).
  33. W. P. Bowen and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optomechanics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016).
  34. R. Brunelli and T. Poggiot, Template matching: Matched spatial filters and beyond, Pattern Recogn. 30, 751 (1997).
  35. B. J. Owen and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Matched filtering of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Computational cost and template placement, Phys. Rev. D 60, 022002 (1999).
  36. S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Experimental characterization of frequency-dependent squeezed light, Phys. Rev. A 71, 013806 (2005).
  37. J. Junker, D. Wilken, N. Johny, D. Steinmeyer, and M. Heurs, Frequency-dependent squeezing from a detuned squeezer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 033602 (2022).
  38. Y. Ma, H. Miao, B. H. Pang, M. Evans, C. Zhao, J. Harms, R. Schnabel, and Y. Chen, Proposal for gravitational-wave detection beyond the standard quantum limit through EPR entanglement, Nat. Phys. 13, 776 (2017).
  39. F. Y. Khalili and E. S. Polzik, Overcoming the standard quantum limit in gravitational wave detectors using spin systems with a negative effective mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 031101 (2018).
  40. E. Zeuthen, E. S. Polzik, and F. Y. Khalili, Gravitational wave detection beyond the standard quantum limit using a negative-mass spin system and virtual rigidity, Phys. Rev. D 100, 062004 (2019).
  41. J. Hofer, R. Gross, G. Higgins, H. Huebl, O. F. Kieler, R. Kleiner, D. Koelle, P. Schmidt, J. A. Slater, M. Trupke et al., High-q magnetic levitation and control of superconducting microspheres at millikelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 043603 (2023).
  42. H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, S. Chelkowski, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, S. Gossler, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Observation of squeezed light with 10-db quantum-noise reduction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 033602 (2008).
  43. H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Detection of 15 db squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110801 (2016).
  44. M. T. Jaekel and S. Reynaud, Quantum limits in interferometric measurements, Europhys. Lett. 13, 301 (1990).
  45. V. B. Braginsky and F. Y. Khalili, Quantum Measurement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995).
  46. S. L. Danilishin and F. Y. Khalili, Quantum measurement theory in gravitational-wave detectors, Living Rev. Relativ. 15, 5 (2012).
  47. M. Tsang, H. M. Wiseman, and C. M. Caves, Fundamental quantum limit to waveform estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 090401 (2011).
  48. H. Miao, R. X. Adhikari, Y. Ma, B. Pang, and Y. Chen, Towards the fundamental quantum limit of linear measurements of classical signals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 050801 (2017).
  49. H. Fearn, Linear amplifiers and attenuators, Quantum Optics: J. Eur. Opt. Soc. B 2, 103 (1990).
  50. U. Leonhardt, Quantum physics of simple optical instruments, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 1207 (2003).
  51. M. Rossi, A. Militaru, N. C. Zambon, A. Riera-Campeny, O. Romero-Isart, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Quantum delocalization of a levitated nanoparticle, arXiv:2408.01264.
  52. J. Janszky and P. Adam, Strong squeezing by repeated frequency jumps, Phys. Rev. A 46, 6091 (1992).
  53. M. R. Vanner, I. Pikovski, G. D. Cole, M. S. Kim, Č. Brukner, K. Hammerer, G. J. Milburn, and M. Aspelmeyer, Pulsed quantum optomechanics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16182 (2011).
  54. R. Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255 (1966).
  55. C. Whittle, L. McCuller, V. Sudhir, and M. Evans, Unification of thermal and quantum noises in gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 241401 (2023).
  56. O. Romero-Isart, A. C. Pflanzer, M. L. Juan, R. Quidant, N. Kiesel, M. Aspelmeyer, and J. I. Cirac, Optically levitating dielectrics in the quantum regime: Theory and protocols, Phys. Rev. A 83, 013803 (2011).
  57. P. Maurer, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, and O. Romero-Isart, Quantum theory of light interaction with a Lorenz-Mie particle: Optical detection and three-dimensional ground-state cooling, Phys. Rev. A 108, 033714 (2023).
  58. C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, J. Zielińska, M. Rossi, A. Militaru, M. Frimmer, L. Novotny, P. Maurer, and O. Romero-Isart, Suppressing recoil heating in levitated optomechanics using squeezed light, PRX Quantum 4, 030331 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation